LAW5652 - The judiciary in comparative perspective - 2019

6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Postgraduate - Unit

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered.

Faculty

Law

Chief examiner(s)

Professor HP Lee

Unit guides

Offered

Prato

  • Term 2 2019 (On-campus)

Synopsis

The unit will include comparative law content and builds on the content of LAW4523

The contents of the unit will be varied depending on topical issues pertaining to the judiciary as they arise from time to time. But it would include many if not all of the following:

The Judiciary as a branch of government. This will entail an exploration of the concept of judicial independence and its interrelationship with the doctrine of separation of powers. It will focus on the standards for judicial independence as prescribed by international instruments. The relationship with other branches of government will be analysed.

Appointment of Judges and Conditions of Service This topic will examine on a comparative basis judicial appointment processes and the criteria for judicial appointment. The implications of appointing acting, reserve and part-time judges, the conditions of service, judicial education and disputes about entitlements

to hold and exercise judicial office.

Removal, Suspension and Discipline of Judges What constitutes 'judicial misbehaviour'? A study of removal mechanisms from various jurisdictions and the grounds for removal from judicial office. The constitutional dimensions of suspension of judges. Mechanisms to deal with complaints against judges with particular attention to the Judicial Officers Act 1986 (NSW).

Judicial Officers and the Rule Against Bias Disqualification of judges and recusals. Public Interest and Private Interest and Codes of Ethics. The involvement of judges in extra-curial activities will be considered,

especially conducting commissions and committees of inquiry.

Modes of Protecting the Judicial Institution A general consideration of contempt of court and attacks on the judiciary. Criticism of the judiciary and the proper limits. Offences relating to the administration of justice. The scope of judicial immunities. Parliamentary conventions relating to the judiciary.

Judicial Accountability The concept of accountability. Meaning of 'open' court. A duty to give reasons;appeals and reviews. The relationship between the courts and the media. Judicial involvement in public

controversies.

Outcomes

  1. Critically analyse and extract the fundamental notions of judicial independence, judicial integrity, judicial impartiality and judicial accountability, with particular reference to international norms and

    comparative guidelines

  2. Demonstrate an ability to recognise, reflect and summarise upon ethical issues and contemporary challenges relating to the Australian judiciary from a comparative perspective

  3. Engage in critical analysis and practice making reasoned choices pertaining to dilemmas confronting judicial officers

  4. Discover, research, evaluate, elucidate and synthesis contemporary constitutional, legal and policy issues concerning the Australian judiciary

  5. Express and communicate effectively, appropriately and persuasively on issues pertaining to the judiciary from a comparative perspective

  6. Develop the skills and requirements to be able to learn and work with autonomy, independence and professionalism.

Assessment

10% class participation; 30% take-home exam (2250 words); and 60% research assignment (4500 words)