units
faculty-ug-law
Faculty of Law
This unit entry is for students who completed this unit in 2014 only. For students planning to study the unit, please refer to the unit indexes in the the current edition of the Handbook. If you have any queries contact the managing faculty for your course or area of study.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton First semester 2014 (Day) Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) |
The unit begins by examining the foundation and structure of the institutions and processes of the Australian legal system. This introduces the sources of authoritative law - statutes, delegated legislation and judicial precedents. A substantial portion of the study of the Australian legal system will examine how judges use precedents and interpret legislation. We will use a series of cases from a selected area of law to study how the content of common law changes within the constraints of the doctrine and practice of precedent. Students will assess the influence of social change in the development of the common law.
At the conclusion of the course, students should be able to:
Multiple choice/matching Research Skills for Law quiz (1hour); 5%; Legal reasoning skills task (equivalent to 1000 words, 1 hour): 20%; Engaging with the Legal System Report and Reflection (1500 words) 30%; and examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 45%
Mr Ross Hyams (First Semester)
Dr Simon Smith (Second Semester)
Four hours of lectures per week
LAW7212, LAW1100
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) |
There are two components taught concurrently. The Writing component will teach basic skills in legal writing, with an emphasis on the types of writing required for assessment in other law units, including research essays and answers to legal problems. The Research component will provide students with the essential skills to undertake research tasks required for their law studies. Students will learn to analyse a research problem into searchable components; locate and update Australian and foreign primary and secondary materials by using online and hard copy library research tools; use and cite references correctly, and evaluate the relevance and authoritative status of legal materials.
Upon completion of this unit, students will be able to:
There will be no final examination.
Assessment Task 1:
Legal Writing Assignment: 20% (1000 words)
Opinion writing piece on a current issue, based on provided resources.
Assessment Task 2:
Statutory Interpretation: 30% (1500 words)
Students will be required to critically evaluate a piece of legislation in accordance with the basic principles of statutory interpretation. In order to complete this task, students will need to undertake research on extrinsic materials.
Assessment Task 3:
Research Assignment: 40% (2000 words)
A research memorandum of advice or legal opinion based on a scenario, leading on from assessments 1 and 2. Feedback from instructors will be provided on the feedback sheet via Student Services after the final mark is released.
Research Exercise: 10%
A series of short answer exercises testing the student's research skills learned in class. Delivery and submission will be via Moodle.
Students will have three hours of small group seminar classes each week. Preparation for class will typically require about 3 hours a week. Private study, group work, further reading, written exercises and assessments will account for the balance of 12 hours of study time per week throughout the semester.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton First semester 2014 (Day) |
Contract law addresses the broad concepts, principles and rules used to determine the content binding promises and as appropriate, their defeasibility or enforcement in a market economy. It is taught in two units - Contract A and B.
Contract A covers formation, including capacity, formalities, privacy and consideration and the content and construction of contract.
The unit is taught paying due attention to critiques of contract law as well as the policy factors influencing various forms of contracting.
At the conclusion of the unit, students should have achieved the following learning outcomes:
Optional written assignment (1000 words) (20%); examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 80% for those who undertake optional written assignment or 100% for those who do not undertake optional written assignment.
Three hours of lectures per week and six tutorials of one hour each throughout the semester.
LAW2100
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) |
Contract law addresses the broad concepts, principles and rules used to determine the content of binding promises and as appropriate, their defeasibility or enforcement in a market economy. Contract B builds on Contract A (which mainly covers formation, terms and construction of terms of contract). Contract B focuses on three main areas, namely:
At the conclusion of the unit, students should have achieved the following learning outcomes:
Optional legal problem solving assignment (2000 words) (40%);
Examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60% (for those who undertake the optional assignment) or 100% for all other students.
Three hours of lectures per week and one hour tutorial per week from weeks 6-12.
LAW2100
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton First semester 2014 (Day) |
This unit is concerned with the main torts other than the tort of negligence. It commences with an introductory study of the role and objectives of tort law and how the law of torts is being supplemented by various alternate statutory compensation schemes. Thereafter, the study examines the basic protection offered to persons by the tort of trespass; torts pertaining to goods, detinue action on the case and conversion; torts pertaining to land, and concludes with a study of vicarious liability and the related area of non-delegable duties. The availability and nature of remedies is examined throughout, together with applicable legislation and alternative statutory compensation schemes.
Students successfully completing this unit should have:
Optional class test (50 minutes) 20% plus final examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 80% for students who sat optional class test OR 100% for students who did not sit optional class test
Three hours of lectures per week and one hour tutorial per week from weeks 6-12
LAW2200
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) |
This unit will be primarily concerned with the tort of negligence. Students will be introduced to the basic elements of the tort of negligence - namely, duty of care, breach of duty, causation, remoteness, defences and remedies. Students will then examine "particular duty situations". Among the particular duty situations considered will be: pure economic loss caused by negligent statements, pure economic loss caused by negligent acts, psychological damage, rescuers, omissions and defective products and structures. Students will also consider statutory compensation schemes that have been introduced to supplement the tort of negligence.
Students who successfully complete this unit should:
Optional class test (50 minutes): 20% plus final examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time):80% for students who sat optional class test OR 100% for students who did not sit optional class test.
Three hours of lectures per week and one hour tutorial per week from weeks 6-12.
LAW2200
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) |
Topics include: the basic concepts and principles underpinning Administrative law; the structure of government administration; the obtaining of reasons for governmental decisions, and freedom of information; the privatisation of administrative services; sources of administrative discretions; the systems which have developed for the review of the actions of administrative agencies; and the scope of administrative law remedies. Students will examine the grounds of judicial review at common law and under statute. That examination will provide the basis for an analysis that will be conducted of the distinctions between the legality of decisions and their merits, and between errors of law and errors of fact. Consideration will also be given to concepts of statutory and administrative discretion, and justiciability. Students will be helped to develop the skills necessary to solve problems arising in administrative law.
Examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100% or examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60% and research assignment (2,000 words): 40%
Dr Matthew Groves (First Semester)
Professor Jeffrey Goldsworthy (Second Semester)
Three hours of lectures per week and one hour tutorial per fortnight.
LAW3100
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton Full year 2014 (Day) |
Topics include: basic constitutional principles including representative and responsible government, parliamentary sovereignty and separation of powers; the constitutions of the Australian States (emphasising Victoria), the Federal Constitution, Statute of Westminster and Australia Acts; Australian federalism including distribution of legislative and fiscal powers between Commonwealth and States, inconsistency of laws and intergovernmental immunities; techniques and principles of constitutional interpretation; principal Commonwealth legislative powers; limitations on governmental power; express and implied rights.
Students who successfully complete this unit should:
Mid-year examination (3 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 50%
Research paper (5000 words): 50%
Professor Sarah Joseph (Semester 1)
Professor Jeff Goldsworthy (Semester 2)
Three hours of lectures per week and one hour tutorial per fortnight in 1st semester. Individual research in 2nd semester.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton First semester 2014 (Day) Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) |
Topics include: the Constitutions of Victoria and the Commonwealth of Australia, the Statute of Westminster and the Australia Acts; basic constitutional principles such as representative and responsible government, parliamentary sovereignty, and separation of powers; techniques and principles of constitutional interpretation; Australian federalism and inter-governmental relations, including the distribution of legislative and fiscal powers between the Commonwealth and the States, inconsistency of laws, and intergovernmental immunities; principal Commonwealth legislative powers; limitations on governmental power including selected express and limited constitutional rights and freedoms.
Students wishing to practise law in Malaysia must undertake LAW3200, a full-year offering of Constitutional law.
Students who successfully complete this unit will be able to:
Tutorial Participation: 10%
AND
Research Assignment (1,500 words): 30% plus
Final Examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60%
OR
Final Examination (3 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 90%
Professor Jeffrey Goldsworthy (First Semester)
Professor Sarah Joseph (Second Semester)
Three hours of lectures per week and one hour tutorial per fortnight.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton First semester 2014 (Day) |
This unit provides an introduction to the general doctrines and purposes of the criminal law, to the law relating to certain crimes and to the workings of the system of criminal justice in the courts. Certain aspects of criminal procedure will be examined to enable an understanding of the legal and administrative framework within which prosecutions are conducted. Some of the doctrines applicable to all crimes and the requisite mental elements of a crime are examined. Students will be encouraged to consider how the criminal law and its procedures for determining guilt have evolved historically and may be viewed from the vantage point of different perspectives.
Class test:30%
Tutorial participation 10%
Examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time) 60%
Three hours of lectures per week and six one-hour tutorials per semester.
LAW3300
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) |
This unit builds upon Criminal law and procedure A and comprises study of the general doctrines of the criminal law, the law relating to certain crimes, and the workings of the system of criminal justice in the courts. The following crimes are studied in depth: sexual offences, drug offences, offences of strict liability, attempts to commit crimes, liability of accessories and offences against property. Doctrines applicable to all crimes and the requisite mental elements of a crime are examined. Students will be encouraged to consider how the criminal law and its procedure for determining guilt have evolved historically and may be viewed from the vantage point of different perspectives.
Tutorial participation (10%) AND either examination (3 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 90% OR examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60% and research assignment (1,500 words): 30%
Three lectures per week and one tutorial per week from weeks 6-12.
LAW3300
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton First semester 2014 (Day) |
Private property is a central institution in most Western political, social and legal systems. The Property A unit aims to introduce students to this area of legal knowledge and to the historical, social, economic and political factors which have influenced its development. In addition, the Property A unit enables students to gain an understanding of the relationship between the rules of property law and other rules used to resolve conflicts between legal persons.
Students who successfully complete the unit should have:
Research assignment (2000 words) 40% and examination (120 minutes and reading and noting time of 30 minutes) 60% OR examination (150 minutes and reading and noting time of 30 minutes) 100%.
Three hours of lectures per week plus one hour tutorial per week starting in week 5 or 6
LAW3400
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) |
Private property is a central institution in most Western political, social and legal systems. Property B aims to introduce students to this area of legal knowledge and to the historical, social, economic and political factors which have influenced its development. Property B aims to discuss the legal principles and policies relevant to the determination of disputes between persons claiming competing interests in property. In particular the unit aims to familiarize students with broad concepts and specific rules relating to statutory schemes of registration; concurrent ownership, security interests and competing interests in property.
On completion of the unit, students should have:
Research Assignment (2000 words) 40% and examination (150 minutes plus reading and noting time of 30 minutes) 60% OR examination (150 minutes plus reading and noting time of 30 minutes) 100%.
Three hours of lectures per week plus weekly tutorials from weeks 5-12
LAW3400
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
The unit focuses on the institutions and processes that surround the implementation and enforcement of criminal law. Students will examine the idea of a criminal justice 'system'; objectives and models of criminal justice; and crime statistics and public perceptions of crime. Other topics will be drawn from the following areas: police powers and exercise of discretion; the exercise of prosecutorial discretion; theories of punishment; juvenile justice; imprisonment and prisoners rights; sentencing; and the role of victims in the criminal justice system.
On completion of this unit students will have acquired or developed:
Research essay (2000 words): 40%
Examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60%.
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) |
Banking law and regulation around the globe have gone through tremendous changes over the last decade. The technological and multimedia developments, recent financial crises, changes to the commercial environment and financial markets globalization have all brought to the emergence of new banking policies coupled with innovative and advanced banking services. As banks and the services they supply are a key component in any modern financial system, policy makers, courts and legal practitioners are now facing more challenges than ever before.
The course deals with the law and practice of banks and their relationship with their customers, while focusing on the most recent changes and advanced innovations in the banking industry. It is designed to impart the students with unique knowledge on one of the building blocks of the commercial and financial market from a comparative and global perspective.
Principle topics will include
Students completing this subject will:
Research assignment (2000 words): 40% and examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60%
An intensive unit of 4 hours of lectures per week in weeks 5-11 of the semester comprising of 2 additional hours of lectures per week in weeks 7-10.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
Topics covered include: the guarantees of fundamental liberties; the role of the Conference of Rulers; relations between the federation and the states; the judiciary; special and emergency powers; processes of constitutional amendments; the separation of powers doctrine; the methods, techniques and attitudes of the Malaysian judiciary in constitutional interpretation.
On completion of this unit students should:
Research assignment (5000 words): 50%
Examination (2 hours): 50%
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
This unit provides an examination of areas of criminal law and procedure in which gender is particularly significant, and introduces students to feminist theories of law and criminality, and relevant rights analyses. Students will be encouraged to think critically about how the criminal law and its practice have evolved historically. Violence and gender will be a focus, including an examination of violent behaviours, the censures of violent behaviours, the operation of criminal defences, and developments in the laws dealing with sexual assault. A range of current issues will be discussed, including issues raised by sentencing and imprisonment.
On completing this unit students will have acquired or developed:
Research assignment (2500 words): 50% and class presentation: 20% and examination: 30% (one hour in-semester)
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
The course focuses on contemporary problems in Australian constitutional law that are not covered in depth in Constitutional Law, LAW3201, with a comparative dimension where appropriate. Topics will include methods of constitutional interpretation (including the tension between the framers' original intentions and contemporary values); express constitutional rights (trial by jury and freedom of religion); implications drawn from the Constitution, including the separation of powers as a new springboard for implied rights and the demise of the cross-vesting scheme; the "races power"; the defence power both in war and peace; military discipline tribunals; and parliamentary privilege.
On completion of this unit students should:
Class participation 10%; research assignment (2000 words) 40%; final examination (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time) 50%
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
Topics will be drawn from both the general part of the criminal law, for example: automatism, insanity, intoxication, duress and entrapment; specific offences, for example, obscenity, contempt, homicide and sexual offences, and issues such as the role of the jury, sentencing and the function of the psychiatrist in the criminal process. Students will be called upon to undertake independent research.
Compulsory research assignment (2500 words): 50% and examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 50%
Three hours of lectures per week.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
Controls designed to control pollution of air, water, and land, noise pollution, and conservation of the national estate. Enforcement of such controls. Relevance of environmental considerations over a wide range of decision making processes. Environmental impact assessment. An introduction to planning law. Coordination of environmental controls between Commonwealth and States including relevant provisions of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth). Environmental litigation, including issues of justiciability, and the standing of private citizens and environmental groups.
On conclusion of this subject students should:
Research paper (2000 words): 40%
Take-home examination (3000 words): 60%
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
This unit will examine the following major areas:
On completion of the subject students should understand:
Class test (1hour plus 10 minutes reading time) or written research assignment subject to lecturer approval 1250 words: 25%
Examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading time): 75%
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) |
The unit focuses on the rights and liabilities of parties to an insurance contract as governed by the common law and statute, with particular reference to the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth). Topics covered include risk, insurable interest, the duty of utmost good faith, non-disclosure and misrepresentation, conditions, warranties and premium, the role of agents and brokers in the formation of contracts of insurance, construction of policies and standard cover, adjustment of rights including claims, causation, proof and fraud, the indemnity principle and measure of loss, remedies and dispute resolution, subrogation, double insurance and contribution, cancellation of cover. While reference is made to different types of insurance (eg. Life, marine, liability, fire etc) the special rules applying to each type are not covered in detail.
Students completing the unit should be able to:
Assignment (2500 words): 50% AND Examination (2.5 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 50%
Three hours of lectures per week
This unit may not be taken by a student who has completed or enrolled in Insurance Law BTX5031 OR Insurance Law BTX4031
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton First semester 2014 (Day) Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) |
Topics include: theory of international law; the place of States in international law, including their rights, obligations, status and jurisdiction; the sources of international law and how they are interpreted and applied; the implementation of international law by states, in particular Australia's approach; the nature of international disputes and their resolution; the law related to the use of force by States and self-defence; the role of international institutions; the role of individuals in international law; and specific areas of public international law, including the law of the sea and environmental law.
On completion of this subject students should understand and be able to critically examine:
Semester 1: Optional assignment (2000 words): 40% and examination (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60% OR examination (3 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100%
Semester 2: Two mandatory assignments: (i) an in-class test in week four of the semester (50 minutes plus reading and noting time): 20% AND a take-home examination (to be handed in during the examination period): 4000 words, 80%
Dr Alison Kesby (Semester 1)
Dr Eric Wilson (Semester 2)
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
Topics include: an overview of international organisations and the role they play in the development of international law; the sources of international institutional law; the United Nations, including the General Assembly; the Security Council, peacekeeping operations and human rights; global judicial bodies including the International Court of Justice and War Crimes Tribunals; international economic organisations including the IMF and the World (IBRD); regional organisations particularly APEC; the effectiveness of international organisations including enforcement issues and prospects for reform.
Students who successfully complete the course should have:
Individual research assignment (4000 words): 50%
Take-home examination (two weeks - 4000 words): 50%
Taught intensively over 2.5 weeks of lectures for 3 hours a day.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
This unit will examine competition law polices and their operation. The principles relevant to the background and development of contemporary competition law and the role of competition authorities will be explored. The law in practice will be studied through specific globally-relevant examples. The law in practice will be studied through specific examples from Italy and the EU, with emphasis on differences. Students will be offered a site visit to a specialist law firm in Italy. Part 2 will focus on Australian competition law.
Seminar participation 25% and either two-hour examination 75% OR research paper, 3,500 words 75%.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
This unit examines the origin, nature and operation of Asian legal systems. A general overview of these systems, including sources of law and legal institutions, is followed by a closer examination of the legal system of at least one Asian country.
Legal pluralism will provide the conceptual framework for the course. In depth coverage of one Asian country will concentrate on significant legal topics, such as constitutional and administrative law, criminal law, commercial law, trade and investment law, legal institutions and the local legal profession.
On completion of this unit, students should have:
Examination 1.5 hours 50%; research paper (3200 words) 40%; class participation 10% OR examination 3 hours 90% and class participation 10%
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton Summer semester B 2014 (Day) |
This Unit examines the right of employees to bargain collectively and the right of freedom of association in international law, and how those rights are reflected in the Fair Work Act 2009. This examination includes the regulation of enterprise bargaining, secret strike ballots and the right to strike in the context of bargaining for an enterprise agreement; the right to belong (or not to belong) to a trade union and the right to engage in lawful industrial activities.
The Unit also examines the role and functions of trade unions, the legal status of trade unions and their obligations. The role of the common law and the secondary boycott provisions in the control of unlawful industrial action are also considered.
On completion of the subject students should understand:
Internal assessment 40% comprising EITHER research assignment 2000 words OR case note 1500 words (30%) and class presentation on case (10%); AND
Examination (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time)
Dr Karen Wheelwright (Summer B)
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
Topics include: concepts of equality and discrimination; the Australian social context; the law developed around State and Federal anti-discrimination legislation primarily in sex discrimination; grounds of discrimination including sex, race, disability and sexuality discrimination, and (if time) discrimination based on political or religious belief or activity; areas of activity covered or exempted from the legislation; constitutional complications of the legislation; problems of proof; procedural issues and the remedies available to victims of discrimination; concludes by evaluating effectiveness of the legislation and alternative measures like affirmative action.
On completion of the subject a student should have:
Examination (2.5 hours writing time and 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100% or research paper (2,500 words): 50% and examination (2.5 hours writing time and 30 minutes reading and noting time): 50%.
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
The unit examines: the notion of 'social theory' and its relevance to an understanding of the law; history, industrial society and 'modernity'; law, and the rule of law, as a social phenomenon; law and social solidarity (Durkheim); law as a system of social rules (Hart, Dworkin, Critical Legal Studies); Marxist analysis of law; criticisms of the Marxist analysis (Thompson, Williams, Krygier, Cohen, Rawls); post-Marxist critical approaches to law (Habermas, Foucault); law and modernity (Weber).
Students will acquire or develop:
Research essay (3000 words): 60%
Examination (2 hours writing time plus 10 minutes reading/ settling time): 40%
Three hours of lectures per week.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) |
Topics include: the legal nature of the employment relationship between an employer and an employee; the individual nature of that relationship as opposed to the relationship between collective organisations of employers and employees; the formation of that relationship, and the source and content of the legal obligations which flow from it; legal classifications of the work relationship which dictate consequent industrial and taxation obligations; the legal principles relating to termination and breach of the contract and the remedies which flow; the legal rights of an employee who claims that his or her employment has been prejudiced by discriminatory behaviour.
On completion of this unit students should be able to demonstrate an understanding of the individual components of the employment relationship as opposed to the relationship between organised groups of employers and employees. Students will understand the elements of a valid contract of employment and be able to identify and analyse the rights and duties of an employer and an employee under that contract. Students should be able to apply the legal principles to circumstances which give rise to termination and breach of contract and to identify, apply and critically analyse the appropriate remedies. Students should be able to recognise discrimination in employment and to apply the appropriate law.
Optional internal assessment 40%, comprising EITHER research assignment 2000 words OR case note 1500 words (30%)
class presentation (10%) PLUS examination (2 hours plus 30 min reading and noting) 60%
OR
Examination (3 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting): 100%
Three hours of lectures per week.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
International public order is both the practical and the normative foundation of public international law. International law does not operate within a vacuum, nor does it consist of the pro forma application of abstract principles and universals detached from real world conditions. Rather, international public order is best understood as the practical regulation of a global society of state and sub-state actors, subordinate to the trans-national rule of law. International law, therefore, is inseparable from the wider issues of global governance, the mechanisms, institutions and principles that enable the global society to operate as an integrated political and legal system.
Taking this unit, students will not only acquire a sophisticated understanding of the concepts of international public order and the trans-national rule of law, but also how the integrity of the international system is inseparable from the practical operation of global governance. Understanding will be achieved through the detailed examination of a particular area of concern within international public order and how formal legal resolutions of disputes must necessarily be framed within terms of global governance and the trans-national rule of law.
The topics to be studied include: the international legal process (the concept and sources of international law); international law as the judicial basis of global governance; and practical problems in international law and world order (conflict prevention; socio-political justice; international economic law; and international environmental law).
On completion of this unit students will have acquired or developed:
Research paper (4000 words): 50%; seminar presentation (written): 25%; seminar presentation (oral): 10%; and class attendance and participation: 15%.
Three hours per week of class contact. Students should allocate a total of 12 hours per week of class contact/private study/preparation.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton First semester 2014 (Day) |
Students will study the relationship between law and justice; major theories of the foundations and the nature of law (legal positivism, natural law, legal realism); the nature of legal reasoning and the role of value-judgments in judicial decision-making; the meaning of statutes and constitutions; judicial activism and fidelity to law.
Students will acquire a basic understanding of the major contemporary philosophies of law and legal reasoning, and the main lines of debate between them. In particular, students will:
Class Participation: (10%)
Compulsory research assignment 2,000 words: (40%)
Final examination: (2 hours plus 30 minutes and noting reading time): 50%
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
This unit considers why freedom of speech is important to the media and how it is protected in Australia. The unit also covers the three major restraints on freedom of speech; the law of defamation, the action for breach of confidence and laws that protect privacy, both incidentally and intentionally. These will be considered from the perspective of how these laws inhibit the media in the collection and dissemination of information. Due consideration will be given to whether an appropriate balance is struck between freedom of speech and other rights, such as the protection of reputation. Reform of the law will also be considered, particularly the need for uniform defamation laws.
By the end of this unit students should be familiar with the concept of freedom of speech and the way in which it is protected in Australia. They should be familiar with how laws pertaining to defamation, breach of confidence and privacy restrict free speech and control how the media collect and disseminate information. They should have developed their own opinions on whether the law has struck an appropriate balance between freedom of speech and other competing rights, such as the protection of reputation and the right to keep certain information confidential.
Written assignment (1500 words): 30% and final written examination (3 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 70% OR final written examination (3 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100%
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
Introduction to feminist legal theory presents a fundamental challenge to existing knowledge about law by questioning 'taken for granted' assumptions about gender, gender roles and neutrality of legal knowledge and practice. Themes such as public/private distinction, ideas of neutrality or objectivity in law, concepts of equality, difference and discrimination, equal or different treatment of men and women, and differences within these categories provide a framework for analysis. Sex and sexuality, family relationships, women's economic dependence or independence, legal construction of gender and the critique of male-centred concepts of equality and human rights.
On completion of this unit students should have:
Research Paper (2,000 words): 40%
Examination 2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading time): 60%
Three hours of lectures per week.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Prato Term 2 2014 (Day) |
The number of places available for a unit taught in Prato is strictly limited to 45. This is the maximum room capacity at the Prato Centre.
Topics include: common law - civil law: elementary comparisons; classification of legal systems; historical origins of the civil law; legal education and legal profession; constitutions; judicial organisation; sources of law; judicial methodology; civil procedure.
Students who successfully complete this unit should:
50% research essay 2,500 words
50% take home exam 2,500 words.
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton First semester 2014 (Day) |
This unit is a general introduction to international human rights law. It is concerned with human rights standards as they exist in international law and the international mechanisms for enforcing these standards. The unit will consider a selection of specific human rights, limitations to human rights (e.g. derogation in time of emergency) and some major contemporary international human rights issues.
Upon completion of this unit students should be able to
Class exercise 20% and
Research paper (2000 words) 40% and
Examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time) 40%
OR
Class exercise 20% and
Examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time) 80%
Contact hours: In 2014, lectures run for 4 hours per week commencing 3 April 2014.
4 hours per week over 9 weeks
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton First semester 2014 (Day) |
This unit looks at the principles that the Australian courts apply to civil cases in which not all facts are linked to a single jurisdiction. There may be links to foreign countries or to more than one Australian jurisdiction. The main questions considered in this unit are:
This unit is highly useful for students who plan to go into legal practice.
Students who successfully complete this unit should:
Class Participation: 10%; Research assignment (max. 2000 words): 40%; and examination (2 hours writing and 30 minutes reading and noting): 50%
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
The legislative control, 'protection' and disempowerment experienced by indigenous Australians and the historical, comparative and contemporary contexts of their experiences in and with the Australian legal system. Laws and policies concerning identity, dispossession, protection and assimilation are examined. Over-representation of indigenous people within the criminal justice system, Deaths in Custody and stolen generations. Land rights, the Mabo and Wik cases, and the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth). Human rights and the role of international law, self determination, reconciliation and law reform.
Upon completion of this unit students should
The methods of assessment in this Unit are
Short reaction piece (response to texts) (1600 words): 20%
Research paper (2000 words): 40%
Examination (2 hours writing and 30 minutes reading and noting time): 40%
OR
Short reaction piece (response to texts) (1600 words): 20%
Examination (3 hours writing and 30 minutes reading and noting time): 80%
This unit runs semi-intensively.
For students in the LLB Hons course: Foundations of Law, Criminal Law 1, Public Law & Statutory Interpretation, Torts, Contract A , Contract B, Property A, Constitutional Law;
For students in the LLB course: Pre-requisites: LAW1101 Introduction to Legal Reasoning; LAW 1104 Research and Writing.
For students in the LLB Hons course: Equity, Corporations Law
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Prato Term 2 2014 (Day) |
The number of places available for a unit taught in Prato is strictly limited to 45. This is the maximum room capacity at the Prato Centre.
The national and international laws applicable to international
commercial transactions including the movement of goods, capital and
services. The sale of goods and services by parties in one nationstate
to parties in another (and the financing of such a contract of
sale). The transfer of technology both from and to a nation-state
through licensing and franchising. The establishment of foreign-owned
means of production abroad through direct foreign investment and
international joint ventures. Legal regimes and international treaties that
regulate and impact upon international business transactions. The
resolution of disputes that may occur in such transactions.
Upon completion of this subject, students should:
Seminar participation: 10%, seminar presentation: 10% and take-home examination of 4,000 words maximum: 80%.
Three 3-hour lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton First semester 2014 (Day) Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) Clayton Summer semester B 2014 (Day) Clayton Winter semester 2014 (Day) |
The number of places available for this unit is strictly limited to 42. In selecting applications, priority is given to those students who areclosest to completion of the LLB or Law component of their degree, and then on the basis of academic merit.
Drawing on ideas first developed at the Harvard Negotiation Project and on work from a variety of research perspectives, this unit examines the theory and practice of negotiation and aims to improve students' effectiveness as negotiators. Adopting an intensive blended learning approach that incorporates lectures, readings, simulations, exercises and discussion, students will: analyse different negotiating styles; practice utilising a principled negotiation framework; learn how to collaborate, create and claim more value; influence and communicate more effectively; better manage emotions; deal with difficult tactics; and reflect on issues of ethics and deception. In addition, students will explore a spectrum of other advocacy and dispute resolution processes (including mediation as a form of facilitated principled negotiation) and consider related issues of suitability, choice and the role of the lawyer.
Upon successful completion of the unit, students will:
Participation 10%
In-Class Assessments 30%
Reflective Journal Submission 30%
Negotiation Role Play & Analysis 30%
Mr Tom Harber (Summer A 2013)
Mr Tom Harber (Summer B 2014)
Dr Sandy Caspi-Sable (Semester 1)
Mr Tom Harber (Winter Semester)
Dr Sandy Caspi-Sable (Semester 2)
Intensive
LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104. Please note that there is an application form for this unit, available at: http://www.law.monash.edu.au/current-students/resources/forms/index.html
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) |
This unit introduces students to European Union law. After an overview of the historical development of European integretation and the ideological, political and economic factors shaping the Union, the unit focuses on the constitutional and institutional architecture of the European Union as well as selected issues of substantive European law. The unit explores the composition, roles and functions of the EU's main institutions; it analyses the principles and procedures governing law-making in the EU, the enforcement mechanisms of EU law and available judicial remedies; it covers the interactions between the EU and national legal orders. It also analyses the most important areas of substantive European law related to the Internal Market, such as the free movement of goods and workers. It concludes by examining the EU's external relations.
Upon completion of this unit students should be able to:
Class presentation and/or discussion: 10%
Research assignment: 30% (1,500 words)
Take-home examination: 60% (3,000 words)
Three hours of lectures per week
LAW3200/LAW 3201
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
This unit examines the constitutional and jurisdictional contexts within which property and spousal maintenance disputes are resolved. The course covers the procedural and substantive provisions of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) relevant to property and maintenance disputes between spouses, and de facto couples, including obtaining orders and injunctions against third parties and the division of superannuation interests. It also examines the non adversarial procedures and processes for resolving disputes. The course examines and critiques the existing law and the differential impact of marriage and cohabitation on men and women.
Students who complete this unit should:
Mid semester class test (one hour plus 10 minutes reading/noting time, closed book) worth 50% of the result AND end of semester class test (one hour plus 10 minutes reading/noting time, open book) worth 50% of the result OR Optional participation in the Family Law Assistance Program with both a 2.5 day practical component and a research report (2000 words) worth 50% of the result AND end of semester class test (one hour plus 10 minutes reading/noting time, open book) worth 50% of the result.
Four hours of lectures per week over ten weeks.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) |
Examines legislative structures for resolving disputes between parents, children and State child welfare authorities and the difficulties which arise as the result of the divided Commonwealth/State responsibility. Examines creation of families and parent-child relationships, common law and statutory principles governing rights and responsibilities of parents, particularly the provisions of Family Law Act 1975 (Cth). Examines paramountcy of 'best interests of the child' and relevant considerations.
Students who complete this course will:
a. identify and evaluate a knowledge of the common law and statutory principles which govern the relations between parents and children and between children, parents and the State and develop some understanding of the way in which these laws operate in practice
b analyse and interpret the jurisdictional issues and legal procedures relevant to the determination of such disputes
c research and evaluate theoretical and critical debates about the laws governing parents and children and the adequacy of current laws and procedures
d communicate effectively and persuasively on issues relevant to family law
e. evaluate and reflect on some of the skills necessary for practice in this area of the law and recognize ethical issues they may encounter in practice.
f. learn and work autonomously and use feedback to improve their own capabilities and performance
Final examination (3 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100% OR final examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60% and either a research assignment (2000 words): 40% OR participation in the Family Law Assistance Program with both 2.5 days (over five x half days) practical component AND a file/court report (1500 words): 40%
4 hours of lectures per week for 9 weeks
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton First semester 2014 (Day) |
Topics include: sources of international refugee law and the evolution of the international regime for refugee protection; comparative implementation of the refugee definition in Europe and other jurisdictions; modification of the Refugees Convention in domestic legislation; restrictive concepts such as 'internal protection' and 'safe third country'; the development of 'complementary protection' for asylum-seekers; issues raised by regional responses and creation of 'burden sharing' arrangements between States; procedures for determination of refugee status; proposals to reformulate the refugee protection regime.
Upon completion of this unit students should:
Research assignment (2,500 words): 50%
Examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 50%.
Four hours of lectures per week (for 9 weeks)
LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104
International/Partner universities: General Introduction to Law
None
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Malaysia Trimester 2 2014 (Day) |
Both the structure of government and human rights guarantees - in constitutions of the Western liberal-democratic tradition - will be considered. Structure-of-government topics may include the design and function of legislatures and their component Houses; heads of state; federal division of powers; judicial power and constitutional Courts. Rights provisions to be considered will be selected from traditionally protected rights such as freedom of speech and freedom of religion. The dialogue model of rights protection pioneered in Canada will also be considered. In conclusion, attention will be devoted to the approaches to constitutional interpretation manifested by various Courts: to what extent should they strive to be loyal to the text and/or the founders' intentions?
Upon completion of this unit, students should:
1. Short paper (1,000 words): 20%
2. Take-home exam (3,000 words): 60%
3. Participation: 10%
4. Presentation: 10%
Dr Normann Witzleb (Malaysia)
Twelve three-hour seminars
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
Topics include: the constitutional underpinning and legal framework governing citizenship and immigration in Australia; the development of current policies in an historical, social, cultural, international and economic context; the change in legislative policy under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) from discretionary to codified decision-making; the legislative and administrative scheme for migration visa decisions including merits and judicial review; the notion of citizenship under the Citizenship Act and the consequences of lack of citizenship in relation to detention, removal and deportation; the role/effect of multiculturalism in relation to policies and procedures.
On completion of this unit students should be able to:
Examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 70%
Assignment (2000 words): 30%
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton First semester 2014 (Day) Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) |
This unit introduces students to the nature and function of equity in the modern Australian legal system. Students learn about the relationship between equity and the common law within the broader context of Australia's judge-made private law, and study key doctrines of equity, including breach of confidence, fiduciary relationships and the duties to which they give rise, equitable property rights and equitable remedies.
On completion of this unit students will:
Exam (3 hour writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100% OR written assignment (2000) words: 40% AND exam (2 hour writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60%.
Dr Patrick Emerton (First Semester)
Ms Nadine Huels (Second Semester)
Three hours of lectures per week and one hour tutorial per fortnight
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton First semester 2014 (Day) Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) |
This unit introduces students to the nature and function of trusts in the modern Australian legal system. Students learn how trusts are used and learn the rules governing their existence. In particular, the rules governing the creation and administration of trusts, and the rights and obligations of parties to trusts are taught.
On completion of this unit students should be able to:
Written research assignment (2000 words): 40% and final written examination (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60% OR final written examination (3 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100%
Dr Susan Barkehall Thomas (First Semester)
Associate Professor David Lindsay (Second Semester)
Three hours of lectures per week and one hour tutorial per fortnight
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton First semester 2014 (Day) Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) Malaysia Term 3 2014 (Day) |
On completion of this unit students will have covered the following topics:
On completion of this unit, students will have:
One 2,000 word research essay 40% and final exam (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time) 60%
Dr Eric Windholz (First Semester)
Dr Karen Wheelwright (Second Semester)
Dr Normann Witzleb (Malaysia)
Three hours of lectures per week and one hour tutorial per fortnight.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
The unit seeks to provide comprehensive coverage of the wide-ranging legal forms, policies and practices in Australia that relate to the upholding of human rights standards. The perspective adopted is new in the sense that human rights laws are not viewed as simply being those laws that expressly refer to rights protection. Rather it is to recognise that in the absence of a strong jurisprudential culture of rights in the Common law world generally, and certainly in Australia, laws protecting as well as infringing human rights nonetheless are apparent.
Upon completion of this subject students should:
Research paper (2,500 words): 50% OR Hanover Welfare Services Student Placement: 50% and exam (2 hours plus 10 mins reading time): 50% OR Examination (3 hours plus 10 mins reading time ): 100%
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton First semester 2014 (Day) Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) Clayton Summer semester A 2014 (Day) Clayton Summer semester B 2014 (Day) |
This is a program of individual research and writing on a legal topic or project which has been approved by the Chief Examiner after consultation with the proposed supervisor. The topics or projects may be associated with opportunities for placements or internships in legal services in the private or government sectors, in Australia or overseas.
Students successfully completing this subject should:
Research paper (5000-6000 words): 100%
LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104
Please note that there is an application form for this unit, available at: http://www.law.monash.edu.au/current-students/resources/forms/index.html
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton First semester 2014 (Day) Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) Clayton Summer semester A 2014 (Day) Clayton Summer semester B 2014 (Day) |
This is a program of individual research and writing on a legal topic or project which has been approved by the Chief Examiner after consultation with the proposed supervisor. The topics or projects may be associated with opportunities for placements or internships in legal services in the private or government sectors, in Australia or overseas.
Students successfully completing this subject should:
Research paper (5000-6000 words): 100%
LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104
Please note that there is an application form for this unit, available at: http://www.law.monash.edu.au/current-students/resources/forms/index.html
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
Classes in legal problem-solving techniques. A guide to the theory of legal argumentation and explains how those skills can be applied for maximum benefit in dealing with legal problems. Development of students' legal research skills with emphasis on teaching students how these skills can be applied to produce efficient and accurate legal writing. Presentation and defence of a legal submission, enhancing their oral presentation skills and their ability to work with others. While print sources will be referred to, a greater emphasis will be placed on electronic sources with the resources of the Internet.
Upon completion of this unit students should have developed:
Individual Research Project: 30%
Group Research Topic (written group submission: 30% and oral presentation/defence of submission: 30%): 60%
Class participation: 10%
Three hours per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton Summer semester A 2014 (Day) Clayton Summer semester B 2014 (Day) |
This unit gives students an understanding of the fundamental principles and concepts in Family Law. Topics include:
On completion of the unit students will be able to:
a. comprehend and explain the essential concepts and policies underlying the Australian family law system including the broader context in which the system operates.
b. critically evaluate the challenges and debates surrounding family law including the ethical debates and professional responsibilities facing family lawyers.
c. identify, analyse and critically comment on disputes between parties to a marriage or parties in a de facto relationship involving issues of property, children and maintenance
d. demonstrate reasoning skills and professional judgement which generate appropriate responses to complex statutory problems
e. communicate effectively appropriately and persuasively on issues pertaining to family law.
f. learn and work autonomously and collaboratively and use feedback to improve their own capabilities and performance.
Examination (2 hours writing time plus 10 minutes reading time): 100% OR Examination (1 hour writing time plus 10 minutes reading time): 50% plus participation in a placement program (25%) with a written research assignment (25%) (2000 words): 50%
Taught intensively over 3 weeks of lectures for 4 hours a day, with examination in the following week.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
This unit will compare the methods used to resolve disputes in the Common Law Legal Family and the Civil Law Legal Family. Through the Comparative method students will ascertain the fundamental elements of each system. The role of the judge at first instance will be critically analysed in both systems. The principles of orality, contestation and adherence to party disposition will be explored. The adversary system will be contrasted with the 'inquisitorial' adversary system. The continuing importance of the common law jury will be tested. Each step of litigation from the commencement through to the final disposition will be considered.
To broaden the perspective of domestic students to a major legal system and its way of resolving disputes; To expose students to the comparative method; To expose students to the court system of a western culture nation of a different legal family and its laws; To cause students to reflect on their system of dispute resolution, its aims and shortcomings.
Examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100% OR Examination (1 hour writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time)): 50%
Assignment (4000 words): 50%
Three hours of lectures per week
LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 OR LAW1104; LAW2100 or LAW2101 and LAW2102; LAW2200 or LAW2201 and LAW2202
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Prato Term 2 2014 (Day) |
The objective of this unit will be to examine the principles and practices of this new area as reflected in the rules of the major arbitration institutions, the national arbitration laws (with particular emphasis on Australia) and arbitral tribunal decisions. The topics to be considered in the course include: the nature of international arbitration, the types of arbitration, the legal framework, the agreement to arbitrate, judicial enforcement of the agreement, the powers of the tribunal and the conduct of the arbitration, the arbitral award and challenge to the award
To make students familiar with a growing area of dispute resolution in international commerce so that they can better advise clients, both domestic and foreign. By the end of the course, students should have a grasp of the practical aspects of arbitration, how to draft arbitration clauses, how to enforce awards and the preferred rules in a given case. In addition, through examining comparative legal materials, students should develop an appreciation of international solutions to domestic problems.
Two only of the following 3 options:
1. Assessed moot (each of four students will speak for 15-20 minutes): 50%
2. Research essay (2500 words): 50%
3. Examination - two day take-home: 50%
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
The object of this unit will be to examine the principles and practices of this area as reflected in the rules of the major arbitration institutions, the national arbitration laws (with particular emphasis on Australia) and arbitral tribunal decisions. The topics to be considered in the unit include: the nature of international arbitration, the types of arbitration, the legal framework, the agreement to arbitrate, judicial enforcement of the agreement, the powers of the tribunal and the conduct of the arbitration, the arbitral award and challenge to the award.
NB Quota applies.
To make students familiar with the growing area of dispute resolution in international commerce so that they can better advise clients, both domestic and foreign. By the end of the unit, students should have a grasp of the practical aspects of arbitration - how to draft arbitration clauses, how to enforce awards and the preferred rules in a given case. In addition, through examining comparative legal material, students should develop an appreciation of international solutions to domestic problems.
Two only of the following 3 options:
1. Assessed moot (each of four students will speak for 15-20 minutes): 50%
2. Research essay (2500 words): 50%
3. Take home examination: 50%
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
Topics include: UNCLOS III - history of negotiation; regime implementation; maritime boundaries; territorial demarcation - exclusive economic zones (EEZ); living marine resource management - fisheries; straddling stocks; environmental protection - point-source pollution; non-living marine resource management - oil and gas; off-shore drilling; artificial islands and installations; the Deep Sea Bed Authority; international dispute settlement; International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS).
Upon successful completion of this unit, students will have developed:
Individually assessed report relating to research undertaken for negotiations (500 words) 10%; group assessment exercise - simulation adversarial team negotiations - bilateral fisheries and offshore petroleum access agreements/treaties: 30%; research assignment testing ability to apply Law of the Sea doctrine to practical situations and problems (3000 words): 60%
Three hours of lectures per week
LAW7033
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
APPLICATION: students will be invited to apply for enrolment in LAW4183 Jessup Moot. This will be done through class announcements and public advertisements. When applying, students will be required to submit: a personal CV; a formal academic transcript; a short letter of application, outlining the reasons for applying and interests in competitive mooting and International law. Enrolment: maximum of 20
Seminar research and presentation: 25%
Practice Mooting: 25%
Memorial Research and Writing (3000 words): 50%
10 x 3 hour seminar per week and 9 hours practice mooting
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton First semester 2014 (Day) |
Students will be introduced to individual criminal responsibility in international law. The history and development of international criminal law, its codification and implementation by applicable municipal and international institutions examined. The main categories of crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court - genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes - will be studied with reference to international instruments and case law. Various bases of responsibility, including command responsibility and joint criminal enterprise, will be examined, along with applicable defences and excuses. The application of contemporary international criminal law in Australia and future directions of international criminal law will be studied.
Optional essay 2000 words: 40% AND final examination (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting): 60% OR final exam (2 and a half hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting): 100%
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
This unit examines international banking and securities transactions and their regulation. Major national markets will be considered along with important areas of international financial regulation and policy. An analysis of international financial instruments including international asset securitisation is followed by the regulatory regimes governing stock markets and derivatives. Emerging markets generate special issues for international finance. Three types of emerging markets finance will be looked at, as well as the impact of the 1997 Asian financial crisis. Finally is there a need for reform of the international financial system and the role of the IMF following September 11?
On completion of this unit, students should:
Research assignment (2400 words): 30%
Examination (2 hours writing time
30 minutes reading and noting time): 70% OR Examination (3 hours writing time
30 minutes reading and noting time): 100%
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
The growth of international criminal jurisdiction and the continual improvement in opportunities for legal cultures to interact with one another have led to a much greater interest, both practical and theoretical, in comparative criminal law over the last decade or so. Even within Australia, the creation of a federal Criminal Code has allowed for an even more extensive use of the possibilities inherent in federalism for comparative criminal law within the one country.
The first topic to be examined is what use can be made of comparative criminal law and the pitfalls that may be encountered in doing so.
Topics to be considered will then include: whether the criminal law should be codified, and what codification means; the role of intention in the criminal law and the different definitions of intention in various legal systems; murder, manslaughter and sexual offences (both consensual and non-consensual); crimes of omission; the prohibition of retrospective criminal offences, the right to silence, trial by jury and topics in sentencing law (including plea bargaining).
Throughout, there will be an emphasis on comparative analysis of the criminal law. Jurisdictions to be selected for comparison include the common law of some Australian States and England; statutory modifications of the common law, such as the partial abolition of the right to silence in England; common-law jurisdictions which have adopted entire criminal codes such as Canada, Malaysia, three of the Australian States and the federal jurisdiction in Australia; and civil-law countries, principally Germany but also, as materials are available, others (such as Spain).
Outcomes
On completion of this unit, students should:
Class participation 10%; take-home examination (4500 words): 90%
Dr Janice Richardson (Prato)
Dr Greg Taylor (Malaysia)
Twelve three-hour seminars
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
This unit examines the role of theory in the criminal law and whether there are "fundamental principles" which underlie all systems of criminal justice. A con-sideration of the various theories of punishment propounded in the common law and civil law of crime follows.
The issue of codification as implemented in both common law and civil law jurisdictions is then ad-dressed. Students will then be invited to examine in detail the roles played by the investigating magis-trates, procurators and the judiciary in civil law sys-tems and compare that role with the ones played by the prosecutor, judge and jury in the common law systems.
The relationship between substantive criminal law and procedure will be considered by focusing on such issues as the principle of territoriality, equality before the law including the right to a fair trial and the right to legal representation.
A comparative examination of the criminal law of Australia and Italy in the areas of the law of homi-cide, sexual offences and property offences will be undertaken. An analysis of the modern law of extra-dition, mutual assistance and various international treaties will enable a study of the impact of interna-tionalisation on the criminal law including a consid-eration of the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court. How have the Australian and the Italian legal systems dealt with the "war on terrorism"? Finally the unit will examine the use of several sentencing options in Italian and Australian criminal law.
N.B. Quota applies.
On completion of this unit, students should:
Class participation 10%; take-home examination (4500 words): 90%
36 hours in 4 weeks.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
This unit will allow students to acquire knowledge and understanding of a specialist, and increasingly important, area of law. Construction Law: Principles and Practice examines the legal issues impacting on construction projects including the different types of contracts and project delivery methods. In this unit, students explore how construction contracts deal with a variety of issues that arise during the course of a construction project, including variations, latent conditions, delays and defective work, as well as related issues such as insurance and security. Students will examine the relevant legislations and learn to research and write on construction law issues.
A candidate who has successfully completed this unit should:
a.be familiar with the different types of contracts used on construction projects and the pros and cons of each;
b.understand risk allocation and the different methods of project delivery;
c.be able to apply the contract provisions that relate to various issues that impact on construction projects such as variations, latent defects, delays and defective works and the legal ramifications of each;
d.recognise the different types of insurance required for construction projects and be able to critically assess the contractual provisions relevant to them;
e.have knowledge of the various statutes and regulations governing the construction industry; and
f.be able to write clearly, concisely and logically on issues relating to construction law.
1,500 site visit report - 30% and examination (2 and a half hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time):70%
4 hours per week for 9 weeks commencing week 1
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton First semester 2014 (Day) |
The unit provides an overview of the law regarding the undertaking and commercialisation of biotechnology and its outcomes. The unit focuses on Australian law and where relevant, the approach taken in overseas jurisdictions is included. Areas examined will include the laws with respect to research and development, product regulation, environmental and medical law. Topics include introduction to international regulation of biotechnology and problems in regulating science generally; national and state regulatory system for biotechnology; bioprospecting and biodiscovery - access to genetic resources; regulation of end product commercialisation; issues in human and animal technology.
On completion of this unit students should:
Examination (3 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100% OR Examination (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60 % and assignment (2000 words): 40%
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) |
This Unit examines the legal regulation of the marketplace for consumer goods and services in Australia. The nature of the consumer marketplace is considered, and the ways in which Australian governments seek to protect the interests of consumers is examined. The Unit critically examines the theoretical and evidence-based foundations for consumer protection laws. Particular attention is given to the operation of the Australian Consumer Law regarding unfair contract terms, consumer guarantees, and manufacturer's liabilities. Attention is also given to the regulation of buying consumer goods and services on the Internet, the operation of the National Consumer Credit Protection Act, the regulation of retail investment advice, industry codes of conduct and resolving consumer disputes.
On completing the unit, students should be able to gain an understanding of:
Final take-home examination (max 3,500 words): 70%; research essay (1500 words): 30% OR the option of a take home examination (mid semester take home exam, max 1,500 words and end of semester take home exam, max 3,500 words): 100%.
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
This unit examines current developments in international and regional instruments and institutions that promote and protect the human rights of indigenous peoples. Comparative perspectives on the rights of indigenous peoples in common law jurisdictions such as Australia, Canada and New Zealand will be studied. Areas of focus include the definitions of indigenous peoples, the concept self-determination, collective and individual rights, land and resource rights, civil and political participation, and economic and cultural rights.
Please note that in 2009 this unit will involve the opportunity to participate in international videoconferencing seminars with universities in North America and New Zealand.
Students will be able to:
Examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time) 40% and Research Essay (2,500 words) 50% and Literature Exercise (500 words) 10%
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
Fundamentals of commercial law emphasising the Australian approach. The nature of commercial law from a functional perspective and need for reform of the law of sale in Australia. Overview of personal property and concepts of transfer of ownership and bailment. Major topics are law of agency (types of agents, their authority and power, agency and other legal relationships), transfer of property in goods (contract of sale, transfer and reservation of property, transfer of title and remedies for the sale of goods), law of partnership (nature and formation of partnerships, relationship of partners amongst themselves, liability of partners, dissolution of partnerships and limited partnerships).
Research assignment (2000 words): 40%
Examination (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60% OR Examination (3 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100%
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) |
The unit will provide an introduction to the international laws of armed conflict (LOAC), known also as International Humanitarian Law. It will cover the historical development and sources of LOAC, the moral dilemma created by the regulation of armed conflict and how armed conflict has come to be regulated: e.g. the fundamental principles applicable to the conduct of armed conflict, the permissible methods and means of armed conflict, the protection regime under the Geneva Conventions, their Additional Protocols and the developing body of customary international law, the distinction between combatants and civilians, treatment of prisoners of war (particularly in light of recent events at Guantanamo Bay). It will also cover the imbalance of protection between international and non-international armed conflict.
Upon completion of this unit, students should:
Final exam 2.5 hours (plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100% OR optional essay 2000 words: 40% AND final exam 2 hours (plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60%
Four hours of lectures per week for nine weeks
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
Topics include: introduction to class actions; criteria for bringing a class action; costs and class action; compensating the class lawyer; settlement; financing class actions; and court regulation of communication with the class.
Upon completing this unit, students should:
100% examination (2.5 hours plus 10 minutes reading/settling time) OR 50% examination (1.5 hours plus 10 minutes reading/settling time) and 50% research paper (3500 words).
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton First semester 2014 (Day) Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) Clayton Full year 2014 (Day) Clayton Summer semester A 2014 (Day) Clayton Summer semester B 2014 (Day) |
This is a program of individual research and writing during two semesters on a legal topic or project which has been approved by the Chief Examiner after consultation with the proposed supervisor. It is expected that some of those topics or projects will be associated with opportunities for placements or internships in legal services in the private or government sectors, in Australia or overseas.
Student who successfully complete this unit should:
Research paper or papers (10000-12000 words): 100%
LAW1100 OR LAW1101 AND LAW1102 OR LAW1104
Please note that there is an application form for this unit, available at: http://www.law.monash.edu.au/current-students/resources/forms/index.html
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton Summer semester A 2014 (Day) |
The number of places available in this unit is 5
The Phillip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition is conducted each year and runs over the summer semester. Five students will be invited to participate and will be selected each year from those students who have successfully completed the Jessup Moot Seminar unit. The team of five students will work closely in a team to prepare detailed and lengthy written submissions and represent fictional States in a topical hypothetical case before the International Court of Justice. Written memorials are submitted in mid-January each year. The team will then moot against teams from other Australian Universities. The Australian Regional Rounds are usually held in Canberra in the first week of February. The two finalist teams from the Australian Regional Rounds then travel to Washington DC to compete in the International Rounds against teams from around the world.
Students participating in the Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition will, inter alia:
The objectives of this unit include, inter alia, to
Memorial research and writing of two Memoranda (12,000 words each; group task): 50%
Mooting preparation and participation (group task): 50%
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
Coordinator(s) | Professor Rowan Russell |
Topics include: security (nature of security, negative pledge, subordination); fixed and floating charges; the new personal property securities law; everyday issues and common pitfalls in finance law; guarantees; insolvency issues; loans and debt finance; syndicated financing; project financing; aircraft financing; derivatives, netting and set-off; domestic and international capital markets; securitisation; and regulatory and tax considerations.
Upon completing this unit, students should:
Examination (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time), 90%, and preparation and participation in one workshop, 10%.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) |
This subject unit takes a radically different approach to the study of law by focusing on forms of conflict management, dispute prevention and dispute resolution outside the adversarial system. It examines ways of lawyering that employ non-adversarial, psychologically beneficial, and humanistic methods of solving legal problems, resolving legal disputes and preventing legal difficulties.
Traditional legal education, with its focus on case law and judicial decision-making, tends to overstate the importance of both law and litigation in resolving disputes. This subject aims to equip law students with the knowledge they need to work with and think about non adversarial processes, an essential element of lawyering in the twenty-first century.
Non-adversarial justice is a focus on non-court dispute resolution or on processes used by courts which adopt a problem-solving approach. Theories of non-adversarial justice emanate from multiple disciplines and include alternative dispute resolution (and its component processes such as mediation, evaluation, negotiation, conciliation and arbitration), participatory justice, therapeutic jurisprudence, preventative law, restorative justice, collaborative law, diversion, shadow of the law theory, problem-solving courts, managerial justice and multi-door courthouse theory. Non-adversarial techniques and processes have been employed in fields as diverse as native title land negotiations, criminal cases, disputes over telephone bills or banking, negotiations over work conditions, disputes over residence of children after separation, decisions about where to locate hazardous materials sites and in truth and reconciliation commissions.
This subject starts by critically examining our adversarial legal system and how lawyers operate (and are perceived to operate) within it. We then explore the nature of non-adversarial justice, the various theories behind the movement and the reasons for the perceived need for non-adversarial processes. Students will learn about a range of non-adversarial processes and the theories behind them. A focus of student learning will be upon understanding when the use of such processes may be appropriate or inappropriate. The aim of teaching students this is to help them to understand the role that lawyers can play in preventing conflict and in providing non-adversarial means of conflict management or resolution. Students will be asked to reflect upon the role that lawyers can and do play in non-adversarial processes and upon the ethics of legal practice in such circumstances. Role plays may be used to assist with gaining understanding in this area.
As part of their assessment, students will be asked to observe a legal process such as a court hearing. They will be asked to take notes on what they see and evaluate the process from the perspective of participants and how it impacts upon them. Students will be expected to suggest changes to practice, policy or law that would improve the process. It is anticipated that this exercise will assist students to develop skills in observation and critical analysis of legal processes including making recommendations for change or law reform. In preparation for this exercise, students will be provided with information about how to conduct observations, how to analyse such information and on the law reform process.
A research essay will test students' research and analytical skills. Students will be encouraged to research an aspect of the syllabus in order to gain and deeper understanding of the interaction between the theory and practice of non adversarial justice.
Examples of non adversarial processes that are employed in a range of different fields, include:
mediation (including some of the newer practices in the mediation field)
arbitration
conciliation
facilitation
negotiation
ombudsmen schemes;
managerial justice (case management)
restorative justice schemes
truth and reconciliation commissions
Examples of specific dispute resolution services or specialist courts that may be studied include;
Community justice and dispute resolution centres (including the new Collingwood Neighbourhood Justice Centre)
The new Family Relationship Centres;
Drug Courts;
Family Violence Courts;
Children's Court;
Koori/Murri Courts;
Mental Health Courts;
The Family and Federal Magistrates' Courts;
Coroner's Court
Royal Commissions;
Administrative tribunals;
Group Conferencing schemes;
Victim/offender reconciliation/mediation programs;
Healing circles; and
Sentencing circles
Upon completion of this unit, students should:
Research essay or Placement Assignment (2500 words)- 50%
Take home exam (2500 words) - 50%
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) |
Criminal investigation and procedure involves an examination of the elaborate and sometimes complex set of arrangements which have evolved over many hundreds of years for dealing with the processing of criminal cases against alleged offenders.
Criminal investigation and procedure involves not only a study of the process and the law relating to the various elements of that process but also a consideration of some fundamental issues of political and legal philosophy: in essence, what is the appropriate balance to be struck between the community interest in preventing and dealing with crime and the liberties and interests of the individuals who are caught up in the system?
The Unit deals with the following topics and issues:
The overall objective of this Unit is to acquaint students with the significant number of steps or decision-making stages of the criminal investigation process, and the law and practice in relation to those key decision-making points. Students will develop a good descriptive and analytical grasp of the whole criminal investigative process.
The area will be approached not only from the perspective of what the law is but also from a legal policy standpoint. Significant emphasis will be given to the fundamental political and philosophical questions which arise in criminal investigation, especially those concerning civil liberties and community interests.
Class attendance and participation (10%)
2500 word research project (50%)
Take-home examination (40%)
For students in the LLB course:
LAW1101 Introduction to legal reasoning
LAW1104 Research and writing
For students in the LLB Hons course:
Prerequisites:
Foundations of law
Criminal law 1
Public law and statutory interpretation
Torts
Contract A
Contract B
Property A
Constitutional law
Co-requisites:
Equity
Corporations law
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
The unit is a problem based seminar where students simulate a team of lawyers acting on a complex project, requiring them to consider the interplay between legal systems and discrete areas of substantive and procedural law. The seminars involve discussion and simulations. The lecturer will provide background lecturing and information on key areas, but the essence of the unit is student centred learning. Students will be broken into groups to undertake the research, engage in discussions and report back to the seminar as they would in legal practice when assisting an employer in an activity such as this.
The lecturer will provide feedback on presentations (which would provide ongoing and regular formative assessment), and direct the research and thinking for the next stage of the project.
While the pedagogical approach to the unit will remain constant, the actual problem to be used will vary in each year. The problem may be primarily commercial or non-commercial although it could equally combine elements of each. Students will be advised of the content of the problem prior to enrolment.
The objective of the unit is to have students engage in problem-based learning with a view to developing their skills in:
and to develop the students' methodological skills in approaching any complex problem in all areas of legal practice.
Assessment will be out of the following range:
1. Class participation (optional up to 10%);
2. Class simulation (10%);
3. Preliminary written submission (500 word - 10%%);
4. Oral presentation of preliminary submission (15 minutes - 10%
5. Final report and presentation/simulation (10% per 500 words - comprising 60 or 70% of the marks depending on whether the student opts for a class participation mark)
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
The seminar touches on the most fundamental public policies issues that our society faces: economic growth and wealth distribution. Selected government responses will be analysed from nations chosen to represent varying solutions in the following areas: optimising income tax, income taxations vs consumption taxation, tax and economic growth - accelerated depreciation, international tax policy, and environmental taxation. The unit will both begin with and conclude with an overview of basic tax policy and tax policy and utilitarianism and concepts of progressive taxation.
Upon completing this unit, students should:
Written assignment (3000 words): 60%
Examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading/ settling time): 40%
36-39 hours instruction, meeting in 3-hours classes over 3.5 weeks. The private study for class will be between 6-9 hours pre assigned material for each 3-hour class.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
This unit examines the ways in which Australian law defines and regulates the relationship between humans and animals. It will introduce students to the key concepts, legal frameworks and regulatory regimes that apply to this area and will encourage a critical engagement with those principles and regimes. The unit begins by providing an historical overview of the status of animals as property in the law. It will then consider competing philosophical theories and interests that have motivated the evolution of law as it relates to the regulation and protection of animals.
The unit will then analyse a range of regulatory regimes under Australian state and federal law that apply to our interactions with animals, be those domesticated, wild or agricultural animals. This will include: the use of animals in scientific experiments, sport and entertainment, the regulation of the agricultural use of animals, animal welfare standards and free trade, the live export industry, issues relating to companion animals, and issues affecting wild animals such as hunting, endangered species, pests and zoos. Students will explore particular problem areas in these fields, as well as being introduced to discrete issues in animal protection litigation.
Although the primary focus of the unit will be upon the law in Australia, where relevant the approach in Australia will be compared to overseas jurisdictions and will be considered in the context of relevant international relations and regulation.
A candidate who has successfully completed this subject should:
Research Assignment (2,500 words) 50%
Final Examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and notation time)50%
Three hours per week.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton First semester 2014 (Day) |
Coordinator(s) | Dr Ronli Sifris |
The term 'transitional justice' refers to the various judicial and non-judicial measures that may be implemented in order to redress a legacy of human rights abuses. Such measures include criminal prosecutions, truth commissions, reparations and different forms of institutional reform.
This unit will be divided into three parts. Part I will provide an overview of transitional justice. It will consider the meaning of the term "transitional justice" and provide a framework through which the concept of transitional justice may be viewed. It will also discuss the dilemmas inherent in dealing with a legacy of human rights abuse. For example, we will discuss the tension between peace and justice, the advantages and disadvantages of local versus international mechanisms for achieving justice, the tension between allocating resources to dealing with the past and allocating resources to building a better future. We will also consider the various contexts in which transitional justice mechanisms may be applicable. For example, we will consider the transition from dictatorship to democracy, the implementation of transitional justice mechanisms in conflicted democracies and the ways in which countries like Australia may use transitional justice mechanisms to deal with a legacy of human rights abuse against indigenous populations.
Part II of this unit will engage in a more detailed discussion of the actual transitional justice mechanisms. For example, we will consider the nature of prosecutions and the different types of prosecutions available. We will consider the option of a truth commission and how this compares with prosecutions. We will also consider the concept of reparations both from a moral and a legal standpoint and we will discuss the importance of institutional reform.
Part III of this unit will use case studies to ground students' understanding of the subject matter in concrete examples. For example, we will consider the South African truth commission and consider the role that it played in South Africa's transition from apartheid to democracy. We will consider the "Arab Spring" and the role of transitional justice in those societies. In addition to exploring the transitional justice programmes implemented in different countries, we will also engage in a comparative analysis of the various case studies.
On completion of this unit students should:
Assignment: 30% (1,500 words)
AND
Class Presentation: 10%
AND
Take-home exam: 60% (3,000 words)
Students enrolled in this unit will be provided with 36 contact hours of lectures/ seminars per semester whether intensive, semi-intensive, or semester-long offering.
None
None
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
Coordinator(s) | Ms Kathryn James |
Schumpeter wrote of taxation that "nothing shows so clearly the character of a society and of a civilization as does the fiscal policy that its political sector adopts." (History of Economic Analysis, 1954).
Although the primary function of taxation is to raise revenue to finance the operation of the state, the raising of this revenue gives rise to many issues which lie at the heart of the relationship between the citizen and the state such as:
Despite the significance of taxation across all levels of our economic, political and legal system, it has been repeatedly recognised that the study of taxation has too often been neglected and wrongly dismissed as the province of the technocrat. This unit encourages students to see the importance of challenging this position and of addressing this neglect because questions of taxation speak to the nature of our economic, social and political system.
This unit seeks to introduce students to the importance of tax policy and provide students with the skills to analyse taxation from a range of policy perspectives. It aims to introduce students to the various disciplines relevant to shaping and understanding taxation including economics, politics and law. Importantly students will be encouraged to develop skills of policy analysis and use these skills to enhance their understanding of issues in relation to tax policy and the development and application of tax law.
Upon completing this unit, students should be able to:
Class participation - 10 percent; Compulsory written assignment (2000 words) - 40 percent; 2 hour exam
30 minutes reading time - 50 percent
3 hours per week class contact
Law 1101, Law 2101 and Law 2102
Nil
Nil
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) |
This unit focuses on the avoidance, management and resolution of construction disputes, which is commonly referred to as the 'back end' of construction law. It begins with a critical analysis of the causes of construction disputes and the role that the construction contract and different project delivery methods play in construction disputes. Students explore various dispute avoidance processes (DAPs) that can prevent conflicts, which invariably arise during a construction project from escalating into disputes. Next, students examine the different 'real time' dispute resolution methods that can be used during the course of a construction project to assist parties to reach completion with no outstanding disputes. Finally, students explore the processes that are available for resolving disputes that remain outstanding post project completion, including ADR, arbitration and litigation. The focus is on the unique aspects of construction disputes that require specific responses including the use of Scott schedules and the hot-tubbing of experts.
Students will analyse construction dispute resolution processes in use in other jurisdictions, in order to evaluate whether the Australian systems are in need of reform. There will also be a critical examination of international arbitration to determine whether it represents world's best practice when it comes to construction dispute resolution.
Students will analyse traditional and alternative ways of resolving construction disputes and learn to research and write on construction dispute resolution issues.
A candidate who has successfully completed this unit should:
a.be able to identify the causes of construction disputes and the factors contributing to the escalation of construction conflicts into construction disputes;
b.be familiar with the different types of dispute avoidance processes (DAPs) used on construction projects around the world and the pros and cons of each;
c.understand the ways in which parties can engage in 'real time' resolution of construction disputes during the course of a project, and the legal ramifications of such processes;
d.recognise the broad range of ADR options available (mediation, expert determination, senior executive appraisal and early neutral evaluation) and the factors that influence the suitability of each for particular construction disputes;
e.be able to critically evaluate the use of arbitration for the resolution of construction disputes at both a domestic and international level;
f.have a comprehensive understanding of the regulatory regimes governing domestic and international arbitrations of construction disputes;
g.be able to assess the judicial systems in place in Australia and other countries for the determination of construction litigation and the need for reform; and
h.be able to undertake scholarly research and write clearly, concisely and logically on the avoidance, management and resolution of construction disputes.
Research paper (1,500 words): 30%
Final Exam (2 and a half hours plus 30 minutes for reading and noting): 70%
4 hours a week over 9 weeks
LAW1101 Introduction to Legal Reasoning, LAW1101 Reading and Writing, LAW2101 Contract A, LAW2102 Contract B
None
None
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
The first half of the unit will consist of an in-depth consideration of the main theories of statutory interpretation: intentionalism, textualism and purposivism. With regard to intentionalism, the focus will not only be on the standard arguments for and against intentionalism, but also on the deeper theoretical commitments of intentionalism. For example, intentionalism presupposes that there is a defensible notion of legislative intent. Students will consider not only classic (aggregative) theories of legislative intent, and the criticisms of those theories, but also contemporary (largely non-aggregative) theories. Students will also consider the current scepticism among judges on the High Court of Australia towards the concept of legislative intent. Similarly, with regard to textualism, consideration will be given not only to the standard arguments for and against textualism, but also to different versions of textualism based on different accounts of the meaning of a legal text. Consideration will also be given to Andrei Marmor's recent argument that, while textualism provides an accurate account of the meaning of statutory texts, few appellate court cases involving statutory interpretation turn on a correct understanding of the meaning of the relevant statutory text.
The second half of the unit will turn from theory to practice, with an in-depth consideration of the High Court of Australia's current approach to statutory interpretation and some criticisms of that approach. Students will consider the role that constitutional principles governing the distinction between judicial and legislative power affect the way in which judges interpret statutes, the general approach that judges take to statutory interpretation and the account of the linguistic content of statutes implicitly accepted by the High Court. Consideration will also be given to the role that the principle of legality plays in the interpretation of statutes, and cases where the legal effect of a statute may differ from its linguistic content (where, for example, that linguistic content is ambiguous or where there is a need for equitable interpretation). Critical attention will focus on the High Court's understanding of the difference between legislative and judicial power, and its understanding of the relationship between the linguistic content of a statute and the legal effect of that statute.
This unit aims to:
There will be two assessment tasks for the unit:
1. a compulsory 2,500 word research assignment, worth 50% of the total mark for the unit; and
2. a two hour final examination, worth 50% of the total mark for the unit.
3 hours per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) |
Coordinator(s) | Dr Adam McBeth |
The number of places available in this unit is 30 - 40 (depending on the number and identity of the competitions in which students enrolled in the unit participate)
Admission to this unit is by competitive application. The unit will be capped depending on the number of competitions offered from year to year. Criteria for selection will include course progression, marks in completed units, experience or skill in mooting, debating or other advocacy (assessed through an oral advocacy exercise).
Students will be allocated to teams for various external mooting competitions in which they will represent Monash University. These will vary from year to year, but may include:
Michael Kirby Contract Moot
Shine Torts Moot
Gibbs Constitutional Law Moot
Administrative Appeals Tribunal Moot
National Women's Moot
Castan Centre Human Rights Moot
National Environmental Moot
National Family Law Moot
Oxford Intellectual Property Moot
World Human Rights Moot
International Humanitarian Law Moot
Seminars are provided on advocacy techniques, research techniques and the drafting of court documents. Students will then work as a team on the problem relevant to their assigned competition, including researching the problem, preparing written submissions and formulating oral arguments. Attendance at scheduled sessions is compulsory.
Where permitted by the rules of the respective competitions, students will be invited to critique the practice performances of their peers in other competitions. Regular practice moots will also be held for each team, overseen by academics and external guest judges with expertise in the relevant field.
By the end of this unit, students will be able to:
Participation in seminars: 10% - This includes both class participation and engagement in constructive critique of other students' presentations.
Written submissions: 30% - Group mark (approximately 1500 words for each of the appellant/applicant and respondent)
Oral presentation: 60% - Individual mark, judged in the final practice moot before competition.
3 Hours per week
LAW1102 and LAW1104
This unit is subject to a quota. Further information is available from the Law Faculty.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Prato Term 2 2014 (Day) |
Coordinator(s) | Dr Gerry Nagtzaam |
The number of places available for a unit taught in Prato is strictly limited to 45. This is the maximum room capacity at the Prato Centre.
This subject is designed to provide both a comprehensive and critical introduction to global ecoterrorism. The subject introduces students to the broad political challenges raised by the global enfironmental crisis both in the developed and developing world. The general historical evolution of international environmental law and policy will also be analysed. Attention will be given to the major environmental, economic and political tensions that have both shaped and constrained the evolution of 'ecoterrorist' groups.
The subject will in particular focus on the key individuals and major 'ecoterrorist' groups that have grown up as disillusion with the pace of environmental change within global society has increased. The subject will critically analyse the key groups often categorised as ecoterrorist including Earth First!, the Earth Liberation Front, the Animal Liberation Front and the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society. It will focus on their founders, historical development, key philosophical beliefs and practices. Students will be encouraged to draw on theoretical debates to identify the ways in which modern ecoterrorism has tested and/or reinforced the traditional assumptions, ideologies, arguments and institutions of international environmental law and policy.
Students will be challenged to develop and refine their ability to analyse critically the different ways in which environmental problems and risks are perceived, framed and managed by differently situated actors within an ecoterrorist context. The subject cover the international and domestic legal responses to ecoterrorism. The subject also contextualises the major legal developments by examining the key state and nonstate actors and institutions involved in the negotiation, settlement and enforcement of law relating to ecoterrorist activities. Finally, the evolving nature of international ecoterrorism law and policy, including problems and prospects for the future, will be critically examined.
Upon successful completion of this unit students are expected to
Individual seminar presentation (1,000 word paper submitted to the lecturer combined with a 20 minute presentation to other class members on a chosen topic): 20% and a take-home examination of 4,000 words maximum: 80%.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
This unit will build upon the study of Torts in the LLB Hons and explore a range of torts other than negligence and selected contemporary issues in relation to tortious liability. It will enhance students' understanding of the mechanisms through which torts law addresses civil wrongs. It will analyse the social, economic and political constraints in which torts law operates and how they find reflection in liability rules. Where appropriate, the unit will have regard to materials from other jurisdictions and adopt a comparative approach.
The issues considered may vary, depending on topicality and lecturer/student interest in a given year. They are likely to include some or all of the following:
On completion of this unit students should be able to:
Class participation: 10 %
Research paper (2,000 words): 40%
Examination: 50 %
3 hours per week
LAW2201 Torts A (or equivalent in the new LLB Hon)
None
None
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Malaysia Trimester 2 2014 (Day) |
The unit focuses on providing the students with an understanding of fundamental aspects of the legal and constitutional systems of Malaysia and Singapore. Topics covered include the making of the Malaysian and Singapore constitutions, the King, Rulers and the Constitution, the 1983 Constitutional Crisis, the 1993 Constitutional Crisis, Emergency Powers and Preventive Detention Laws, the Malaysian Judiciary, religious freedom in Malaysia and Singapore's Presidency.
On completing the unit, the student should be able to:
One 1,500 word research essay 30%;
Class participation 10%; and
Final exam (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time) 60%
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
The object of this unit is to examine the regulatory requirements for specific types of capital market transactions in Canada, the EU, the UK and the US. Subjects to be covered including the securities regulations affecting the issuance of securities, the disclosure requirements once securities are being traded in the secondary market, shareholders' rights, the securities aspects of takeover regulation, and definitions and prohibitions on insider trading.
On completion of this unit students should:
Examination (24 hour take-home) 4 Questions 100% OR Examination (24 hour take-home) 2 Questions 50% AND Essay 4,000 words 50%
The 36 hours of classes will be presented in a semi-intensive format of 9 hours of classes for 4 weeks.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
Part I, "Understanding Criminology", presents an overview of criminology - now made more exciting via integrated coverage of terrorism and related crimes - and describes the vast horizon of this science. It explains what crime is and techniques for measuring the amount and characteristics of crime and criminals. It also traces the history of criminological thought through the era that witnessed the formation of the major schools of criminology, classicism and positivism (eighteenth and nineteenth centuries).
Part II, "Explanations of Crime and Criminal Behaviour", includes explanations of crime and criminal behaviour on the basis of the various theories developed in the twentieth century. Among the subjects covered are theories that offer biological, psychological, sociological, socio-political, and integrated explanations. Coverage of research by radical, socialist, and feminist criminologists has been updated. Theories that discuss why offenders choose to commit one offence rather than another at a given time and place are also covered in this part.
Part III, "Types of Crime", covers the various types of crimes from a legal and sociological perspective. The familiar street crimes, such as homicide and robbery, are assessed, as are other criminal activities such as white-collar and corporate crime, which are so much in the spotlight these days, as well as other high-tech crimes that have been highlighted by researchers only in recent years.
Upon completing this unit, students should
Research assignment (2,000 words): 25% and final open-book exam (2 hours 30 minutes plus 30 minutes reading time): 75%.
The 36 hours of classes will be presented in a semi-intensive format of 9 hours of classes per week for 4 weeks.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Prato Term 2 2014 (Day) |
The number of places available for a unit taught in Prato is strictly limited to 45. This is the maximum room capacity at the Prato Centre.
All societies grapple with the issues of ensuring compliance with criminal laws, establishing appropriate forms of punishment, and implementing those punishments in acceptable and effective ways. This unit focuses on theories, institutions and processes relating to the legal system's response to breaches of the criminal law, in a range of comparative jurisdictions. Students will examine theories of punishment, approaches to and options for sentencing, contributions being made in various jurisdictions by therapeutic jurisprudence and restorative justice, and different approaches to the use of imprisonment. Students will also examine the operation and management of imprisonment in a range of jurisdictions, including issues of discipline, drug use, gender and ethnicity, and human rights.
On completion of this unit students will have acquired or developed
Research assignment 50% (2500 words)
AND
Take home examination: 50% (2500 words)
Students should allocate a total of 12 hours per week of class contact/private study/preparation, including 3 hours/week of lecture attendance.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
The unit in Remedies will consider the remedial goals of the common law, equity and some important statutes, as well as examine the legal rules and principles which give effect to these goals.
The focus will be on damages and coercive remedies. The course will begin by studying the principles underlying compensation before moving to restitution, punishment and coercion. While it will not be possible to look at every general law remedy, the major topics concerning the assessment of damages in tort and contract, misleading or deceptive conduct and for breach of equitable obligations will be studied.
Among the questions to be considered are:
On completion of this unit, students should:
Option A: assignment (3000 words): 60%; examination (2 hours writing and 30 mins reading and noting): 40% OR Option B: examination (2 hours writing and 30 mins reading and noting): 100%
There will be a 2 hour seminar and a separate one hour class, the latter generally in the form of a workshop class. It is expected that students prepare for each class, with an average of 3 hour private study for each contact hour.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
The contents of the unit will be varied depending on topical issues pertaining to the judiciary as they arise from time to time. But it would include many if not all of the following:
On completion of this unit students should
Research assignment (max 2500 words): 50%
AND
Examination (1.5 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 50%
Average number of three hours of contact hours per week over 13 weeks. An additional nine hours private study/preparation and research work per week.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
Topics covered are:
A candidate who has successfully completed this unit should:
Open book examination (3 hours): 75%; assigned seminar presentation: 10%; and short response papers (3 x 400 words each):15%
The 36 hours of classes will be presented in 3.5 weeks. The remainder of the student workload of 108 hours will consist of pre-reading prior to class, preparing for class participation, researching and writing an assignment, and preparation for the final examination.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
The "democratization of credit" refers to the recent expansion in access to credit by households in the lower ranges of the distribution of income. A major policy question raised by the democratization of credit is how to adapt consumer bankruptcy law and parallel out-of-court measures to the increased incidence of over indebtedness. As the recent sub prime crisis highlights, common law systems have generally taken a laissez-faire approach and used the bankruptcy system as the primary legal remedy when debtors cannot repay their loans. This unit will deal with the approaches taken in a number of jurisdictions, including Europe and North America, to address the policy questions raised by the democratization of credit in recent years. Among the subjects considered are: out of court and formal bankruptcy procedures, consensual negotiation, creditor responsibility and the historical trajectory of regulatory approaches to over indebtedness.
On completion of this unit, students should:
a. understand the underlying policies and the range of options for dealing with consumer over indebtedness in a number of international and comparative systems and legislation;
b. be able to understand and critically assess over indebtedness in relation to general themes in commercial law, and law generally, including the relative role of rules and standards, the tension between certainty and flexibility, the use of judicial discretion and the managerial role of judges; and
c. grasp the ways in which bankruptcy systems and legislation touch on regulatory theories and have implications for the day-to-day lives of many people globally.
Class presentation (group or individual) 10%; oral participation 10% and research essay 80% (4,000 words)
Students will be required to attend 36 hours of seminars, and undertake approximately an additional 108 hours of private study, including reading, class preparation, assignment preparation and revision time over the duration of the course.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
This unit will introduce the students to the fundamental concepts, policies and mechanisms of corporate insolvency law. It will emphasize specifically the mechanisms designed for rescuing a firm as a going-concern. The unit will discuss formal insolvency proceedings as well as informal out-of-court negotiations between a firm and its creditors. The unit will focus on the following issues:
The objectives of this unit are:
Class participation: 10%, class test: 10% and examination (two and a half hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 80%.
Students will be required to attend 36 hours of seminars, and undertake approximately an additional 108 hours of private study, including reading, class preparation, assignment preparation and exam revision time over the duration of the course.
LAW 4171 Corporations Law or equivalent
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
Product Liability refers to civil liability for injuries caused by defective products. This class will focus mainly on two systems of addressing injuries from defective products the American law system and the European Union system.
Product liability occupies a central role in American law, as the number of new products used by consumers has increased exponentially. With this proliferation of new consumer products has come an increase in injuries. Products liability is a major way America attempts to deter firms from manufacturing unsafe products, and to compensate those that suffer injury from those products.
The first part of the course will examine the American product liability system, focusing on the key sources of law underlying that system--common law principles of negligence, strict liability and deceit, contract and warranty principles, and statutory principles found in the Uniform Commercial Code. Using these sources of law, the course will explore the main theories of manufacturer liability, the concept of product defect, and defences available to the manufacturer under American law.
The second part of the course will explore the same issues from the EU perspective. The European Community adopted its first Product Liability Directive in 1985, and its version of strict products liability has since been adopted in some version in many parts of the world. The EU approach differs in many important ways from the American approach. For example, the EU directive focuses on a test for defect the consumer expectation test that has been abandoned or given less significance in most American jurisdictions. The two systems like wise differ in their respective approaches to proof, remedies, defences, and defining a proper defendant. Moreover, unlike the American system, where product liability dominates the system of accident compensation, in most European countries, product liability plays a more modest role, and acts more as a supplement to the social compensation systems available in those countries.
Why have the two systems evolved in such different ways? What are the advantages and disadvantages of the different approaches? Those are the core issues that the course will address.
The objective of the course is to understand and compare two systems of addressing injuries from consumer products, the American law approach and the European Union approach.
Assessment will be based on class participation (10%), a short research project based on class readings (40%), and a take home examination (50%).
Students will be required to attend 36 hours of seminars, and undertake approximately an additional 108 hours of private study, including reading, class preparation, assignment preparation and exam revision time over the duration of the course.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
Climate change has been described as the defining legal and policy challenge of the 21st century. This unit provides an introduction to the international legal response to this challenge. It examines critically the emergence of climate change as a public policy problem, the relationship between climate science and climate policy, and the negotiation, content and implementation of international legal instruments related to climate change. It will not consider national, sub national or non-governmental approaches to climate change. Topics to be addressed include:
By the end of the unit, students should be able to:
Evaluation will be by a variety of methods. A substantial portion of the assessment will be based on group work for which each member of a group receives the same mark. Participation: 10%, group assignment (1000 words): 20%; role-playing negotiation exercise (conducted in 3 parts): Part 1: 10%, Part 2: 10%, Part 3: 10%; final exam (2 hours, closed book): 40%
Students will be required to attend 36 hours of seminars, and undertake approximately an additional 108 hours of private study, including reading, class preparation, assignment preparation and exam revision time over the duration of the course.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
On completion of this unit, a student should be able to:
This unit will examine Australia's taxation laws from an international and comparative perspective. It will outline the broad features of the Australian tax system and compare and contrast these features with the broad features of the Malaysian and Singaporean tax systems. Aspects of certain other countries tax regimes will also be briefly considered. Similarities and differences between the various regimes will be highlighted, discussed and analysed. The unit will focus on income taxation and consumption taxation (GST). It will use the Australian tax system as the basis for further comparative discussion. Special attention will be devoted to discussing Australia's international tax rules and its international tax treaties with Singapore and/or Malaysia. Broad policy issues relating to the design of tax systems and international tax rules will also be considered.
The following topics will be covered in the unit:
Class participation: 10%
Class presentation: 10%
Research paper (1,500 words): 30%
Take home examination: 50%
Students will be required to attend 36 hours of seminars, and undertake approximately an additional 108 hours of private study, including reading, class preparation, assignment preparation and revision time over the duration of the course.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
Rules aim to create order in our society. They provide structure so people know how to behave and what to expect from others. Rules are devised by people. Biologically, people are creatures that live in groups and need groups. Rules are needed to maintain group stability. Law, therefore, is in essence a biological phenomenon that can, and indeed should, be studied in the light of biological theories. In addition, because modern biology cannot be comprehended without evolutionary processes, evolutionary biology is one of the perspectives that can increase our understanding of the principles of law. To be sure, we should be careful in applying biological mechanisms to legal subjects, yet we may more fully grasp the nature of law by bringing the two disciplines together.
It is currently also difficult to use evolutionary biology to determine which legal incentives should be used to regulate behaviour, not least because we do not exactly know to what end we should regulate behaviour. However, these caveats do not imply that law cannot be seen as a kind of extended phenotype that can be studied by biologists. With the right genes, an organism can build a shelter, thereby improving not only its survival chances but also the replication chances of its genes. It is reasonable to assume that people have the right genes to build a law system that maximises their survival chances.
However, will this confuse the is with the ought? In philosophy, it is taboo to derive norms from facts. In the context of law and biology, however, this seems odd as connecting these disciplines is very much about linking the ought and the is. Where biology can give us credible foundations for law, there necessarily has to be a connection between is and ought. Moreover, we should ask ourselves whether there even is a substantial difference between the two notions. Could we not regard the ought as a particular type of is?
From this point of view, morals and rules are a product of our brain, as are all interpretations of facts. The brain in its turn is also a product of genes and environment.
When law is studied from a biological perspective, then questions should be asked about the rationality of law. How can a judge take a strictly rational decision when our thinking is closely linked with emotion and feelings? Can the gap between legal professionals and ordinary citizens be partly explained because jurists do not ask themselves whether lawfulness includes a sense of justice?
In this course we will study biological and psychological backgrounds of the law. This may not always be easy, because several of our certainties may prove to be illusory or ill-founded. Asking questions about the biological foundations of law involves questioning our own identity. In that sense, science is ruthless; dogmas must and will be questioned.
Can biology and psychology give all the answers? Certainly not. Nevertheless, it is important to think implications over. As Mill said: Maybe the opinion is true, or maybe is contains a portion of truth an even there is no truth in it at all, then it still sharpens our own conviction.
In this course we will explore some biological and psychological facts and we will ask ourselves questions like: Can biology usefully contribute to moral argument? Can it contribute to an understanding of the proper role and functioning of legal norms?
The lecturer published articles in which he states that the ought can be derived from the biological is. Nevertheless, he explicitly challenges his students to falsify this statement. In this way students can explore the issues and form their own views.
Learning objectives:
Class participation (10%) and paper in which an article on law and an article on psychology/biology are compared
Students will be required to attend 36 hours of seminars, and undertake approximately an additional 108 hours of private study, including reading, class preparation, assignment preparation and exam revision time over the duration of the course.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
This unit will provide an overview of the obligations under international law to provide protection to trade marks and a comparison of selected, key aspects of trade mark protection in Australia, the United States and the EU. Consequently, in relation to international law. it will examine the trade mark aspects of the TRIPS agreement and the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy of ICANN relating to domain names. To a lesser extent, deal with the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property and the Madrid Protocol relating to multiple filings of trade mark applications. Selected, key aspects of comparison will include issues such as jurisdiction specific approaches to ownership, the requirements for registrability of trade marks such as shape trade marks and the different approaches to infringement, including dilution of trade marks and parallel importing. Other topics may include the registration and control of domain names. It is likely that, in light of Australian legislative proposals, the unit will also critically examine the arguments of the tobacco industry that international trade mark obligations prevent the implementation of plain packaging of cigarettes.
Class participation: 10%; compulsory assignment (1,500 words): 30%; and final exam of 2 hours plus 30 minutes for reading and noting: 60%
Students will be required to attend 36 hours of seminars, and undertake approximately an additional 108 hours of private study, including reading, class preparation, assignment preparation and exam revision time over the duration of the course.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
This course begins with comparative approaches to a range of legal traditions in which family law is idiosyncratically situated. Topical issues touching on how domestic law interacts with legal diversity in family law will be canvassed. Particular emphasis will be placed on the interactions between religiously-governed family law and secular state law.
From the comparative law perspective, the course will progress to a consideration of the ways in which Immigration and Refugee Law interacts with domestic family law and family law policy.
The seminar will then progress to an examination of the traditional common law conflict of law principles that touch on family law matters, including jurisdiction and recognition and international enforcement of foreign family law orders. Consideration will then be given to the modification of the common law regime by treaty and legislation, including the various Hague Conventions that apply to family law issues. Further attention will be given to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child as well as other human rights treaties. Each regime will be considered in the context of its impact upon domestic legal issues.
The six main area of family law will be examined through the lenses of comparative and international law, including marriage, divorce, matrimonial property, adoption, custody, and support.
Objectives include:
The students will complete four short (1250 words) critical analysis papers. Each paper will be worth 25% of the overall unit grade.
Students will be required to attend 36 hours of seminars, and undertake approximately an additional 108 hours of private study, including reading, class preparation, and assignment preparation over the duration of the course.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) |
Coordinator(s) | Professor Graeme Hodge; Mr Eric Windhoz |
This Unit explores the interrelationship between public policy, regulation and the law. The Unit begins by introducing students to the policy cycle - the process by which issues (or problems) are identified and prioritised for action by government, and the action to be taken to address the issue (solve the problem) is agreed. In doing so, the Unit will expose students to some of the challenges facing governments and regulators when deciding whether and how to address a particular issue. The Unit also will introduce students to the breadth of tools available to governments to achieve their policy ends. In doing so, the Unit will explore how the concept of 'regulation' has expanded beyond the traditional legal concept of regulation as rules promulgated by a sovereign state, to include all the tools used by governments to alter or control the behaviour of people and other entities. The Unit will then explore some the theories, concepts and constructs that explain regulatory practice in a modern liberal capitalist society, before moving on to consider what may constitute 'good' regulation and regulatory practice. Finally, the Unit will explore how the law intersects with, supports and shapes public policy and the regulatory endeavour. Rather than focus on one substantive area of regulation, several case studies will be used to illustrate and highlight the general themes of the Unit. Moreover, the Unit will include aspects of politics, economics, public administration and public policy in its consideration of the issues, further developing students' skills in understanding and applying the law in its societal context.
On completion of the Unit students should have:
Research assignment: 50% (50 marks).
Examination (120 minutes writing time plus 10 minutes reading time): 50% (50 marks).
Research assignment:
The assignment will consist of an oral presentation (10 marks) and a written paper (40 marks).
Students will be given the choice of undertaking the assignment individually or in self-managed teams of 2, 3 or 4 persons.
Individual assignment:
+ 5 minute oral presentation; and
+ 2000 word written paper.
Group assignment:
+ 10 minute group oral presentation - the marks for which will be common to all students in that group; and
+ 2000 word group written paper - the marks for which will be common to all students in that group.
3 hours per week
None
None
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
This course will compare the methods of statutory interpretation in different countries. We will examine the lawmaking processes of the various nations, and what effect different processes should have on statutory interpretation. To that end, we will examine the various goals of statutory interpretation. We also will consider the effects of operating under civil law versus the common law system. Likewise, we will consider the effects of operating in a parliamentary, democratic, or some other, system. The course has multiple aims. First, it will provide a survey of the various legal systems. Second, it will provide students with insights into why each system has adopted particular legislative and judicial rules. In that vein, the course will also consider whether the rules each system has adopted are optimal when compared to the wide range of available rules. Third, the course will provide a working knowledge of the theoretical underpinnings of legislation and judicial interpretation of laws, so that students will be able to discuss the merits or demerits of particular systems on a more abstract level.
Performance in this class will be evaluated in three ways. The first is class participation. Class participation will constitute 5% of the grade. The second is a midterm examination. This midterm will be in-class and will last one hour. (It will be the first hour of class that day; we will have ordinary class for the balance of the time period after the test that day.) The midterm will constitute 15% of the grade. The third is a final examination. It will constitute 80% of the grade. It will be two and a half hours; students will be given half an hour of reading time before the time for the examination begins.
Students will be required to attend 36 hours of seminars, and undertake approximately an additional 108 hours of private study, including reading, class preparation, assignment preparation and exam revision time over the duration of the course.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton Summer semester A 2014 (Day) |
Coordinator(s) | Dr Eric Wilson |
The representation of Law and lawyers within popular culture is one of the most important, but underappreciated, dimensions of the legal profession, of practice, and of the practical negotiation of legal ethics. The 'social status' of the lawyer within the wider culture is one of the dominant factors governing the student's decision to enter (or not to enter) law school. Furthermore, the dissemination of judicial procedure and dispute resolution through popular culture and the mass media is one of the primary means of both enforcing and challenging the legitimacy of Law and its practitioners within the broader community.
Within the diverse representations of Law offered by popular culture both literature and cinema are of special significance. Literature, both 'elitist' (Kafka; Camus) and 'popular' (Thurow; Grisham) is one of the primary mediums for the critical examination of legal reasoning and the nature and ethics of practice within the wider culture, often revealing subversive and confronting truths normally suppressed by conventional legal education and training. Cinema, along with television, is one of the leading arenas for the formulation of the social consensus concerning the nature of Law and lawyers, often artistically re-staging the processes of legal reasoning and dispute resolution so as to both critique and affirm the legitimacy of legal culture.
This unit will examine all of these issues through a critical analysis and discussion of a number of the seminal 'texts' within both the literature and cinema of Law.
This unit will explore the academic subject of 'Law and Popular Culture' by utilizing some of the classic literary and cinematic 'texts' that treat with the Law, lawyers, legal practice, and legal reasoning. A student successfully completing this unit should be expected to demonstrate proficiency in discussing the following four issues that will be covered by this course.
Two reflective essays (1000 words each; 20% each) and one extended essay (3000 words; 60%). The topics for all three assignments will be assigned by the instructor. Class attendance and participation is mandatory.
3 hours per week
None
None
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
The traditional line between public and private law used to be drawn between constitutional, criminal and administrative law as public law, and subjects loosely associated around the laws of obligations; contract, tort and restitution. Alternatively, laws that govern the relationship between citizen and state, is public law, and laws governing the relationship between two actors, is private law. Both approaches no longer adequately describe the relationship between public and private. Increasingly, the state is resorting to private law to create and enforce social policy. Similarly, courts are being asked to give what are traditionally associated as private law remedies to public law claims. Courts are also engaging through enforcement of private law litigation a regulatory role that transcends the immediate interests of the litigants. This course explores the increasingly blurred relationship between public and private law. Our course draws on experiences from a variety of jurisdictions. Our account is episodic; we do not have any ideological position on the material we will present. Some topics to be covered include the following:
Permanent Injunctions as Constitutional Remedies - Structural Injunctions
Conceptions of Privacy and Enforcement
On completion of the unit a student should:
Class participation 10%, research memorandum 30% (1500 words), and two hour examination for 60%.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
In the beginning of the 21st century, it seems that the age of parliamentary democracy had passed and that the concept of constitutional democracy had swept the world. Yet, closer study reveals that the picture is not uniform. First, substantively different versions of the constitutional model may be identified. Second, it is already possible to see the first signs of a shift to a stage of synthesis in which a new constitutional model is being generated which integrates the principle of the supremacy of the legislature with that of the supremacy of the judiciary.
This course will concentrate on presenting various constitutional models and examining their advantages and disadvantages. The course will be divided into three parts. In the first part we shall describe the 'traditional constitutional model' and its underlying rationale. In addition, we shall distinguish between various versions of this model and illustrate them by describing and comparing the constitutional mechanism in a number of countries (United States, Germany, France and Italy). In the second part, we shall examine several arguments against the traditional constitutional model and various proposals made to resolve those argument. In the third part, we shall describe the 'synthesized model', explain its rationale and illustrate it by describing the constitutional mechanism in a number of countries which have apparently adopted it (Canada, New Zealand and Great Britain).
Take-home examination - 100%
Students will be required to attend 36 hours of seminars, and undertake approximately an additional 108 hours of private study, including reading, class preparation, assignment preparation and exam revision time over the duration of the course.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton Trimester 2 2014 (Day) |
Coordinator(s) | Dr Rebecca Giblin |
The following topics will be studied in detail:
At the end of this unit, students will have:
Research essay (max 1500 words): 30%
Assessed tutorials (3 tutorials x 10% each): 30%
Final exam: 40%
12 lecture hours per week taught over 4 weeks
This unit is offered to specific cohort students only
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
This unit will cover a selected number of issues in medical law and ethics. Topics will include general issues that revolve around notions of autonomy, competency and compulsion as well as a number of contemporary bioethics issues such as organ transplantation, abortion and medical research.
In discussing these issues, students will be encouraged to think about the differences as well as the interplay between legal rules and ethical guidelines. The discussions will also include a consideration of the different approaches taken by different countries and students will be invited to think critically about the responses of different jurisdictions.
Take-home examination (60%), written assignment (30%), class participation (10%).
Students will be required to attend 36 hours of seminars, and undertake approximately an additional 108 hours of private study, including reading, class preparation, assignment preparation and revision time over the duration of the course.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
This Unit will introduce students to the idea, and foundation, of corporate social responsibility (CSR) as a component of corporate governance. Students will then be exposed to various facets of the three distinct but interrelated challenges to CSR. First, why should corporations have social responsibilities towards their stakeholders? Second, what is the scope, nature and extent of these responsibilities? Third, how could corporations be made accountable for violating their social responsibilities in areas such as human rights, labour rights and the environment?
Issues such as the following will be explored:
On completion of this Unit, students should be able to:
Class presentation: 10%
research assignment (drafting a legal advice or formulating a CSR policy for a corporation): 30%
take-home examination: 60%.
Students will be required to attend 36 hours of seminars, and undertake approximately an additional 108 hours of private study, including reading, class preparation, assignment preparation and revision time over the duration of the course.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
This Unit will introduce students to the idea, and foundation, of corporate social responsibility (CSR) as a component of corporate governance. Students will then be exposed to various facets of the three distinct but interrelated challenges to CSR. First, why should corporations have social responsibilities towards their stakeholders? Second, what is the scope, nature and extent of these responsibilities? Third, how could corporations be made accountable for violating their social responsibilities in areas such as human rights, labour rights and the environment?
Issues such as the following will be explored:
On completion of this Unit, students should be able to:
Class presentation: 10%
research assignment (drafting a legal advice or formulating a CSR policy for a corporation): 30%
open book examination (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading time): 60%.
Students will be required to attend 36 hours of seminars, and undertake approximately an additional 108 hours of private study, including reading, class preparation, assignment preparation and revision time over the duration of the course.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
This unit takes a comparative approach to the law of remedies for civil wrongs. It examines the treatment of selected remedial issues in various common law jurisdictions.
The topics covered include the following:
Class participation (10%); research assignment (max.1500 words) (30%); take home examination (max.3000 words) (60%)
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
This unit will take a comparative approach to a number of discrete remedial issues. Some of the areas to be covered in the course may include the following:
On completion of the unit a student should:
Class participation (10%); research assignment (max. 1500 words) (30%); take home examination (max. 3000 words) (60%)
Students will be required to attend 36 hours of seminars, and undertake approximately an additional 108 hours of private study, including reading, class preparation, assignment preparation and revision time over the duration of the course.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
Coordinator(s) | Dr Sirko Harder |
This unit examines selected areas of torts law from a comparative perspective. It analyses current issues and emerging trends across common law and civil law jurisdictions.
The topics covered include the following:
On completion of this unit, a student should be able to:
Class participation (10%); research assignment (max. 1500 words) (30%); take-home examination (max.3000 words) (60%)
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Prato Term 2 2014 (Day) |
The number of places available for a unit taught in Prato is strictly limited to 45. This is the maximum room capacity at the Prato Centre.
This unit will examine various sources of international law that potentially apply to sexuality-based claims. The approach of individual states, both from a domestic law perspective and in interpreting international obligations, will also be considered. We will examine international treaties and case law from various international as well as domestic courts. Consideration will be given to policy objectives and competing cultural and political arguments. Students will work in groups and participate in exercises where they simulate the roles played by various constituencies, including judges, state actors, lawyers, and individuals claiming discriminatory treatment.
On completion of this unit, a student should be able to:
Class participation and in-class simulated exercises: 10%
Research paper (1,500 words): 30%
Take-home final examination: 60%.
9 hours per week (intensive mode)
None
None
None
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
This unit begins with a detailed discussion of several well-known cases from the common law of Contract. The goal is to notice the gaps between the rules and the ultimate decisions. The course continues with a discussion of Max Weber's classical statement of how legal questions are decided in the civil law and his suggestion that adjudication in the common law is irrational. The unit then attempts to respond to Weber's challenge by focusing on the classical discussion of this question by some of the great theorists of the common law, together with contemporary writers who contribute to the same discussion. Students will read and discuss chapters by several writers, including Blackstone, Holmes, Maitland, Cardozo, Llewellyn, Hart and Sachs, Gilmore, Posner, Unger, Frug, Williams, and Fisher. Emphasis will be on discussion both the discussion among the theorists themselves and our own discussion with the competing traditions that we discover in the reading.
On completion of this unit, a student should be able to:
notice when there are gaps between the announced rules and the case results
Class participation: 10%
Presentation: 10%
Research paper (1,500 words): 30%
Take home examination: 50%.
9 hours per week
None
None
None
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
This unit introduces the key concepts in the administration of criminal justice and the major ethical systems. It examines issues relevant to the administration of criminal justice by identifying the ethical dilemmas that might arise for professionals in the criminal justice system. Topics will include ethics and police, ethics and lawyers, ethics in corrections and the ethics of criminal justice policy making. In discussing ethical dilemmas at the various stages of the administration of criminal justice, students will be encouraged and challenged to think about the differences and interplay between the procedural rules, institutional practices and ethical guidelines. The impact and implications of the issues are considered and their possible resolutions explored. The different approaches taken by different countries in tackling the said issues will be examined by students, who will be invited to think critically about how ethics can facilitate in the search for the appropriate resolution for the said issues.
On completion of this unit, a student should be able to:
Class participation: 10%
Presentation: 10%
Research paper (2,000 words): 40%
Take home examination: 40%.
9 hours per week
None
None
None
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
The unit explores four models which exist within the field of mediation, and examines their connection with various jurisprudential approaches. Mediation is an alternative method to litigation, in which a third party facilitates negotiation between at least two other parties. Mediation is the paradigmatic alternative to adjudication and its basic principles are unique and different from those of the adversarial model. The course examines the notion of mediation by referring to four conceptual frameworks to understand it: Traditional communal; Pragmatic problem solving; Humanistic Transformative and Narrative Cultural. Each model of mediation will be studied both in practice and theory, and its relation to jurisprudential streams of thought will be examined. Theories such as legal feminism, legal pluralism, multiculturalism and postmodernism will be studied as possible foundations for the various models, and their application will be examined critically through the use of case studies, films and simulations. The overall sequence of the course will show the transformation of mediation from a pragmatic efficient alternative to litigation to a public narrative based method for the resolution of public dispute.
On completion of this unit, a student should be able to:
Class participation: 10 %
Response paper: 10%
Take home examination: 80%.
9 Hours per week
None
None
None
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
Coordinator(s) | Dr Heli Askola |
This unit will provide a comparative survey of some of the modern principles of evidence. it will focus on the rights and obligations of the parties in the common law and civil law regimes. Some of the major concepts of evidence law will be examined including:
On completion of this unit, a student should be able to:
Class participation: 10%
Class presentation: 10%
Research paper (1500 words): 30%
Two hour open book exam: 50%
Students will be required to attend 36 hours of seminars, and undertake approximately an additional 108 hours of private study, including reading, class preparation, and assignment preparation and revision time over the duration of the course.
None
None
None
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Malaysia Term 3 2014 (Day) |
This unit compares rules of private international law of different jurisdictions. Private
international law (or conflict of laws) is the body of rules applying to civil disputes with an international element. These are the rules on when a court is to assume jurisdiction, when a foreign judgment is to be recognised, and which law is to be applied to a dispute. Private international law is domestic law. Focusing on commercial disputes, this unit compares the private international law of Australia, Canada, the European Union, the UK and the US.
This unit investigates case law, domestic legislation and regulations of the European Union, namely the Brussels I Regulation, the Rome I Regulation and the Rome II Regulation.
With regard to the jurisdictions covered, the following issues are investigated:
On completion of the unit, a student should be able to:
Three short essays (1000 words each) 60%; Outline of Arguments (1200 words) 24%; and Reasons for Judgement (800 words) 16%
9 hours (if taught over 4 weeks)
LAW2101 Contract A and LAW2102 Contract B, or an equivalent introductory course in contract law at another university; LAW2201 Torts A and LAW2202 Torts B, or an equivalent introductory course in contract law at another university.
None
None
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Prato Term 2 2014 (Day) |
Coordinator(s) | Dr Janice Richardson |
The number of places available for a unit taught in Prato is strictly limited to 45. This is the maximum room capacity at the Prato Centre.
This unit will be primarily concerned with examining what legal action individuals can take in order to protect their privacy against others: the state, the media, companies and other individuals. It will look at the position in Australia and then the development of the common law torts in England. The English position is unusual because the common law has been developed so as to give effect to Art 8 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) on a case by case basis. The jurisprudence of European Court of Human Rights and its broad interpretation of Art 8 ECHR (Right to Private and Family Life) will then be considered in this context. The general approach of European law to protecting privacy will be contrasted with the underlying values that are reflected in the US.
Students who successfully complete this unit should:
Seminar and presentation assessment: 20% and take-home examination: 80%.
6 hours over 6 weeks or 12 hours over 3 weeks.
None
None
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Prato Term 2 2014 (Day) |
Coordinator(s) | Dr Janice Richardson |
The number of places available for a unit taught in Prato is strictly limited to 45. This is the maximum room capacity at the Prato Centre.
The aim of this course is to consider the meaning of political liberty in Europe today. It will start by comparing different traditions of European thought on the meaning of freedom that continue to influence our views. Whilst the course is focused upon primary readings of political philosophers, their theoretical frameworks will be considered in the context of contemporary legal debates and concepts.
Indicative subject matter (which can be reduced depending upon time and student interest):
Seminar 1: Introduction to different concepts of political freedom and the relationship to different contemporary issues in law in contemporary Europe
Seminar 2: The liberal tradition: Mill "On Liberty"; the limits of law
Seminar 3: Berlin's concept of negative liberty and Waldron's discussion of property law and homelessness
Seminar 4: Robert Nozick: freedom as an argument for a minimal state; Cohen's attack on the concept of self-ownership; responses to the question: could freedom of contract include the right to enter into a civil slave agreement?
Seminar 5: Carole Pateman: freedom as the absence of subordination; the "sexual contract"; images of employment and traditional marriage contracts; a critique of the liberal public/private divide and concepts of privacy in law.
Seminar 6: The Civic Republican Tradition: Skinner's Reading of Machiavelli
Seminar 7: Arendt on freedom as public action; European context
Seminar 8: Kant's concept of liberty and of personhood; links with the concept of legal personhood and public reason
Seminar 9: Cornell's reading of Kant; a legal test for law's legitimacy
Seminar 10 and 11: Foucault on freedom; law cannot guarantee freedom; is it possible to judge a freer society within a Foucauldian framework? This will include an examination of the shift from middle to late Foucault and Patton's reading compared with Charles Taylor.
Seminar 12: Revision
Students who successfully complete this unit should develop:
Seminar participation: 10%, seminar presentation: 10% and take-home examination of 4,000 words maximum: 80%.
This will vary depending upon the demands of Prato and the timetable. Indicative hours would be: 6 hours a week for 6 weeks or 12 hours per week for 3 weeks. The total number of hours contact will remain 36.
None
None
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Prato Term 2 2014 (Day) |
Coordinator(s) | Mr Wissam Aoun |
The number of places available for a unit taught in Prato is strictly limited to 45. This is the maximum room capacity at the Prato Centre.
This course examines patentable subject matter across Canada, the US, the UK and Australia. It examines the most fundamental question in patent law: namely, what is an 'invention'? In other words, is this the type of "stuff" that patent law should protect with a twenty (20) year monopoly?
Indeed, the meaning of "invention" is far from a doctrinal topic "bedevilled by verbal formulae" and "sterile argument about the meaning of words". For, "whoever controls the meaning of 'invention' controls what can be patented and hence an important aspect of industrial policy." (Peter Prescott QC, sitting as deputy judge, in CFPH LLC, (Patent Applications Nos. 0226884.3 and 0419317.3), [2005] EWHC 1589).
This course will therefore cover novel aspects of patentability: from software and business methods to higher life forms (including even half-monkey half-human chimeras).
No technical background required or expected, nor is any previous work in patent law needed.
Seminar 1: Introduction to patentable subject matter, and basic patent law principles.
Seminar 2: Patentable subject matter in Canada.
Seminar 3: Patentable subject matter in Canada (cont'd).
Seminar 4: Patentable subject matter in the US.
Seminar 5: Patentable subject matter in the US (cont'd).
Seminar 6: Group work and/or presentations.
Seminar 7: Patentable subject matter in the UK.
Seminar 8: Patentable subject matter in the UK (cont'd).
Seminar 9: Patentable subject matter in Australia.
Seminar 10: Patentable subject matter in Australia (cont'd).
Seminar 11: Group work and/or presentations.
Seminar 12: Revision.
At the end of the course, it is expected that students will:
Seminar participation: 10%
Seminar presentation and/or group assignment:10%
Final written assignment of 4,000 words maximum (take-home): 80%
12 hours per week for 3 weeks, subject to the scheduling availability, and demands, of the Prato program. The total number of hours contact will remain 36.
LAW1101 Introduction to Legal Reasoning; LAW1104 Research and Writing or equivalent introductory units.
None
None
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Prato Term 2 2014 (Day) |
Coordinator(s) | Professor Benjamin L Berger |
The number of places available for a unit taught in Prato is strictly limited to 45. This is the maximum room capacity at the Prato Centre.
This seminar will provide both an historical and contemporary comparative look at the ways that legal systems have dealt with religious difference, freedom of religion, and "the secular". An important note in contemporary scholarship on the contemporary interaction of law and religion has been that there is not a single "secular" but, rather, varieties of secularisms. A close study of the various ways that political power, law, and religion have been configured provides a unique and valuable line of sight into comparative legal traditions, constitutional structure, and legal and political theory. Some of the most interesting contemporary legal and political debates have arisen out of questions about freedom of religion, its limits, and the just relationship between religion and the state. Issues range from the permissible content of public reason and the appearance of religious symbols in public space, to the legal status of religious education and the rights of parents to make decisions for their children on religious grounds. Drawing on cases and legal issues from a range of national traditions, as well as from comparative legal and theoretical scholarship, this seminar will explore the contemporary interaction of law and religion in a variety of jurisdictions. The seminar will involve a close study of issues arising within a broad spectrum of legal areas, including constitutional law, education law, criminal law, family law, health law, administrative law, and the law of deliberative democracy.
In addition to specific case studies, topics addressed may include some of the following, but will be selected and emphasized based on student and instructor interest in a given year:
Topic 1:Theoretical models for the study of religion and society
Topic 2:Historical patterns in the interaction of law and religion
Topic 3:Theoretical Approaches to "Secularism"
Topic 4:Comparative Approaches to Freedom of Religion
Topic 5:Religion in Public Decision-Making
Topic 6:Religion, Secularism, and State Symbols
Topic 7:Religion, Secularism, and Education
Topic 8:Religion and Conflicts of Rights
Topic 9:Gender Equality, Sexual Diversity, and Religion
Topic 10: Religious Difference and Legal Pluralism
Students who successfully complete this unit will develop:
Seminar participation (10%) and presentation (10%)
Three critical essays based on the course materials, total word count for the three assignments to amount to no more than 4000 words (80%)
Students are required to attend 36 hours of seminars over the duration of this intensive course.
LAW1101 Introduction to Legal Reasoning; LAW1104 Research and Writing or equivalent introductory units.
None
None
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
Coordinator(s) | Dr Normann Witzleb |
This unit explores the main legal issues involved in the resolution of legal disputes between private (that is, non-state) parties in an international setting. In that respect, we will consider in detail the two major systems of dispute resolution: litigation before national courts and arbitration before private arbitral tribunals. We will analyze and compare the legal issues that may arise at the different stages of an international dispute in each of these systems and on that basis discuss the policy issues involved in each context and the considerations that will become relevant for parties when deciding which kind of dispute resolution system to choose. Particular emphasis will be on
On completion of this unit, a student should be able to:
engage in discussion about jurisdictional and policy issues relating to the these approaches and solutions.
Class participation: 10 %
Research paper (1,500 words): 30 %
Examination: 60 %
12 hours/week (taught intensively as part of the Law Malaysia Program)
LAW1101 Introduction to Legal Reasoning, LAW1104 Research and Writing or an equivalent introductory course at another university.
NONE
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Prato Term 2 2014 (Day) |
The number of places available for a unit taught in Prato is strictly limited to 45. This is the maximum room capacity at the Prato Centre.
Game theory is a contemporary theory of rational decision making.
In this unit students will examine the following applications of game theory to law:
Differences between legal systems regarding judges and jury, and how these influence the type of reasoning to be expected (appointed compared with elected judges; judges as decision-makers compared with administrators of jury decisions; single decision-makers compared with panels);
regulation-intensive systems compared with judicial determination;
interactions between spheres of government and separation of powers;
voting rules and methods of aggregating preferences;
local compared with national elections;
Federalism compared with unitary government;
the differing role of pre-trial negotiations and judges' intervention therein;
alternative dispute mechanisms and their interaction with judges' role (binding compared with discretionary);
Course material will focus on non-cooperative game theory (where each actor is presumed to be a self-utility-maximizing individual or firm), though some models of cooperative game theory will be presented as well (formation of coalitions among members). Application to legal issues will be discussed, both based on scholarly writings and on students' input as to real-life situations where similar strategic interactions arise (relying both on case law and non-legal everyday experience). Students will be assigned both problem sets (mostly games to participate in) and articles/book chapters to read before each class. Since the course is planned to be intensive time-wise, consideration will be granted as to length of assignments - though they are still key to broadening horizons and facilitating understanding.
Students who successfully complete this unit should develop:
Completion of online games prior to and in class, demonstrating the operation of various aspects of game theory, and participation in class discussion about the implications and application of games to the relevant aspect of the syllabus: 5% per class x 12 classes = 60%
Take-home examination of 2,000 words: 40%.
This will vary depending upon the demands of Prato and the timetable. Indicative hours would be: 6 hours a week for 6 weeks or 12 hours per week for 3 weeks. The total number of hours contact will remain 36.
None
None
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Prato Term 2 2014 (Day) |
The number of places available for a unit taught in Prato is strictly limited to 45. This is the maximum room capacity at the Prato Centre.
This unit challenges students about notions of families and relationships within society. It looks at marriages and de facto partnerships; what constitutes a 'family' and the dynamics of parent-child relationships. It also considers what constitutes the 'best interests' of a child including cases involving child abuse and the role of social science in decision making. It also examines international issues such as relocation, abduction, adoption and surrogacy.
20% class attendance and participation
and
80% research assignment of 4000 words (presented in accord with the AGLC)
Suggested topics will be provided but students can devise their own research topic with the lecturer's approval
36 hours over four weeks
Introduction to legal reasoning and Research and writing or equivalent
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Malaysia Term 3 2014 (Day) |
Coordinator(s) | Dr Normann Witzleb and Professor Dr Philippe Achilleas (University of Paris-Sud XI) |
This unit focuses on the study of air and space law from the perspective of international and comparative law. Air Law covers the rules concerning the status of the airspace and civil aviation activities. Students will study the legal framework on international operation of aircraft, the repression of offences against aircraft, and the liability regime for damage caused by aircraft. Part of the unit will be devoted to the relationship between airlines and passengers. Space law covers the uses of outer space. Students will study the status of this area, the rules for its exploration and exploitation as well as the liability regime covering space activities. Students will also analyse the rules for space applications (satellite telecommunications, satellite TV, earth observation, space flight, military uses).
On completion of this unit, students will have:
Research paper (can be done individually - 1,500 words - or in a group of 3 students - 3,000 words): 30 %
Choice of two of the following three:
mini moot: 10 %
in class case analysis: 10%
presentation on research paper: 10%
Take-home examination: 50 %
Students will be required to attend 36 hours of seminars, and undertake approximately an additional 108 hours of private study, including reading, class preparation, assignment preparation and revision time over the duration of the course.
None
None
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
Topics include: the rules governing companies that seek to raise funds from the public; regulation of the securities industry in Australia and the regulation of takeovers; the securities industry; the nature of securities; the regulation of the stock exchange, brokers and other dealers; proscribed market practices; the regulation of offerings of securities the aims and objectives of takeover legislation; the regulation of takeovers; the policies and perspectives underlying these regimes; the impact of the legislative reforms currently occurring in this area.
Students who successfully complete this unit should:
Research assignment (3000 words): 30%
Examination (2 hours writing time plus reading time): 70% OR Examination (3 hours writing time plus reading time): 100%
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton First semester 2014 (Day) Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) Clayton Summer semester A 2014 (Day) |
The focus of the unit is the major steps in litigation. Using the Rules of the Supreme Court of Victoria, the chronology of a civil proceeding from the decision to sue until the matter is ready for trial is examined.
Students who successfully complete the unit should:
Drafting test: 30% and
Negotiation exercise: 30% and
Examination (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 40%
OR
Drafting test: 30% and
Examination (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 70%
Ms Nicole Mollard (Summer A)
Dr Adam McBeth (First Semester)
Associate Professor Paula Gerber (Second Semester)
Summer Semester: Seven hours of lectures per week for four weeks, six hours of lectures per week for one week and two hours of revision lectures for one week
First Semester: Three hours of lectures per week.
Second Semester: Four hours of lectures per week for nine weeks.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) |
The number of places available in this unit is 70
Topics include: medicine and science in the service of the law, including the organisation of the medical profession; biomedical forensic science; scientific evidence and its collection at the scene of a crime; forensic chemistry; forensic photography; firearm examination and tool marks; fingerprint evidence; forensic pathology; forensic odontology and the identification of victims; traffic medicine; the examination of victims of assault; DNA evidence in the courts; prototypes of police investigation; the State Coroner's system; forensic psychiatry and psychology and issues of criminal responsibility; medico-legal reports in the courts.
Students completing this unit should have a comprehensive understanding, as law students, of forensic medicine, encompassing forensic pathology, clinical forensic medicine, forensic odontology, forensic psychiatry, forensic psychology and forensic science. Students will be familiar with the organisation and operation of the Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine, the Victorian Forensic Science Centre and the Coroner's Court. They will be aware of the challenges presented and the tensions which arise when expert evidence is tendered in the adversarial system of justice employed in Victoria and in Australia as a whole. Students will be able to carry out effective research accessing materials in data bases in the biomedical and scientific fields as well as in law.
Research paper (2000 words): 40%
Examination (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60%
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
Topics which form the core material include: the history of federal involvement in the criminal law; federal policing agencies; the sources and nature of federal criminal procedure; the relationship of federal criminal law to state criminal law and to state courts; and the sentencing structures for federal offenders. Additional emerging topics of federal interest may be added from year to year.
On completion of this unit students should:
Written assignment (3000 words): 60% and 2 hours examination (plus 10 minutes reading time): 30% and class participation: 10%
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
This course deals with the legal framework within which offenders are sentenced, locally, nationally, and internationally. It will examine sentencing principles applicable under state and federal law in Victoria as well as those developed overseas in relation to sentencing guidelines and sentencing commissions. The course will examine the sources of sentencing law; the distribution of sentencing authority between the legislature, judiciary and executive arms of government; the control of sentencing discretion; the role of counsel in the sentencing hearing; and the opportunity for public and victim input. Main sentencing measures and procedures (such as on-the-spot fines) being currently utilised will be explored. The problems of sentencing special offender groups, such as corporate offenders, and special sanctions such as forfeiture of the proceeds of crime, will also be examined if time allows. A typical allocation of topics would be:
Upon completing this unit, students should:
Examination: 70% (30 minutes reading and noting time plus two hours writing time) AND an individual research paper of 1500 words 30%.
Three 4 hour semi-intensive lecture/seminars each week over a period of 3 weeks.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
UNCLOS III - Freedom of Navigation; Right of Transit issues - Admiralty - Introduction to basic principles - International Carriage of Goods; Insurance; Liability - Ship Registration; Flags of Convenience - MARPOL; the London Convention - Port-State Authority - legal regimes (both classical and new) - Maritime Labor regulation - IMO; ILO - Maritime Environmental management - ship-based pollution; exotic species; GMO - International Maritime Public Order - piracy; drug trafficking; illegal transit of human cargoes ("people smuggling")
Students who successfully complete this unit should have acquired technical proficiency and academic fluency in each of the four specialised sub-units making up this course. These are:
Group-based preliminary negotiation session related to selected scenario - 10%; group-based final negotiation session for selected scenario - 20%; group report setting out negotiating strategy, tactics etc and any relevant pre-negotiation information - 10%; and take home assignment undertaken individually: 60%.
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
The unit incorporates the study of case law and theory where the law recognises the underlying principle of unjust enrichment. The unit will cover:
Students who successfully complete this course should have:
1) Written assignment (1,500 words): 30% and examination (2,5 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time) 70%; or
2) Examination (2,5 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100%
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton First semester 2014 (Day) |
The objectives of competition law. Background to the current competition provisions of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) and relevant State 'application' legislation. Administration of the act. Basic economic concepts of market, market power and competition. The prohibitions and related provisions contained in the competition provisions of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), namely the prohibitions against anti-competitive mergers and anti-competitive agreements. Misuse of market power. Exclusive dealing. Resale price maintenance. The provisions dealing with authorisation and notification of conduct which may otherwise be in breach of the act. Penalties and remedies.
Students completing this unit should:
Assignment (1500 words): 30% and examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 70% OR examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100%
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton First semester 2014 (Day) Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) |
Topics include: history, organisation, education, functions and regulation of lawyers in Victoria and elsewhere; reform issues; nature and significance of a profession; independence of courts and lawyers; changing face of dispute resolution; the cost of justice and different modes of legal service delivery; standards of professional conduct including basic trust accounting, complaints and disciplinary procedures; ethical rules and moral values, with a particular emphasis on identifying and resolving ethical issues. The unit meets the requirements of the Council of Legal Education for admission to practice in Victoria in the area of 'professional conduct' (including basic trust accounting).
Students successfully completing this unit should:
Summer: Research assignment (compulsory) (2000 words): 40%
Examination (60%) - 2.5 hours writing, 30 minutes reading and noting
Semesters 1 and 2:
Class Participation: 10%
Research Assignment (Compulsory) 2000 words: 40%
Examination (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 50%
Associate Professor Gaye Lansdell (Summer Semester)
Professor Adrian Evans (First Semester)
Professor Christine Parker (Second Semester)
Semesters 1 and 2: Stream 1 - six hours of lectures per week for 6 weeks, commencing Week 7 of semester. Stream 2 - three hours of lectures per week for 12 weeks.
Summer Semester A: 12 hours of lectures per week for 3 weeks (4 hours per day - 3 days per week)
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | City (Melbourne) First semester 2014 (Day) |
The number of places available in this unit is 32
Introductory lectures on basic advocacy concepts and techniques are conducted by Professor Hampel or by a senior member of the judiciary or the bar. Students participate in three workshops dealing with examination in chief, cross-examination and addresses. These workshops are conducted by advocacy teachers who are members of the Victorian bar and are trained Australian Advocacy Institute teachers. A series of eight mock jury trials are then conducted. Students must participate as counsel in one of these trials, and attend all others. This unit is subject to a quota. Applications are available from the Law Faculty website.
Written case theory for final assessment, prepared jointly by students and both students receiving the same mark (500 words): 10%
Oral assessment (jury trial): 20%
Final oral assessment (assessment trial): 70%
Compulsory Attendance*: Pass/Fail
The consequence of not meeting the hurdle requirement of 100% attendance will be a 0 N result.
*Exemption from 100% attendance may be awarded in mitigating circumstances. Applications are to be addressed by email to the CE with supporting documentation and will be assessed on an individual basis.
Professor the Hon George Hampel QC (Semester 1)
Two (evening) classes per week, consisting of 4 x 2-3 hour lectures, 3 x 3 hour workshops and 8 mock trials.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) |
The administration and distribution of property of deceased persons not effectively disposed of by a will. Testamentary capacity and intention. The formal element for making, altering and revoking a will. The professional duties of lawyers in the drafting and execution of wills and the management of deceased estates. Persons eligible to be appointed executors. Types of grants of representation. Methods of proving a will. The vesting of assets in an executor or administrator. The classification of gifts by will and the doctrines affecting such gifts. The powers and duties of executors and administrators. The distribution of net assets to beneficiaries or next of kin.
Students who successfully complete this unit should:
Research assignment (2,000 words) 40% and examination (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time) 60% OR examination (3 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time)
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton First semester 2014 (Day) |
Topics include: practising law and practising medicine.; principles governing clinical medical practice; the foundation of medical ethics; the relationship between medicine and allied health professions; the regulation of the medical profession; doctors, patients and the law and alternatives to litigation; medical negligence and consent; rights to refuse medical treatment, and competence and incompetence in law and medicine; medical confidentiality; law and psychiatry; the body as property; medical research: volunteers, institutional ethics committees and the law; medical treatment and the end of life; the beginnings of life: novel birth technologies and abortion; doctors in court.
On completion of this unit students should have:
Research Paper (1,500 words): 30% and examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading time): 70% OR examination (3 hours writing plus 30 minutes reading time): 100%
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Prato Term 2 2014 (Day) |
The number of places available for a unit taught in Prato is strictly limited to 45. This is the maximum room capacity at the Prato Centre.
The unit examines the way in which the international community is tackling existing and future environmental problems - including ozone layer depletion, climate change, destruction of biodiversity, heritage conservation, disposal of hazardous waste. The 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Brazil has seen a development of international environmental law and policy. The Australian Government has adopted a high profile in international negotiations on environmental matters. In addition Australia has already felt the effect of international obligations in respect of world heritage sites and climate change.
On completion of this subject students should:
Research paper (2500 words): 50% and take-home examination: 50%
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
Topics include: the legal consequences of an individual or company becoming insolvent; the objectives and features of insolvency law; the proceedings leading to bankruptcy and liquidation; the impact of bankruptcy and liquidation on contractual and property rights; property available to creditors including the antecedent transaction provisions of the Bankruptcy Act and Corporations Law; claims which can be made in bankruptcy and liquidation; the administrative machinery of insolvency and alternatives to bankruptcy and liquidation.
Upon completion of this unit students should:
Assignment (1500 words): 30% and examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 70% OR examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100%
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton First semester 2014 (Day) |
The purpose of this unit is to identify and evaluate the laws which govern the way in which the media collect and disseminate news and information about the state. Topics include the media and the courts (open justice and obtaining information about court proceedings, suppression orders, contempt of court, journalists and their sources), the media and parliament (contempt of Parliament, parliamentary broadcasts), reporting elections, reporting on defence and national security (D notices, sedition, official secrets, reporting terrorism etc), and offensive publications (blasphemy, obscenity, racial and religious vilification etc).
By the end of the unit, students should have a general understanding of, and be able to provide advice about the application of, the laws which impact on the way in which the media collect and disseminate news and information about the institutions of state. They should have developed their own opinions on whether the law has struck an appropriate balance between freedom of speech and other competing rights such as the protection of the administration of justice and the protection of national security.
Written research assignment (1500 words): 30% and final written examination (3 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 70% OR final written examination (3 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100%
Three hours of lectures per week
LAW1100 OR LAW 1102 AND LAW1102 OR LAW1104
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) |
Copyright and designs focuses on two important forms of intellectual property. Learn why we have copyright law, its international framework, what it covers, whether it exists in any given scenario, whether it has been infringed and the possible consequences of such infringement. Then examine Australia's designs law, which protects the visual appearance of manufactured goods, with a focus on the overlap between copyright and designs protection. Throughout, there will be an emphasis on current legal issues and the relationships between these rights and other parts of IP law.
Upon completion of this unit students should be able to:
Take-home examination: 100%
OR
Assignment (1000 words): 20% and take-home examination: 80%
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton First semester 2014 (Day) |
This unit provides an introduction to the law of patents, registered trade marks and unfair competition. The emphasis of the course is upon patents and registered trade marks with some reference to passing off and statutory remedies for misleading and deceptive conduct under the Australian consumer law provisions in Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth).
Upon completion of this unit students should
Assignment (1000 words): 20% and examination (2 hours writing time plus 10 minutes reading time): 80% OR examination (2.5 hours writing time plus 10 minutes reading time): 100%
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton Summer semester A to Semester one 2014 (Day) Clayton Trimester 2 2014 (Day) Clayton Trimester 3 2014 (Day) |
The number of places available in this unit is 20
Students may enrol in 1 of the following clinics:
Upon completion of this subject students should:
Casework at Clinic according to criteria available from coordinator: 80%
Written report: 20%
Dr Renata Alexander (Summer Semester)
Mr Ross Hyams (First Semester)
Ms Helen Yandell (Second Semester)
One 3-hour clinic session per week plus follow up research and casework. In addition to the weekly intake session, students will be required to spend up to 6 hours per week in research, case preparation and consultation with their supervisor.
All of LAW1101 and LAW1104; LAW2101 and LAW2102; LAW2201 and LAW2202; LAW3301 andLAW3302
In addition, students intending to undertake any of the following clinics:
Sexual Assault Clinic
Commercial Law Clinic
Family Violence Clinic
Migration Clinic
JobWatch Clinic
must have completed LAW5216 or LAW5218. In other clinics preference for a placement will be given to students who have completed these units.
Please see http://www.law.monash.edu.au/cle.html for an application form and more information.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
The nature and operation of superannuation funds in Australia and how they are affected by the superannuation legislation, by the taxation regime, and by general principles of contract and equity. The trustee's duties.
Upon completion of this unit, a student should understand:
Assignment (2000 words): 20%
Examination (3 hours): 80% OR Assignment (5000 words): 50%
Examination: 50%
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton First semester 2014 (Day) |
Examination of private international law texts in the light of different legal systems. Convention on the International Sale of Goods (Vienna Convention). Oral Advocacy in an arbitration setting. International Mooting Competition - some students selected for Vienna.
Upon completion of this unit, students should:
Writing two memoranda (Team) 20%
Mooting: 80%
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton First semester 2014 (Day) Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) |
The unit covers the concepts of income taxation and the taxation of capital gains, in their underlying historical, social and constitutional contexts. It includes the policy and constitutional matrices of taxation, the legal definition of income, taxation of income from personal services and business, taxation of fringe benefits, indirect taxation on goods and services, taxation of capital gains, allowable deductions from gross income in personal and business contexts and the general effect of anti-avoidance legislation.
On completion of this unit students should have:
Research assignment (2000 words): 40% and examination (2.5 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60% OR examination (2.5 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100%
3 hours per week over 12 weeks
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) |
This unit will examine a range of advanced income tax, capital gains tax and goods and services tax issues relating to common business, property and commercial transactions. It will consider the structure of different kinds of business entities (eg partnerships, trusts and companies) and will examine how the tax law deals with business restructures, demergers, and takeovers. It will also examine a range of superannuation, fringe benefits, employee share scheme and other tax planning issues.
Upon completion of this unit students should have:
Examination (3 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100% OR Assignment (2500 words): 50% Examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 50%
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton First semester 2014 (Day) Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) |
This unit involves a critical examination of
Upon completion of the unit, students will have an understanding of general evidentiary principles. In particular, they will have developed:
Assignment (2000 words): 40% and examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60% OR examination (3 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100%
Professor Jonathan Clough (First Semester)
Dr Gideon Boas (Second Semester)
Three hours of lectures per week and one hour tutorial per fortnight
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
This unit examines the way corporations are governed, and the roles of directors and shareholders. Primary focus will be on Australian law, however, comparisons will be drawn from other countries, eg the UK, Canada and the US. Topics include:
On completion of this unit, students should be able to: recognise and understand the common problems experienced by members of various types of company; advise a hypothetical client regarding strategies for preventing or remedying those problems without recourse to litigation; advise a hypothetical client regarding litigious remedies to combat those problems; understand likely trends for future development in the law relating to shareholders' rights and remedies; develop and demonstrate oral communication skills and skills of presentation of legal concepts, rules and argument in an interactive seminar context; and, develop and demonstrate legal research and writing and legal argument skills.
Presentation: 10%; Research Paper: 90%.
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
The unit involves an examination of selected contemporary problems in evidence. It is designed to give students the opportunity of studying in detail particular themes relating to proof of facts in the forensic context which themes are not covered, or are dealt with only in outline, in Evidence LAW5159. A particular focus of the course will be the Commonwealth Government's Codification of the Law of Evidence for use in Federal Courts. This codification is embodied in the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth). The background of this Act is contained mainly in the recommendations of the Australian Law Reform Commission contained in its 1987 report, Evidence (ALRC 38).
Upon completion of this unit students will have an in-depth understanding of the rules and principles governing the proof of facts in issue in a trial. In particular, they will have developed:
Examination: 100% OR Research assignment (3000 words): 40%
Examination: 60%
Three hours of lectures per week
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
This unit will provide an introduction to the new legal and social issues which have arisen due to the now extensive use of the internet for commerce, education and entertainment. The unit will cover issues such as jurisdiction, electronic contracting, electronic security, content regulation, intellectual property, privacy and will provide sufficient flexibility to examine any new issues as they arise.
Students successfully completing this unit should have satisfied the following:
Written research assignment (2000 words): 40% and final written examination (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60% OR final written examination (3 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100%
Three hours of lectures per week
LAW1100 OR LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW2100 or LAW2101 and LAW2102; LAW2200 or LAW2201 and LAW2202; LAW3400 or LAW3401 and LAW3402
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
This unit will provide an introduction to the new legal and social issues which have arisen due to the now extensive use of the internet for commerce, education and entertainment. The unit will cover issues such as jurisdiction, electronic contracting, electronic security, content regulation, intellectual property, privacy and will provide sufficient flexibility to examine any new issues as they arise.
Students successfully completing this unit should have satisfied the following:
Class presentation: 10% AND optional research assignment (1500 words): 30%
AND final written examination (closed book) (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60%
OR
Class presentation: 10% AND final written examination (closed book) (3 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 90%
LAW1100 OR LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW2100 or LAW2101 and LAW2102; LAW2200 or LAW2201 and LAW2202.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton Full year 2014 (Day) |
This unit provides high achieving students with an opportunity to research, write and present a significant piece of original work. Students will write a thesis under the supervision of an academic member of staff, on a topic chosen by the student and approved by the Chief Examiner. Students will also publically present the main findings of their research and participate in a seminar program.
The unit aims to:
Students who successfully complete LAW5207 should, in general:
Thesis (8,000-10,000 words) 80%
Presentation of thesis findings (at Honours Conference at end of Semester 2) 10%
Attendance and participation in the supporting Honours Research Seminar Program (2 x 1 day events being the Honours Orientation Day and Honours Conference and 2 x half day Honours Seminars including completion of set exercises ahead of these seminars) 10%
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton Summer semester A to Semester one 2014 (Day) Clayton Trimester 2 2014 (Day) Clayton Trimester 3 2014 (Day) |
Coordinator(s) | Ross Hyams; Adrian Evans; Fay Gertner; Helen Yandell |
The number of places available in this unit is 40
Attendance at a legal service which endeavours to meet the needs of its community. Students learn a range of lawyers' skills and develop professional commitment and ethical standards. The subject adds a social dimension to academic training by creating an opportunity for students to assess the adequacy of law and legal processes in context.
Students completing this unit should have acquired:
Legal service work: 80%
Community Engagement 20%
Ungraded requirement: Completion of a reflective journal entry every two weeks throughout the clinical period.
An ungraded SFR (Satisfied Faculty Requirements) for the reflective journal is required to obtain a pass in this Unit.
Dr Renata Alexander (Summer Semester)
Assoc. Professor Adrian Evans (First Semester)
Mr Ross Hyams (Second Semester)
One half-day Legal Service session per week for 17 weeks (including non-teaching period) plus one and a half days per week client follow-up and one 2-hour seminar for 10 weeks
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Not offered in 2014 |
Through Springvale Monash Legal Service, students will work with identified groups in the community who are experiencing injustice because of their common identity, particular legal problem or their poverty. Students will acquire a theoretical framework and first-hand perspective of the impact of the law and the legal system and focus on appropriate law reform campaigns and community development strategies. They will be divided into small teams and supervised on a day-to-day basis by a specialist member of the legal centre staff and assessed by a Monash Law academic located at the centre.
Students who successfully complete this unit will:
1 research activity of 5000 words, for example:
a submission to government on a specific aspects of law reform;
a set of community explanatory statements concerning projected changes to local laws and regulations;
a brief to media on the regional effects of government policy and regulation
OR
1 x joint research activity, involving two or more students - total of 5000 words. Can include electronic material, fact sheets etc. 65%
5 x journal entries outlining progress of project 10%
plus 1 public presentation of progress of project 25%
Students will attend a seminar program for 8 weeks involving 2 hours contact per week plus regular tutorials of 2 hours per week. Students will also be required to allocate 8 hours per week over 12 weeks for client-group consultations, private research, preparation of materials and community presentations, with assessment being finalised over the remaining 5 weeks of a 17 week period.
Application form and more information available at http://www.law.monash.edu.au/cle.html
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Clayton Summer semester A to Semester one 2014 (Day) Clayton Trimester 2 2014 (Day) Clayton Trimester 3 2014 (Day) |
The number of places available in this unit is 12
This unit is open to those who have completed a family law unit and placement and wish to broaden their knowledge and develop their practical skills in family law.
The unit will run in a 17 week format and requires students to run their own family law files, and take a mentoring role to less experienced students. Under the supervision of a family law practitioner, students will draft documents, advise clients, brief counsel, attend court to instruct counsel and do general correspondence. Students are rostered for FLAP client contact sessions, work on ongoing files, take on new matters as initiated and attend on roster the duty lawyer service at the Family Court at Dandenong each Monday.
Students who successfully complete this unit will:
Casework performance including attendance and punctuality, taking instructions and relationship with clients, discussion with supervisor, follow-up work, drafting documents, family law advocacy skill, compliance with office and regulatory procedures, understanding of appropriate file initiatives 70% AND 1 individual research activity or assignment 30%. The assignment is to be 1,500 words. In place of the assignment, students can develop and present a research activity after firstly discussing a topic with the supervisor.
Students will attend a seminar program for 6-8 weeks involving 2 hours contact per week plus regular tutorials.
Students will also be required to allocate 14 hours per week for client-group consultations, private research, preparation of materials and client presentations.
Participation in a prior placement at FLAP as a part of a Monash family law unit, a minimum of 12 weeks volunteering on a one day a week basis at FLAP or completion of Professional Practice LAW5216. Please see http://www.law.monash.edu.au/cle.html for an application form and more information.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Monash Passport category | Internship (Act Program) |
Offered | Clayton First semester 2014 (Day) |
The number of places available for this unit is limited by the number of agencies and placements offered in each year. The number of places in 2014 is 22.
Students are placed as interns with a partner organisation operating in the legal sector and complete a unique research project jointly defined by the partner organisation and the unit convenor. The partner organisations are leading regulatory, law reform, service provision or policy-setting organisations in the legal sector. Students communicate the research findings in the format specified by the partner organisation, such as a consultation paper, report, commentary, manual, submission or speech. The partner organisation provides field supervision, and the faculty provides academic supervision. Students negotiate a project plan with their supervisors, keep a progress journal, and make an oral report on the project and learning outcomes.
A candidate who successfully complete the unit should:
Negotiated research project 70%
Negotiated project plan and journal reporting on progress (2000 words) 20%
Oral presentation on project and learning outcomes 10%
A total of 132 hours of internship at an agency
Six hours of seminar
one hour of meeting per month with academic supervisor
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Overseas 1-60 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas First semester 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas 2-60 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas Second semester 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas Summer semester A 2014 (Off-campus Day) |
This unit is used by the faculty to enrol students undertaking outbound exchange studies at a host institution. Students will not be able to enrol in this unit via WES. The faculty will manage the enrolment of students undertaking an outbound exchange program to ensure fees and credit are processed accurately.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Overseas 1-60 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas First semester 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas 2-60 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas Second semester 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas Summer semester A 2014 (Off-campus Day) |
This unit is used by the faculty to enrol students undertaking outbound exchange studies at a host institution. Students will not be able to enrol in this unit via WES. The faculty will manage the enrolment of students undertaking an outbound exchange program to ensure fees and credit are processed accurately.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Overseas 1-60 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas First semester 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas 2-60 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas Second semester 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas Summer semester A 2014 (Off-campus Day) |
This unit is used by the faculty to enrol students undertaking outbound exchange studies at a host institution. Students will not be able to enrol in this unit via WES. The faculty will manage the enrolment of students undertaking an outbound exchange program to ensure fees and credit are processed accurately.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Overseas 1-60 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas First semester 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas 2-60 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas Second semester 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas Summer semester A 2014 (Off-campus Day) |
This unit is used by the faculty to enrol students undertaking outbound exchange studies at a host institution. Students will not be able to enrol in this unit via WES. The faculty will manage the enrolment of students undertaking an outbound exchange program to ensure fees and credit are processed accurately.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Overseas 1-60 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas First semester 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas 2-60 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas Second semester 2014 (Off-campus Day) |
This unit is used by the faculty to enrol students undertaking outbound exchange studies at a host institution. Students will not be able to enrol in this unit via WES. The faculty will manage the enrolment of students undertaking an outbound exchange program to ensure fees and credit are processed accurately.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Overseas 1-60 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas First semester 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas 2-60 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas Second semester 2014 (Off-campus Day) |
This unit is used by the faculty to enrol students undertaking outbound exchange studies at a host institution. Students will not be able to enrol in this unit via WES. The faculty will manage the enrolment of students undertaking an outbound exchange program to ensure fees and credit are processed accurately.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Overseas 1-60 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas First semester 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas 2-60 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas Second semester 2014 (Off-campus Day) |
This unit is used by the faculty to enrol students undertaking outbound exchange studies at a host institution. Students will not be able to enrol in this unit via WES. The faculty will manage the enrolment of students undertaking an outbound exchange program to ensure fees and credit are processed accurately.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Overseas 1-60 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas First semester 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas 2-60 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas Second semester 2014 (Off-campus Day) |
This unit is used by the faculty to enrol students undertaking outbound exchange studies at a host institution. Students will not be able to enrol in this unit via WES. The faculty will manage the enrolment of students undertaking an outbound exchange program to ensure fees and credit are processed accurately.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Overseas 1-60 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas First semester 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas 2-60 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas Second semester 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas Summer semester A 2014 (Off-campus Day) |
This unit is used by the faculty to enrol students undertaking outbound exchange studies at a host institution. Students will not be able to enrol in this unit via WES. The faculty will manage the enrolment of students undertaking an outbound exchange program to ensure fees and credit are processed accurately.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Overseas 1-60 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas First semester 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas 2-60 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas Second semester 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas Summer semester A 2014 (Off-campus Day) |
This unit is used by the faculty to enrol students undertaking outbound exchange studies at a host institution. Students will not be able to enrol in this unit via WES. The faculty will manage the enrolment of students undertaking an outbound exchange program to ensure fees and credit are processed accurately.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Overseas 1-60 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas First semester 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas 2-60 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas Second semester 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas Summer semester A 2014 (Off-campus Day) |
This unit is used by the faculty to enrol students undertaking outbound exchange studies at a host institution. Students will not be able to enrol in this unit via WES. The faculty will manage the enrolment of students undertaking an outbound exchange program to ensure fees and credit are processed accurately.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Overseas 1-60 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas First semester 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas 2-60 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas Second semester 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas Summer semester A 2014 (Off-campus Day) |
This unit is used by the faculty to enrol students undertaking outbound exchange studies at a host institution. Students will not be able to enrol in this unit via WES. The faculty will manage the enrolment of students undertaking an outbound exchange program to ensure fees and credit are processed accurately.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Overseas 1-60 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas First semester 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas 2-60 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas Second semester 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas Summer semester A 2014 (Off-campus Day) |
This unit is used by the faculty to enrol students undertaking outbound exchange studies at a host institution. Students will not be able to enrol in this unit via WES. The faculty will manage the enrolment of students undertaking an outbound exchange program to ensure fees and credit are processed accurately.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Overseas 1-60 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas First semester 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas 2-60 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas Second semester 2014 (Off-campus Day) |
This unit is used by the faculty to enrol students undertaking outbound exchange studies at a host institution. Students will not be able to enrol in this unit via WES. The faculty will manage the enrolment of students undertaking an outbound exchange program to ensure fees and credit are processed accurately.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Offered | Overseas 1-60 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas First semester 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas 2-60 2014 (Off-campus Day) Overseas Second semester 2014 (Off-campus Day) |
This unit is used by the faculty to enrol students undertaking outbound exchange studies at a host institution. Students will not be able to enrol in this unit via WES. The faculty will manage the enrolment of students undertaking an outbound exchange program to ensure fees and credit are processed accurately.
Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.
Level | Undergraduate |
Faculty | Faculty of Law |
Monash Passport category | Depth (Enhance Program) |
Offered | Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day) |
Coordinator(s) | Mr Lloyd England |
This Unit provides an overview of fundamental legal concepts, principles and institutions which affect professionals across disciplines. Working individually and in groups, students will research and communicate information about current legal issues as applied to their selected profession or discipline.
On completion of this unit, a student should be able to:
Research essay (3000 words): 60%
Group work product (1500 words each) and presentation: 30%
Class participation and attendance: 10%
Students will be required to attend 36 hours of seminars and undertake approximately an additional 108 hours of private study, including reading, class preparation, and research assignment preparation over the duration of the course.
48 credit points completed in a bachelor degree course. This unit has a quota and selection process. Please note that there is an application form for this unit, available at: http://www.law.monash.edu.au/current-students/resources/forms/index.html