units

faculty-ug-law

Faculty of Law

Monash University

Monash University Handbook 2014 Undergraduate - Units

This unit entry is for students who completed this unit in 2014 only. For students planning to study the unit, please refer to the unit indexes in the the current edition of the Handbook. If you have any queries contact the managing faculty for your course or area of study.

print version


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton First semester 2014 (Day)
Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

The unit begins by examining the foundation and structure of the institutions and processes of the Australian legal system. This introduces the sources of authoritative law - statutes, delegated legislation and judicial precedents. A substantial portion of the study of the Australian legal system will examine how judges use precedents and interpret legislation. We will use a series of cases from a selected area of law to study how the content of common law changes within the constraints of the doctrine and practice of precedent. Students will assess the influence of social change in the development of the common law.

Outcomes

At the conclusion of the course, students should be able to:

  1. explain how the institutions of the Australian legal system shape the content and administration of the law
  2. extract and formulate legal propositions from judicial decisions, and assess their scope, legal validity and weight
  3. identify and articulate the legal issues raised by a given fact situation
  4. locate efficiently the current law on a legal issue using library resources
  5. interpret, analyse, synthesise and apply the law when located, to solve a legal problem
  6. make a legal argument, or provide an opinion, and to do so clearly, accurately and concisely.

Assessment

Multiple choice/matching Research Skills for Law quiz (1hour); 5%; Legal reasoning skills task (equivalent to 1000 words, 1 hour): 20%; Engaging with the Legal System Report and Reflection (1500 words) 30%; and examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 45%

Chief examiner(s)

Mr Ross Hyams (First Semester)
Dr Simon Smith (Second Semester)

Workload requirements

Four hours of lectures per week

Prohibitions

LAW7212, LAW1100


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton Second semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

There are two components taught concurrently. The Writing component will teach basic skills in legal writing, with an emphasis on the types of writing required for assessment in other law units, including research essays and answers to legal problems. The Research component will provide students with the essential skills to undertake research tasks required for their law studies. Students will learn to analyse a research problem into searchable components; locate and update Australian and foreign primary and secondary materials by using online and hard copy library research tools; use and cite references correctly, and evaluate the relevance and authoritative status of legal materials.

Outcomes

Upon completion of this unit, students will be able to:

  • design and implement an efficient research strategy to answer a legal research question, using the most appropriate online and paper-based research tools;
  • critically evaluate the relevance, quality, authority and currency of the materials that they find;
  • correctly use, attribute and cite the work of others and avoid plagiarism
  • identify the hallmarks of good legal writing, and use them to edit and improve their own writing; and
  • apply and develop their higher order thinking skills of evaluation, problem-solving, synthesis, and analysis in writing on legal topics.

Assessment

There will be no final examination.

Assessment Task 1:
Legal Writing Assignment: 20% (1000 words)
Opinion writing piece on a current issue, based on provided resources.

Assessment Task 2:
Statutory Interpretation: 30% (1500 words)
Students will be required to critically evaluate a piece of legislation in accordance with the basic principles of statutory interpretation. In order to complete this task, students will need to undertake research on extrinsic materials.

Assessment Task 3:
Research Assignment: 40% (2000 words)
A research memorandum of advice or legal opinion based on a scenario, leading on from assessments 1 and 2. Feedback from instructors will be provided on the feedback sheet via Student Services after the final mark is released.

Research Exercise: 10%
A series of short answer exercises testing the student's research skills learned in class. Delivery and submission will be via Moodle.

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Students will have three hours of small group seminar classes each week. Preparation for class will typically require about 3 hours a week. Private study, group work, further reading, written exercises and assessments will account for the balance of 12 hours of study time per week throughout the semester.

Prerequisites

Co-requisites


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton First semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

Contract law addresses the broad concepts, principles and rules used to determine the content binding promises and as appropriate, their defeasibility or enforcement in a market economy. It is taught in two units - Contract A and B.
Contract A covers formation, including capacity, formalities, privacy and consideration and the content and construction of contract.
The unit is taught paying due attention to critiques of contract law as well as the policy factors influencing various forms of contracting.

Outcomes

At the conclusion of the unit, students should have achieved the following learning outcomes:

  1. a coherent, critical and policy-aware understanding of the principles and rules of the law of contract
  2. a well developed ability to extract and evaluate principles and rules from primary and secondary law sources (cases, statutes, textbooks, articles and other writings about contract law)
  3. a well developed ability to use these principles and rules to solve selected problems in examinations and other settings
  4. a well developed understanding of the dynamic nature of the law of contract
  5. a reasonable level of understanding of trajectories for further evolution of contract law's principles and rules.

Assessment

Optional written assignment (1000 words) (20%); examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 80% for those who undertake optional written assignment or 100% for those who do not undertake optional written assignment.

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week and six tutorials of one hour each throughout the semester.

Co-requisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104

Prohibitions

LAW2100


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton Second semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

Contract law addresses the broad concepts, principles and rules used to determine the content of binding promises and as appropriate, their defeasibility or enforcement in a market economy. Contract B builds on Contract A (which mainly covers formation, terms and construction of terms of contract). Contract B focuses on three main areas, namely:

  1. Ending of Contracts (by discharge, termination & frustration)
  2. Remedies at common law, in equity and under statutes (including damages, specific performance, injunction, and rescission)
  3. Vitiating Factors (such as misrepresentation, misleading and deceptive conduct, mistake, duress, undue influence unconscionability under the general law and under statutes, and unfair terms.

Outcomes

At the conclusion of the unit, students should have achieved the following learning outcomes:

  1. a coherent, critical and policy-aware understanding of the principles and rules of the law of contract regarding termination and frustration of contracts, remedies and vitiating factors
  2. a well developed ability to extract and evaluate the relevant principles and rules from primary and secondary law sources (cases, statutes, textbooks, articles and other writings about contract law)
  3. a well developed ability to use these principles and rules to solve selected problems in examinations and other settings
  4. a well developed understanding of the dynamic nature of the law of contract
  5. a reasonable level of understanding of trajectories for further evolution of contract law's principles and rules.

Assessment

Optional legal problem solving assignment (2000 words) (40%);

Examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60% (for those who undertake the optional assignment) or 100% for all other students.

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week and one hour tutorial per week from weeks 6-12.

Prerequisites

LAW1100 OR LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW2101

Co-requisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104

Prohibitions

LAW2100


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton First semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

This unit is concerned with the main torts other than the tort of negligence. It commences with an introductory study of the role and objectives of tort law and how the law of torts is being supplemented by various alternate statutory compensation schemes. Thereafter, the study examines the basic protection offered to persons by the tort of trespass; torts pertaining to goods, detinue action on the case and conversion; torts pertaining to land, and concludes with a study of vicarious liability and the related area of non-delegable duties. The availability and nature of remedies is examined throughout, together with applicable legislation and alternative statutory compensation schemes.

Outcomes

Students successfully completing this unit should have:

  1. an understanding of the main principles of the law of torts, with the exception of the tort of negligence which is studied in Torts B
  2. upon analysing factual situations involving loss or damage to persons or property, the ability to provide well structured advice regarding torts and tortious remedies arising from those facts
  3. familiarity with the theories and critical debate about the role and nature of the law of torts
  4. enhanced legal skills of critical analysis and thinking, oral communication and legal research.

Assessment

Optional class test (50 minutes) 20% plus final examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 80% for students who sat optional class test OR 100% for students who did not sit optional class test

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week and one hour tutorial per week from weeks 6-12

Co-requisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104

Prohibitions

LAW2200


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton Second semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

This unit will be primarily concerned with the tort of negligence. Students will be introduced to the basic elements of the tort of negligence - namely, duty of care, breach of duty, causation, remoteness, defences and remedies. Students will then examine "particular duty situations". Among the particular duty situations considered will be: pure economic loss caused by negligent statements, pure economic loss caused by negligent acts, psychological damage, rescuers, omissions and defective products and structures. Students will also consider statutory compensation schemes that have been introduced to supplement the tort of negligence.

Outcomes

Students who successfully complete this unit should:

  1. be in a position to examine a factual situation which has caused a person loss or damage and to determine whether that person has a cause of action under the tort of negligence
  2. be in a position, having determined that a cause of action exists, to advise on the remedies (damages, injunctions, etc) which should be pursued by the person who has suffered the loss or damage
  3. be able to analyse and examine critically the current state of tort of negligence from different perspectives and to discuss how that tort can more securely protect the personal, proprietary and economic interests of persons in Australia
  4. be aware of alternative statutory compensation schemes which replace or supplement the tort of negligence
  5. find that, in addition to their powers of critical analysis and thinking, their oral communication and research skills are also enhanced by participation in this course.

Assessment

Optional class test (50 minutes): 20% plus final examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time):80% for students who sat optional class test OR 100% for students who did not sit optional class test.

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week and one hour tutorial per week from weeks 6-12.

Prerequisites

LAW1100 OR LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW2201

Co-requisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104

Prohibitions

LAW2200


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton Second semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

Topics include: the basic concepts and principles underpinning Administrative law; the structure of government administration; the obtaining of reasons for governmental decisions, and freedom of information; the privatisation of administrative services; sources of administrative discretions; the systems which have developed for the review of the actions of administrative agencies; and the scope of administrative law remedies. Students will examine the grounds of judicial review at common law and under statute. That examination will provide the basis for an analysis that will be conducted of the distinctions between the legality of decisions and their merits, and between errors of law and errors of fact. Consideration will also be given to concepts of statutory and administrative discretion, and justiciability. Students will be helped to develop the skills necessary to solve problems arising in administrative law.

Outcomes

  1. Know and understand the core values in administrative law and be able to evaluate the principles and processes that have developed in terms of those values
  2. Have acquired knowledge and understanding of the various avenues of challenging administrative decisions, and be able to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the alternative avenues of review
  3. Have developed knowledge and understanding of the basic grounds of judicial review and be able to assess the lawfulness of administrative action
  4. Have developed practical skills in recognising, researching and solving administrative law problems and issues
  5. Have acquired knowledge and practical skills in purposive statutory interpretation to define the scope of statutory powers
  6. Have further developed legal research, writing and legal argument skills by undertaking systematic research, including empirical research and the application of theory, into current issues relating to administrative law.

Assessment

Examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100% or examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60% and research assignment (2,000 words): 40%

Chief examiner(s)

Dr Matthew Groves (First Semester)
Professor Jeffrey Goldsworthy (Second Semester)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week and one hour tutorial per fortnight.

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104

Co-requisites

Prohibitions

LAW3100


12 points, SCA Band 3, 0.250 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton Full year 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

Topics include: basic constitutional principles including representative and responsible government, parliamentary sovereignty and separation of powers; the constitutions of the Australian States (emphasising Victoria), the Federal Constitution, Statute of Westminster and Australia Acts; Australian federalism including distribution of legislative and fiscal powers between Commonwealth and States, inconsistency of laws and intergovernmental immunities; techniques and principles of constitutional interpretation; principal Commonwealth legislative powers; limitations on governmental power; express and implied rights.

Outcomes

Students who successfully complete this unit should:

  1. be able to present arguments for or against, and make an objective assessment of, the constitutionality of Commonwealth and Victorian legislation and Commonwealth executive government action by reference to the doctrines of constitutional law and the provisions of the Commonwealth and Victorian Constitutions studied in this course
  2. be able to advise the Victorian and Commonwealth governments on ways and means of achieving governmental objectives consistently with constitutional requirements and prohibitions
  3. be able to analyse and critically comment upon the current state of federal and Victorian constitutional law and practice and to discuss how current law and practice could be changed to better accommodate the national and regional interests of the Australian people
  4. be able to carefully analyse and critically evaluate judgments of the High Court of Australia on constitutional law from the perspectives of:
    1. the interpretive techniques used
    2. the underlying policy goals of the relevant constitutional doctrines or provisions and other relevant policy perspectives
  5. experience an enhancement of their abilities for critical analysis, research skills and skills of written argument.

Assessment

Mid-year examination (3 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 50%
Research paper (5000 words): 50%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week and one hour tutorial per fortnight in 1st semester. Individual research in 2nd semester.

Prerequisites

LAW1100 OR LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104

Prohibitions


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton First semester 2014 (Day)
Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

Topics include: the Constitutions of Victoria and the Commonwealth of Australia, the Statute of Westminster and the Australia Acts; basic constitutional principles such as representative and responsible government, parliamentary sovereignty, and separation of powers; techniques and principles of constitutional interpretation; Australian federalism and inter-governmental relations, including the distribution of legislative and fiscal powers between the Commonwealth and the States, inconsistency of laws, and intergovernmental immunities; principal Commonwealth legislative powers; limitations on governmental power including selected express and limited constitutional rights and freedoms.
Students wishing to practise law in Malaysia must undertake LAW3200, a full-year offering of Constitutional law.

Outcomes

Students who successfully complete this unit will be able to:

  1. present arguments for or against, and objectively assess, the constitutional validity of Commonwealth and Victorian legislation and executive government action
  2. analyse and critically evaluate the current state of federal and Victorian constitutional law and practice, and discuss the desirability of reform and
  3. analyse and critically evaluate judgments of the High Court and other Australian courts in constitutional cases, from the perspectives of:
    1. the interpretive techniques used
    2. the principles or policies underlying the relevant constitutional doctrines or provisions.

Assessment

Tutorial Participation: 10%

AND

Research Assignment (1,500 words): 30% plus
Final Examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60%

OR

Final Examination (3 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 90%

Chief examiner(s)

Professor Jeffrey Goldsworthy (First Semester)
Professor Sarah Joseph (Second Semester)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week and one hour tutorial per fortnight.

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104

Prohibitions


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton First semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

This unit provides an introduction to the general doctrines and purposes of the criminal law, to the law relating to certain crimes and to the workings of the system of criminal justice in the courts. Certain aspects of criminal procedure will be examined to enable an understanding of the legal and administrative framework within which prosecutions are conducted. Some of the doctrines applicable to all crimes and the requisite mental elements of a crime are examined. Students will be encouraged to consider how the criminal law and its procedures for determining guilt have evolved historically and may be viewed from the vantage point of different perspectives.

Outcomes

  1. In relation to the substantive law, by the end of semester students should be equipped with an understanding of the elements of the major substantive offence categories of homicide and non-fatal non-sexual offences against the person
  2. In relation to criminal procedure, by the end of semester students should be equipped with a basic understanding of the structure of the criminal justice system in Victoria and the role and discretion of the police, prosecutors, defence counsel, magistrates, judges and juries in relation to the processes of the criminal law
  3. In relation to theories of criminal law, by the end of semester should be equipped with:
    1. an appreciation of the historical, political and social context of the criminal law
    2. an ability to critically examine both the general principles of criminal liability and the use of the criminal law as a method of social control
    3. an informed perspective about the many legal, social, political and moral issues raised in the criminal law area
  4. in relation to the acquisition of skills by the end of semester students should be equipped with analytical and interpretative skills necessary for giving advice in relation to criminal law problems.

Assessment

Class test:30%
Tutorial participation 10%
Examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time) 60%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week and six one-hour tutorials per semester.

Co-requisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104

Prohibitions

LAW3300


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton Second semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

This unit builds upon Criminal law and procedure A and comprises study of the general doctrines of the criminal law, the law relating to certain crimes, and the workings of the system of criminal justice in the courts. The following crimes are studied in depth: sexual offences, drug offences, offences of strict liability, attempts to commit crimes, liability of accessories and offences against property. Doctrines applicable to all crimes and the requisite mental elements of a crime are examined. Students will be encouraged to consider how the criminal law and its procedure for determining guilt have evolved historically and may be viewed from the vantage point of different perspectives.

Outcomes

  1. In relation to substantive law, by the end of the semester students should be equipped with an understanding of the elements of the major substantive offence categories of sexual offences, drug offences, attempts, accessorial liability, strict liability and offences against property
  2. In relation to theories of criminal law, by the end of semester students should be able to write an essay informed by
    1. an appreciation of the historical, political and social context of the criminal law
    2. an understanding of both the general principles of criminal liability and the use of criminal law as a method of social control
    3. an appreciation of some of the many legal, social, political and moral issues raised in the criminal law area
  3. In relation to the acquisition of skills, by the end of semester students should be equipped with enhanced analytical and interpretative skills necessary for giving advice in relation to criminal law problems.

Assessment

Tutorial participation (10%) AND either examination (3 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 90% OR examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60% and research assignment (1,500 words): 30%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three lectures per week and one tutorial per week from weeks 6-12.

Prerequisites

LAW1100 OR LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW3301

Co-requisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104

Prohibitions

LAW3300


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton First semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

Private property is a central institution in most Western political, social and legal systems. The Property A unit aims to introduce students to this area of legal knowledge and to the historical, social, economic and political factors which have influenced its development. In addition, the Property A unit enables students to gain an understanding of the relationship between the rules of property law and other rules used to resolve conflicts between legal persons.

Outcomes

Students who successfully complete the unit should have:

  1. acquired an understanding of what is meant by the notion of property, and how the relationship between a legal person and a 'thing' which is the object of a proprietary interest differs from other legal relationships
  2. analysed the incidents of the major categories of proprietary interests that exist in real and personal property
  3. examined and applied some of the rules governing the creation of proprietary interests at law and in equity
  4. reflected on the role and continuing relevance of historical, social and political factors in shaping modern property law
  5. refined their analytical and problem-solving skills by applying property law principles to resolve factual problems
  6. strengthened their skills of case analysis, statutory interpretation, oral communication, teamwork, legal research and legal writing and self-directed learning.

Assessment

Research assignment (2000 words) 40% and examination (120 minutes and reading and noting time of 30 minutes) 60% OR examination (150 minutes and reading and noting time of 30 minutes) 100%.

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week plus one hour tutorial per week starting in week 5 or 6

Prerequisites

LAW1100 OR LAW1101and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW2100 or LAW2101 and LAW2102

Prohibitions

LAW3400


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton Second semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

Private property is a central institution in most Western political, social and legal systems. Property B aims to introduce students to this area of legal knowledge and to the historical, social, economic and political factors which have influenced its development. Property B aims to discuss the legal principles and policies relevant to the determination of disputes between persons claiming competing interests in property. In particular the unit aims to familiarize students with broad concepts and specific rules relating to statutory schemes of registration; concurrent ownership, security interests and competing interests in property.

Outcomes

On completion of the unit, students should have:

  1. extended their understanding of the different ways that the principal categories of property interests can be created at law and in equity, and the scope of their enforceability
  2. examined and applied the rules governing the resolution of conflicting claims between holders of competing proprietary interests
  3. considered the ways in which the Torrens system of title registration affects the creation and enforcement of interests in registered land
  4. reflected on the role of historical, social and political factors in shaping modern property law
  5. refined and tested analytical and conceptual skills required of lawyers by resolving factual problems in the area of property law
  6. strengthened their skills of case analysis, statutory interpretation, oral communication, teamwork, legal research, legal writing and self-directed learning.

Assessment

Research Assignment (2000 words) 40% and examination (150 minutes plus reading and noting time of 30 minutes) 60% OR examination (150 minutes plus reading and noting time of 30 minutes) 100%.

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week plus weekly tutorials from weeks 5-12

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or Law1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW2100 or LAW2101 and LAW2102 ; LAW3401

Prohibitions

LAW3400


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

The unit focuses on the institutions and processes that surround the implementation and enforcement of criminal law. Students will examine the idea of a criminal justice 'system'; objectives and models of criminal justice; and crime statistics and public perceptions of crime. Other topics will be drawn from the following areas: police powers and exercise of discretion; the exercise of prosecutorial discretion; theories of punishment; juvenile justice; imprisonment and prisoners rights; sentencing; and the role of victims in the criminal justice system.

Outcomes

On completion of this unit students will have acquired or developed:

  1. an understanding of the objectives and theories of criminal justice
  2. a knowledge of current legal, political and social perspectives on criminal justice issues
  3. the ability to independently research and critically analyse problems in the enforcement of the criminal law
  4. the ability to think critically about the principles and institutions which relate to punishment
  5. the capacity to empathise with those practitioners and parties involved in law enforcement and criminal justice processes.

Assessment

Research essay (2000 words): 40%
Examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60%.

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104

Co-requisites

LAW3300 or LAW3301 and LAW3302


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton Second semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

Banking law and regulation around the globe have gone through tremendous changes over the last decade. The technological and multimedia developments, recent financial crises, changes to the commercial environment and financial markets globalization have all brought to the emergence of new banking policies coupled with innovative and advanced banking services. As banks and the services they supply are a key component in any modern financial system, policy makers, courts and legal practitioners are now facing more challenges than ever before.

The course deals with the law and practice of banks and their relationship with their customers, while focusing on the most recent changes and advanced innovations in the banking industry. It is designed to impart the students with unique knowledge on one of the building blocks of the commercial and financial market from a comparative and global perspective.

Principle topics will include

  1. Legal definitions of 'banker' and 'customer'
  2. The juridical nature of the relationship between the parties and their special obligations (including banks fiduciary duty and bank's secrecy
  3. The payments system:
    1. Law governing negotiable instruments and cheques
    2. Payment cards
    3. Electronic banking
  4. The banks right to combine accounts
  5. The lien and bank opinions
  6. The termination of the banker-customer relationship
  7. Deregulation of the financial system and statute law relating to banks and other financial institutions.

Outcomes

Students completing this subject will:

  1. acquire an understanding of the Australian financial and banking system
  2. be familiar with the general principles of law governing the Australian payments system and negotiable instruments with particular emphasis on cheques
  3. appreciate the legal relationship that exists between customers and their banks and the duties owed to each other
  4. attain a sound grasp of the day to day issues that can arise between banks and customers such as wrongful conversion of cheques, confidentiality, combinations of accounts and appropriation of payments and recovery of money paid mistakenly
  5. be familiar with the banking ombudsman system and mediation of banker-customer disputes
  6. learn to solve problems arising out of the application of statute and case-law to specific banker-customer transactions
  7. identify emerging trends of bankers' liability especially the impact of consumer protection legislation to banking business.

Assessment

Research assignment (2000 words): 40% and examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

An intensive unit of 4 hours of lectures per week in weeks 5-11 of the semester comprising of 2 additional hours of lectures per week in weeks 7-10.

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW2100 or LAW2101 and LAW2102


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

Topics covered include: the guarantees of fundamental liberties; the role of the Conference of Rulers; relations between the federation and the states; the judiciary; special and emergency powers; processes of constitutional amendments; the separation of powers doctrine; the methods, techniques and attitudes of the Malaysian judiciary in constitutional interpretation.

Outcomes

On completion of this unit students should:

  1. have acquired an understanding of the functioning of the Malaysian constitutional system
  2. have acquired an appreciation of contemporary issues relating to the constitutional and political systems of Malaysia
  3. be able to see the dynamics of constitutional change in the context of a developing society, with a diversity of races, religions and cultures.

Assessment

Research assignment (5000 words): 50%
Examination (2 hours): 50%

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

This unit provides an examination of areas of criminal law and procedure in which gender is particularly significant, and introduces students to feminist theories of law and criminality, and relevant rights analyses. Students will be encouraged to think critically about how the criminal law and its practice have evolved historically. Violence and gender will be a focus, including an examination of violent behaviours, the censures of violent behaviours, the operation of criminal defences, and developments in the laws dealing with sexual assault. A range of current issues will be discussed, including issues raised by sentencing and imprisonment.

Outcomes

On completing this unit students will have acquired or developed:

  1. a critical understanding of criminal law and procedure and the operation of the criminal justice system, including an understanding of feminist legal theory and criminology relevant to the study of gender, crime and criminality;
  2. an awareness of the role of gender in the formulation and operation of criminal laws and the criminal justice system; and
  3. skills in research and writing and in the oral presentation of ideas. On completion of this subject students should be able to critically analyse developments in criminal law and the criminal justice system in the light of the theoretical perspectives gained in the course and conduct and write about an independent research project.

Assessment

Research assignment (2500 words): 50% and class presentation: 20% and examination: 30% (one hour in-semester)

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW3300 or LAW3301 and LAW3302


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

The course focuses on contemporary problems in Australian constitutional law that are not covered in depth in Constitutional Law, LAW3201, with a comparative dimension where appropriate. Topics will include methods of constitutional interpretation (including the tension between the framers' original intentions and contemporary values); express constitutional rights (trial by jury and freedom of religion); implications drawn from the Constitution, including the separation of powers as a new springboard for implied rights and the demise of the cross-vesting scheme; the "races power"; the defence power both in war and peace; military discipline tribunals; and parliamentary privilege.

Outcomes

On completion of this unit students should:

  1. have extended their basic understanding of Australian constitutional principles
  2. have acquired an appreciation of contemporary issues relating to the constitutional system
  3. be able to evaluate critically the role and functioning of the High Court in contemporary Australian society
  4. have developed a greater appreciation of the complex task of constitutional interpretation, with particular emphasis on fundamental doctrines.

Assessment

Class participation 10%; research assignment (2000 words) 40%; final examination (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time) 50%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW3200/LAW3201


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

Topics will be drawn from both the general part of the criminal law, for example: automatism, insanity, intoxication, duress and entrapment; specific offences, for example, obscenity, contempt, homicide and sexual offences, and issues such as the role of the jury, sentencing and the function of the psychiatrist in the criminal process. Students will be called upon to undertake independent research.

Outcomes

  1. To provide advanced study in criminal law and procedure by reference to contemporary issues and problems not dealt with or insufficiently covered in LAW3300
  2. to develop skills in legal research and the presentation of legal material.

Assessment

Compulsory research assignment (2500 words): 50% and examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 50%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week.

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW3300 or LAW3301 and LAW3302


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

Controls designed to control pollution of air, water, and land, noise pollution, and conservation of the national estate. Enforcement of such controls. Relevance of environmental considerations over a wide range of decision making processes. Environmental impact assessment. An introduction to planning law. Coordination of environmental controls between Commonwealth and States including relevant provisions of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth). Environmental litigation, including issues of justiciability, and the standing of private citizens and environmental groups.

Outcomes

On conclusion of this subject students should:

  1. have been exposed to the principal common law and legislative control mechanisms designed to protect and conserve the environment
  2. have a comprehensive knowledge of the sanctions and enforcement methods available
  3. be equipped to advise individuals, corporations, and community groups as to their rights and obligations under environmental legislation
  4. have an understanding of the relevance of environmental concerns over a wide range of 'governmental' decision-making processes
  5. have an appreciation of the new national approaches to the coordination and harmonisation of Federal-State functions in relation to the environment.

Assessment

Research paper (2000 words): 40%
Take-home examination (3000 words): 60%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

This unit will examine the following major areas:

  1. the development of the Australian federal system for regulating workplace relations, industrial disputes and minimum conditions of employment, including the federal agencies Fair Work Australia and the Fair Work Ombudsman; the impact of globalization and international labour standards on the Australian labour market and its regulation
  2. the scope and coverage of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), its constitutional basis and attempts to establish a national system
  3. statutory minimum conditions for Australian workers, minimum wages and the safety net provided by the Modern Award system
  4. the purpose, scope and content of enterprise agreements; good faith bargaining and the use of industrial action as a bargaining tool
  5. the protection of workplace rights, such as the right to join a union
  6. the enforcement of minimum conditions, modern awards and enterprise agreements through the Fair Work Ombudsman and the court system.

Outcomes

On completion of the subject students should understand:

  1. the importance of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) and the institutions it establishes in regulating all significant aspects of the Australian workplace relations system;
  2. the centrality of constitutional power in determining the federal government's capacity to establish a uniform national workplace relations system;
  3. how minimum standards for workers are set and enforced;
  4. the legal nature of enterprise bargaining and the role of protected industrial action in bargaining for terms and conditions of work; and
  5. how the Fair Work Act protects legislatively-defined workplace rights, including the freedom to choose whether or not to join a union.

Assessment

Class test (1hour plus 10 minutes reading time) or written research assignment subject to lecturer approval 1250 words: 25%
Examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading time): 75%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104

Co-requisites


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton Second semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

The unit focuses on the rights and liabilities of parties to an insurance contract as governed by the common law and statute, with particular reference to the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth). Topics covered include risk, insurable interest, the duty of utmost good faith, non-disclosure and misrepresentation, conditions, warranties and premium, the role of agents and brokers in the formation of contracts of insurance, construction of policies and standard cover, adjustment of rights including claims, causation, proof and fraud, the indemnity principle and measure of loss, remedies and dispute resolution, subrogation, double insurance and contribution, cancellation of cover. While reference is made to different types of insurance (eg. Life, marine, liability, fire etc) the special rules applying to each type are not covered in detail.

Outcomes

Students completing the unit should be able to:

  1. appreciate the role of insurance in managing the risks of business activity
  2. determine the legal rights and liabilities of the parties to a contract of insurance and advise on issues such as whether a policy covers the event which has occurred and whether the insurer has grounds for refusing the claim in whole or in part
  3. evaluate the need for further reform of the legal rules governing insurance contracts.

Assessment

Assignment (2500 words): 50% AND Examination (2.5 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 50%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW2100 or LAW2101 and LAW2102

Co-requisites

LAW2200 or LAW2201 and LAW2202

Prohibitions

This unit may not be taken by a student who has completed or enrolled in Insurance Law BTX5031 OR Insurance Law BTX4031


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton First semester 2014 (Day)
Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

Topics include: theory of international law; the place of States in international law, including their rights, obligations, status and jurisdiction; the sources of international law and how they are interpreted and applied; the implementation of international law by states, in particular Australia's approach; the nature of international disputes and their resolution; the law related to the use of force by States and self-defence; the role of international institutions; the role of individuals in international law; and specific areas of public international law, including the law of the sea and environmental law.

Outcomes

On completion of this subject students should understand and be able to critically examine:

  • the fundamental principles of international law;
  • the theoretical framework of international law and its relationship with domestic law;
  • the crucial role of States, international institutions and individuals in the international legal system;
  • how international law is made and the complexity involved in interpreting and applying its sources;
  • how Australia interprets and applies international law in relation to its own legal framework;
  • the use of force and self-defence in international law;
  • international dispute resolution;
  • some of the different areas of international law;
  • the political context and nature of international law.

Assessment

Semester 1: Optional assignment (2000 words): 40% and examination (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60% OR examination (3 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100%
Semester 2: Two mandatory assignments: (i) an in-class test in week four of the semester (50 minutes plus reading and noting time): 20% AND a take-home examination (to be handed in during the examination period): 4000 words, 80%

Chief examiner(s)

Dr Alison Kesby (Semester 1)
Dr Eric Wilson (Semester 2)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

Topics include: an overview of international organisations and the role they play in the development of international law; the sources of international institutional law; the United Nations, including the General Assembly; the Security Council, peacekeeping operations and human rights; global judicial bodies including the International Court of Justice and War Crimes Tribunals; international economic organisations including the IMF and the World (IBRD); regional organisations particularly APEC; the effectiveness of international organisations including enforcement issues and prospects for reform.

Outcomes

Students who successfully complete the course should have:

  1. acquired an understanding of the development and practice of international organisations and their role in developing international law
  2. an understanding of the roles, structure, functions and practice of international organisations
  3. a general knowledge of regional organisations particularly in the Asia Pacific region and the unexplored links between regional organisations and global governance
  4. examined some particular case studies which evaluate the effectiveness of international organisations and the current issues they face
  5. enhanced their presentational, legal research and legal writing skills.

Assessment

Individual research assignment (4000 words): 50%
Take-home examination (two weeks - 4000 words): 50%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Taught intensively over 2.5 weeks of lectures for 3 hours a day.

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

This unit will examine competition law polices and their operation. The principles relevant to the background and development of contemporary competition law and the role of competition authorities will be explored. The law in practice will be studied through specific globally-relevant examples. The law in practice will be studied through specific examples from Italy and the EU, with emphasis on differences. Students will be offered a site visit to a specialist law firm in Italy. Part 2 will focus on Australian competition law.

Assessment

Seminar participation 25% and either two-hour examination 75% OR research paper, 3,500 words 75%.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

This unit examines the origin, nature and operation of Asian legal systems. A general overview of these systems, including sources of law and legal institutions, is followed by a closer examination of the legal system of at least one Asian country.
Legal pluralism will provide the conceptual framework for the course. In depth coverage of one Asian country will concentrate on significant legal topics, such as constitutional and administrative law, criminal law, commercial law, trade and investment law, legal institutions and the local legal profession.

Outcomes

On completion of this unit, students should have:

  1. extended their general understanding of the main Asian legal systems;
  2. acquired an appreciation of the historical and cultural contexts that have shaped such systems;
  3. an ability to compare aspects of Asian law and legal institutions with Australian counterparts;
  4. gained a greater understanding of how Australian lawyers might adapt when dealing with Asian legal institutions and legal professionals; and
  5. improved legal research and writing skills.

Assessment

Examination 1.5 hours 50%; research paper (3200 words) 40%; class participation 10% OR examination 3 hours 90% and class participation 10%

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 OR LAW1104; LAW2100 or LAW2101 and LAW2102; LAW3300 or LAW3301 and LAW3302


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton Summer semester B 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

This Unit examines the right of employees to bargain collectively and the right of freedom of association in international law, and how those rights are reflected in the Fair Work Act 2009. This examination includes the regulation of enterprise bargaining, secret strike ballots and the right to strike in the context of bargaining for an enterprise agreement; the right to belong (or not to belong) to a trade union and the right to engage in lawful industrial activities.

The Unit also examines the role and functions of trade unions, the legal status of trade unions and their obligations. The role of the common law and the secondary boycott provisions in the control of unlawful industrial action are also considered.

Outcomes

On completion of the subject students should understand:

  1. the impact of laws (either through enhancement or restriction) which affect the right of workers to join together in trade unions and the legal status of unions
  2. the concept of freedom of association and the role played by the legislature and the courts in developing this concept
  3. the concept of the right to strike and
  4. collective labour rights.

Assessment

Internal assessment 40% comprising EITHER research assignment 2000 words OR case note 1500 words (30%) and class presentation on case (10%); AND
Examination (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time)

Chief examiner(s)

Prerequisites

LAW1101 Introduction to Legal Reasoning, LAW1104 Research and Writing or an equivalent introductory course at another university.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

Topics include: concepts of equality and discrimination; the Australian social context; the law developed around State and Federal anti-discrimination legislation primarily in sex discrimination; grounds of discrimination including sex, race, disability and sexuality discrimination, and (if time) discrimination based on political or religious belief or activity; areas of activity covered or exempted from the legislation; constitutional complications of the legislation; problems of proof; procedural issues and the remedies available to victims of discrimination; concludes by evaluating effectiveness of the legislation and alternative measures like affirmative action.

Outcomes

On completion of the subject a student should have:

  1. acquired knowledge of the problem of unjustifiable discrimination and its Australian social context, and of anti-discrimination laws and their application and interpretation
  2. developed their research and writing skills through preparing a research paper
  3. developed an understanding of the philosophical and legal concepts of equality and discrimination and the problems of the development of this area in the common law context
  4. developed the ability to think critically about concepts of equality, discrimination, special treatment, and the capacity and limits of law as a mechanism of social change.

Assessment

Examination (2.5 hours writing time and 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100% or research paper (2,500 words): 50% and examination (2.5 hours writing time and 30 minutes reading and noting time): 50%.

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

The unit examines: the notion of 'social theory' and its relevance to an understanding of the law; history, industrial society and 'modernity'; law, and the rule of law, as a social phenomenon; law and social solidarity (Durkheim); law as a system of social rules (Hart, Dworkin, Critical Legal Studies); Marxist analysis of law; criticisms of the Marxist analysis (Thompson, Williams, Krygier, Cohen, Rawls); post-Marxist critical approaches to law (Habermas, Foucault); law and modernity (Weber).

Outcomes

Students will acquire or develop:

  1. an awareness of the significance of social theory to the understanding of law as a social phenomenon
  2. a familiarity with a number of classical and contemporary social theoretical approaches with implications for the study of legal topics
  3. an awareness of the nature of social theoretic scholarship, and of the theoretical and methodological underpinnings that distinguish research and scholarship in the social sciences and humanities from research in law
  4. the ability to read and to critically engage with primary texts in the social theoretic tradition
  5. the capacity to engage in sustained critical analysis in written assessment work.

Assessment

Research essay (3000 words): 60%
Examination (2 hours writing time plus 10 minutes reading/ settling time): 40%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week.

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104 OR ATS2868/3868, ATS2869/3869 OR ATS2905/3905


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton Second semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

Topics include: the legal nature of the employment relationship between an employer and an employee; the individual nature of that relationship as opposed to the relationship between collective organisations of employers and employees; the formation of that relationship, and the source and content of the legal obligations which flow from it; legal classifications of the work relationship which dictate consequent industrial and taxation obligations; the legal principles relating to termination and breach of the contract and the remedies which flow; the legal rights of an employee who claims that his or her employment has been prejudiced by discriminatory behaviour.

Outcomes

On completion of this unit students should be able to demonstrate an understanding of the individual components of the employment relationship as opposed to the relationship between organised groups of employers and employees. Students will understand the elements of a valid contract of employment and be able to identify and analyse the rights and duties of an employer and an employee under that contract. Students should be able to apply the legal principles to circumstances which give rise to termination and breach of contract and to identify, apply and critically analyse the appropriate remedies. Students should be able to recognise discrimination in employment and to apply the appropriate law.

Assessment

Optional internal assessment 40%, comprising EITHER research assignment 2000 words OR case note 1500 words (30%)
class presentation (10%) PLUS examination (2 hours plus 30 min reading and noting) 60%
OR
Examination (3 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting): 100%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week.

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW2100 or LAW2101 and LAW2102


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

International public order is both the practical and the normative foundation of public international law. International law does not operate within a vacuum, nor does it consist of the pro forma application of abstract principles and universals detached from real world conditions. Rather, international public order is best understood as the practical regulation of a global society of state and sub-state actors, subordinate to the trans-national rule of law. International law, therefore, is inseparable from the wider issues of global governance, the mechanisms, institutions and principles that enable the global society to operate as an integrated political and legal system.
Taking this unit, students will not only acquire a sophisticated understanding of the concepts of international public order and the trans-national rule of law, but also how the integrity of the international system is inseparable from the practical operation of global governance. Understanding will be achieved through the detailed examination of a particular area of concern within international public order and how formal legal resolutions of disputes must necessarily be framed within terms of global governance and the trans-national rule of law.
The topics to be studied include: the international legal process (the concept and sources of international law); international law as the judicial basis of global governance; and practical problems in international law and world order (conflict prevention; socio-political justice; international economic law; and international environmental law).

Outcomes

On completion of this unit students will have acquired or developed:

  1. A deeper understanding of the principles and theories of public international law and international public order.
  2. Experience in the practical application of these principles and theories to problem solving in contemporary issues and disputes within public international law.
  3. Further development of the skills of legal research and writing as well as oral communication.
  4. Greater understanding of the inter-relationship between public international law, global governance, international public order and international dispute resolution.

Assessment

Research paper (4000 words): 50%; seminar presentation (written): 25%; seminar presentation (oral): 10%; and class attendance and participation: 15%.

Workload requirements

Three hours per week of class contact. Students should allocate a total of 12 hours per week of class contact/private study/preparation.

Prerequisites


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton First semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

Students will study the relationship between law and justice; major theories of the foundations and the nature of law (legal positivism, natural law, legal realism); the nature of legal reasoning and the role of value-judgments in judicial decision-making; the meaning of statutes and constitutions; judicial activism and fidelity to law.

Outcomes

Students will acquire a basic understanding of the major contemporary philosophies of law and legal reasoning, and the main lines of debate between them. In particular, students will:

  1. acquire an understanding of how each philosophy regards the relationships between law and justice, and legal and moral reasoning
  2. develop an appreciation of how the debates between these philosophies illuminate actual controversies in the practical administration of legal systems.

Assessment

Class Participation: (10%)
Compulsory research assignment 2,000 words: (40%)
Final examination: (2 hours plus 30 minutes and noting reading time): 50%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW2200 or LAW2201 and LAW2202 OR ATS2868/3868. ATS2869/3869 OR ATS2905/3905


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

This unit considers why freedom of speech is important to the media and how it is protected in Australia. The unit also covers the three major restraints on freedom of speech; the law of defamation, the action for breach of confidence and laws that protect privacy, both incidentally and intentionally. These will be considered from the perspective of how these laws inhibit the media in the collection and dissemination of information. Due consideration will be given to whether an appropriate balance is struck between freedom of speech and other rights, such as the protection of reputation. Reform of the law will also be considered, particularly the need for uniform defamation laws.

Outcomes

By the end of this unit students should be familiar with the concept of freedom of speech and the way in which it is protected in Australia. They should be familiar with how laws pertaining to defamation, breach of confidence and privacy restrict free speech and control how the media collect and disseminate information. They should have developed their own opinions on whether the law has struck an appropriate balance between freedom of speech and other competing rights, such as the protection of reputation and the right to keep certain information confidential.

Assessment

Written assignment (1500 words): 30% and final written examination (3 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 70% OR final written examination (3 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

Introduction to feminist legal theory presents a fundamental challenge to existing knowledge about law by questioning 'taken for granted' assumptions about gender, gender roles and neutrality of legal knowledge and practice. Themes such as public/private distinction, ideas of neutrality or objectivity in law, concepts of equality, difference and discrimination, equal or different treatment of men and women, and differences within these categories provide a framework for analysis. Sex and sexuality, family relationships, women's economic dependence or independence, legal construction of gender and the critique of male-centred concepts of equality and human rights.

Outcomes

On completion of this unit students should have:

  1. acquired an understanding of the basic themes and major issues of feminist legal theory
  2. developed the ability to critically analyse and evaluate the law's treatment of questions of gender and personal identity and the effect of gender on legal knowledge
  3. practised and improved their research and writing skills, and their ability to carry out research in and about law from a feminist perspective, as well as their skills in oral presentation through class/group participation and learning to understand, share and accept differing points of view.

Assessment

Research Paper (2,000 words): 40%
Examination 2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading time): 60%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week.

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedPrato Term 2 2014 (Day)

Quota applies

The number of places available for a unit taught in Prato is strictly limited to 45. This is the maximum room capacity at the Prato Centre.

Synopsis

Topics include: common law - civil law: elementary comparisons; classification of legal systems; historical origins of the civil law; legal education and legal profession; constitutions; judicial organisation; sources of law; judicial methodology; civil procedure.

Outcomes

Students who successfully complete this unit should:

  1. be sensitised to the existence of another major approach to law
  2. be familiar with the major characteristics of the continental European legal system
  3. acquire an understanding of the comparative method
  4. be able to evaluate and analyse their own legal systems from a new perspective.

Assessment

50% research essay 2,500 words
50% take home exam 2,500 words.

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104

Co-requisites

LAW2100 or LAW2101 and LAW2102; LAW2200 or LAW2201 and LAW2202


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton First semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

This unit is a general introduction to international human rights law. It is concerned with human rights standards as they exist in international law and the international mechanisms for enforcing these standards. The unit will consider a selection of specific human rights, limitations to human rights (e.g. derogation in time of emergency) and some major contemporary international human rights issues.

Outcomes

Upon completion of this unit students should be able to

  1. understand and analyse international human rights standards and evaluate mechanisms designed to enforce human rights at the international/regional level;
  2. explain and critically discuss the content of various human rights, such content being identified, inter alia, by reference to the case law of the UN treaty monitoring committees and regional human rights courts;
  3. understand and critically evaluate some of the philosophical bases of and problems with international human rights law in light of contemporary human rights issues

Assessment

Class exercise 20% and
Research paper (2000 words) 40% and
Examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time) 40%
OR
Class exercise 20% and
Examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time) 80%

Contact hours: In 2014, lectures run for 4 hours per week commencing 3 April 2014.

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

4 hours per week over 9 weeks

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton First semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

This unit looks at the principles that the Australian courts apply to civil cases in which not all facts are linked to a single jurisdiction. There may be links to foreign countries or to more than one Australian jurisdiction. The main questions considered in this unit are:

  • when do the Australian courts assume jurisdiction in civil and commercial cases involving a foreign element?
  • when can foreign judgments in civil and commercial matters be enforced in Australia?
  • what are the general principles of choosing the applicable law in cases involving a foreign element?
  • what are the specific rules of choosing the applicable law for contract, tort and marriage?
  • what are the theories underlying the rules on choice of law?

This unit is highly useful for students who plan to go into legal practice.

Outcomes

Students who successfully complete this unit should:

  1. be in a position to identify when a particular fact situation involving a foreign element raises conflictual issues, and what those issues are
  2. be able to advise on how those issues would be approached by an Australian court
  3. have some awareness of the theoretical and policy justifications for the conflictual rules that would be applied in such a situation
  4. have an appreciation of the rules that govern the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in Australia
  5. have an appreciation of the private international law aspects of jurisdictional questions
  6. be able to examine critically the current state of the law relating to conflicts
  7. have some awareness of how conflicts are resolved in other jurisdictions, both under the common law and under civil law.

Assessment

Class Participation: 10%; Research assignment (max. 2000 words): 40%; and examination (2 hours writing and 30 minutes reading and noting): 50%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 OR LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW2100 or LAW2101 and LAW2102; LAW2200 or LAW2201 and LAW2202


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

The legislative control, 'protection' and disempowerment experienced by indigenous Australians and the historical, comparative and contemporary contexts of their experiences in and with the Australian legal system. Laws and policies concerning identity, dispossession, protection and assimilation are examined. Over-representation of indigenous people within the criminal justice system, Deaths in Custody and stolen generations. Land rights, the Mabo and Wik cases, and the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth). Human rights and the role of international law, self determination, reconciliation and law reform.

Outcomes

Upon completion of this unit students should

  1. Define, interpret and reflect upon the common law, constitutional and statutory framework that has applied to indigenous peoples of Australia, and particularly of Victoria;
  2. Identify, analyse and elucidate the relevant principles, laws and precedents and apply them to resolve issues relating to indigenous clients;
  3. Critically assess policies and principles relating to Indigenous people in order to promote a fair justice system recognising past and present injustices
  4. Demonstrate an advanced understanding of the intellectual and practical skills needed to interpret legal conclusions and professional decisions, as well as to identify, research, evaluate and synthesise relevant factual, legal and policy issues
  5. Demonstrate an advanced understanding of the legal research and writing, and legal argument skills by undertaking systematic research into legal policy, rules, procedures and comparative perspectives relating to indigenous peoples and interests; and
  6. Demonstrate developed skills of oral presentation of legal policy, rules and argument in an interactive learning context

Assessment

The methods of assessment in this Unit are
Short reaction piece (response to texts) (1600 words): 20%
Research paper (2000 words): 40%
Examination (2 hours writing and 30 minutes reading and noting time): 40%
OR
Short reaction piece (response to texts) (1600 words): 20%
Examination (3 hours writing and 30 minutes reading and noting time): 80%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

This unit runs semi-intensively.

Prerequisites

For students in the LLB Hons course: Foundations of Law, Criminal Law 1, Public Law & Statutory Interpretation, Torts, Contract A , Contract B, Property A, Constitutional Law;

For students in the LLB course: Pre-requisites: LAW1101 Introduction to Legal Reasoning; LAW 1104 Research and Writing.

Co-requisites

For students in the LLB Hons course: Equity, Corporations Law


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedPrato Term 2 2014 (Day)

Quota applies

The number of places available for a unit taught in Prato is strictly limited to 45. This is the maximum room capacity at the Prato Centre.

Synopsis

The national and international laws applicable to international
commercial transactions including the movement of goods, capital and
services. The sale of goods and services by parties in one nationstate
to parties in another (and the financing of such a contract of
sale). The transfer of technology both from and to a nation-state
through licensing and franchising. The establishment of foreign-owned
means of production abroad through direct foreign investment and
international joint ventures. Legal regimes and international treaties that
regulate and impact upon international business transactions. The
resolution of disputes that may occur in such transactions.

Outcomes

Upon completion of this subject, students should:

  1. have an understanding of the various views, including economic theories, concerning the rationale for and objectives of international commercial law
  2. understand the legal problems that arise from international business transactions
  3. have an understanding of the main issues that should be addressed when negotiating a contract for the international sale of goods and services, the financing of international transactions, and the transport of goods internationally
  4. understand the law dealing with international contracts of sale, including the laws dealing with international payment of goods and the law relating to the contracts of carriage and insurance of goods
  5. be familiar with the international agreements and international regimes that influence and regulate international business transactions
  6. understand the main types of structures commonly used in international business transactions, particularly those involving a transfer of technology
  7. have an understanding of the methods for resolving disputes in this area.

Assessment

Seminar participation: 10%, seminar presentation: 10% and take-home examination of 4,000 words maximum: 80%.

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three 3-hour lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 OR LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW2100 or LAW2101 and LAW2102


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton First semester 2014 (Day)
Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day)
Clayton Summer semester B 2014 (Day)
Clayton Winter semester 2014 (Day)

Quota applies

The number of places available for this unit is strictly limited to 42. In selecting applications, priority is given to those students who areclosest to completion of the LLB or Law component of their degree, and then on the basis of academic merit.

Synopsis

Drawing on ideas first developed at the Harvard Negotiation Project and on work from a variety of research perspectives, this unit examines the theory and practice of negotiation and aims to improve students' effectiveness as negotiators. Adopting an intensive blended learning approach that incorporates lectures, readings, simulations, exercises and discussion, students will: analyse different negotiating styles; practice utilising a principled negotiation framework; learn how to collaborate, create and claim more value; influence and communicate more effectively; better manage emotions; deal with difficult tactics; and reflect on issues of ethics and deception. In addition, students will explore a spectrum of other advocacy and dispute resolution processes (including mediation as a form of facilitated principled negotiation) and consider related issues of suitability, choice and the role of the lawyer.

Outcomes

Upon successful completion of the unit, students will:

  1. have an increased awareness of their own negotiating behaviour in a variety of contexts and be capable of analysing what works, what doesn't work, and why;
  2. possess a thorough and practical understanding of the theory of principled negotiation;
  3. be capable of making negotiation, mediation and conflict resolution decisions based on conscious, rational, informed choice, from a broad array of available tools and methods;
  4. demonstrate improved cognitive and creative skills in generating real-time appropriate responses in a variety of legal and interpersonal contexts;
  5. be able to recognise and reflect upon ethical issues as they arise and be developing an ability to exercise professional judgement;
  6. be able to collaborate and communicate in ways that are efficient, effective, appropriate and persuasive; and
  7. be able to reflect on and assess their own capabilities and performance, with a view to continuing personal and professional development.

Assessment

Participation 10%
In-Class Assessments 30%
Reflective Journal Submission 30%
Negotiation Role Play & Analysis 30%

Chief examiner(s)

Mr Tom Harber (Summer A 2013)
Mr Tom Harber (Summer B 2014)
Dr Sandy Caspi-Sable (Semester 1)
Mr Tom Harber (Winter Semester)
Dr Sandy Caspi-Sable (Semester 2)

Workload requirements

Intensive

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104. Please note that there is an application form for this unit, available at: http://www.law.monash.edu.au/current-students/resources/forms/index.html

Prohibitions


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton Second semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

This unit introduces students to European Union law. After an overview of the historical development of European integretation and the ideological, political and economic factors shaping the Union, the unit focuses on the constitutional and institutional architecture of the European Union as well as selected issues of substantive European law. The unit explores the composition, roles and functions of the EU's main institutions; it analyses the principles and procedures governing law-making in the EU, the enforcement mechanisms of EU law and available judicial remedies; it covers the interactions between the EU and national legal orders. It also analyses the most important areas of substantive European law related to the Internal Market, such as the free movement of goods and workers. It concludes by examining the EU's external relations.

Outcomes

Upon completion of this unit students should be able to:

  1. articulate and apply legal principles of constitutional, institutional and substantive law of the European Union, demonstrating sophisticated awareness of the functioning of European law and ability to solve problems in the area of European Union
  2. critically analyse and reflect upon the institutional structures and substantive policies of the EU, its relationship with its Member States and the wider world
  3. demonstrate appropriate legal research and reasoning skills in relation to European Union law
  4. communicate effectively and persuasively with others
  5. work autonomously, using feedback to improve on performance

Assessment

Class presentation and/or discussion: 10%
Research assignment: 30% (1,500 words)
Take-home examination: 60% (3,000 words)

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104

Co-requisites

LAW3200/LAW 3201


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

This unit examines the constitutional and jurisdictional contexts within which property and spousal maintenance disputes are resolved. The course covers the procedural and substantive provisions of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) relevant to property and maintenance disputes between spouses, and de facto couples, including obtaining orders and injunctions against third parties and the division of superannuation interests. It also examines the non adversarial procedures and processes for resolving disputes. The course examines and critiques the existing law and the differential impact of marriage and cohabitation on men and women.

Outcomes

Students who complete this unit should:

  1. acquire a basic knowledge of the law governing property division and spousal maintenance and develop some understanding of the way in which this law operates in practice
  2. acquire an understanding of the legal procedures relevant to the determination of financial disputes between spouses and de facto partners
  3. become familiar with theoretical and critical debate about the financial consequences of marriage and cohabitation
  4. receive an introduction to some of the skills necessary for practice in family law.

Assessment

Mid semester class test (one hour plus 10 minutes reading/noting time, closed book) worth 50% of the result AND end of semester class test (one hour plus 10 minutes reading/noting time, open book) worth 50% of the result OR Optional participation in the Family Law Assistance Program with both a 2.5 day practical component and a research report (2000 words) worth 50% of the result AND end of semester class test (one hour plus 10 minutes reading/noting time, open book) worth 50% of the result.

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Four hours of lectures per week over ten weeks.

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104

Co-requisites

LAW3400 or LAW3401 and LAW3402

Prohibitions


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton Second semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

Examines legislative structures for resolving disputes between parents, children and State child welfare authorities and the difficulties which arise as the result of the divided Commonwealth/State responsibility. Examines creation of families and parent-child relationships, common law and statutory principles governing rights and responsibilities of parents, particularly the provisions of Family Law Act 1975 (Cth). Examines paramountcy of 'best interests of the child' and relevant considerations.

Outcomes

Students who complete this course will:
a. identify and evaluate a knowledge of the common law and statutory principles which govern the relations between parents and children and between children, parents and the State and develop some understanding of the way in which these laws operate in practice
b analyse and interpret the jurisdictional issues and legal procedures relevant to the determination of such disputes
c research and evaluate theoretical and critical debates about the laws governing parents and children and the adequacy of current laws and procedures
d communicate effectively and persuasively on issues relevant to family law
e. evaluate and reflect on some of the skills necessary for practice in this area of the law and recognize ethical issues they may encounter in practice.
f. learn and work autonomously and use feedback to improve their own capabilities and performance

Assessment

Final examination (3 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100% OR final examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60% and either a research assignment (2000 words): 40% OR participation in the Family Law Assistance Program with both 2.5 days (over five x half days) practical component AND a file/court report (1500 words): 40%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

4 hours of lectures per week for 9 weeks

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104

Prohibitions


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton First semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

Topics include: sources of international refugee law and the evolution of the international regime for refugee protection; comparative implementation of the refugee definition in Europe and other jurisdictions; modification of the Refugees Convention in domestic legislation; restrictive concepts such as 'internal protection' and 'safe third country'; the development of 'complementary protection' for asylum-seekers; issues raised by regional responses and creation of 'burden sharing' arrangements between States; procedures for determination of refugee status; proposals to reformulate the refugee protection regime.

Outcomes

Upon completion of this unit students should:

  1. understand the background and nature of international refugee law
  2. have detailed knowledge of the international instruments applicable to asylum seekers, including the Refugees Convention
  3. have acquired detailed knowledge of the concept of a 'refugee' under the Refugees Convention and of the various elements of the definition
  4. be able to evaluate comparative state and regional practices towards refugee applicants and application of the Refugees Convention
  5. understand and be able to evaluate measures adopted to modify the Refugees Convention
  6. have further developed legal research, writing and legal argument skills by undertaking research, into issues relating to international refugee law
  7. have further developed skills of oral presentation and argumentation in an interactive class context.

Assessment

Research assignment (2,500 words): 50%
Examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 50%.

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Four hours of lectures per week (for 9 weeks)

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104
International/Partner universities: General Introduction to Law

Co-requisites

None


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedMalaysia Trimester 2 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

Both the structure of government and human rights guarantees - in constitutions of the Western liberal-democratic tradition - will be considered. Structure-of-government topics may include the design and function of legislatures and their component Houses; heads of state; federal division of powers; judicial power and constitutional Courts. Rights provisions to be considered will be selected from traditionally protected rights such as freedom of speech and freedom of religion. The dialogue model of rights protection pioneered in Canada will also be considered. In conclusion, attention will be devoted to the approaches to constitutional interpretation manifested by various Courts: to what extent should they strive to be loyal to the text and/or the founders' intentions?

Outcomes

Upon completion of this unit, students should:

  1. have a general understanding of the constitutional law and statutory framework that operate in the various countries of the Western liberal-democratic tradition;
  2. possess an understanding of the various alternatives in institutional design of principal constitutional organs, and the advantages and disadvantages of each;
  3. understand and be able to assess, in their societal contexts, the approaches to federalism in constitutions and court decisions from selected federal countries of the world;
  4. have specific understanding of the particular rights studied, and the framework for protection established under the relevant constitutional systems;
  5. be able to identify or find the relevant principles, laws and precedents and apply them to resolve issues relating to breaches of individual rights and freedoms;
  6. be in a position to assess the merits and demerits of the approach to the protection of human rights pioneered in Canada and copied in Victoria;
  7. have further developed legal research and writing, and legal argument skills by undertaking systematic research into legal policy, rules and procedures and comparative perspectives relating to constitutional law and individual rights
  8. have developed skills of oral presentation of legal policy, rules and argument in an interactive learning context;
  9. be able to identify and assess the broad strands in constitutional interpretation used by Courts within the Western liberal-democratic tradition.

Assessment

1. Short paper (1,000 words): 20%
2. Take-home exam (3,000 words): 60%
3. Participation: 10%
4. Presentation: 10%

Chief examiner(s)

Dr Normann Witzleb (Malaysia)

Workload requirements

Twelve three-hour seminars

Prerequisites

LAW1100 OR LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW3200 or LAW3201


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

Topics include: the constitutional underpinning and legal framework governing citizenship and immigration in Australia; the development of current policies in an historical, social, cultural, international and economic context; the change in legislative policy under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) from discretionary to codified decision-making; the legislative and administrative scheme for migration visa decisions including merits and judicial review; the notion of citizenship under the Citizenship Act and the consequences of lack of citizenship in relation to detention, removal and deportation; the role/effect of multiculturalism in relation to policies and procedures.

Outcomes

On completion of this unit students should be able to:

  1. analyse the legal framework regulating entry to Australia to determine its coherence, fairness, and effectiveness
  2. develop skills of statutory interpretation through examining the Migration Act and Regulations and relevant court decisions
  3. discuss policy issues, including the access of non-citizens and unlawful non-citizens to administrative review, the significance of citizenship, and the impact of cultural differences
  4. give migration clients accurate practical advice on the law, and to be aware of appropriate legal remedies
  5. examine the relationship between Migration Law and other areas of Law such as Administrative Law, and Constitutional law
  6. further develop legal research, writing and legal argument skills by undertaking systematic research, including empirical research and the application of theory, into issues relating to citizenship and migration law
  7. further develop skills of oral presentation and argumentation in an interactive class context
  8. further develop skills of observation through a placement scheme.

Assessment

Examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 70%
Assignment (2000 words): 30%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104

Co-requisites

LAW3100/LAW3101 or LAW3200 or LAW3200/LAW3201


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton First semester 2014 (Day)
Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

This unit introduces students to the nature and function of equity in the modern Australian legal system. Students learn about the relationship between equity and the common law within the broader context of Australia's judge-made private law, and study key doctrines of equity, including breach of confidence, fiduciary relationships and the duties to which they give rise, equitable property rights and equitable remedies.

Outcomes

On completion of this unit students will:

  1. understand the position of equity within the Australian legal system, and its relationship with the common law and its place within the system of judge-made private law
  2. understand, and be able to critically analyse key doctrines of equity, their development in Australia and in other legal systems, and their theoretical underpinnings
  3. be able to make competent judgements regarding the likely future development of equitable doctrines on a case by case basis
  4. be able to articulate the application of equitable doctrines and remedies to practical legal problems.

Assessment

Exam (3 hour writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100% OR written assignment (2000) words: 40% AND exam (2 hour writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60%.

Chief examiner(s)

Dr Patrick Emerton (First Semester)
Ms Nadine Huels (Second Semester)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week and one hour tutorial per fortnight

Prerequisites

LAW1100 OR LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW2100 OR LAW2101 and LAW2102

Co-requisites


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton First semester 2014 (Day)
Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

This unit introduces students to the nature and function of trusts in the modern Australian legal system. Students learn how trusts are used and learn the rules governing their existence. In particular, the rules governing the creation and administration of trusts, and the rights and obligations of parties to trusts are taught.

Outcomes

On completion of this unit students should be able to:

  1. understand the role of trusts in the modern environment
  2. explain the circumstances in which a trust should be created and the methods by which this can be done
  3. advise as to the proper administration of trusts, including the role of superannuation trustees
  4. analyse documents creating trusts and be able to describe the operation of those provisions.

Assessment

Written research assignment (2000 words): 40% and final written examination (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60% OR final written examination (3 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week and one hour tutorial per fortnight

Prerequisites

LAW1100 OR LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW2100 OR 2101 AND 2102

Co-requisites


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton First semester 2014 (Day)
Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day)
Malaysia Term 3 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

On completion of this unit students will have covered the following topics:

  1. Choice of the corporate business form, formation and characteristics of a corporation
  2. The corporate constitution
  3. Corporate finance, share structure and membership
  4. Constitution and powers of the corporate organisations (board and general meeting)
  5. Corporate authority
  6. Governance of the corporation; director's duties
  7. Governance of the corporation; shareholder's remedies
  8. Administration and winding up of the corporation.

Outcomes

On completion of this unit, students will have:

  1. knowledge and understanding of key concepts and principles of corporate law
  2. knowledge and understanding of legislation and policy in the core areas of corporate law
  3. an ability to think critically about the impact of these concepts, principles, legislation and policy on the social and economic context in which they operate
  4. an ability to apply these concepts, principles, legislation and policy to new situations, including those induced by electronic and communications technology
  5. an ability to conduct independent research in corporate law and convey the results of this and the above objectives both orally and in writing.

Assessment

One 2,000 word research essay 40% and final exam (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time) 60%

Chief examiner(s)

Dr Eric Windholz (First Semester)
Dr Karen Wheelwright (Second Semester)
Dr Normann Witzleb (Malaysia)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week and one hour tutorial per fortnight.

Prerequisites

LAW1100 OR LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW2102


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

The unit seeks to provide comprehensive coverage of the wide-ranging legal forms, policies and practices in Australia that relate to the upholding of human rights standards. The perspective adopted is new in the sense that human rights laws are not viewed as simply being those laws that expressly refer to rights protection. Rather it is to recognise that in the absence of a strong jurisprudential culture of rights in the Common law world generally, and certainly in Australia, laws protecting as well as infringing human rights nonetheless are apparent.

Outcomes

Upon completion of this subject students should:

  1. have a broad understanding of the diverse cultural, philosophical, political and legal origins of human rights and human rights laws in Australia
  2. appreciate the variety of domestic legal forms by which human rights are expressed - constitutional, statutory, interpretive, common law and codes of practice
  3. be able to identify and distinguish between the various Australian laws across the whole range of legal specialities that seek to, or in practice do, protect human rights in Australia
  4. critically assess the impact of statutory and common law changes on human rights protection in Australia
  5. understand the extents of institutional, policy and procedural mechanisms for human rights protection
  6. understand the nature and degree of Australia's human rights obligations under international law and their impact on Australian law and practice
  7. have further developed skills in legal research and writing
  8. have further developed skills in presenting oral argument in respect of legal rules and policies in an interactive learning environment.

Assessment

Research paper (2,500 words): 50% OR Hanover Welfare Services Student Placement: 50% and exam (2 hours plus 10 mins reading time): 50% OR Examination (3 hours plus 10 mins reading time ): 100%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton First semester 2014 (Day)
Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day)
Clayton Summer semester A 2014 (Day)
Clayton Summer semester B 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

This is a program of individual research and writing on a legal topic or project which has been approved by the Chief Examiner after consultation with the proposed supervisor. The topics or projects may be associated with opportunities for placements or internships in legal services in the private or government sectors, in Australia or overseas.

Outcomes

Students successfully completing this subject should:

  1. have demonstrated the capacity to undertake independent legal research
  2. have displayed analytical competence
  3. have further developed skills in the presentation of legal writing.

Assessment

Research paper (5000-6000 words): 100%

Chief examiner(s)

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104
Please note that there is an application form for this unit, available at: http://www.law.monash.edu.au/current-students/resources/forms/index.html


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton First semester 2014 (Day)
Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day)
Clayton Summer semester A 2014 (Day)
Clayton Summer semester B 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

This is a program of individual research and writing on a legal topic or project which has been approved by the Chief Examiner after consultation with the proposed supervisor. The topics or projects may be associated with opportunities for placements or internships in legal services in the private or government sectors, in Australia or overseas.

Outcomes

Students successfully completing this subject should:

  1. have demonstrated the capacity to undertake independent legal research
  2. have displayed analytical competence
  3. have further developed skills in the presentation of legal writing.

Assessment

Research paper (5000-6000 words): 100%

Chief examiner(s)

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104
Please note that there is an application form for this unit, available at: http://www.law.monash.edu.au/current-students/resources/forms/index.html

Co-requisites


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

Classes in legal problem-solving techniques. A guide to the theory of legal argumentation and explains how those skills can be applied for maximum benefit in dealing with legal problems. Development of students' legal research skills with emphasis on teaching students how these skills can be applied to produce efficient and accurate legal writing. Presentation and defence of a legal submission, enhancing their oral presentation skills and their ability to work with others. While print sources will be referred to, a greater emphasis will be placed on electronic sources with the resources of the Internet.

Outcomes

Upon completion of this unit students should have developed:

  1. an ability to undertake independent legal research, both electronic and paper based
  2. an understanding of the method for location of case law, legislation and secondary sources together with the relevant methods and sources for updating
  3. an ability effectively and efficiently to apply the results of research to draft a variety of legal documents, including academic style papers, letters of advice and court submissions
  4. an ability to present legal arguments orally.

Assessment

Individual Research Project: 30%
Group Research Topic (written group submission: 30% and oral presentation/defence of submission: 30%): 60%
Class participation: 10%

Workload requirements

Three hours per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 OR LAW1104; LAW3300 or LAW3301 and LAW3302; LAW2100 or LAW2101 and LAW2102; LAW2200 or LAW2201 and LAW2202


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton Summer semester A 2014 (Day)
Clayton Summer semester B 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

This unit gives students an understanding of the fundamental principles and concepts in Family Law. Topics include:

  • the family - history and the concept of 'the family'
  • practising family law - professional and ethical challenges and courts jurisdiction;
  • marriage and divorce - obligations created by marriage
  • dividing property under the Family Law Act - principles relating to property division between married couples and those living in a de facto relationship
  • children's rights and parental responsibilities - the Family Law Act relating to parental responsibility and parenting orders
  • family support spousal maintenance and child support.

Outcomes

On completion of the unit students will be able to:
a. comprehend and explain the essential concepts and policies underlying the Australian family law system including the broader context in which the system operates.
b. critically evaluate the challenges and debates surrounding family law including the ethical debates and professional responsibilities facing family lawyers.
c. identify, analyse and critically comment on disputes between parties to a marriage or parties in a de facto relationship involving issues of property, children and maintenance
d. demonstrate reasoning skills and professional judgement which generate appropriate responses to complex statutory problems
e. communicate effectively appropriately and persuasively on issues pertaining to family law.
f. learn and work autonomously and collaboratively and use feedback to improve their own capabilities and performance.

Assessment

Examination (2 hours writing time plus 10 minutes reading time): 100% OR Examination (1 hour writing time plus 10 minutes reading time): 50% plus participation in a placement program (25%) with a written research assignment (25%) (2000 words): 50%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Taught intensively over 3 weeks of lectures for 4 hours a day, with examination in the following week.

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104 and LAW2101 and LAW2102 and LAW2201 and LAW2202

Prohibitions


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

This unit will compare the methods used to resolve disputes in the Common Law Legal Family and the Civil Law Legal Family. Through the Comparative method students will ascertain the fundamental elements of each system. The role of the judge at first instance will be critically analysed in both systems. The principles of orality, contestation and adherence to party disposition will be explored. The adversary system will be contrasted with the 'inquisitorial' adversary system. The continuing importance of the common law jury will be tested. Each step of litigation from the commencement through to the final disposition will be considered.

Outcomes

To broaden the perspective of domestic students to a major legal system and its way of resolving disputes; To expose students to the comparative method; To expose students to the court system of a western culture nation of a different legal family and its laws; To cause students to reflect on their system of dispute resolution, its aims and shortcomings.

Assessment

Examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100% OR Examination (1 hour writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time)): 50%
Assignment (4000 words): 50%

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 OR LAW1104; LAW2100 or LAW2101 and LAW2102; LAW2200 or LAW2201 and LAW2202

Co-requisites


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedPrato Term 2 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

The objective of this unit will be to examine the principles and practices of this new area as reflected in the rules of the major arbitration institutions, the national arbitration laws (with particular emphasis on Australia) and arbitral tribunal decisions. The topics to be considered in the course include: the nature of international arbitration, the types of arbitration, the legal framework, the agreement to arbitrate, judicial enforcement of the agreement, the powers of the tribunal and the conduct of the arbitration, the arbitral award and challenge to the award

Outcomes

To make students familiar with a growing area of dispute resolution in international commerce so that they can better advise clients, both domestic and foreign. By the end of the course, students should have a grasp of the practical aspects of arbitration, how to draft arbitration clauses, how to enforce awards and the preferred rules in a given case. In addition, through examining comparative legal materials, students should develop an appreciation of international solutions to domestic problems.

Assessment

Two only of the following 3 options:
1. Assessed moot (each of four students will speak for 15-20 minutes): 50%
2. Research essay (2500 words): 50%
3. Examination - two day take-home: 50%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

The object of this unit will be to examine the principles and practices of this area as reflected in the rules of the major arbitration institutions, the national arbitration laws (with particular emphasis on Australia) and arbitral tribunal decisions. The topics to be considered in the unit include: the nature of international arbitration, the types of arbitration, the legal framework, the agreement to arbitrate, judicial enforcement of the agreement, the powers of the tribunal and the conduct of the arbitration, the arbitral award and challenge to the award.

NB Quota applies.

Outcomes

To make students familiar with the growing area of dispute resolution in international commerce so that they can better advise clients, both domestic and foreign. By the end of the unit, students should have a grasp of the practical aspects of arbitration - how to draft arbitration clauses, how to enforce awards and the preferred rules in a given case. In addition, through examining comparative legal material, students should develop an appreciation of international solutions to domestic problems.

Assessment

Two only of the following 3 options:
1. Assessed moot (each of four students will speak for 15-20 minutes): 50%
2. Research essay (2500 words): 50%
3. Take home examination: 50%

Chief examiner(s)

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

Topics include: UNCLOS III - history of negotiation; regime implementation; maritime boundaries; territorial demarcation - exclusive economic zones (EEZ); living marine resource management - fisheries; straddling stocks; environmental protection - point-source pollution; non-living marine resource management - oil and gas; off-shore drilling; artificial islands and installations; the Deep Sea Bed Authority; international dispute settlement; International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS).

Outcomes

Upon successful completion of this unit, students will have developed:

  1. a coherent, critical and historically informed understanding of current international law principles and rules for management of marine resources
  2. a well developed ability to use these principles and rules in simulated situations of interstate claims, conflict and dispute settlement
  3. a well developed understanding of the political, economic, cultural and other contexts for rule evolution and current use
  4. a well developed understanding of the strategic implications of this aspect of international law for Australia
  5. a broad understanding of the role and use of diplomatic conferences in the progressive development of the international law of the sea
  6. a broad understanding of trajectories for further evolution of these principles and rules.

Assessment

Individually assessed report relating to research undertaken for negotiations (500 words) 10%; group assessment exercise - simulation adversarial team negotiations - bilateral fisheries and offshore petroleum access agreements/treaties: 30%; research assignment testing ability to apply Law of the Sea doctrine to practical situations and problems (3000 words): 60%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104

Co-requisites

Prohibitions

LAW7033


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

APPLICATION: students will be invited to apply for enrolment in LAW4183 Jessup Moot. This will be done through class announcements and public advertisements. When applying, students will be required to submit: a personal CV; a formal academic transcript; a short letter of application, outlining the reasons for applying and interests in competitive mooting and International law. Enrolment: maximum of 20

Outcomes

  1. To develop greater intellectual appreciation of International Public Law as an academic discipline
  2. To acquire greater specialised knowledge of critical components of the International Public Law regime, such as State Responsibility, State Jurisdiction and the International regulation of armed force
  3. to undertake intensive research work in current issues of International Law, including creative problem-solving of prescribed hypothetical problems
  4. to increase exposure to the competitive mooting process and the development of basic principles and practices of mooting.

Assessment

Seminar research and presentation: 25%
Practice Mooting: 25%
Memorial Research and Writing (3000 words): 50%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

10 x 3 hour seminar per week and 9 hours practice mooting

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104

Co-requisites


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton First semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

Students will be introduced to individual criminal responsibility in international law. The history and development of international criminal law, its codification and implementation by applicable municipal and international institutions examined. The main categories of crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court - genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes - will be studied with reference to international instruments and case law. Various bases of responsibility, including command responsibility and joint criminal enterprise, will be examined, along with applicable defences and excuses. The application of contemporary international criminal law in Australia and future directions of international criminal law will be studied.

Outcomes

  1. To understand the basic principles of international criminal law and be able to evaluate the doctrines and processes that have developed in terms of those principles
  2. To analyse and interpret key documents which codify and illustrate international criminal law
  3. To understand how international criminal law is developed and implemented by applicable institutions
  4. To demonstrate developed legal research, writing, argument and problem solving skills in relation to international criminal law.

Assessment

Optional essay 2000 words: 40% AND final examination (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting): 60% OR final exam (2 and a half hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting): 100%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW3300 or LAW3301 and LAW3302


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

This unit examines international banking and securities transactions and their regulation. Major national markets will be considered along with important areas of international financial regulation and policy. An analysis of international financial instruments including international asset securitisation is followed by the regulatory regimes governing stock markets and derivatives. Emerging markets generate special issues for international finance. Three types of emerging markets finance will be looked at, as well as the impact of the 1997 Asian financial crisis. Finally is there a need for reform of the international financial system and the role of the IMF following September 11?

Outcomes

On completion of this unit, students should:

  1. have an understanding of the various views, including economic theories, concerning the rationales for and objectives of international and national financial regulation
  2. understand the legal problems arising from international and national financial regulation
  3. understand the main issues that should be addressed when negotiating a contract for the provision of international financial accommodation
  4. have an understanding of the national and international legal structures and principles dealing with and governing international financial instruments
  5. be familiar with the international agreements, regimes and institutions that influence and regulate international financial transactions
  6. understand the main types of structures used in international financial instruments
  7. understand the financial infrastructure behind international financial regulation and policy
  8. be familiar with the legal structure and operation of (some) national models of banking , stock broking and derivatives regulators
  9. appreciate the need for reform of some aspects of the international financial system.

Assessment

Research assignment (2400 words): 30%
Examination (2 hours writing time
30 minutes reading and noting time): 70% OR Examination (3 hours writing time
30 minutes reading and noting time): 100%

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW2100 or LAW2101 and LAW2102


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

The growth of international criminal jurisdiction and the continual improvement in opportunities for legal cultures to interact with one another have led to a much greater interest, both practical and theoretical, in comparative criminal law over the last decade or so. Even within Australia, the creation of a federal Criminal Code has allowed for an even more extensive use of the possibilities inherent in federalism for comparative criminal law within the one country.
The first topic to be examined is what use can be made of comparative criminal law and the pitfalls that may be encountered in doing so.
Topics to be considered will then include: whether the criminal law should be codified, and what codification means; the role of intention in the criminal law and the different definitions of intention in various legal systems; murder, manslaughter and sexual offences (both consensual and non-consensual); crimes of omission; the prohibition of retrospective criminal offences, the right to silence, trial by jury and topics in sentencing law (including plea bargaining).
Throughout, there will be an emphasis on comparative analysis of the criminal law. Jurisdictions to be selected for comparison include the common law of some Australian States and England; statutory modifications of the common law, such as the partial abolition of the right to silence in England; common-law jurisdictions which have adopted entire criminal codes such as Canada, Malaysia, three of the Australian States and the federal jurisdiction in Australia; and civil-law countries, principally Germany but also, as materials are available, others (such as Spain).

Outcomes

Outcomes

On completion of this unit, students should:

  • possess a more sophisticated understanding of the conditions under which individuals should be held morally and legally responsible for their (criminal) actions
  • have an appreciation of whether or not there may be any "fundamental principles" which underlie all criminal justice systems
  • have an understanding of the uses and abuses of comparative criminal law
  • understand the merits or otherwise of codification in both the common law and the civil law
  • understand the basic characteristics of criminal procedure under the inquisitorial and adversarial systems
  • understand the essential features of the substantive law relating to homicide in Australia and other legal systems
  • understand in greater depth the role of intention in the criminal law and the various difficulties involved in defining it
  • be able to understand the arguments for and against criminalising omissions in general and creating an offence of failure to rescue in particular
  • have a comparative appreciation of the major characteristics of the substantive law relating to sexual offences
  • understand the arguments for and against the abolition of the right to silence and the creation of retrospective criminal offences
  • possess an enhanced understanding of the options available in sentencing.

Assessment

Class participation 10%; take-home examination (4500 words): 90%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Twelve three-hour seminars

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 OR LAW1104; LAW3300 or LAW3301 and LAW3302


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

This unit examines the role of theory in the criminal law and whether there are "fundamental principles" which underlie all systems of criminal justice. A con-sideration of the various theories of punishment propounded in the common law and civil law of crime follows.
The issue of codification as implemented in both common law and civil law jurisdictions is then ad-dressed. Students will then be invited to examine in detail the roles played by the investigating magis-trates, procurators and the judiciary in civil law sys-tems and compare that role with the ones played by the prosecutor, judge and jury in the common law systems.
The relationship between substantive criminal law and procedure will be considered by focusing on such issues as the principle of territoriality, equality before the law including the right to a fair trial and the right to legal representation.
A comparative examination of the criminal law of Australia and Italy in the areas of the law of homi-cide, sexual offences and property offences will be undertaken. An analysis of the modern law of extra-dition, mutual assistance and various international treaties will enable a study of the impact of interna-tionalisation on the criminal law including a consid-eration of the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court. How have the Australian and the Italian legal systems dealt with the "war on terrorism"? Finally the unit will examine the use of several sentencing options in Italian and Australian criminal law.

N.B. Quota applies.

Outcomes

On completion of this unit, students should:

  1. understand the conditions under which individuals should be held morally and legally responsible for their (criminal) actions;
  2. understand whether or not there are any "fundamental principles" which underlie all criminal justice systems;
  3. have an appreciation of the various theories of punishment in the common law and the civil law as the basis for an analysis of the relationship between substantive criminal law and criminal procedure;
  4. understand the issues concerning the merits or otherwise of codification in both the common law and the civil law;
  5. understand the basic characteristics of criminal procedure under the inquisitorial and adversarial systems;
  6. be aware of the relationship between substantive criminal law and criminal procedure in relation to issues such as the principles of territoriality, equality before the law including the right to a fair trial, and the right to legal representation in the civil and common law systems;
  7. understand the essential features of the substantive law relating to homicide in Australia and Italy;
  8. understand the major characteristics of the substantive law relating to sexual offences in Australia and Italy;
  9. be aware of the basic elements of the substantive law concerning property offences in Australia and Italy;
  10. have an appreciation of the impact of internationalisation on the criminal law of Australia and Italy;
  11. be aware of the manner in which the criminal law of Australia and Italy has responded to the "war on terrorism";
  12. understand the elementary characteristics of sentencing alternatives in Ausustralian and Italian criminal law.

Assessment

Class participation 10%; take-home examination (4500 words): 90%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

36 hours in 4 weeks.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

This unit will allow students to acquire knowledge and understanding of a specialist, and increasingly important, area of law. Construction Law: Principles and Practice examines the legal issues impacting on construction projects including the different types of contracts and project delivery methods. In this unit, students explore how construction contracts deal with a variety of issues that arise during the course of a construction project, including variations, latent conditions, delays and defective work, as well as related issues such as insurance and security. Students will examine the relevant legislations and learn to research and write on construction law issues.

Outcomes

A candidate who has successfully completed this unit should:
a.be familiar with the different types of contracts used on construction projects and the pros and cons of each;
b.understand risk allocation and the different methods of project delivery;
c.be able to apply the contract provisions that relate to various issues that impact on construction projects such as variations, latent defects, delays and defective works and the legal ramifications of each;
d.recognise the different types of insurance required for construction projects and be able to critically assess the contractual provisions relevant to them;
e.have knowledge of the various statutes and regulations governing the construction industry; and
f.be able to write clearly, concisely and logically on issues relating to construction law.

Assessment

1,500 site visit report - 30% and examination (2 and a half hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time):70%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

4 hours per week for 9 weeks commencing week 1

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104

Co-requisites

LAW2100 or LAW2101 and LAW2102; LAW2200 or LAW2201 and LAW2202


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton First semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

The unit provides an overview of the law regarding the undertaking and commercialisation of biotechnology and its outcomes. The unit focuses on Australian law and where relevant, the approach taken in overseas jurisdictions is included. Areas examined will include the laws with respect to research and development, product regulation, environmental and medical law. Topics include introduction to international regulation of biotechnology and problems in regulating science generally; national and state regulatory system for biotechnology; bioprospecting and biodiscovery - access to genetic resources; regulation of end product commercialisation; issues in human and animal technology.

Outcomes

On completion of this unit students should:

  1. have an understanding with the laws and regulations relevant to
    1. the undertaking of biotechnology research generally in Australia as well as biotechnology research involving animal and/or human subjects including cloning and stem cell research
    2. commercialisation of the outcomes of biotechnology
    3. bioprospecting
  2. have an application of the legal implications of current events on the law regarding the application of biotechnology in the commercial environment
  3. have a familiarity of treaty law applicable to biotechnology
  4. demonstrate a capacity to analyse and apply current biotechnology law to factual situations and an awareness of how those laws may be improved in order to enhance the use of biotechnology for the benefit of the community.

Assessment

Examination (3 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100% OR Examination (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60 % and assignment (2000 words): 40%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 OR LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton Second semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

This Unit examines the legal regulation of the marketplace for consumer goods and services in Australia. The nature of the consumer marketplace is considered, and the ways in which Australian governments seek to protect the interests of consumers is examined. The Unit critically examines the theoretical and evidence-based foundations for consumer protection laws. Particular attention is given to the operation of the Australian Consumer Law regarding unfair contract terms, consumer guarantees, and manufacturer's liabilities. Attention is also given to the regulation of buying consumer goods and services on the Internet, the operation of the National Consumer Credit Protection Act, the regulation of retail investment advice, industry codes of conduct and resolving consumer disputes.

Outcomes

On completing the unit, students should be able to gain an understanding of:

  1. the ways in which various sectors of the consumer marketplace are regulated
  2. the regulatory and policy options available to regulators
  3. theories, and any supporting empirical evidence, regarding the ways in which consumers and businesses respond to regulatory settings
  4. the operation of relevant consumer protection laws and regulations in Australia.

Assessment

Final take-home examination (max 3,500 words): 70%; research essay (1500 words): 30% OR the option of a take home examination (mid semester take home exam, max 1,500 words and end of semester take home exam, max 3,500 words): 100%.

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 OR LAW1104; LAW2100 or LAW2101 and LAW2102


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

This unit examines current developments in international and regional instruments and institutions that promote and protect the human rights of indigenous peoples. Comparative perspectives on the rights of indigenous peoples in common law jurisdictions such as Australia, Canada and New Zealand will be studied. Areas of focus include the definitions of indigenous peoples, the concept self-determination, collective and individual rights, land and resource rights, civil and political participation, and economic and cultural rights.
Please note that in 2009 this unit will involve the opportunity to participate in international videoconferencing seminars with universities in North America and New Zealand.

Outcomes

Students will be able to:

  • identify the key current issues regarding the recognition, protection and enforcement of indigenous rights by way of international and regional law and fora;
  • understand the basic parameters of comparative law theory and methodology;
  • research the major theoretical and practical issues about indigenous peoples from international, regional and comparative perspectives;
  • comment on the prospect for reform of the legal rights of indigenous peoples, in the light of current legislative, judicial, political and comparative developments; and
  • present written and oral analysis of complex problems involving indigenous peoples.

Assessment

Examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time) 40% and Research Essay (2,500 words) 50% and Literature Exercise (500 words) 10%

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

Fundamentals of commercial law emphasising the Australian approach. The nature of commercial law from a functional perspective and need for reform of the law of sale in Australia. Overview of personal property and concepts of transfer of ownership and bailment. Major topics are law of agency (types of agents, their authority and power, agency and other legal relationships), transfer of property in goods (contract of sale, transfer and reservation of property, transfer of title and remedies for the sale of goods), law of partnership (nature and formation of partnerships, relationship of partners amongst themselves, liability of partners, dissolution of partnerships and limited partnerships).

Outcomes

  1. To develop an understanding of the issues facing buyers and sellers in relation to the transfer of property in goods
  2. To give students an understanding of the state, national and international regulation of contracts for the sale of goods
  3. To develop in students the capacity to advise both buyers and sellers of goods about their legal rights in relation to the transfer of ownership of those goods
  4. To provide students with an understanding of the legal and commercial issues facing partners in their dealings with others and with third parties
  5. To develop an understanding of the legal and commercial issues involved in the relationship of principal and agent, both as between principal and agent and as between them and third parties
  6. To build on the skills and knowledge acquired by students in the prerequisite subject.

Assessment

Research assignment (2000 words): 40%
Examination (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60% OR Examination (3 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW2100 or LAW2101 and LAW2102


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton Second semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

The unit will provide an introduction to the international laws of armed conflict (LOAC), known also as International Humanitarian Law. It will cover the historical development and sources of LOAC, the moral dilemma created by the regulation of armed conflict and how armed conflict has come to be regulated: e.g. the fundamental principles applicable to the conduct of armed conflict, the permissible methods and means of armed conflict, the protection regime under the Geneva Conventions, their Additional Protocols and the developing body of customary international law, the distinction between combatants and civilians, treatment of prisoners of war (particularly in light of recent events at Guantanamo Bay). It will also cover the imbalance of protection between international and non-international armed conflict.

Outcomes

Upon completion of this unit, students should:

  1. have developed a strong understanding of the sources of the LOAC, rooted in international law;
  2. to understand the law of jus ad bellum, that is when the use of force itself (or war) is lawful and when it is unlawful in international law;
  3. understand the important historical roots of war and the LOAC and how it impacts upon the modern protection regime;
  4. be able to critically discuss the moral dilemmas underpinning the regulation of war in the human rights era and assess the relative roles of the LOAC and human rights;
  5. be able to critically assess the complex protection regime relating to civilians, combatants, prisoners of war and others in the conduct of armed conflict;
  6. be able to critically assess the differences in the regulatory regime between international and non-international armed conflict;
  7. be able to critically assess the way LOAC is enforced, including through international 'war crimes' tribunals and the permanent International Criminal Court;
  8. be able to understand, evaluate and apply policy arguments for and against reform of the legal protection afforded during international and non-international armed conflicts;
  9. appreciate of current challenges to and debates surrounding LOAC;
  10. be able to identify or find the relevant principles, laws and precedents and apply them to resolve issues relating to LOAC.

Assessment

Final exam 2.5 hours (plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100% OR optional essay 2000 words: 40% AND final exam 2 hours (plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Four hours of lectures per week for nine weeks

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

Topics include: introduction to class actions; criteria for bringing a class action; costs and class action; compensating the class lawyer; settlement; financing class actions; and court regulation of communication with the class.

Outcomes

Upon completing this unit, students should:

  • appreciate the historical development of class actions (CA) or their equivalent;
  • have a comprehensive understanding of the sources of CA in each of the target countries;
  • be able to evaluate the aims, the means and the consequences of an effective class action device;
  • understand the range of alternatives to a class action in individually non-viable claims;
  • be able to evaluate the evolving role of the judiciary in both common law and civil law jurisdictions;
  • understand the relative roles and powers of courts and the legislature in class actions;
  • evaluate the role of the 'lawyer entrepreneur model'; and
  • be familiar with the comparative method as it applies to class actions.

Assessment

100% examination (2.5 hours plus 10 minutes reading/settling time) OR 50% examination (1.5 hours plus 10 minutes reading/settling time) and 50% research paper (3500 words).

Prerequisites


12 points, SCA Band 3, 0.250 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton First semester 2014 (Day)
Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day)
Clayton Full year 2014 (Day)
Clayton Summer semester A 2014 (Day)
Clayton Summer semester B 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

This is a program of individual research and writing during two semesters on a legal topic or project which has been approved by the Chief Examiner after consultation with the proposed supervisor. It is expected that some of those topics or projects will be associated with opportunities for placements or internships in legal services in the private or government sectors, in Australia or overseas.

Outcomes

Student who successfully complete this unit should:

  1. have demonstrated the capacity to undertake independent legal research
  2. have displayed advanced analytical competence
  3. have further developed skills in the presentation of legal writing.

Assessment

Research paper or papers (10000-12000 words): 100%

Chief examiner(s)

Prerequisites

LAW1100 OR LAW1101 AND LAW1102 OR LAW1104
Please note that there is an application form for this unit, available at: http://www.law.monash.edu.au/current-students/resources/forms/index.html


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton Summer semester A 2014 (Day)

Quota applies

The number of places available in this unit is 5

Synopsis

The Phillip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition is conducted each year and runs over the summer semester. Five students will be invited to participate and will be selected each year from those students who have successfully completed the Jessup Moot Seminar unit. The team of five students will work closely in a team to prepare detailed and lengthy written submissions and represent fictional States in a topical hypothetical case before the International Court of Justice. Written memorials are submitted in mid-January each year. The team will then moot against teams from other Australian Universities. The Australian Regional Rounds are usually held in Canberra in the first week of February. The two finalist teams from the Australian Regional Rounds then travel to Washington DC to compete in the International Rounds against teams from around the world.

Students participating in the Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition will, inter alia:

  1. acquire and develop proficiency in oral advocacy, legal research and legal writing skills in the highly demanding, yet exciting global context of public international law
  2. develop and broaden their knowledge and expertise in public law and international dispute resolution before the International Court of Justice
  3. experience the concept of through preparation of a particular case on public international law and the opportunity to match their preparation with that of equally prepared students in a national and possibly international competition setting.

Outcomes

The objectives of this unit include, inter alia, to

  1. Develop an advanced knowledge of critical components of the public international law and acquire greater intellectual appreciation of public law;
  2. Examine and critically analyse traditional and emerging areas of international law and key issues of public international law arising out of the annual competition problem (the compromise);
  3. Build upon existing research and legal writing skills and develop further proficiency in international law legal research and legal writing skills associated with the public international law and the International Court of Justice;
  4. Acquire an ability to construct and develop written and oral legal argument within the context of public international law and the International Court of Justice;
  5. Acquire a familiarity with the practice and procedures of the International Court of Justice;
  6. Acquire and develop proficiency in oral advocacy practical skills associated with international court of justice; and
  7. Experience the concept of through preparation of a particular case on public international law and the opportunity to match their preparation with that of equally prepared students in a national and possibly international competition setting.

Assessment

Memorial research and writing of two Memoranda (12,000 words each; group task): 50%
Mooting preparation and participation (group task): 50%

Chief examiner(s)

Prerequisites

LAW1100 OR LAW1101 AND LAW1102 OR LAW1104; LAW4122


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014
Coordinator(s)Professor Rowan Russell

Synopsis

Topics include: security (nature of security, negative pledge, subordination); fixed and floating charges; the new personal property securities law; everyday issues and common pitfalls in finance law; guarantees; insolvency issues; loans and debt finance; syndicated financing; project financing; aircraft financing; derivatives, netting and set-off; domestic and international capital markets; securitisation; and regulatory and tax considerations.

Outcomes

Upon completing this unit, students should:

  • be familiar with the basic principles of the law and the practice of corporate finance;
  • be familiar with legal and commercial aspects of various forms of debt finance, including secured and unsecured transactions and other forms of raising debt:
  • understand the concept of the 'capital markets' particularly debt capital markets as a means of raising funds by Australian issuers in both the Australian domestic market and in the international capital market; and
  • be able to analyse international financial transactions in the context of market practice having regard to the legal, contractual, regulatory and taxation regime in Australia, the Euro markets and, to a limited extent, the US market.

Assessment

Examination (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time), 90%, and preparation and participation in one workshop, 10%.

Chief examiner(s)

Prerequisites

LAW2100 OR LAW2101 and LAW2102


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton Second semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

This subject unit takes a radically different approach to the study of law by focusing on forms of conflict management, dispute prevention and dispute resolution outside the adversarial system. It examines ways of lawyering that employ non-adversarial, psychologically beneficial, and humanistic methods of solving legal problems, resolving legal disputes and preventing legal difficulties.
Traditional legal education, with its focus on case law and judicial decision-making, tends to overstate the importance of both law and litigation in resolving disputes. This subject aims to equip law students with the knowledge they need to work with and think about non adversarial processes, an essential element of lawyering in the twenty-first century.
Non-adversarial justice is a focus on non-court dispute resolution or on processes used by courts which adopt a problem-solving approach. Theories of non-adversarial justice emanate from multiple disciplines and include alternative dispute resolution (and its component processes such as mediation, evaluation, negotiation, conciliation and arbitration), participatory justice, therapeutic jurisprudence, preventative law, restorative justice, collaborative law, diversion, shadow of the law theory, problem-solving courts, managerial justice and multi-door courthouse theory. Non-adversarial techniques and processes have been employed in fields as diverse as native title land negotiations, criminal cases, disputes over telephone bills or banking, negotiations over work conditions, disputes over residence of children after separation, decisions about where to locate hazardous materials sites and in truth and reconciliation commissions.
This subject starts by critically examining our adversarial legal system and how lawyers operate (and are perceived to operate) within it. We then explore the nature of non-adversarial justice, the various theories behind the movement and the reasons for the perceived need for non-adversarial processes. Students will learn about a range of non-adversarial processes and the theories behind them. A focus of student learning will be upon understanding when the use of such processes may be appropriate or inappropriate. The aim of teaching students this is to help them to understand the role that lawyers can play in preventing conflict and in providing non-adversarial means of conflict management or resolution. Students will be asked to reflect upon the role that lawyers can and do play in non-adversarial processes and upon the ethics of legal practice in such circumstances. Role plays may be used to assist with gaining understanding in this area.
As part of their assessment, students will be asked to observe a legal process such as a court hearing. They will be asked to take notes on what they see and evaluate the process from the perspective of participants and how it impacts upon them. Students will be expected to suggest changes to practice, policy or law that would improve the process. It is anticipated that this exercise will assist students to develop skills in observation and critical analysis of legal processes including making recommendations for change or law reform. In preparation for this exercise, students will be provided with information about how to conduct observations, how to analyse such information and on the law reform process.
A research essay will test students' research and analytical skills. Students will be encouraged to research an aspect of the syllabus in order to gain and deeper understanding of the interaction between the theory and practice of non adversarial justice.
Examples of non adversarial processes that are employed in a range of different fields, include:
mediation (including some of the newer practices in the mediation field)
arbitration
conciliation
facilitation
negotiation
ombudsmen schemes;
managerial justice (case management)
restorative justice schemes
truth and reconciliation commissions
Examples of specific dispute resolution services or specialist courts that may be studied include;
Community justice and dispute resolution centres (including the new Collingwood Neighbourhood Justice Centre)
The new Family Relationship Centres;
Drug Courts;
Family Violence Courts;
Children's Court;
Koori/Murri Courts;
Mental Health Courts;
The Family and Federal Magistrates' Courts;
Coroner's Court
Royal Commissions;
Administrative tribunals;
Group Conferencing schemes;
Victim/offender reconciliation/mediation programs;
Healing circles; and
Sentencing circles

Outcomes

Upon completion of this unit, students should:

  1. be able to critically analyse the nature of the adversarial system, including its benefits and pitfalls
  2. understand the nature of non-adversarial justice, the theories behind the movement and the reasons for the perceived need for non-adversarial processes
  3. understand theories of interpersonal conflict, how disputes arise, conflict management and dispute prevention
  4. understand and be able to explain the theoretical underpinnings and the nature of a range of non adversarial processes in civil and criminal and international law, including some that relate to criminal offences, disputes following separation/divorce, workplace and industrial disputes, native title, neighbourhood disputes, environmental disputes, administrative and commercial law
  5. be able to critically analyse each of the non-adversarial processes taught for their various strengths and weaknesses and be able to identify which non-adversarial processes may or may not be appropriate in particular cases
  6. understand and evaluate the place of non adversarial processes within an adversarial legal system
  7. be able to appreciate the complexities of the relationship between law and non-adversarial processes
  8. be able to explain how courts can apply principles of non-adversarial justice
  9. understand how lawyers can and do their work with non-adversarial processes and appreciate the role that lawyers can play in directing clients towards non-adversarial processes in appropriate cases
  10. understand and be able to critically comment on appropriate ethical standards of conduct for of lawyers and other professionals working with non-adversarial processes
  11. develop skills in observation and critical analysis of legal processes including making recommendations for changes or law reform.

Assessment

Research essay or Placement Assignment (2500 words)- 50%

Take home exam (2500 words) - 50%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton Second semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

Criminal investigation and procedure involves an examination of the elaborate and sometimes complex set of arrangements which have evolved over many hundreds of years for dealing with the processing of criminal cases against alleged offenders.

Criminal investigation and procedure involves not only a study of the process and the law relating to the various elements of that process but also a consideration of some fundamental issues of political and legal philosophy: in essence, what is the appropriate balance to be struck between the community interest in preventing and dealing with crime and the liberties and interests of the individuals who are caught up in the system?

The Unit deals with the following topics and issues:

  • The underlying purposes of the criminal investigative and procedural system
  • The architecture of the criminal investigative process: police, prosecution, defence and the courts
  • Criminal investigative arrangements: investigation, rights and responsibilities
  • Commencing criminal proceedings
  • Custodial investigation: questioning, identification, forensic and other procedures
  • Bail
  • Prosecution processes and principles
  • Criminal trials
  • Sentencing
  • Appeals

Outcomes

The overall objective of this Unit is to acquaint students with the significant number of steps or decision-making stages of the criminal investigation process, and the law and practice in relation to those key decision-making points. Students will develop a good descriptive and analytical grasp of the whole criminal investigative process.
The area will be approached not only from the perspective of what the law is but also from a legal policy standpoint. Significant emphasis will be given to the fundamental political and philosophical questions which arise in criminal investigation, especially those concerning civil liberties and community interests.

Assessment

Class attendance and participation (10%)
2500 word research project (50%)
Take-home examination (40%)

Chief examiner(s)

Prerequisites

For students in the LLB course:
LAW1101 Introduction to legal reasoning
LAW1104 Research and writing

For students in the LLB Hons course:
Prerequisites:
Foundations of law
Criminal law 1
Public law and statutory interpretation
Torts
Contract A
Contract B
Property A
Constitutional law

Co-requisites:
Equity
Corporations law


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

The unit is a problem based seminar where students simulate a team of lawyers acting on a complex project, requiring them to consider the interplay between legal systems and discrete areas of substantive and procedural law. The seminars involve discussion and simulations. The lecturer will provide background lecturing and information on key areas, but the essence of the unit is student centred learning. Students will be broken into groups to undertake the research, engage in discussions and report back to the seminar as they would in legal practice when assisting an employer in an activity such as this.
The lecturer will provide feedback on presentations (which would provide ongoing and regular formative assessment), and direct the research and thinking for the next stage of the project.
While the pedagogical approach to the unit will remain constant, the actual problem to be used will vary in each year. The problem may be primarily commercial or non-commercial although it could equally combine elements of each. Students will be advised of the content of the problem prior to enrolment.

Outcomes

The objective of the unit is to have students engage in problem-based learning with a view to developing their skills in:

  • identifying relevant areas of law,
  • researching and reporting on appropriate areas of law,
  • integrating questions of evidence, procedure and substantive law,
  • considering the relevance of international and comparative perspectives and determining how to prioritize and integrate differing legal norms,

and to develop the students' methodological skills in approaching any complex problem in all areas of legal practice.

Assessment

Assessment will be out of the following range:
1. Class participation (optional up to 10%);
2. Class simulation (10%);
3. Preliminary written submission (500 word - 10%%);
4. Oral presentation of preliminary submission (15 minutes - 10%
5. Final report and presentation/simulation (10% per 500 words - comprising 60 or 70% of the marks depending on whether the student opts for a class participation mark)

Chief examiner(s)

Co-requisites


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

The seminar touches on the most fundamental public policies issues that our society faces: economic growth and wealth distribution. Selected government responses will be analysed from nations chosen to represent varying solutions in the following areas: optimising income tax, income taxations vs consumption taxation, tax and economic growth - accelerated depreciation, international tax policy, and environmental taxation. The unit will both begin with and conclude with an overview of basic tax policy and tax policy and utilitarianism and concepts of progressive taxation.

Outcomes

Upon completing this unit, students should:

  1. Be able to compare and contrast the roles of governments in selected countries in a market economy;
  2. Be able to analyse the efficiency and equity of varying government policies on taxation;
  3. Appreciate the degree of redistribution in the tax and transfer system; whether income or consumption should be taxed; whether corporations or individuals should remit taxes;
  4. Apply the above skills in undertaking three written research and analysis papers.

Assessment

Written assignment (3000 words): 60%
Examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading/ settling time): 40%

Workload requirements

36-39 hours instruction, meeting in 3-hours classes over 3.5 weeks. The private study for class will be between 6-9 hours pre assigned material for each 3-hour class.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

This unit examines the ways in which Australian law defines and regulates the relationship between humans and animals. It will introduce students to the key concepts, legal frameworks and regulatory regimes that apply to this area and will encourage a critical engagement with those principles and regimes. The unit begins by providing an historical overview of the status of animals as property in the law. It will then consider competing philosophical theories and interests that have motivated the evolution of law as it relates to the regulation and protection of animals.

The unit will then analyse a range of regulatory regimes under Australian state and federal law that apply to our interactions with animals, be those domesticated, wild or agricultural animals. This will include: the use of animals in scientific experiments, sport and entertainment, the regulation of the agricultural use of animals, animal welfare standards and free trade, the live export industry, issues relating to companion animals, and issues affecting wild animals such as hunting, endangered species, pests and zoos. Students will explore particular problem areas in these fields, as well as being introduced to discrete issues in animal protection litigation.

Although the primary focus of the unit will be upon the law in Australia, where relevant the approach in Australia will be compared to overseas jurisdictions and will be considered in the context of relevant international relations and regulation.

Outcomes

A candidate who has successfully completed this subject should:

  1. Understand and be able to critically evaluate competing philosophical theories that underpin legal and regulatory schemes involving animals;

  1. Be familiar with the legal status of animals and the historical development of animal law generally;

  1. Be familiar with the different legislative regimes (legislation and industry codes) that relate to the regulation and protection of animals and be able to critically assess them;

  1. Be able to engage in discussion regarding the case for ongoing reform regarding the regulation and welfare of animals;

  1. Be familiar with Australian and overseas jurisprudence relating to animal rights and be able to critically assess such jurisprudence;

  1. Understand the international dimensions of animal regulation through treaties and other agreements;

  1. Be able to research and write clearly, concisely and logically on issues relating to animal law.

Assessment

Research Assignment (2,500 words) 50%
Final Examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and notation time)50%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours per week.

Prerequisites

LAW1104 Research and Writing and LAW1101 Introduction to Legal Reasoning


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton First semester 2014 (Day)
Coordinator(s)Dr Ronli Sifris

Synopsis

The term 'transitional justice' refers to the various judicial and non-judicial measures that may be implemented in order to redress a legacy of human rights abuses. Such measures include criminal prosecutions, truth commissions, reparations and different forms of institutional reform.

This unit will be divided into three parts. Part I will provide an overview of transitional justice. It will consider the meaning of the term "transitional justice" and provide a framework through which the concept of transitional justice may be viewed. It will also discuss the dilemmas inherent in dealing with a legacy of human rights abuse. For example, we will discuss the tension between peace and justice, the advantages and disadvantages of local versus international mechanisms for achieving justice, the tension between allocating resources to dealing with the past and allocating resources to building a better future. We will also consider the various contexts in which transitional justice mechanisms may be applicable. For example, we will consider the transition from dictatorship to democracy, the implementation of transitional justice mechanisms in conflicted democracies and the ways in which countries like Australia may use transitional justice mechanisms to deal with a legacy of human rights abuse against indigenous populations.

Part II of this unit will engage in a more detailed discussion of the actual transitional justice mechanisms. For example, we will consider the nature of prosecutions and the different types of prosecutions available. We will consider the option of a truth commission and how this compares with prosecutions. We will also consider the concept of reparations both from a moral and a legal standpoint and we will discuss the importance of institutional reform.

Part III of this unit will use case studies to ground students' understanding of the subject matter in concrete examples. For example, we will consider the South African truth commission and consider the role that it played in South Africa's transition from apartheid to democracy. We will consider the "Arab Spring" and the role of transitional justice in those societies. In addition to exploring the transitional justice programmes implemented in different countries, we will also engage in a comparative analysis of the various case studies.

Outcomes

On completion of this unit students should:

  • have a general understanding of what is meant by the term "transitional justice"
  • have a general understanding of the dilemmas of dealing with past atrocities
  • have a general understanding of the different transitional justice mechanisms (such as prosecutions, truth commissions, reparations programs, institutional reform) and their respective advantages and disadvantages
  • have a basic level of knowledge regarding the use of prosecutions in specific case studies
  • have a basic level of knowledge regarding the use of truth commissions in specific case studies
  • have a basic level of knowledge regarding the various reparations programs that have been implemented in different societies
  • have a basic level of knowledge regarding the way that different societies have reformed their institutions
  • have insight into the ways in which the various transitional justice mechanisms could be utilised in Australia.

Assessment

Assignment: 30% (1,500 words)
AND
Class Presentation: 10%
AND
Take-home exam: 60% (3,000 words)

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Students enrolled in this unit will be provided with 36 contact hours of lectures/ seminars per semester whether intensive, semi-intensive, or semester-long offering.

Prerequisites

Pre-requisites: LAW1101 Introduction to legal reasoning and LAW1104 Research and Writing

Co-requisites

None

Prohibitions

None


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014
Coordinator(s)Ms Kathryn James

Synopsis

Schumpeter wrote of taxation that "nothing shows so clearly the character of a society and of a civilization as does the fiscal policy that its political sector adopts." (History of Economic Analysis, 1954).

Although the primary function of taxation is to raise revenue to finance the operation of the state, the raising of this revenue gives rise to many issues which lie at the heart of the relationship between the citizen and the state such as:

  • the role of taxation in a market economy
  • who should bear the burden of taxation?
  • what should be taxed - income, consumption, wealth, resources?
  • the role of taxation in achieving outcomes beyond revenue raising including the role of taxation in the redistribution of resources, and the use of tax expenditures to achieve various social, economic and political outcomes
  • the link between the tax and transfer system or, more specifically, the link between taxation and the modern welfare state
  • the political influence of individuals and groups in shaping tax policy and legal outcomes.

Despite the significance of taxation across all levels of our economic, political and legal system, it has been repeatedly recognised that the study of taxation has too often been neglected and wrongly dismissed as the province of the technocrat. This unit encourages students to see the importance of challenging this position and of addressing this neglect because questions of taxation speak to the nature of our economic, social and political system.

This unit seeks to introduce students to the importance of tax policy and provide students with the skills to analyse taxation from a range of policy perspectives. It aims to introduce students to the various disciplines relevant to shaping and understanding taxation including economics, politics and law. Importantly students will be encouraged to develop skills of policy analysis and use these skills to enhance their understanding of issues in relation to tax policy and the development and application of tax law.

Outcomes

Upon completing this unit, students should be able to:

  • analyse the role of taxation in the modern Australian state and within a market economy
  • analyse tax policy from a range of disciplinary perspectives such as law, politics and economics
  • develop a critical appreciation of the significance of key tax policy choices relating to the tax mix (ie the combination of taxes), tax base (what should be taxed), tax rates and taxpaying units (ie who should be taxed)
  • appreciate the role of key norms and values such as equity, efficiency and justice in the tax policy debate
  • develop an understanding of how debates in relation to tax policy affect the practical administration of tax laws
  • apply skills of policy analysis and evaluation to the above issues.

Assessment

Class participation - 10 percent; Compulsory written assignment (2000 words) - 40 percent; 2 hour exam
30 minutes reading time - 50 percent

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

3 hours per week class contact

Prerequisites

Law 1101, Law 2101 and Law 2102

Co-requisites

Nil

Prohibitions

Nil


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton Second semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

This unit focuses on the avoidance, management and resolution of construction disputes, which is commonly referred to as the 'back end' of construction law. It begins with a critical analysis of the causes of construction disputes and the role that the construction contract and different project delivery methods play in construction disputes. Students explore various dispute avoidance processes (DAPs) that can prevent conflicts, which invariably arise during a construction project from escalating into disputes. Next, students examine the different 'real time' dispute resolution methods that can be used during the course of a construction project to assist parties to reach completion with no outstanding disputes. Finally, students explore the processes that are available for resolving disputes that remain outstanding post project completion, including ADR, arbitration and litigation. The focus is on the unique aspects of construction disputes that require specific responses including the use of Scott schedules and the hot-tubbing of experts.

Students will analyse construction dispute resolution processes in use in other jurisdictions, in order to evaluate whether the Australian systems are in need of reform. There will also be a critical examination of international arbitration to determine whether it represents world's best practice when it comes to construction dispute resolution.

Students will analyse traditional and alternative ways of resolving construction disputes and learn to research and write on construction dispute resolution issues.

Outcomes

A candidate who has successfully completed this unit should:
a.be able to identify the causes of construction disputes and the factors contributing to the escalation of construction conflicts into construction disputes;
b.be familiar with the different types of dispute avoidance processes (DAPs) used on construction projects around the world and the pros and cons of each;
c.understand the ways in which parties can engage in 'real time' resolution of construction disputes during the course of a project, and the legal ramifications of such processes;
d.recognise the broad range of ADR options available (mediation, expert determination, senior executive appraisal and early neutral evaluation) and the factors that influence the suitability of each for particular construction disputes;
e.be able to critically evaluate the use of arbitration for the resolution of construction disputes at both a domestic and international level;
f.have a comprehensive understanding of the regulatory regimes governing domestic and international arbitrations of construction disputes;
g.be able to assess the judicial systems in place in Australia and other countries for the determination of construction litigation and the need for reform; and
h.be able to undertake scholarly research and write clearly, concisely and logically on the avoidance, management and resolution of construction disputes.

Assessment

Research paper (1,500 words): 30%

Final Exam (2 and a half hours plus 30 minutes for reading and noting): 70%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

4 hours a week over 9 weeks

Prerequisites

LAW1101 Introduction to Legal Reasoning, LAW1101 Reading and Writing, LAW2101 Contract A, LAW2102 Contract B

Co-requisites

None

Prohibitions

None


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

The first half of the unit will consist of an in-depth consideration of the main theories of statutory interpretation: intentionalism, textualism and purposivism. With regard to intentionalism, the focus will not only be on the standard arguments for and against intentionalism, but also on the deeper theoretical commitments of intentionalism. For example, intentionalism presupposes that there is a defensible notion of legislative intent. Students will consider not only classic (aggregative) theories of legislative intent, and the criticisms of those theories, but also contemporary (largely non-aggregative) theories. Students will also consider the current scepticism among judges on the High Court of Australia towards the concept of legislative intent. Similarly, with regard to textualism, consideration will be given not only to the standard arguments for and against textualism, but also to different versions of textualism based on different accounts of the meaning of a legal text. Consideration will also be given to Andrei Marmor's recent argument that, while textualism provides an accurate account of the meaning of statutory texts, few appellate court cases involving statutory interpretation turn on a correct understanding of the meaning of the relevant statutory text.

The second half of the unit will turn from theory to practice, with an in-depth consideration of the High Court of Australia's current approach to statutory interpretation and some criticisms of that approach. Students will consider the role that constitutional principles governing the distinction between judicial and legislative power affect the way in which judges interpret statutes, the general approach that judges take to statutory interpretation and the account of the linguistic content of statutes implicitly accepted by the High Court. Consideration will also be given to the role that the principle of legality plays in the interpretation of statutes, and cases where the legal effect of a statute may differ from its linguistic content (where, for example, that linguistic content is ambiguous or where there is a need for equitable interpretation). Critical attention will focus on the High Court's understanding of the difference between legislative and judicial power, and its understanding of the relationship between the linguistic content of a statute and the legal effect of that statute.

Outcomes

This unit aims to:

  1. provide students with a detailed understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the main theories of statutory interpretation
  2. provide students with a detailed understanding of the High Court of Australia's current approach to statutory interpretation, and some of the key criticisms of that approach and
  3. improve students' skills of analysis and critical reasoning, by exposing them to the sophisticated debates between judges and academics in both Australia and the United States concerning statutory interpretation, and by requiring students to participate in those debates both in the research assignment and in the essay-based examination.

Assessment

There will be two assessment tasks for the unit:

1. a compulsory 2,500 word research assignment, worth 50% of the total mark for the unit; and
2. a two hour final examination, worth 50% of the total mark for the unit.

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

3 hours per week

Prerequisites

LAW1101 and LAW1104 (or equivalent from another institution)


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton Second semester 2014 (Day)
Coordinator(s)Dr Adam McBeth

Quota applies

The number of places available in this unit is 30 - 40 (depending on the number and identity of the competitions in which students enrolled in the unit participate)

Synopsis

Admission to this unit is by competitive application. The unit will be capped depending on the number of competitions offered from year to year. Criteria for selection will include course progression, marks in completed units, experience or skill in mooting, debating or other advocacy (assessed through an oral advocacy exercise).

Students will be allocated to teams for various external mooting competitions in which they will represent Monash University. These will vary from year to year, but may include:
Michael Kirby Contract Moot
Shine Torts Moot
Gibbs Constitutional Law Moot
Administrative Appeals Tribunal Moot
National Women's Moot
Castan Centre Human Rights Moot
National Environmental Moot
National Family Law Moot
Oxford Intellectual Property Moot
World Human Rights Moot
International Humanitarian Law Moot
Seminars are provided on advocacy techniques, research techniques and the drafting of court documents. Students will then work as a team on the problem relevant to their assigned competition, including researching the problem, preparing written submissions and formulating oral arguments. Attendance at scheduled sessions is compulsory.

Where permitted by the rules of the respective competitions, students will be invited to critique the practice performances of their peers in other competitions. Regular practice moots will also be held for each team, overseen by academics and external guest judges with expertise in the relevant field.

Outcomes

By the end of this unit, students will be able to:

  • Analyse a practical problem to identify the legal issues
  • Plan and execute a legal research task independently
  • Conduct legal research and locate appropriate case law, legislation and secondary materials
  • Draft concise written summaries of complex legal arguments
  • Interpret and apply legislative provisions in solving a legal problem
  • Engage in self-directed learning
  • Orally present a complex legal argument in a concise and compelling manner
  • Answer legal questions from a judge or arbitrator in real time
  • Identify and evaluate relevant ethical and moral issues in legal situations
  • Work as a team in solving a legal problem
  • Critique the work of peers in a professional manner

Assessment

Participation in seminars: 10% - This includes both class participation and engagement in constructive critique of other students' presentations.

Written submissions: 30% - Group mark (approximately 1500 words for each of the appellant/applicant and respondent)

Oral presentation: 60% - Individual mark, judged in the final practice moot before competition.

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

3 Hours per week

Prerequisites

LAW1102 and LAW1104
This unit is subject to a quota. Further information is available from the Law Faculty.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedPrato Term 2 2014 (Day)
Coordinator(s)Dr Gerry Nagtzaam

Quota applies

The number of places available for a unit taught in Prato is strictly limited to 45. This is the maximum room capacity at the Prato Centre.

Synopsis

This subject is designed to provide both a comprehensive and critical introduction to global ecoterrorism. The subject introduces students to the broad political challenges raised by the global enfironmental crisis both in the developed and developing world. The general historical evolution of international environmental law and policy will also be analysed. Attention will be given to the major environmental, economic and political tensions that have both shaped and constrained the evolution of 'ecoterrorist' groups.
The subject will in particular focus on the key individuals and major 'ecoterrorist' groups that have grown up as disillusion with the pace of environmental change within global society has increased. The subject will critically analyse the key groups often categorised as ecoterrorist including Earth First!, the Earth Liberation Front, the Animal Liberation Front and the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society. It will focus on their founders, historical development, key philosophical beliefs and practices. Students will be encouraged to draw on theoretical debates to identify the ways in which modern ecoterrorism has tested and/or reinforced the traditional assumptions, ideologies, arguments and institutions of international environmental law and policy.
Students will be challenged to develop and refine their ability to analyse critically the different ways in which environmental problems and risks are perceived, framed and managed by differently situated actors within an ecoterrorist context. The subject cover the international and domestic legal responses to ecoterrorism. The subject also contextualises the major legal developments by examining the key state and nonstate actors and institutions involved in the negotiation, settlement and enforcement of law relating to ecoterrorist activities. Finally, the evolving nature of international ecoterrorism law and policy, including problems and prospects for the future, will be critically examined.

Outcomes

Upon successful completion of this unit students are expected to

  1. demonstrate a general grasp of the historical evolution of international environmental law and policy in response to the increasingly global nature of ecological problems
  2. demonstrate a broad understanding of the diverse ideological character and claims of the modern environment movement and the major lines of contestation in the broader global environmental debate
  3. be able to identify the different ways in which new environmental issues, actors, interests and agendas have challenged the basic norms and institutions of global governance, particularly the system of sovereign states, environmental multilateralism, and the norms and institutions of global economic governance
  4. have a general understanding of the role of key individuals, actors and institutions involved in ecoterrorist activities
  5. recognise the tensions and debates within the national, international and global communities, about the role of direct action and ecoterrorism
  6. recognize and critically analyse the key groups often characterized as ecoterrorist including Earth First!, the Earth Liberation Front, the Animal Liberation Front and the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society
  7. be able to evaluate critically the different global institutional responses to global ecoterrorism
  8. have developed an appreciation of cross-cutting and emerging issues of international environmental law such as human rights, indigenous people, war and the environment and the perspectives of various actors in evolving those issues.
  9. have developed an ability to think critically and present a reasoned argument in relation to key developments and problems in international ecoterrorism law and policy
  10. be able to make an assessment of where global ecoterrorism can be expected to develop in the future.

Assessment

Individual seminar presentation (1,000 word paper submitted to the lecturer combined with a 20 minute presentation to other class members on a chosen topic): 20% and a take-home examination of 4,000 words maximum: 80%.

Chief examiner(s)

Prerequisites

LAW1101 and LAW1104 or other equivalent introduction to law courses offered at another University.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

This unit will build upon the study of Torts in the LLB Hons and explore a range of torts other than negligence and selected contemporary issues in relation to tortious liability. It will enhance students' understanding of the mechanisms through which torts law addresses civil wrongs. It will analyse the social, economic and political constraints in which torts law operates and how they find reflection in liability rules. Where appropriate, the unit will have regard to materials from other jurisdictions and adopt a comparative approach.

The issues considered may vary, depending on topicality and lecturer/student interest in a given year. They are likely to include some or all of the following:

  1. Theoretical perspectives on the role of torts law and its relationship with other compensation systems
  2. Torts to Goods
  3. Breach of Statutory Duty
  4. Economic Torts
  5. Protection of dignity and emotional well being
  6. Torts remedies
  7. Torts law litigation
  8. Torts law reform.

Outcomes

On completion of this unit students should be able to:

  1. demonstrate and apply specialised knowledge of a range of torts other than negligence as well as of current controversies in torts law;
  2. demonstrate advanced skills in interpreting civil liability legislation, torts law cases, academic commentary and law reform materials and applying them to solve practical problems and to evaluate torts law policy issues;
  3. critically evaluate the effectiveness of torts law in redressing civil wrongs having regard to the social, economic and political context in which tort law operates;
  4. conduct independent research into relevant domestic and international materials on current controversies in torts law; and
  5. write clear, creative and persuasive opinions and critical essays demonstrating an advanced understanding of contemporary torts and torts-related issues.

Assessment

Class participation: 10 %
Research paper (2,000 words): 40%
Examination: 50 %

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

3 hours per week

Prerequisites

LAW2201 Torts A (or equivalent in the new LLB Hon)

Co-requisites

None

Prohibitions

None


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedMalaysia Trimester 2 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

The unit focuses on providing the students with an understanding of fundamental aspects of the legal and constitutional systems of Malaysia and Singapore. Topics covered include the making of the Malaysian and Singapore constitutions, the King, Rulers and the Constitution, the 1983 Constitutional Crisis, the 1993 Constitutional Crisis, Emergency Powers and Preventive Detention Laws, the Malaysian Judiciary, religious freedom in Malaysia and Singapore's Presidency.

Outcomes

On completing the unit, the student should be able to:

  1. appreciate the key features of the constitutional systems of Malaysia and Singapore; and
  2. evaluate the significance of political and legal developments in relation to constitutionalism in Malaysia and Singapore.

Assessment

One 1,500 word research essay 30%;
Class participation 10%; and
Final exam (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time) 60%

Chief examiner(s)


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

The object of this unit is to examine the regulatory requirements for specific types of capital market transactions in Canada, the EU, the UK and the US. Subjects to be covered including the securities regulations affecting the issuance of securities, the disclosure requirements once securities are being traded in the secondary market, shareholders' rights, the securities aspects of takeover regulation, and definitions and prohibitions on insider trading.

Outcomes

On completion of this unit students should:

  1. Understand the legal frameworks for capital market regulation in Canada, the EU, the UK and the US, and the relationships between these systems of regulation and corporate governance reforms.
  2. Understand the varying regulatory philosophies and challenges informing the relevant capital market regulators in the different jurisdictions.
  3. Be able to critically evaluate the pressures brought to bear on national systems of capital market regulation in light of globalization and increasing shareholder activism by hedge funds; private equity and socially-responsible investors.

Assessment

Examination (24 hour take-home) 4 Questions 100% OR Examination (24 hour take-home) 2 Questions 50% AND Essay 4,000 words 50%

Workload requirements

The 36 hours of classes will be presented in a semi-intensive format of 9 hours of classes for 4 weeks.

Prerequisites


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

Part I, "Understanding Criminology", presents an overview of criminology - now made more exciting via integrated coverage of terrorism and related crimes - and describes the vast horizon of this science. It explains what crime is and techniques for measuring the amount and characteristics of crime and criminals. It also traces the history of criminological thought through the era that witnessed the formation of the major schools of criminology, classicism and positivism (eighteenth and nineteenth centuries).
Part II, "Explanations of Crime and Criminal Behaviour", includes explanations of crime and criminal behaviour on the basis of the various theories developed in the twentieth century. Among the subjects covered are theories that offer biological, psychological, sociological, socio-political, and integrated explanations. Coverage of research by radical, socialist, and feminist criminologists has been updated. Theories that discuss why offenders choose to commit one offence rather than another at a given time and place are also covered in this part.
Part III, "Types of Crime", covers the various types of crimes from a legal and sociological perspective. The familiar street crimes, such as homicide and robbery, are assessed, as are other criminal activities such as white-collar and corporate crime, which are so much in the spotlight these days, as well as other high-tech crimes that have been highlighted by researchers only in recent years.

Outcomes

Upon completing this unit, students should

  • understand crime as a social phenomenon;
  • have participated in theoretical debates, contributed ideas, and been exposed to solutions to the problems of crime;
  • understand the threat posed by terrorism and by white collar crime;
  • be exposed to contrasting approaches to controlling terrorism;
  • be exposed to contrasting approaches to controlling white collar and corporate offences; and
  • be familiar with international research and statistical information on the critical issues facing the field of contemporary criminology

Assessment

Research assignment (2,000 words): 25% and final open-book exam (2 hours 30 minutes plus 30 minutes reading time): 75%.

Workload requirements

The 36 hours of classes will be presented in a semi-intensive format of 9 hours of classes per week for 4 weeks.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedPrato Term 2 2014 (Day)

Quota applies

The number of places available for a unit taught in Prato is strictly limited to 45. This is the maximum room capacity at the Prato Centre.

Synopsis

All societies grapple with the issues of ensuring compliance with criminal laws, establishing appropriate forms of punishment, and implementing those punishments in acceptable and effective ways. This unit focuses on theories, institutions and processes relating to the legal system's response to breaches of the criminal law, in a range of comparative jurisdictions. Students will examine theories of punishment, approaches to and options for sentencing, contributions being made in various jurisdictions by therapeutic jurisprudence and restorative justice, and different approaches to the use of imprisonment. Students will also examine the operation and management of imprisonment in a range of jurisdictions, including issues of discipline, drug use, gender and ethnicity, and human rights.

Outcomes

On completion of this unit students will have acquired or developed

  1. an understanding of the objectives and theories of sentencing and punishment;
  2. a knowledge of current global legal, political and social perspectives on sentencing and punishment;
  3. an understanding of theories of punishment, and sentencing alternatives, in a range of comparative jurisdictions
  4. the ability to independently research and critically analyse problems in the enforcement of the criminal law; and
  5. the ability to think critically about the principles and institutions which relate to punishment.

Assessment

Research assignment 50% (2500 words)
AND
Take home examination: 50% (2500 words)

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Students should allocate a total of 12 hours per week of class contact/private study/preparation, including 3 hours/week of lecture attendance.

Prerequisites

LAW1100 OR LAW1101 AND LAW1102 OR LAW1104 AND LAW3300 OR LAW3301 AND LAW3302


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

The unit in Remedies will consider the remedial goals of the common law, equity and some important statutes, as well as examine the legal rules and principles which give effect to these goals.

The focus will be on damages and coercive remedies. The course will begin by studying the principles underlying compensation before moving to restitution, punishment and coercion. While it will not be possible to look at every general law remedy, the major topics concerning the assessment of damages in tort and contract, misleading or deceptive conduct and for breach of equitable obligations will be studied.

Among the questions to be considered are:

  • With compensatory damages being the primary remedy for many torts and for breach of contract, what role is there for punishment and gain-based damages in our law of civil obligations and what remedies give effect to these goals?
  • Why are the compensation rules for tort different from those for contract? How are they different?
  • How do the doctrine of mitigation and other limiting factors affect compensation in common law?
  • In what ways does the assessment of damages for misleading or deceptive conduct differ from damages in tort and contract?
  • Is compensation assessed differently where there is a breach of an equitable obligation? Should it be?
  • When are injunctions and specific performance available, and what factors affect their availability?

Outcomes

On completion of this unit, students should:

  • have gained a good understanding of the law of remedies as a legal discipline and an area of practice
  • understand and be able to explain the various goals of remedies
  • appreciate the interaction between causes of action and remedial responses
  • have acquired specific knowledge in the areas of damages for torts, breach of contract and misleading and deceptive conduct; equitable compensation and coercive relief
  • have developed a critical understanding of contemporary issues in Remedies Law
  • have developed and demonstrated their ability to engage in informed and articulate oral discussions on issues in Remedies Law
  • have developed and demonstrated the ability to independently research, analyse and write on issues in Remedies Law
  • be able to solve practical problems that involve the Law of Remedies and to prepare clear and accurate written advice for clients

Assessment

Option A: assignment (3000 words): 60%; examination (2 hours writing and 30 mins reading and noting): 40% OR Option B: examination (2 hours writing and 30 mins reading and noting): 100%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

There will be a 2 hour seminar and a separate one hour class, the latter generally in the form of a workshop class. It is expected that students prepare for each class, with an average of 3 hour private study for each contact hour.

Prerequisites

Co-requisites


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

The contents of the unit will be varied depending on topical issues pertaining to the judiciary as they arise from time to time. But it would include many if not all of the following:

  • The Judiciary as a branch of government. This will entail an exploration of the concept of judicial independence and its interrelationship with the doctrine of separation of powers. It will focus on the standards for judicial independence as prescribed by international instruments. The relationship with other branches of government will be analysed.
  • Appointment of Judges and Conditions of Service This topic will examine on a comparative basis judicial appointment processes and the criteria for judicial appointment. The implications of appointing acting, reserve and part-time judges, the conditions of service, judicial education and disputes about entitlements to hold and exercise judicial office.
  • Removal, Suspension and Discipline of Judges What constitutes 'judicial misbehaviour'? A study of removal mechanisms from various jurisdictions and the grounds for removal from judicial office. The constitutional dimensions of suspension of judges. Mechanisms to deal with complaints against judges with particular attention to the Judicial Officers Act 1986 (NSW).
  • Judicial Officers and the Rule Against Bias Disqualification of judges and recusals. Public Interest and Private Interest and Codes of Ethics. The involvement of judges in extra-curial activities will be considered, especially conducting commissions and committees of inquiry.
  • Modes of Protecting the Judicial Institution A general consideration of contempt of court and attacks on the judiciary. Criticism of the judiciary and the proper limits. Offences relating to the administration of justice. The scope of judicial immunities. Parliamentary conventions relating to the judiciary.
  • Judicial Accountability The concept of accountability. Meaning of 'open' court. A duty to give reasons; appeals and reviews. The relationship between the courts and the media. Judicial involvement in public controversies.

Outcomes

On completion of this unit students should

  • have developed an in-depth understanding of the fundamental notions of judicial independence and judicial accountability, with particular reference to international guidelines and norms
  • have acquired an appreciation of the contemporary challenges relating to the Australian judiciary from a comparative perspective
  • be able to evaluate critically the exercise of judicial power, particularly in times of crisis
  • be able to evaluate proposals to reform the judicial institution.

Assessment

Research assignment (max 2500 words): 50%
AND
Examination (1.5 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 50%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Average number of three hours of contact hours per week over 13 weeks. An additional nine hours private study/preparation and research work per week.

Prerequisites

LAW1101 and LAW1102 OR LAW1104


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

Topics covered are:

  1. introduction and history of the GATT/WTO system;
  2. the nature of disputes and dispute settlement;
  3. dispute settlement organs of the WTO;
  4. dispute settlement rules and procedures;
  5. elements of non-violation complaints and GATT/WTO jurisprudence;
  6. jurisdiction, standing and essential elements of a claim:
    1. against whom may a claim be brought?
    2. the proper complainant
    3. activities which may be challenged.
  7. consultations, arbitration and alternative dispute resolution:
    1. consultations
    2. good offices, conciliation and mediation
    3. arbitration.
  8. establishment of the panel process:
    1. panel composition
    2. terms of reference.
  9. panel functions, process and procedure:
    1. powers and obligations of panels
    2. due process and procedure
    3. timing and urgency
    4. substantive stages of the panel process
    5. multiple complaints and joinder
    6. third party rights
    7. standard of review
    8. panel report - recommendations and rulings.
  10. sources of law and their interpretation;
  11. evidence, fact finding; burden and standards of proof;
  12. implementation and remedies;
  13. appeals and the appellate process:
    1. appellate Body Jurisdiction
    2. rights to appeal
    3. grounds of appeal - Law vs Facts.
  14. additional dispute settlement provisions - treatment of developing countries.

Outcomes

A candidate who has successfully completed this unit should:

  1. be familiar with the history and objectives of the GATT and WTO and ongoing negotiations;
  2. be familiar with the major WTO dispute settlement bodies and their decisions (by ad hoc panels and the appellate body);
  3. be able to explain the approach of the WTO to evidence and to procedure; and
  4. understand the key challenges that apply to national import and export behaviour and explain the likely outcomes, through the cases, and other dispute resolution techniques.

Assessment

Open book examination (3 hours): 75%; assigned seminar presentation: 10%; and short response papers (3 x 400 words each):15%

Workload requirements

The 36 hours of classes will be presented in 3.5 weeks. The remainder of the student workload of 108 hours will consist of pre-reading prior to class, preparing for class participation, researching and writing an assignment, and preparation for the final examination.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

The "democratization of credit" refers to the recent expansion in access to credit by households in the lower ranges of the distribution of income. A major policy question raised by the democratization of credit is how to adapt consumer bankruptcy law and parallel out-of-court measures to the increased incidence of over indebtedness. As the recent sub prime crisis highlights, common law systems have generally taken a laissez-faire approach and used the bankruptcy system as the primary legal remedy when debtors cannot repay their loans. This unit will deal with the approaches taken in a number of jurisdictions, including Europe and North America, to address the policy questions raised by the democratization of credit in recent years. Among the subjects considered are: out of court and formal bankruptcy procedures, consensual negotiation, creditor responsibility and the historical trajectory of regulatory approaches to over indebtedness.

Outcomes

On completion of this unit, students should:
a. understand the underlying policies and the range of options for dealing with consumer over indebtedness in a number of international and comparative systems and legislation;
b. be able to understand and critically assess over indebtedness in relation to general themes in commercial law, and law generally, including the relative role of rules and standards, the tension between certainty and flexibility, the use of judicial discretion and the managerial role of judges; and
c. grasp the ways in which bankruptcy systems and legislation touch on regulatory theories and have implications for the day-to-day lives of many people globally.

Assessment

Class presentation (group or individual) 10%; oral participation 10% and research essay 80% (4,000 words)

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Students will be required to attend 36 hours of seminars, and undertake approximately an additional 108 hours of private study, including reading, class preparation, assignment preparation and revision time over the duration of the course.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

This unit will introduce the students to the fundamental concepts, policies and mechanisms of corporate insolvency law. It will emphasize specifically the mechanisms designed for rescuing a firm as a going-concern. The unit will discuss formal insolvency proceedings as well as informal out-of-court negotiations between a firm and its creditors. The unit will focus on the following issues:

  1. introducing the various types of corporate insolvency proceedings;
  2. the legal requirements for initiation of each insolvency proceeding;
  3. management's fiduciary duties upon insolvency of the firm;
  4. the control of a firm while it undergoes an insolvency proceedings;
  5. advanced financial planning to combat corporate insolvency (bankruptcy remote
  6. ;
  7. a comparison between insolvency proceedings and out-of-court negotiations;
  8. the relationship between insolvency proceedings and a government bailout;
  9. the authorities of financial regulators upon a firm's insolvency;
    1. the moratorium against the firm's creditors;
  10. the avoiding powers in and insolvency proceeding;
  11. the priority between various types of creditors;
  12. prototypes of corporate rescue (reorganization or going-concern sales);
  13. creditors' representation and voting rights in a rescue regime.

Outcomes

The objectives of this unit are:

  • to introduce the students to the fundamental dilemmas of financially distressed firms;
  • to teach the available legal alternatives for resolving financial distress;
  • to expose the underlying policies of corporate insolvency law;
  • to elaborate on corporate creditors' rights; and
  • to provide a comparative perspective of corporate insolvency law.

Assessment

Class participation: 10%, class test: 10% and examination (two and a half hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 80%.

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Students will be required to attend 36 hours of seminars, and undertake approximately an additional 108 hours of private study, including reading, class preparation, assignment preparation and exam revision time over the duration of the course.

Prerequisites

LAW 4171 Corporations Law or equivalent


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

Product Liability refers to civil liability for injuries caused by defective products. This class will focus mainly on two systems of addressing injuries from defective products the American law system and the European Union system.
Product liability occupies a central role in American law, as the number of new products used by consumers has increased exponentially. With this proliferation of new consumer products has come an increase in injuries. Products liability is a major way America attempts to deter firms from manufacturing unsafe products, and to compensate those that suffer injury from those products.
The first part of the course will examine the American product liability system, focusing on the key sources of law underlying that system--common law principles of negligence, strict liability and deceit, contract and warranty principles, and statutory principles found in the Uniform Commercial Code. Using these sources of law, the course will explore the main theories of manufacturer liability, the concept of product defect, and defences available to the manufacturer under American law.
The second part of the course will explore the same issues from the EU perspective. The European Community adopted its first Product Liability Directive in 1985, and its version of strict products liability has since been adopted in some version in many parts of the world. The EU approach differs in many important ways from the American approach. For example, the EU directive focuses on a test for defect the consumer expectation test that has been abandoned or given less significance in most American jurisdictions. The two systems like wise differ in their respective approaches to proof, remedies, defences, and defining a proper defendant. Moreover, unlike the American system, where product liability dominates the system of accident compensation, in most European countries, product liability plays a more modest role, and acts more as a supplement to the social compensation systems available in those countries.
Why have the two systems evolved in such different ways? What are the advantages and disadvantages of the different approaches? Those are the core issues that the course will address.

Outcomes

The objective of the course is to understand and compare two systems of addressing injuries from consumer products, the American law approach and the European Union approach.

Assessment

Assessment will be based on class participation (10%), a short research project based on class readings (40%), and a take home examination (50%).

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Students will be required to attend 36 hours of seminars, and undertake approximately an additional 108 hours of private study, including reading, class preparation, assignment preparation and exam revision time over the duration of the course.

Prerequisites

LAW2101 Contract A and LAW2102 Contract B and LAW2201 Torts A and LAW2202 Torts B or an equivalent Introductory course in tort law and contract law at another university.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

Climate change has been described as the defining legal and policy challenge of the 21st century. This unit provides an introduction to the international legal response to this challenge. It examines critically the emergence of climate change as a public policy problem, the relationship between climate science and climate policy, and the negotiation, content and implementation of international legal instruments related to climate change. It will not consider national, sub national or non-governmental approaches to climate change. Topics to be addressed include:

  • the causes and impacts of, and trends in, global climate change;
  • the problem of scientific uncertainty and its implications for international climate change law;
  • the main options for and obstacles to mitigation of and adaptation to climate change, and the relationship between mitigation and adaptation;
  • the international politics of climate change, including the differing positions, interests and priorities of developed and developing states and the special challenges facing particularly vulnerable states and communities;
  • the negotiation, content and implementation of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol, including Joint Implementation, the Clean Development Mechanism, international emissions trading, financial assistance and technology transfer;
  • key issues and developments in the negotiation and implementation of a post-Kyoto international climate change agreement;
  • the role and meaning of the concepts of state sovereignty, common concern of humankind, sustainable development, common but differentiated responsibilities, intra- and inter-generational equity, the precautionary principle, and climate justice in the international climate change legal regime;
  • key issues, options, proposals and rules surrounding the incorporation of land use and forestry into the international climate change regime, including Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD);
  • compliance, enforcement and dispute settlement in the international climate change regime;
  • interactions between the international climate change regime and international regimes related to ozone depletion, biodiversity, law of the sea, human rights, and international trade; and
  • options and prospects for a transition to a carbon-free or low-carbon future.

Outcomes

By the end of the unit, students should be able to:

  • identify the causes and impacts of, and trends in, global climate change;
  • identify and evaluate critically the main options for and obstacles to mitigation of and adaptation to climate change, and the relationship between mitigation and adaptation;
  • discuss critically the international politics of climate change, including the differing positions, interests and priorities of developed and developing states and the special challenges facing particularly vulnerable states and communities;
  • interpret, apply and evaluate critically the main features of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol;
  • discuss critically the key issues in the negotiation and implementation of a post-Kyoto international climate change agreement, and evaluate critically the main features of any such agreement;
  • explain the concepts of state sovereignty, common concern of humankind, sustainable development, common but differentiated responsibilities, intra- and inter-generational equity, the precautionary principle, climate justice, compliance and enforcement, and apply them to the problem of climate change;
  • explain the major interactions between the international climate change regime and international regimes related to ozone depletion, biodiversity, law of the sea, human rights, and international trade;
  • evaluate critically the options and prospects for a transition to a carbon-free or low-carbon future; and
  • generate new ideas and options by preparing for and participating in role-playing simulations of international climate change negotiations.

Assessment

Evaluation will be by a variety of methods. A substantial portion of the assessment will be based on group work for which each member of a group receives the same mark. Participation: 10%, group assignment (1000 words): 20%; role-playing negotiation exercise (conducted in 3 parts): Part 1: 10%, Part 2: 10%, Part 3: 10%; final exam (2 hours, closed book): 40%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Students will be required to attend 36 hours of seminars, and undertake approximately an additional 108 hours of private study, including reading, class preparation, assignment preparation and exam revision time over the duration of the course.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

On completion of this unit, a student should be able to:

  • demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles of international tax law and design;
  • understand the broad framework of Austalia's income tax and GST systems;
  • understand Australia's basic international tax rules;
  • identify similarities and differences between Australia's basic tax rules and those of other countries, particularly Singapore and Malaysia; and
  • engage in discussion about jurisdictional and policy issues relating to the design of tax systems.

Outcomes

This unit will examine Australia's taxation laws from an international and comparative perspective. It will outline the broad features of the Australian tax system and compare and contrast these features with the broad features of the Malaysian and Singaporean tax systems. Aspects of certain other countries tax regimes will also be briefly considered. Similarities and differences between the various regimes will be highlighted, discussed and analysed. The unit will focus on income taxation and consumption taxation (GST). It will use the Australian tax system as the basis for further comparative discussion. Special attention will be devoted to discussing Australia's international tax rules and its international tax treaties with Singapore and/or Malaysia. Broad policy issues relating to the design of tax systems and international tax rules will also be considered.

The following topics will be covered in the unit:

  • Principles of taxation law policy and design;
  • Structural features of income and consumption taxes;
  • Rate structures " progressive and flat rate structures;
  • Design of good tax systems
  • Tax expenditures;
  • Jurisdictional issues;
  • International tax enforcement;
  • GST (focusing on taxation of common transactions, including imports and exports and a comparison of the Australian and Singapore GST systems);
  • Residence and Source;
  • Income and deductions;
  • Capital gains taxation (focusing on taxation of international transactions);
  • Foreign tax credits and exemptions;
  • Withholding taxes;
  • Double Tax Agreements (focusing on Australia's agreements with Singapore and Malaysia);
  • Tax Information Exchange Agreements;
  • Corporate taxation systems (focusing on the difference between imputation, exemption and deduction systems);
  • Accruals taxation regimes;
  • Tax havens; and
  • International tax policy issues.

Assessment

Class participation: 10%
Class presentation: 10%
Research paper (1,500 words): 30%
Take home examination: 50%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Students will be required to attend 36 hours of seminars, and undertake approximately an additional 108 hours of private study, including reading, class preparation, assignment preparation and revision time over the duration of the course.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

Rules aim to create order in our society. They provide structure so people know how to behave and what to expect from others. Rules are devised by people. Biologically, people are creatures that live in groups and need groups. Rules are needed to maintain group stability. Law, therefore, is in essence a biological phenomenon that can, and indeed should, be studied in the light of biological theories. In addition, because modern biology cannot be comprehended without evolutionary processes, evolutionary biology is one of the perspectives that can increase our understanding of the principles of law. To be sure, we should be careful in applying biological mechanisms to legal subjects, yet we may more fully grasp the nature of law by bringing the two disciplines together.
It is currently also difficult to use evolutionary biology to determine which legal incentives should be used to regulate behaviour, not least because we do not exactly know to what end we should regulate behaviour. However, these caveats do not imply that law cannot be seen as a kind of extended phenotype that can be studied by biologists. With the right genes, an organism can build a shelter, thereby improving not only its survival chances but also the replication chances of its genes. It is reasonable to assume that people have the right genes to build a law system that maximises their survival chances.
However, will this confuse the is with the ought? In philosophy, it is taboo to derive norms from facts. In the context of law and biology, however, this seems odd as connecting these disciplines is very much about linking the ought and the is. Where biology can give us credible foundations for law, there necessarily has to be a connection between is and ought. Moreover, we should ask ourselves whether there even is a substantial difference between the two notions. Could we not regard the ought as a particular type of is?
From this point of view, morals and rules are a product of our brain, as are all interpretations of facts. The brain in its turn is also a product of genes and environment.
When law is studied from a biological perspective, then questions should be asked about the rationality of law. How can a judge take a strictly rational decision when our thinking is closely linked with emotion and feelings? Can the gap between legal professionals and ordinary citizens be partly explained because jurists do not ask themselves whether lawfulness includes a sense of justice?
In this course we will study biological and psychological backgrounds of the law. This may not always be easy, because several of our certainties may prove to be illusory or ill-founded. Asking questions about the biological foundations of law involves questioning our own identity. In that sense, science is ruthless; dogmas must and will be questioned.
Can biology and psychology give all the answers? Certainly not. Nevertheless, it is important to think implications over. As Mill said: Maybe the opinion is true, or maybe is contains a portion of truth an even there is no truth in it at all, then it still sharpens our own conviction.
In this course we will explore some biological and psychological facts and we will ask ourselves questions like: Can biology usefully contribute to moral argument? Can it contribute to an understanding of the proper role and functioning of legal norms?
The lecturer published articles in which he states that the ought can be derived from the biological is. Nevertheless, he explicitly challenges his students to falsify this statement. In this way students can explore the issues and form their own views.

Outcomes

Learning objectives:

  • becoming acquainted with biological perspectives on moral, norms and law;
  • considering biological and psychological perspectives to jurisprudence and philosophy of law;
  • discovering new empirical perspectives on law; and
  • discovering man as a biological and psychological origin of law and order.

Assessment

Class participation (10%) and paper in which an article on law and an article on psychology/biology are compared

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Students will be required to attend 36 hours of seminars, and undertake approximately an additional 108 hours of private study, including reading, class preparation, assignment preparation and exam revision time over the duration of the course.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

This unit will provide an overview of the obligations under international law to provide protection to trade marks and a comparison of selected, key aspects of trade mark protection in Australia, the United States and the EU. Consequently, in relation to international law. it will examine the trade mark aspects of the TRIPS agreement and the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy of ICANN relating to domain names. To a lesser extent, deal with the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property and the Madrid Protocol relating to multiple filings of trade mark applications. Selected, key aspects of comparison will include issues such as jurisdiction specific approaches to ownership, the requirements for registrability of trade marks such as shape trade marks and the different approaches to infringement, including dilution of trade marks and parallel importing. Other topics may include the registration and control of domain names. It is likely that, in light of Australian legislative proposals, the unit will also critically examine the arguments of the tobacco industry that international trade mark obligations prevent the implementation of plain packaging of cigarettes.

Outcomes

  1. A knowledge of the key international conventions in the field of trade mark law.
  2. An understanding of the key issues relating to trade mark registration and enforcement of trade mark rights.
  3. Be able to compare and contrast approaches to key issues in trade mark registration and enforcement in Australia, the USA and the EU.
  4. Have an understanding of cross-border trade mark issues such as control of domain names.
  5. Awareness of the limits, if any, on government regulation of trade marked products

Assessment

Class participation: 10%; compulsory assignment (1,500 words): 30%; and final exam of 2 hours plus 30 minutes for reading and noting: 60%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Students will be required to attend 36 hours of seminars, and undertake approximately an additional 108 hours of private study, including reading, class preparation, assignment preparation and exam revision time over the duration of the course.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

This course begins with comparative approaches to a range of legal traditions in which family law is idiosyncratically situated. Topical issues touching on how domestic law interacts with legal diversity in family law will be canvassed. Particular emphasis will be placed on the interactions between religiously-governed family law and secular state law.
From the comparative law perspective, the course will progress to a consideration of the ways in which Immigration and Refugee Law interacts with domestic family law and family law policy.
The seminar will then progress to an examination of the traditional common law conflict of law principles that touch on family law matters, including jurisdiction and recognition and international enforcement of foreign family law orders. Consideration will then be given to the modification of the common law regime by treaty and legislation, including the various Hague Conventions that apply to family law issues. Further attention will be given to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child as well as other human rights treaties. Each regime will be considered in the context of its impact upon domestic legal issues.
The six main area of family law will be examined through the lenses of comparative and international law, including marriage, divorce, matrimonial property, adoption, custody, and support.

Outcomes

Objectives include:

  • have students develop an awareness of the range of legal traditions within which family law is situated;
  • have students develop an awareness of links among Immigration and Refugee Law, domestic family law, and family law policy; and
  • have students develop an understanding of both private and public international law principles that impact upon domestic legal issues.

Assessment

The students will complete four short (1250 words) critical analysis papers. Each paper will be worth 25% of the overall unit grade.

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Students will be required to attend 36 hours of seminars, and undertake approximately an additional 108 hours of private study, including reading, class preparation, and assignment preparation over the duration of the course.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton Second semester 2014 (Day)
Coordinator(s)Professor Graeme Hodge; Mr Eric Windhoz

Synopsis

This Unit explores the interrelationship between public policy, regulation and the law. The Unit begins by introducing students to the policy cycle - the process by which issues (or problems) are identified and prioritised for action by government, and the action to be taken to address the issue (solve the problem) is agreed. In doing so, the Unit will expose students to some of the challenges facing governments and regulators when deciding whether and how to address a particular issue. The Unit also will introduce students to the breadth of tools available to governments to achieve their policy ends. In doing so, the Unit will explore how the concept of 'regulation' has expanded beyond the traditional legal concept of regulation as rules promulgated by a sovereign state, to include all the tools used by governments to alter or control the behaviour of people and other entities. The Unit will then explore some the theories, concepts and constructs that explain regulatory practice in a modern liberal capitalist society, before moving on to consider what may constitute 'good' regulation and regulatory practice. Finally, the Unit will explore how the law intersects with, supports and shapes public policy and the regulatory endeavour. Rather than focus on one substantive area of regulation, several case studies will be used to illustrate and highlight the general themes of the Unit. Moreover, the Unit will include aspects of politics, economics, public administration and public policy in its consideration of the issues, further developing students' skills in understanding and applying the law in its societal context.

Outcomes

On completion of the Unit students should have:

  • acquired an understanding of the policy cycle and the challenges facing governments and regulators when deciding whether and how to regulate a particular issue;
  • acquired an understanding of a number of theories, concepts and constructs that explain regulatory practice in a modern liberal capitalist society;
  • acquired the capacity to apply a number of regulatory theories, concepts and constructs to analyse a basic regulatory regime to identify its key elements and institutional characteristics;
  • acquired a general understanding of the relationship between regulation and the other principal activities of government;
  • further developed skills in understanding and applying the law in its societal context;
  • further developed skills in research and critical analysis;
  • further developed oral communication skills;
  • an opportunity to develop team work skills.

Assessment

Research assignment: 50% (50 marks).
Examination (120 minutes writing time plus 10 minutes reading time): 50% (50 marks).

Research assignment:
The assignment will consist of an oral presentation (10 marks) and a written paper (40 marks).
Students will be given the choice of undertaking the assignment individually or in self-managed teams of 2, 3 or 4 persons.
Individual assignment:
+ 5 minute oral presentation; and
+ 2000 word written paper.
Group assignment:
+ 10 minute group oral presentation - the marks for which will be common to all students in that group; and
+ 2000 word group written paper - the marks for which will be common to all students in that group.

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

3 hours per week

Prerequisites

Co-requisites

None

Prohibitions

None


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

This course will compare the methods of statutory interpretation in different countries. We will examine the lawmaking processes of the various nations, and what effect different processes should have on statutory interpretation. To that end, we will examine the various goals of statutory interpretation. We also will consider the effects of operating under civil law versus the common law system. Likewise, we will consider the effects of operating in a parliamentary, democratic, or some other, system. The course has multiple aims. First, it will provide a survey of the various legal systems. Second, it will provide students with insights into why each system has adopted particular legislative and judicial rules. In that vein, the course will also consider whether the rules each system has adopted are optimal when compared to the wide range of available rules. Third, the course will provide a working knowledge of the theoretical underpinnings of legislation and judicial interpretation of laws, so that students will be able to discuss the merits or demerits of particular systems on a more abstract level.

Outcomes

  • To introduce students to various legislative procedures used in different countries
  • To compare the various methods of interpretation used in different countries
  • To encourage students to think critically about the reasons for legislation and the goals of the courts in implementing that legislation
  • To consider whether the transference of legislative or interpretative methods from one country to another could improve lawmaking

Assessment

Performance in this class will be evaluated in three ways. The first is class participation. Class participation will constitute 5% of the grade. The second is a midterm examination. This midterm will be in-class and will last one hour. (It will be the first hour of class that day; we will have ordinary class for the balance of the time period after the test that day.) The midterm will constitute 15% of the grade. The third is a final examination. It will constitute 80% of the grade. It will be two and a half hours; students will be given half an hour of reading time before the time for the examination begins.

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Students will be required to attend 36 hours of seminars, and undertake approximately an additional 108 hours of private study, including reading, class preparation, assignment preparation and exam revision time over the duration of the course.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton Summer semester A 2014 (Day)
Coordinator(s)Dr Eric Wilson

Synopsis

The representation of Law and lawyers within popular culture is one of the most important, but underappreciated, dimensions of the legal profession, of practice, and of the practical negotiation of legal ethics. The 'social status' of the lawyer within the wider culture is one of the dominant factors governing the student's decision to enter (or not to enter) law school. Furthermore, the dissemination of judicial procedure and dispute resolution through popular culture and the mass media is one of the primary means of both enforcing and challenging the legitimacy of Law and its practitioners within the broader community.
Within the diverse representations of Law offered by popular culture both literature and cinema are of special significance. Literature, both 'elitist' (Kafka; Camus) and 'popular' (Thurow; Grisham) is one of the primary mediums for the critical examination of legal reasoning and the nature and ethics of practice within the wider culture, often revealing subversive and confronting truths normally suppressed by conventional legal education and training. Cinema, along with television, is one of the leading arenas for the formulation of the social consensus concerning the nature of Law and lawyers, often artistically re-staging the processes of legal reasoning and dispute resolution so as to both critique and affirm the legitimacy of legal culture.
This unit will examine all of these issues through a critical analysis and discussion of a number of the seminal 'texts' within both the literature and cinema of Law.

Outcomes

This unit will explore the academic subject of 'Law and Popular Culture' by utilizing some of the classic literary and cinematic 'texts' that treat with the Law, lawyers, legal practice, and legal reasoning. A student successfully completing this unit should be expected to demonstrate proficiency in discussing the following four issues that will be covered by this course.

  1. Employing an inter-disciplinary approach grounded primarily, but not exclusively, upon cultural studies and critical theory, the unit will examine the representation of law and lawyers within popular culture, primarily through their respective depictions in the 'mass media' form of both literature (popular and elitist) and cinema. An additional objective is to introduce students to the branch of critical legal studies known as 'law and literature', which can be broken down into three components:
    1. the ideology of law and legal practice as a means of both legitimizing and critiquing contemporary legal culture
    2. the discursive nature of representations of law and lawyers within the wider community that govern the social perceptions of legal practice and dispute resolution
    3. the social function of the cultural representation of law, which operates to reconcile the community to orthodox legal practice through the creation and circulation of a set of stereotypes and collective expectations concerning legal standards and outcomes.

  1. The primary sources of literature and cinema will be used as an alternative, or 'non-academic', means for a critical and reflective consideration of outstanding issues in more formally academic domains of legal scholarship, including legal ethics and the philosophy of law. The study of the literary and cinematic treatment of classic problems of jurisprudence, including the nature of the rule of law, the social contract, sovereignty, due process, and natural justice, will reveal the extent to which formal legal theory serves as an expression of wider patterns of cultural and aesthetic forms of reasoning.

  1. Employing both academic (secondary) and non-academic (primary) texts, the unit will consider a number of important facets of critical legal scholarship, most importantly the 'law and literature' movement, which tries to both explain and critique law in terms of the various literary techniques of dramatic narrative. This unit largely operates within the 'law and literature' tradition by directly engaging with novels and films, both of which are highly narrative-driven artistic forms. The text's depiction and resolution of the legal issue under its consideration will be discussed in class as a parallel, or secondary, commentary on the centrality of narrative to all forms of legal speech and practice.

  1. The unit will offer a wider and more sophisticated understanding of the nature and value of inter-disciplinary approaches, such as cultural studies, to the development of legal scholarship than is offered in traditional 'black letter' law courses.

Assessment

Two reflective essays (1000 words each; 20% each) and one extended essay (3000 words; 60%). The topics for all three assignments will be assigned by the instructor. Class attendance and participation is mandatory.

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

3 hours per week

Prerequisites

Co-requisites

None

Prohibitions

None


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

The traditional line between public and private law used to be drawn between constitutional, criminal and administrative law as public law, and subjects loosely associated around the laws of obligations; contract, tort and restitution. Alternatively, laws that govern the relationship between citizen and state, is public law, and laws governing the relationship between two actors, is private law. Both approaches no longer adequately describe the relationship between public and private. Increasingly, the state is resorting to private law to create and enforce social policy. Similarly, courts are being asked to give what are traditionally associated as private law remedies to public law claims. Courts are also engaging through enforcement of private law litigation a regulatory role that transcends the immediate interests of the litigants. This course explores the increasingly blurred relationship between public and private law. Our course draws on experiences from a variety of jurisdictions. Our account is episodic; we do not have any ideological position on the material we will present. Some topics to be covered include the following:

  • Jurisprudential Accounts of Public and Private Law
  • A vision of multiculturalism
  • Privatizing criminal law
  • Damages as a Constitutional Remedy

Permanent Injunctions as Constitutional Remedies - Structural Injunctions

  • Interlocutory Injunctions in Constitutional Settings

Conceptions of Privacy and Enforcement

  • Class Actions and Behavioural Modification
  • Tobacco and other vices
  • The Enforcement of Morality
  • Public Impediments to reforming Tort Law
  • The place of an apology in law

Outcomes

On completion of the unit a student should:

  • have gained an understanding of different approaches to selected rights and remedial issues engaged with enforcement;
  • understand the complex relationship between public and private rights and how remedies are critical to the expression of those rights;
  • understand the wider context of law and society, and in particular the relationship between rights and remedies and how social policy goals are asserted through various legal doctrines;
  • have a critical appreciation of different conceptions of public and private rights and the remedies problems experienced in a number of common law countries; and
  • have developed the ability to independently research and write a minor memorandum on a remedies topic.

Assessment

Class participation 10%, research memorandum 30% (1500 words), and two hour examination for 60%.

Chief examiner(s)


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

In the beginning of the 21st century, it seems that the age of parliamentary democracy had passed and that the concept of constitutional democracy had swept the world. Yet, closer study reveals that the picture is not uniform. First, substantively different versions of the constitutional model may be identified. Second, it is already possible to see the first signs of a shift to a stage of synthesis in which a new constitutional model is being generated which integrates the principle of the supremacy of the legislature with that of the supremacy of the judiciary.
This course will concentrate on presenting various constitutional models and examining their advantages and disadvantages. The course will be divided into three parts. In the first part we shall describe the 'traditional constitutional model' and its underlying rationale. In addition, we shall distinguish between various versions of this model and illustrate them by describing and comparing the constitutional mechanism in a number of countries (United States, Germany, France and Italy). In the second part, we shall examine several arguments against the traditional constitutional model and various proposals made to resolve those argument. In the third part, we shall describe the 'synthesized model', explain its rationale and illustrate it by describing the constitutional mechanism in a number of countries which have apparently adopted it (Canada, New Zealand and Great Britain).

Outcomes

  1. Present various constitutional models.
  2. Examine the advantages and disadvantages of each model.
  3. Present and compare constitutional mechanism in a number of countries.

Assessment

Take-home examination - 100%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Students will be required to attend 36 hours of seminars, and undertake approximately an additional 108 hours of private study, including reading, class preparation, assignment preparation and exam revision time over the duration of the course.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton Trimester 2 2014 (Day)
Coordinator(s)Dr Rebecca Giblin

Synopsis

The following topics will be studied in detail:

  • General characteristics of intellectual property
  • Policy underlying copyright and designs in Australia, Hong Kong, the PRC and other relevant jurisdictions
  • Trade-related Intellectual Property Provisions of the World Trade Organisation
  • General nature of copyright law
  • The conceptualization of a work
  • Duration, fixation, ownership, licensing, fair dealing with regard to copyright
  • Copyright infringement, remedies and defences
  • Moral rights
  • International copyright system
  • General characteristics of design law

Outcomes

At the end of this unit, students will have:

  • an appreciation of the economic, cultural and political contexts in which intellectual property is used and be able to take these factors into consideration when dealing with the legal aspects of the subject
  • an understanding of the international context of copyright and designs laws
  • knowledge of the legal principles governing copyright and designs law in Australia and some comparative knowledge of the equivalent regime in Hong Kong and the PRC
  • the ability and capability to explain the requirements for protection under the laws of intellectual property and related registrations for purposes of providing advice to clients
  • the ability and capability to explain the elements of the causes of action of copyright and registered design and the related defences to clients
  • the ability and capability to discuss the legal considerations regarding the assignment and licensing of copyrighted works to clients
  • the ability and capability to analyse the major cases and legislation relating to copyright
  • the ability and capability to advise a client about the likely application of copyright rules in novel situations
  • become familiar with the special difficulties that can arise from conflicts between national interests and legal systems when conducting trade involving relevant intellectual property.

Assessment

Research essay (max 1500 words): 30%
Assessed tutorials (3 tutorials x 10% each): 30%
Final exam: 40%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

12 lecture hours per week taught over 4 weeks

Prerequisites

This unit is offered to specific cohort students only


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

This unit will cover a selected number of issues in medical law and ethics. Topics will include general issues that revolve around notions of autonomy, competency and compulsion as well as a number of contemporary bioethics issues such as organ transplantation, abortion and medical research.
In discussing these issues, students will be encouraged to think about the differences as well as the interplay between legal rules and ethical guidelines. The discussions will also include a consideration of the different approaches taken by different countries and students will be invited to think critically about the responses of different jurisdictions.

Outcomes

  1. To introduce students to a number of selected issues in medical law and ethics
  2. To help students to develop an understanding of the ways in which legal and ethical rules impact on such issues
  3. To encourage students to think critically about the role of law and ethics in the resolution of the issues identified.

Assessment

Take-home examination (60%), written assignment (30%), class participation (10%).

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Students will be required to attend 36 hours of seminars, and undertake approximately an additional 108 hours of private study, including reading, class preparation, assignment preparation and revision time over the duration of the course.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

This Unit will introduce students to the idea, and foundation, of corporate social responsibility (CSR) as a component of corporate governance. Students will then be exposed to various facets of the three distinct but interrelated challenges to CSR. First, why should corporations have social responsibilities towards their stakeholders? Second, what is the scope, nature and extent of these responsibilities? Third, how could corporations be made accountable for violating their social responsibilities in areas such as human rights, labour rights and the environment?

Issues such as the following will be explored:

  • meaning and historical evolution of the notion of CSR - comparing CSR with concepts such as corporate accountability, corporate citizenship, triple bottom line, corporate philanthropy, and sustainable business;
  • CSR and corporate governance - CSR's intrusion into company law;
  • changing interface of states, corporations, law, and human rights against the backdrop of globalisation - privatisation of states and human rights;
  • drivers of CSR, e.g., a risk management tool, ethical investing and consumerism, business case for CSR;
  • ethical, social, legal and economic justifications for CSR;
  • scope, nature and extent of social responsibilities - complicity of corporations with states in human rights abuses, responsibilities of corporations operating in conflict zones or repressive regimes, handling CSR issues within supply chains and in global operations;
  • review of existing CSR initiatives: private v. public, voluntary v. obligatory, national v. international - the "protect, respect and remedy" framework proposed by Professor John Ruggie, UN Secretary General's Special Representative on Business and Human Rights; and
  • CSR litigation (e.g., under common law and the US Alien Tort Claims Act) and the challenges thereof - the doctrine of forum non conveniens, and the allocation of liability within a corporate group.

Outcomes

On completion of this Unit, students should be able to:

  • analytically describe the concept of CSR and its historical evolution as well as relationship to corporate governance;
  • critically evaluate the changing role of corporations in a globalised free market-oriented society and the justifications for CSR;
  • apply CSR regulations, principles, practices, case studies and initiatives to solve ethical dilemmas that corporations face when operating in different countries;
  • ascertain the nature and extent of social responsibilities - both ethical and legal - of corporations operating globally under diverse conditions;
  • compare and contrast the relative efficacy of different CSR initiatives;
  • develop effective writing and oral communication skills in relation to CSR issues; and
  • assess the importance of acting ethically and with due regard to one's social responsibilities.

Assessment

Class presentation: 10%
research assignment (drafting a legal advice or formulating a CSR policy for a corporation): 30%
take-home examination: 60%.

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Students will be required to attend 36 hours of seminars, and undertake approximately an additional 108 hours of private study, including reading, class preparation, assignment preparation and revision time over the duration of the course.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

This Unit will introduce students to the idea, and foundation, of corporate social responsibility (CSR) as a component of corporate governance. Students will then be exposed to various facets of the three distinct but interrelated challenges to CSR. First, why should corporations have social responsibilities towards their stakeholders? Second, what is the scope, nature and extent of these responsibilities? Third, how could corporations be made accountable for violating their social responsibilities in areas such as human rights, labour rights and the environment?

Issues such as the following will be explored:

  • meaning and historical evolution of the notion of CSR - comparing CSR with concepts such as corporate accountability, corporate citizenship, triple bottom line, corporate philanthropy, and sustainable business;
  • CSR and corporate governance - CSR's intrusion into company law;
  • changing interface of states, corporations, law, and human rights against the backdrop of globalisation - privatisation of states and human rights;
  • drivers of CSR, e.g., a risk management tool, ethical investing and consumerism, business case for CSR;
  • ethical, social, legal and economic justifications for CSR;
  • scope, nature and extent of social responsibilities - complicity of corporations with states in human rights abuses, responsibilities of corporations operating in conflict zones or repressive regimes, handling CSR issues within supply chains and in global operations;
  • review of existing CSR initiatives: private v. public, voluntary v. obligatory, national v. international - the "protect, respect and remedy" framework proposed by Professor John Ruggie, UN Secretary General's Special Representative on Business and Human Rights; and
  • CSR litigation (e.g., under common law and the US Alien Tort Claims Act) and the challenges thereof - the doctrine of forum non conveniens, and the allocation of liability within a corporate group.

Outcomes

On completion of this Unit, students should be able to:

  • analytically describe the concept of CSR and its historical evolution as well as relationship to corporate governance;
  • critically evaluate the changing role of corporations in a globalised free market-oriented society and the justifications for CSR;
  • apply CSR regulations, principles, practices, case studies and initiatives to solve ethical dilemmas that corporations face when operating in different countries;
  • ascertain the nature and extent of social responsibilities - both ethical and legal - of corporations operating globally under diverse conditions;
  • compare and contrast the relative efficacy of different CSR initiatives;
  • develop effective writing and oral communication skills in relation to CSR issues; and
  • assess the importance of acting ethically and with due regard to one's social responsibilities.

Assessment

Class presentation: 10%
research assignment (drafting a legal advice or formulating a CSR policy for a corporation): 30%
open book examination (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading time): 60%.

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Students will be required to attend 36 hours of seminars, and undertake approximately an additional 108 hours of private study, including reading, class preparation, assignment preparation and revision time over the duration of the course.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

This unit takes a comparative approach to the law of remedies for civil wrongs. It examines the treatment of selected remedial issues in various common law jurisdictions.

The topics covered include the following:

  1. Aims and methods of comparative legal studies;
  2. Compensation for non-pecuniary loss in contract and tort;
  3. Effect of contributory negligence in contract and tort;
  4. Liability of multiple wrongdoers;
  5. Gain-based remedies in contract and tort;
  6. Punitive damages in contract and tort;
  7. Vindication as an aim of damages;
  8. Specific relief and personal-service agreements.

Assessment

Class participation (10%); research assignment (max.1500 words) (30%); take home examination (max.3000 words) (60%)

Chief examiner(s)

Prerequisites

LAW1101 Introduction to legal reasoning; LAW1104 Research and writing; LAW2101 Contract A and LAW2102 Contract B, or an equivalent introductory course in contract law at another university; LAW2201 Torts A and LAW2202 Torts B, or an equivalent introductory course in tort law at another university.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

This unit will take a comparative approach to a number of discrete remedial issues. Some of the areas to be covered in the course may include the following:

  • the use of probabilistic causation principles: Courts in both the United Kingdom and Canada have explored the issue of changing the classic 'but for' causation principle toward a principle that awards compensation based upon a demonstrated 'material contribution' to the injury;
  • vindication as an aim for damages: Some common law courts have recently adopted a new category of 'vindicatory damages', in particular where the defendant violated the plaintiff's human rights;
  • the assessment of non-pecuniary damages in both contract and tort law;
  • a comparative assessment of punitive damages in contract law: In what circumstances (if any) should a contract breaker be exposed to punitive sanctions?;
  • the extent to which parties can stipulate remedies in a contract - liquidated damages, exclusive remedy clauses;
  • specific performance, injunctions and personal service agreements: Are the traditional policies informing the exercise of the judicial discretion to order or deny specific performance and injunctions still applicable today considering how we now conceive employment and personal service contracts?
  • the extra-territorial enforcement of equitable orders; and
  • liability of multiple wrongdoers: Statute law increasingly makes exceptions to the principle of joint and several liability where multiple wrongdoers have caused the plaintiff's harm. What policies underlie this trend to adopt the principle of proportionate liability and what is the effect of these changes?

Outcomes

On completion of the unit a student should:

  • have gained an understanding of different approaches to selected remedial issues;
  • understand the place the law of remedies has in the wider context of law and society, and in particular the relationship between law and equity and how social policy goals are asserted through various legal doctrines;
  • have a critical appreciation of different conceptions to similar remedies problems experienced in a number of common law countries; and
  • have developed the ability to independently research and write a minor memorandum on a remedies topic

Assessment

Class participation (10%); research assignment (max. 1500 words) (30%); take home examination (max. 3000 words) (60%)

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Students will be required to attend 36 hours of seminars, and undertake approximately an additional 108 hours of private study, including reading, class preparation, assignment preparation and revision time over the duration of the course.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014
Coordinator(s)Dr Sirko Harder

Synopsis

This unit examines selected areas of torts law from a comparative perspective. It analyses current issues and emerging trends across common law and civil law jurisdictions.

The topics covered include the following:

  1. Aims and methods of comparative legal studies;
  2. Development of tort law in common law and civil jurisdictions;
  3. Europeanisation of tort law;
  4. Liability for pure economic loss;
  5. Liability for psychological harm;
  6. Liability for 'wrongful life' and 'wrongful birth';
  7. Proof of causation;
  8. Protection of privacy.

Outcomes

On completion of this unit, a student should be able to:

  • demonstrate detailed and advanced understanding of the selected topics;
  • enhance their understanding of the jurisprudence and practice of torts law;
  • engage in oral discussion about the function and evolution of modern torts law across jurisdictional boundaries; and
  • be able to critically assess the interaction of torts law and related areas.

Assessment

Class participation (10%); research assignment (max. 1500 words) (30%); take-home examination (max.3000 words) (60%)

Chief examiner(s)

Prerequisites

LAW2201 Torts A and LAW2202 Torts B or an equivalent Introductory course in tort law at another university


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedPrato Term 2 2014 (Day)

Quota applies

The number of places available for a unit taught in Prato is strictly limited to 45. This is the maximum room capacity at the Prato Centre.

Synopsis

This unit will examine various sources of international law that potentially apply to sexuality-based claims. The approach of individual states, both from a domestic law perspective and in interpreting international obligations, will also be considered. We will examine international treaties and case law from various international as well as domestic courts. Consideration will be given to policy objectives and competing cultural and political arguments. Students will work in groups and participate in exercises where they simulate the roles played by various constituencies, including judges, state actors, lawyers, and individuals claiming discriminatory treatment.

Outcomes

On completion of this unit, a student should be able to:

  • demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles of international law that relate to sexuality-based claims
  • articulate the basic variations of domestic law, from a global perspective, relating to sexuality-based claims
  • understand the basis for legal distinctions between challenges based on privacy, discrimination, and free expression
  • understand and the potential implications arising from claims based on privacy, discrimination, and free expression
  • engage in policy discussions about laws relating to sexuality-based claims.

Assessment

Class participation and in-class simulated exercises: 10%
Research paper (1,500 words): 30%
Take-home final examination: 60%.

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

9 hours per week (intensive mode)

Prerequisites

None

Co-requisites

None

Prohibitions

None


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

This unit begins with a detailed discussion of several well-known cases from the common law of Contract. The goal is to notice the gaps between the rules and the ultimate decisions. The course continues with a discussion of Max Weber's classical statement of how legal questions are decided in the civil law and his suggestion that adjudication in the common law is irrational. The unit then attempts to respond to Weber's challenge by focusing on the classical discussion of this question by some of the great theorists of the common law, together with contemporary writers who contribute to the same discussion. Students will read and discuss chapters by several writers, including Blackstone, Holmes, Maitland, Cardozo, Llewellyn, Hart and Sachs, Gilmore, Posner, Unger, Frug, Williams, and Fisher. Emphasis will be on discussion both the discussion among the theorists themselves and our own discussion with the competing traditions that we discover in the reading.

Outcomes

On completion of this unit, a student should be able to:

  • understand the civil law critique of how cases are decided at common law

notice when there are gaps between the announced rules and the case results

  • understand the different conceptions of case adjudication elaborated by the great thinkers of the common law
  • use the differing conceptions productively when making legal argument
  • elaborate an original theory of how cases should be decided.

Assessment

Class participation: 10%
Presentation: 10%
Research paper (1,500 words): 30%
Take home examination: 50%.

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

9 hours per week

Prerequisites

None

Co-requisites

None

Prohibitions

None


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

This unit introduces the key concepts in the administration of criminal justice and the major ethical systems. It examines issues relevant to the administration of criminal justice by identifying the ethical dilemmas that might arise for professionals in the criminal justice system. Topics will include ethics and police, ethics and lawyers, ethics in corrections and the ethics of criminal justice policy making. In discussing ethical dilemmas at the various stages of the administration of criminal justice, students will be encouraged and challenged to think about the differences and interplay between the procedural rules, institutional practices and ethical guidelines. The impact and implications of the issues are considered and their possible resolutions explored. The different approaches taken by different countries in tackling the said issues will be examined by students, who will be invited to think critically about how ethics can facilitate in the search for the appropriate resolution for the said issues.

Outcomes

On completion of this unit, a student should be able to:

  1. demonstrate an understanding of the key concepts in the administration of criminal justice and the major ethical systems;
  2. identify the ethical dilemmas in the administration of criminal justice;
  3. analyse selected issues in the administration of criminal justice from an ethical viewpoint;
  4. evaluate criminal justice practices and laws from an ethical perspective;
  5. engage in discussion of how ethics can play a role in the resolution of issues in criminal justice in different legal jurisdictions.

Assessment

Class participation: 10%
Presentation: 10%
Research paper (2,000 words): 40%
Take home examination: 40%.

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

9 hours per week

Prerequisites

None

Co-requisites

None

Prohibitions

None


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

The unit explores four models which exist within the field of mediation, and examines their connection with various jurisprudential approaches. Mediation is an alternative method to litigation, in which a third party facilitates negotiation between at least two other parties. Mediation is the paradigmatic alternative to adjudication and its basic principles are unique and different from those of the adversarial model. The course examines the notion of mediation by referring to four conceptual frameworks to understand it: Traditional communal; Pragmatic problem solving; Humanistic Transformative and Narrative Cultural. Each model of mediation will be studied both in practice and theory, and its relation to jurisprudential streams of thought will be examined. Theories such as legal feminism, legal pluralism, multiculturalism and postmodernism will be studied as possible foundations for the various models, and their application will be examined critically through the use of case studies, films and simulations. The overall sequence of the course will show the transformation of mediation from a pragmatic efficient alternative to litigation to a public narrative based method for the resolution of public dispute.

Outcomes

On completion of this unit, a student should be able to:

  • understand the theoretical frameworks which underlie the process of mediation
  • be able to explain the differences between distinct models of mediation
  • understand the relationship between jurisprudential ideals and the ADR movement
  • explore the intercultural aspects of the process of mediation
  • apply mediation in various contexts, including across cultures and jurisdictions.

Assessment

Class participation: 10 %
Response paper: 10%
Take home examination: 80%.

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

9 Hours per week

Prerequisites

None

Co-requisites

None

Prohibitions

None


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014
Coordinator(s)Dr Heli Askola

Synopsis

This unit will provide a comparative survey of some of the modern principles of evidence. it will focus on the rights and obligations of the parties in the common law and civil law regimes. Some of the major concepts of evidence law will be examined including:

  • the role of the parties in litigation
  • burden of proof
  • relevance and admissibility
  • witnesses
  • privileges
  • the hearsay rule
  • expert evidence
  • documentary and real evidence.

Outcomes

On completion of this unit, a student should be able to:

  1. demonstrate a working knowledge and have an overview of the major general principles of evidence law as they apply to different legal jurisdictions, specifically Australia, Canada, the U.S. and some civilian jurisdictions;
  2. understand and recognise some of the major differences and similarities of the evidence rules in the various jurisdictions;
  3. demonstrate a critical appreciation of the application and meaning of a number of specific rules of evidence by examining statute and case law from the various jurisdictions;
  4. independently research and write a minor memorandum on an evidence topic.

Assessment

Class participation: 10%
Class presentation: 10%
Research paper (1500 words): 30%
Two hour open book exam: 50%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Students will be required to attend 36 hours of seminars, and undertake approximately an additional 108 hours of private study, including reading, class preparation, and assignment preparation and revision time over the duration of the course.

Prerequisites

None

Co-requisites

None

Prohibitions

None


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedMalaysia Term 3 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

This unit compares rules of private international law of different jurisdictions. Private

international law (or conflict of laws) is the body of rules applying to civil disputes with an international element. These are the rules on when a court is to assume jurisdiction, when a foreign judgment is to be recognised, and which law is to be applied to a dispute. Private international law is domestic law. Focusing on commercial disputes, this unit compares the private international law of Australia, Canada, the European Union, the UK and the US.

This unit investigates case law, domestic legislation and regulations of the European Union, namely the Brussels I Regulation, the Rome I Regulation and the Rome II Regulation.

With regard to the jurisdictions covered, the following issues are investigated:

  • the history, nature and sources of private international law;
  • the theoretical and policy considerations underpinning private international law;
  • the rules on the courts' jurisdiction in commercial disputes with an international element, including the restraint of foreign proceedings;
  • the rules on recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in commercial disputes;
  • the general choice-of-law process;
  • the specific rules on the determination of the law applying to claims in contract and tort.

Outcomes

On completion of the unit, a student should be able to:

  • identify when a particular commercial dispute involving a foreign element raises issues of private international law, and what those issues are;
  • advise on how those issues would be approached by a court in Australia, Canada, the European Union and the US;
  • explain the theoretical and policy considerations underpinning the private international law of Australia, Canada, the European Union, the UK and the US;
  • critically analyse current rules of private international law and make suggestions for law reform
  • undertake independent research on a topic of private international law

Assessment

Three short essays (1000 words each) 60%; Outline of Arguments (1200 words) 24%; and Reasons for Judgement (800 words) 16%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

9 hours (if taught over 4 weeks)

Prerequisites

LAW2101 Contract A and LAW2102 Contract B, or an equivalent introductory course in contract law at another university; LAW2201 Torts A and LAW2202 Torts B, or an equivalent introductory course in contract law at another university.

Co-requisites

None

Prohibitions

None


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedPrato Term 2 2014 (Day)
Coordinator(s)Dr Janice Richardson

Quota applies

The number of places available for a unit taught in Prato is strictly limited to 45. This is the maximum room capacity at the Prato Centre.

Synopsis

This unit will be primarily concerned with examining what legal action individuals can take in order to protect their privacy against others: the state, the media, companies and other individuals. It will look at the position in Australia and then the development of the common law torts in England. The English position is unusual because the common law has been developed so as to give effect to Art 8 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) on a case by case basis. The jurisprudence of European Court of Human Rights and its broad interpretation of Art 8 ECHR (Right to Private and Family Life) will then be considered in this context. The general approach of European law to protecting privacy will be contrasted with the underlying values that are reflected in the US.

Outcomes

Students who successfully complete this unit should:

  1. be in a position to examine a factual situation which has caused a person loss of privacy and to determine whether that person has a cause of action under the law of torts in Australia, England and (under Art 8 ECHR) in European generally;
  2. be in a position, having determined that a cause of action exists, to advise on the remedies (damages, injunctions, etc) which should be pursued by the person who has suffered the loss or damage;
  3. be in a position to consider the way in which the European Court of Human Rights has envisaged the right to privacy; to be able to critically discuss the underpinnings of law such as: what is privacy and what is being protected?
  4. be in a position to compare the approach of Europe to that of the US with regard to the meaning of privacy. This will include an examination of the argument that privacy protects respect for the dignity of personhood against assaults by the media and culture industry. It will also involve considering the position of the state, for example, the argument that national health services should have access to sensitive data to aid medical research. The extent to which different views of liberty are implicated in the argument will be explored

Assessment

Seminar and presentation assessment: 20% and take-home examination: 80%.

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

6 hours over 6 weeks or 12 hours over 3 weeks.

Prerequisites

LAW1101 and LAW1104 or other introduction to law courses.

Co-requisites

None

Prohibitions

None


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedPrato Term 2 2014 (Day)
Coordinator(s)Dr Janice Richardson

Quota applies

The number of places available for a unit taught in Prato is strictly limited to 45. This is the maximum room capacity at the Prato Centre.

Synopsis

The aim of this course is to consider the meaning of political liberty in Europe today. It will start by comparing different traditions of European thought on the meaning of freedom that continue to influence our views. Whilst the course is focused upon primary readings of political philosophers, their theoretical frameworks will be considered in the context of contemporary legal debates and concepts.
Indicative subject matter (which can be reduced depending upon time and student interest):
Seminar 1: Introduction to different concepts of political freedom and the relationship to different contemporary issues in law in contemporary Europe
Seminar 2: The liberal tradition: Mill "On Liberty"; the limits of law
Seminar 3: Berlin's concept of negative liberty and Waldron's discussion of property law and homelessness
Seminar 4: Robert Nozick: freedom as an argument for a minimal state; Cohen's attack on the concept of self-ownership; responses to the question: could freedom of contract include the right to enter into a civil slave agreement?
Seminar 5: Carole Pateman: freedom as the absence of subordination; the "sexual contract"; images of employment and traditional marriage contracts; a critique of the liberal public/private divide and concepts of privacy in law.
Seminar 6: The Civic Republican Tradition: Skinner's Reading of Machiavelli
Seminar 7: Arendt on freedom as public action; European context
Seminar 8: Kant's concept of liberty and of personhood; links with the concept of legal personhood and public reason
Seminar 9: Cornell's reading of Kant; a legal test for law's legitimacy
Seminar 10 and 11: Foucault on freedom; law cannot guarantee freedom; is it possible to judge a freer society within a Foucauldian framework? This will include an examination of the shift from middle to late Foucault and Patton's reading compared with Charles Taylor.
Seminar 12: Revision

Outcomes

Students who successfully complete this unit should develop:

  1. A detailed and critical understanding of the key elements of diverse arguments within the European tradition on the nature of political freedom and its relationship to law.
  2. An ability to understand and evaluate competing theoretical frameworks and to formulate, express and support the student's own arguments.

Assessment

Seminar participation: 10%, seminar presentation: 10% and take-home examination of 4,000 words maximum: 80%.

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

This will vary depending upon the demands of Prato and the timetable. Indicative hours would be: 6 hours a week for 6 weeks or 12 hours per week for 3 weeks. The total number of hours contact will remain 36.

Prerequisites

LAW1101 & LAW1104 or other equivalent introduction to law course.

Co-requisites

None

Prohibitions

None


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedPrato Term 2 2014 (Day)
Coordinator(s)Mr Wissam Aoun

Quota applies

The number of places available for a unit taught in Prato is strictly limited to 45. This is the maximum room capacity at the Prato Centre.

Synopsis

This course examines patentable subject matter across Canada, the US, the UK and Australia. It examines the most fundamental question in patent law: namely, what is an 'invention'? In other words, is this the type of "stuff" that patent law should protect with a twenty (20) year monopoly?
Indeed, the meaning of "invention" is far from a doctrinal topic "bedevilled by verbal formulae" and "sterile argument about the meaning of words". For, "whoever controls the meaning of 'invention' controls what can be patented and hence an important aspect of industrial policy." (Peter Prescott QC, sitting as deputy judge, in CFPH LLC, (Patent Applications Nos. 0226884.3 and 0419317.3), [2005] EWHC 1589).

This course will therefore cover novel aspects of patentability: from software and business methods to higher life forms (including even half-monkey half-human chimeras).

No technical background required or expected, nor is any previous work in patent law needed.

Seminar 1: Introduction to patentable subject matter, and basic patent law principles.
Seminar 2: Patentable subject matter in Canada.
Seminar 3: Patentable subject matter in Canada (cont'd).
Seminar 4: Patentable subject matter in the US.
Seminar 5: Patentable subject matter in the US (cont'd).
Seminar 6: Group work and/or presentations.
Seminar 7: Patentable subject matter in the UK.
Seminar 8: Patentable subject matter in the UK (cont'd).
Seminar 9: Patentable subject matter in Australia.
Seminar 10: Patentable subject matter in Australia (cont'd).
Seminar 11: Group work and/or presentations.
Seminar 12: Revision.

Outcomes

At the end of the course, it is expected that students will:

  1. be familiar with the existing body of jurisprudence and major academic writings in the area of patentable subject matter;
  2. extrapolate and critically assess the evolving principles and themes embodied in that jurisprudence and literature;
  3. be able to better articulate, understand and apply those principles in practice.

Assessment

Seminar participation: 10%
Seminar presentation and/or group assignment:10%
Final written assignment of 4,000 words maximum (take-home): 80%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

12 hours per week for 3 weeks, subject to the scheduling availability, and demands, of the Prato program. The total number of hours contact will remain 36.

Prerequisites

LAW1101 Introduction to Legal Reasoning; LAW1104 Research and Writing or equivalent introductory units.

Co-requisites

None

Prohibitions

None


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedPrato Term 2 2014 (Day)
Coordinator(s)Professor Benjamin L Berger

Quota applies

The number of places available for a unit taught in Prato is strictly limited to 45. This is the maximum room capacity at the Prato Centre.

Synopsis

This seminar will provide both an historical and contemporary comparative look at the ways that legal systems have dealt with religious difference, freedom of religion, and "the secular". An important note in contemporary scholarship on the contemporary interaction of law and religion has been that there is not a single "secular" but, rather, varieties of secularisms. A close study of the various ways that political power, law, and religion have been configured provides a unique and valuable line of sight into comparative legal traditions, constitutional structure, and legal and political theory. Some of the most interesting contemporary legal and political debates have arisen out of questions about freedom of religion, its limits, and the just relationship between religion and the state. Issues range from the permissible content of public reason and the appearance of religious symbols in public space, to the legal status of religious education and the rights of parents to make decisions for their children on religious grounds. Drawing on cases and legal issues from a range of national traditions, as well as from comparative legal and theoretical scholarship, this seminar will explore the contemporary interaction of law and religion in a variety of jurisdictions. The seminar will involve a close study of issues arising within a broad spectrum of legal areas, including constitutional law, education law, criminal law, family law, health law, administrative law, and the law of deliberative democracy.

In addition to specific case studies, topics addressed may include some of the following, but will be selected and emphasized based on student and instructor interest in a given year:

Topic 1:Theoretical models for the study of religion and society
Topic 2:Historical patterns in the interaction of law and religion
Topic 3:Theoretical Approaches to "Secularism"
Topic 4:Comparative Approaches to Freedom of Religion
Topic 5:Religion in Public Decision-Making
Topic 6:Religion, Secularism, and State Symbols
Topic 7:Religion, Secularism, and Education
Topic 8:Religion and Conflicts of Rights
Topic 9:Gender Equality, Sexual Diversity, and Religion
Topic 10: Religious Difference and Legal Pluralism

Outcomes

Students who successfully complete this unit will develop:

  1. A clear appreciation for the varieties of ways in which law and religion configure in contemporary models of secularism and the social and political importance of these models;
  2. Knowledge about the interaction of law and religion in contemporary constitutional orders;
  3. An improved capacity for comparative analysis of legal and political systems;
  4. An improved ability to understand and evaluate competing theoretical frameworks and to formulate, express, and support the student's opinions and arguments

Assessment

Seminar participation (10%) and presentation (10%)
Three critical essays based on the course materials, total word count for the three assignments to amount to no more than 4000 words (80%)

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Students are required to attend 36 hours of seminars over the duration of this intensive course.

Prerequisites

LAW1101 Introduction to Legal Reasoning; LAW1104 Research and Writing or equivalent introductory units.

Co-requisites

None

Prohibitions

None


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014
Coordinator(s)Dr Normann Witzleb

Synopsis

This unit explores the main legal issues involved in the resolution of legal disputes between private (that is, non-state) parties in an international setting. In that respect, we will consider in detail the two major systems of dispute resolution: litigation before national courts and arbitration before private arbitral tribunals. We will analyze and compare the legal issues that may arise at the different stages of an international dispute in each of these systems and on that basis discuss the policy issues involved in each context and the considerations that will become relevant for parties when deciding which kind of dispute resolution system to choose. Particular emphasis will be on

  1. the initiation of the proceedings (jurisdiction and forum selection clauses, arbitration agreements and arbitrability),
  2. the conducting of the proceedings (service of process, taking of evidence) and
  3. the recognition and enforcement of the respective decisions (court judgments and arbitral awards).

Outcomes

On completion of this unit, a student should be able to:

  1. demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles of international litigation and arbitration;
  2. analyze and apply the legal framework governing international litigation and arbitration;
  3. acquire understanding and sensibility for the parallels and differences between litigation before national courts on the one hand and commercial arbitration on the other;
  4. acquire understanding and sensitivity for the similarities and differences of the approaches and solutions adopted in different countries towards international litigation and arbitration (with a particular emphasis on Europe and the United States);

engage in discussion about jurisdictional and policy issues relating to the these approaches and solutions.

Assessment

Class participation: 10 %
Research paper (1,500 words): 30 %
Examination: 60 %

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

12 hours/week (taught intensively as part of the Law Malaysia Program)

Prerequisites

LAW1101 Introduction to Legal Reasoning, LAW1104 Research and Writing or an equivalent introductory course at another university.

Co-requisites

NONE

Prohibitions

LAW4652 Transitional Litigation
LAW4179 International Commercial Arbitration


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedPrato Term 2 2014 (Day)

Quota applies

The number of places available for a unit taught in Prato is strictly limited to 45. This is the maximum room capacity at the Prato Centre.

Synopsis

Game theory is a contemporary theory of rational decision making.

In this unit students will examine the following applications of game theory to law:

Differences between legal systems regarding judges and jury, and how these influence the type of reasoning to be expected (appointed compared with elected judges; judges as decision-makers compared with administrators of jury decisions; single decision-makers compared with panels);

regulation-intensive systems compared with judicial determination;

interactions between spheres of government and separation of powers;

voting rules and methods of aggregating preferences;

local compared with national elections;

Federalism compared with unitary government;

the differing role of pre-trial negotiations and judges' intervention therein;

alternative dispute mechanisms and their interaction with judges' role (binding compared with discretionary);

Course material will focus on non-cooperative game theory (where each actor is presumed to be a self-utility-maximizing individual or firm), though some models of cooperative game theory will be presented as well (formation of coalitions among members). Application to legal issues will be discussed, both based on scholarly writings and on students' input as to real-life situations where similar strategic interactions arise (relying both on case law and non-legal everyday experience). Students will be assigned both problem sets (mostly games to participate in) and articles/book chapters to read before each class. Since the course is planned to be intensive time-wise, consideration will be granted as to length of assignments - though they are still key to broadening horizons and facilitating understanding.

Outcomes

Students who successfully complete this unit should develop:

  1. A detailed and critical understanding of game-theoretic concepts as they apply to legal reasoning.
  2. An ability to understand and evaluate competing applications of game-theoretic models in the legal literature.
  3. A new and different outlook on day-to-day experiences and political interactions, based on their similarity to models and games elucidated in classStudents who successfully complete this unit should develop:

Assessment

Completion of online games prior to and in class, demonstrating the operation of various aspects of game theory, and participation in class discussion about the implications and application of games to the relevant aspect of the syllabus: 5% per class x 12 classes = 60%
Take-home examination of 2,000 words: 40%.

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

This will vary depending upon the demands of Prato and the timetable. Indicative hours would be: 6 hours a week for 6 weeks or 12 hours per week for 3 weeks. The total number of hours contact will remain 36.

Prerequisites

None

Co-requisites

None


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedPrato Term 2 2014 (Day)

Quota applies

The number of places available for a unit taught in Prato is strictly limited to 45. This is the maximum room capacity at the Prato Centre.

Synopsis

This unit challenges students about notions of families and relationships within society. It looks at marriages and de facto partnerships; what constitutes a 'family' and the dynamics of parent-child relationships. It also considers what constitutes the 'best interests' of a child including cases involving child abuse and the role of social science in decision making. It also examines international issues such as relocation, abduction, adoption and surrogacy.

Outcomes

  1. identify and evaluate specific issues in Australian and comparative family law regarding families and parent-child relationships

  1. analyse, interpret and contrast different approaches to the concept of 'family' and 'best interests of a child'

  1. research appropriate responses to different legal and policy issues about regulating families and relationships and write a substantial piece demonstrating research and synthesizing skills

  1. communicate effectively and persuasively on issues pertaining to family law

  1. learn and work autonomously and use feedback to improve their own capabilities and performance

  1. evaluate the role of law in regulating families and inter-personal relationships

Assessment

20% class attendance and participation
and
80% research assignment of 4000 words (presented in accord with the AGLC)
Suggested topics will be provided but students can devise their own research topic with the lecturer's approval

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

36 hours over four weeks

Prerequisites

Introduction to legal reasoning and Research and writing or equivalent


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedMalaysia Term 3 2014 (Day)
Coordinator(s)Dr Normann Witzleb and Professor Dr Philippe Achilleas (University of Paris-Sud XI)

Synopsis

This unit focuses on the study of air and space law from the perspective of international and comparative law. Air Law covers the rules concerning the status of the airspace and civil aviation activities. Students will study the legal framework on international operation of aircraft, the repression of offences against aircraft, and the liability regime for damage caused by aircraft. Part of the unit will be devoted to the relationship between airlines and passengers. Space law covers the uses of outer space. Students will study the status of this area, the rules for its exploration and exploitation as well as the liability regime covering space activities. Students will also analyse the rules for space applications (satellite telecommunications, satellite TV, earth observation, space flight, military uses).

Outcomes

On completion of this unit, students will have:

  • knowledge and understanding of key international concepts and principles of air and space law
  • knowledge and understanding of international legislation in the core areas of air and space law
  • knowledge and understanding of national legislation in the core areas of space law
  • an ability to apply these concepts, principles, legislation and policy to concrete situations
  • an ability to conduct independent research in air and space law and convey the results of this and the above objectives both orally and in writing.

Assessment

Research paper (can be done individually - 1,500 words - or in a group of 3 students - 3,000 words): 30 %
Choice of two of the following three:
mini moot: 10 %
in class case analysis: 10%
presentation on research paper: 10%
Take-home examination: 50 %

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Students will be required to attend 36 hours of seminars, and undertake approximately an additional 108 hours of private study, including reading, class preparation, assignment preparation and revision time over the duration of the course.

Prerequisites

LAW1101 or LAW1104 or other equivalent introduction to law course.

Co-requisites

None

Prohibitions

None


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

Topics include: the rules governing companies that seek to raise funds from the public; regulation of the securities industry in Australia and the regulation of takeovers; the securities industry; the nature of securities; the regulation of the stock exchange, brokers and other dealers; proscribed market practices; the regulation of offerings of securities the aims and objectives of takeover legislation; the regulation of takeovers; the policies and perspectives underlying these regimes; the impact of the legislative reforms currently occurring in this area.

Outcomes

Students who successfully complete this unit should:

  1. understand the operation and regulation of the securities industry in Australia
  2. be able to analyse and examine critically the present regulatory regime from different perspectives and have an appreciation of the dynamics of the current and continuing process of reform of corporate and securities law
  3. have a clear and detailed knowledge and understanding of the structure and regulation of primary and secondary securities markets in Australia
  4. understand the aims and objectives of the Australian scheme for the regulation of company takeovers and have a basic knowledge of the details of the regulatory scheme
  5. have improved skills in statutory interpretation and drafting as a result of the detailed consideration of some of the most technical aspects of the Corporations Law which are dealt with in this subject
  6. have a greater understanding of the fundamental policy of disclosure and investor protection which is the basis of the Australian regulatory scheme for public companies.

Assessment

Research assignment (3000 words): 30%
Examination (2 hours writing time plus reading time): 70% OR Examination (3 hours writing time plus reading time): 100%

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104

Co-requisites


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton First semester 2014 (Day)
Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day)
Clayton Summer semester A 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

The focus of the unit is the major steps in litigation. Using the Rules of the Supreme Court of Victoria, the chronology of a civil proceeding from the decision to sue until the matter is ready for trial is examined.

Outcomes

Students who successfully complete the unit should:

  1. understand the sequence, steps and documentation of common law and commercial litigation
  2. be familiar with the major sources of law and research tools in the area of civil procedure
  3. be able to categorise an arising fact situation and apply the relevant substantive law to the applicable procedural step
  4. recognise and select the requisite procedural document
  5. be able to draft elementary pleadings
  6. be sensitised to the use and abuse of civil procedural devices, especially costs and delay
  7. be aware of the theoretical underpinnings of our procedural system.

Assessment

Drafting test: 30% and
Negotiation exercise: 30% and
Examination (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 40%

OR

Drafting test: 30% and
Examination (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 70%

Chief examiner(s)

Ms Nicole Mollard (Summer A)
Dr Adam McBeth (First Semester)
Associate Professor Paula Gerber (Second Semester)

Workload requirements

Summer Semester: Seven hours of lectures per week for four weeks, six hours of lectures per week for one week and two hours of revision lectures for one week
First Semester: Three hours of lectures per week.
Second Semester: Four hours of lectures per week for nine weeks.


Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104

Co-requisites

LAW2100 or LAW2101 and LAW2102; LAW2200 or LAW2201 and LAW2202


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton Second semester 2014 (Day)

Quota applies

The number of places available in this unit is 70

Synopsis

Topics include: medicine and science in the service of the law, including the organisation of the medical profession; biomedical forensic science; scientific evidence and its collection at the scene of a crime; forensic chemistry; forensic photography; firearm examination and tool marks; fingerprint evidence; forensic pathology; forensic odontology and the identification of victims; traffic medicine; the examination of victims of assault; DNA evidence in the courts; prototypes of police investigation; the State Coroner's system; forensic psychiatry and psychology and issues of criminal responsibility; medico-legal reports in the courts.

Outcomes

Students completing this unit should have a comprehensive understanding, as law students, of forensic medicine, encompassing forensic pathology, clinical forensic medicine, forensic odontology, forensic psychiatry, forensic psychology and forensic science. Students will be familiar with the organisation and operation of the Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine, the Victorian Forensic Science Centre and the Coroner's Court. They will be aware of the challenges presented and the tensions which arise when expert evidence is tendered in the adversarial system of justice employed in Victoria and in Australia as a whole. Students will be able to carry out effective research accessing materials in data bases in the biomedical and scientific fields as well as in law.

Assessment

Research paper (2000 words): 40%
Examination (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW3300 or LAW3301 and LAW3302.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

Topics which form the core material include: the history of federal involvement in the criminal law; federal policing agencies; the sources and nature of federal criminal procedure; the relationship of federal criminal law to state criminal law and to state courts; and the sentencing structures for federal offenders. Additional emerging topics of federal interest may be added from year to year.

Outcomes

On completion of this unit students should:

  1. be familiar with the sources and significance of federal criminal law in the Australian criminal justice system
  2. have an overview of the contents and an understanding of the special features of federal criminal law and procedure and federal sentencing law and how these elements relate to state criminal law systems
  3. have a critical understanding of the possible future shape of federal involvement in the criminal law sphere.

Assessment

Written assignment (3000 words): 60% and 2 hours examination (plus 10 minutes reading time): 30% and class participation: 10%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW3300 or LAW3301 and LAW3302


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

This course deals with the legal framework within which offenders are sentenced, locally, nationally, and internationally. It will examine sentencing principles applicable under state and federal law in Victoria as well as those developed overseas in relation to sentencing guidelines and sentencing commissions. The course will examine the sources of sentencing law; the distribution of sentencing authority between the legislature, judiciary and executive arms of government; the control of sentencing discretion; the role of counsel in the sentencing hearing; and the opportunity for public and victim input. Main sentencing measures and procedures (such as on-the-spot fines) being currently utilised will be explored. The problems of sentencing special offender groups, such as corporate offenders, and special sanctions such as forfeiture of the proceeds of crime, will also be examined if time allows. A typical allocation of topics would be:

  1. Introduction to the legislative, judicial and executive framework of sentencing authority in a federal system of government.
  2. Content of the Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic) & Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), part .
  3. Courts exercising sentencing powers.
  4. The sentencing hearing - role of the trial judge; roles of prosecution and defence counsel; victim impact statements; the role of the Sentencing Advisory Council; role of the media and the community.
  5. Evidentiary rules and burden of proof at the sentencing hearing.
  6. Plea making mitigation and aggravation.
  7. Philosophical underpinning: retribution v. rehabilitation (treatment v. punishment), community protection, proportionality; mitigation and mercy.
  8. Main sanctions - fiscal; incapacitation; community-based; restorative justice models; conviction v. non-conviction orders; the significance of the offender's consent to sentence.
  9. Special offender groups e.g. corporations; juveniles; sex offenders; intellectually disabled.
  10. Controlling sentencing discretion - the various models.

Outcomes

Upon completing this unit, students should:

  1. possess an overview of the legal framework within which offenders against federal and state law in Victoria are sentenced or subjected to other measures such as civil action for forfeiture of proceeds of crime under state or federal law, or administrative sanctions such as infringement notices, or other post sentence sanctions such as control orders, or orders made under the Sex Offenders Registration Act 2004 (Vic);
  2. appreciate the role that specialist courts have in relation to the sentencing of children, young offenders, drug dependent persons, and Koorie offenders;
  3. recognise the non-judicial, as well as the judicial components of sentencing;
  4. have obtained an overview of different philosophical underpinnings of the sentencing systems, particularly the conflict between rehabilitation and retribution; and
  5. be aware of some of the overseas developments in sentencing, especially administrative and legislative efforts to limit the scope of judicial discretion in imposing sentence.

Assessment

Examination: 70% (30 minutes reading and noting time plus two hours writing time) AND an individual research paper of 1500 words 30%.

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three 4 hour semi-intensive lecture/seminars each week over a period of 3 weeks.

Prerequisites

LAW3300 or LAW3301 and LAW3302


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

UNCLOS III - Freedom of Navigation; Right of Transit issues - Admiralty - Introduction to basic principles - International Carriage of Goods; Insurance; Liability - Ship Registration; Flags of Convenience - MARPOL; the London Convention - Port-State Authority - legal regimes (both classical and new) - Maritime Labor regulation - IMO; ILO - Maritime Environmental management - ship-based pollution; exotic species; GMO - International Maritime Public Order - piracy; drug trafficking; illegal transit of human cargoes ("people smuggling")

Outcomes

Students who successfully complete this unit should have acquired technical proficiency and academic fluency in each of the four specialised sub-units making up this course. These are:

  1. the institutionalised public regime of International maritime management, including UNCLOS III, Freedom of Passage, the International maritime Organisation (IMO), Ship Registration, Flags of Convenience, and the international jurisdictions of Courts of Admiralty
  2. Maritime environmental management regimes (MARPOL; the London Convention); dumping, ship-based Pollution, Tanker collisions and spills, ballast and exotic species
  3. International Maritime Labor regulation (ILO; IMO); Port State Authority (both classic and new regimes), safety of ship construction and transport (eg collision)
  4. issues of International maritime Public Order, including Piracy, Slavery, Human Cargoes ("people smuggling"), drug trafficking, and the management of "the Maritime commons". Students should be able to analyse all of these concepts critically and be able to identify and resolve legal problems arising in all of the categories described. Most importantly, students should obtain a detailed appreciation of the embededness of International maritime management within the inclusive regimes of the Public Order of the Sea.

Assessment

Group-based preliminary negotiation session related to selected scenario - 10%; group-based final negotiation session for selected scenario - 20%; group report setting out negotiating strategy, tactics etc and any relevant pre-negotiation information - 10%; and take home assignment undertaken individually: 60%.

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW2100 or LAW2101 and LAW2102


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

The unit incorporates the study of case law and theory where the law recognises the underlying principle of unjust enrichment. The unit will cover:

  1. the elements of the unjust enrichment principle
  2. the scenarios in which it is recognised, and where it is controversial
  3. the remedies and defences that are available
  4. whether restitution is limited to unjust enrichment or is also available for wrongs.

Outcomes

Students who successfully complete this course should have:

  • been exposed to controversies concerning the structure and shape of restitution as a third branch of private law alongside contract and tort
  • acquired an overview of legal and equitable remedies which embody a 'restitutionary' response - the recovery of money and other benefits unjustly retained
  • acquired an understanding of the principal areas where the restitutionary response has been applied
  • considered the content and operation of the unjust enrichment principle
  • have become familiar with the historical antecedents of the modern law of unjust enrichment or restitution
  • will have considered possible reforms to the existing law of restitution in light of the unjust enrichment analysis.

Assessment

1) Written assignment (1,500 words): 30% and examination (2,5 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time) 70%; or
2) Examination (2,5 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW2100 or LAW2101 and LAW2102

Co-requisites

LAW2200 or LAW2201 and LAW2202, LAW3400 or LAW3401 and LAW3402


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton First semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

The objectives of competition law. Background to the current competition provisions of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) and relevant State 'application' legislation. Administration of the act. Basic economic concepts of market, market power and competition. The prohibitions and related provisions contained in the competition provisions of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), namely the prohibitions against anti-competitive mergers and anti-competitive agreements. Misuse of market power. Exclusive dealing. Resale price maintenance. The provisions dealing with authorisation and notification of conduct which may otherwise be in breach of the act. Penalties and remedies.

Outcomes

Students completing this unit should:

  1. have an appreciation of the competing schools of thought on the objectives of competition law
  2. be able to assess the circumstances under which conduct may substantially lessen competition and have a basic understanding of the economic concepts which underlie the competition provisions of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) and relevant State 'application' legislation
  3. have an understanding of the scope and content of the competition provisions of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) and relevant State 'application' legislation.

Assessment

Assignment (1500 words): 30% and examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 70% OR examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104

Prohibitions


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton First semester 2014 (Day)
Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

Topics include: history, organisation, education, functions and regulation of lawyers in Victoria and elsewhere; reform issues; nature and significance of a profession; independence of courts and lawyers; changing face of dispute resolution; the cost of justice and different modes of legal service delivery; standards of professional conduct including basic trust accounting, complaints and disciplinary procedures; ethical rules and moral values, with a particular emphasis on identifying and resolving ethical issues. The unit meets the requirements of the Council of Legal Education for admission to practice in Victoria in the area of 'professional conduct' (including basic trust accounting).

Outcomes

Students successfully completing this unit should:

  1. have an understanding of the legal profession in its historical and societal contexts and issues surrounding the regulation of the profession
  2. be able to analyse critically the role of the lawyer in the Australian legal system with reference to questions such as the independence of courts and lawyers, the adversarial nature of the system, dispute resolution, the cost of justice and different modes of legal service delivery
  3. have examined and understood the concept of trust in the lawyer-client relationship
  4. have developed skills in recognising and distinguishing types of professional and personal conduct and questions of moral, ethical and legal obligation
  5. have developed skills in applying the law of contract and torts in relation to lawyer-client duties, breaches and remedies
  6. have enhanced skills in critical analysis and presentation of argument.

Assessment

Summer: Research assignment (compulsory) (2000 words): 40%
Examination (60%) - 2.5 hours writing, 30 minutes reading and noting
Semesters 1 and 2:
Class Participation: 10%
Research Assignment (Compulsory) 2000 words: 40%
Examination (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 50%

Chief examiner(s)

Associate Professor Gaye Lansdell (Summer Semester)
Professor Adrian Evans (First Semester)
Professor Christine Parker (Second Semester)

Workload requirements

Semesters 1 and 2: Stream 1 - six hours of lectures per week for 6 weeks, commencing Week 7 of semester. Stream 2 - three hours of lectures per week for 12 weeks.
Summer Semester A: 12 hours of lectures per week for 3 weeks (4 hours per day - 3 days per week)

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW2100 or LAW2101 and LAW2102; LAW2200 or LAW2201 and LAW2202


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedCity (Melbourne) First semester 2014 (Day)

Quota applies

The number of places available in this unit is 32

Synopsis

Introductory lectures on basic advocacy concepts and techniques are conducted by Professor Hampel or by a senior member of the judiciary or the bar. Students participate in three workshops dealing with examination in chief, cross-examination and addresses. These workshops are conducted by advocacy teachers who are members of the Victorian bar and are trained Australian Advocacy Institute teachers. A series of eight mock jury trials are then conducted. Students must participate as counsel in one of these trials, and attend all others. This unit is subject to a quota. Applications are available from the Law Faculty website.

Outcomes

  1. To introduce students to trial practice and the role of the advocate in the adversary system
  2. To introduce students to basic advocacy skills and techniques in: conceptualisation and preparation, opening and closing addresses, examination of witnesses, cross examination, and communication skills in the court room
  3. To assess students' understanding of these skills and ability to perform them at a basic level.

Assessment

Written case theory for final assessment, prepared jointly by students and both students receiving the same mark (500 words): 10%
Oral assessment (jury trial): 20%
Final oral assessment (assessment trial): 70%
Compulsory Attendance*: Pass/Fail
The consequence of not meeting the hurdle requirement of 100% attendance will be a 0 N result.
*Exemption from 100% attendance may be awarded in mitigating circumstances. Applications are to be addressed by email to the CE with supporting documentation and will be assessed on an individual basis.

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Two (evening) classes per week, consisting of 4 x 2-3 hour lectures, 3 x 3 hour workshops and 8 mock trials.

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW3300 or LAW3301 and LAW3302


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton Second semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

The administration and distribution of property of deceased persons not effectively disposed of by a will. Testamentary capacity and intention. The formal element for making, altering and revoking a will. The professional duties of lawyers in the drafting and execution of wills and the management of deceased estates. Persons eligible to be appointed executors. Types of grants of representation. Methods of proving a will. The vesting of assets in an executor or administrator. The classification of gifts by will and the doctrines affecting such gifts. The powers and duties of executors and administrators. The distribution of net assets to beneficiaries or next of kin.

Outcomes

Students who successfully complete this unit should:

  1. acquire a comprehensive knowledge of the law of Victoria regulating the administration and devolution of inheritable property of a deceased person
  2. be able to analyse and critically examine a factual situation relating to the estate of a deceased person and to determine the procedure for obtaining authority to administer the estate, the validity of testamentary dispositions, the entitlements of beneficiaries or next of kin, the liability of particular assets to meet the burden of debts and the entitlements of beneficiaries or next of kin, the liability of particular assets to meet the burden of debts and the entitlements of beneficiaries and the ultimate distribution of the net assets to the beneficiaries or next of kin
  3. have enhanced their powers of critical analysis and thinking, their oral communication and research skills.

Assessment

Research assignment (2,000 words) 40% and examination (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time) 60% OR examination (3 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time)

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 OR LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW3400 or LAW3401 and LAW3402


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton First semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

Topics include: practising law and practising medicine.; principles governing clinical medical practice; the foundation of medical ethics; the relationship between medicine and allied health professions; the regulation of the medical profession; doctors, patients and the law and alternatives to litigation; medical negligence and consent; rights to refuse medical treatment, and competence and incompetence in law and medicine; medical confidentiality; law and psychiatry; the body as property; medical research: volunteers, institutional ethics committees and the law; medical treatment and the end of life; the beginnings of life: novel birth technologies and abortion; doctors in court.

Outcomes

On completion of this unit students should have:

  1. acquired an understanding and appreciation of the rationales and roles of the legal and medical practice and structure
  2. developed the ability to critically analyse and evaluate a number of major issues and concepts fundamental to the doctor - patient relationship
  3. practiced and improved their research and writing skills as well as their skills in class/group participation and learning to understand , share and accept differing points of view.

Assessment

Research Paper (1,500 words): 30% and examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading time): 70% OR examination (3 hours writing plus 30 minutes reading time): 100%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 OR LAW1104 or Medical students in their third year of the MBBS


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedPrato Term 2 2014 (Day)

Quota applies

The number of places available for a unit taught in Prato is strictly limited to 45. This is the maximum room capacity at the Prato Centre.

Synopsis

The unit examines the way in which the international community is tackling existing and future environmental problems - including ozone layer depletion, climate change, destruction of biodiversity, heritage conservation, disposal of hazardous waste. The 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Brazil has seen a development of international environmental law and policy. The Australian Government has adopted a high profile in international negotiations on environmental matters. In addition Australia has already felt the effect of international obligations in respect of world heritage sites and climate change.

Outcomes

On completion of this subject students should:

  1. understand the interrelationship between international law and international environmental law and how international environmental law has developed as a separate area of law
  2. have acquired a comprehensive and up-to-date knowledge of international environmental law, including its historical development, conventions and treaties that have been negotiated to deal specifically with global environmental problems
  3. have extended their basic understanding and knowledge of how the international community has addressed global environmental problems
  4. be able to critically analyse the ways in which global environmental problems are addressed by the international community in particular the adoption of framework conventions and protocols
  5. demonstrate a capacity to conduct systematic research on some specific topic of International Environmental law
  6. have an appreciation of future issues of relevance to the development of this area of law.

Assessment

Research paper (2500 words): 50% and take-home examination: 50%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

Topics include: the legal consequences of an individual or company becoming insolvent; the objectives and features of insolvency law; the proceedings leading to bankruptcy and liquidation; the impact of bankruptcy and liquidation on contractual and property rights; property available to creditors including the antecedent transaction provisions of the Bankruptcy Act and Corporations Law; claims which can be made in bankruptcy and liquidation; the administrative machinery of insolvency and alternatives to bankruptcy and liquidation.

Outcomes

Upon completion of this unit students should:

  1. have a basic understanding of the various views, including economic theories, concerning the rationale for and objectives of insolvency law
  2. understand the meaning and significance of the legal concept of insolvency
  3. have an understanding of the impact of insolvency generally on an individual's rights and liabilities, including the impact of insolvency on contractual and property rights and on obligations
  4. understand the legal principles and rules governing bankruptcy and liquidation: including insolvency administration; voluntary and involuntary insolvency proceedings; the meaning and consequences of insolvency; the property available to creditors on bankruptcy/liquidation, including avoidance of antecedent transactions; the process of realising the insolvent estate for the benefit of creditors; criminal offences relating to bankruptcy; alternatives, formal and informal, to bankruptcy and liquidation
  5. be able to assess critically the effectiveness of the law in meeting its objectives
  6. appreciate the alternatives available to insolvent debtors to bankruptcy and liquidation.

Assessment

Assignment (1500 words): 30% and examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 70% OR examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 OR LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW3402


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton First semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

The purpose of this unit is to identify and evaluate the laws which govern the way in which the media collect and disseminate news and information about the state. Topics include the media and the courts (open justice and obtaining information about court proceedings, suppression orders, contempt of court, journalists and their sources), the media and parliament (contempt of Parliament, parliamentary broadcasts), reporting elections, reporting on defence and national security (D notices, sedition, official secrets, reporting terrorism etc), and offensive publications (blasphemy, obscenity, racial and religious vilification etc).

Outcomes

By the end of the unit, students should have a general understanding of, and be able to provide advice about the application of, the laws which impact on the way in which the media collect and disseminate news and information about the institutions of state. They should have developed their own opinions on whether the law has struck an appropriate balance between freedom of speech and other competing rights such as the protection of the administration of justice and the protection of national security.

Assessment

Written research assignment (1500 words): 30% and final written examination (3 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 70% OR final written examination (3 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 OR LAW 1102 AND LAW1102 OR LAW1104

Co-requisites

Recommended but not required: LAW4140; LAW5146


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton Second semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

Copyright and designs focuses on two important forms of intellectual property. Learn why we have copyright law, its international framework, what it covers, whether it exists in any given scenario, whether it has been infringed and the possible consequences of such infringement. Then examine Australia's designs law, which protects the visual appearance of manufactured goods, with a focus on the overlap between copyright and designs protection. Throughout, there will be an emphasis on current legal issues and the relationships between these rights and other parts of IP law.

Outcomes

Upon completion of this unit students should be able to:

  1. Explain the policies and objectives underlying the copyright and designs law regimes of intellectual property protection;
  2. Critically evaluate those policies and objectives and relate them to proposals for law reform;
  3. Illustrate their understanding of the law by advising authors, designers and other creators, as well as users of material created by such persons, as to their rights and liabilities under copyright and designs laws;
  4. Understand and describe the features of the international rules governing the protection of copyright and designs.
  5. Evaluate the impact of technological change on the formulation and protection of the rights studied; and
  6. Apply their case analysis and statutory interpretation skills to complex factual scenarios.

Assessment

Take-home examination: 100%
OR
Assignment (1000 words): 20% and take-home examination: 80%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1101 Introduction to Legal Reasoning; LAW 1104 Research and Writing; LAW3401 and LAW3402 (Property A and Property B)


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton First semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

This unit provides an introduction to the law of patents, registered trade marks and unfair competition. The emphasis of the course is upon patents and registered trade marks with some reference to passing off and statutory remedies for misleading and deceptive conduct under the Australian consumer law provisions in Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth).

Outcomes

Upon completion of this unit students should

  1. have an appreciation of the policies and objectives underlying the regimes of intellectual property protection studied;
  2. be in a position to comment critically on those policies and objectives and to relate them to proposals for law reform;
  3. have acquired a sound knowledge of the subject matter that is eligible for protection under these laws, the requirements for obtaining such protection and its scope, once obtained;
  4. be in a position to provide basic advice to inventors, innovators, investors and marketers on their rights and liabilities under the laws of patents, trade marks, and unfair competition;
  5. have an appreciation of the basic features of the international rules governing the protection of inventions and the protection of registered trade marks;
  6. have an appreciation of the impact of technological change on the formulation and protection of the rights studied; and
  7. have enhanced their skills of case analysis and statutory interpretation.

Assessment

Assignment (1000 words): 20% and examination (2 hours writing time plus 10 minutes reading time): 80% OR examination (2.5 hours writing time plus 10 minutes reading time): 100%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW3400 or LAW3401 and LAW3402


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton Summer semester A to Semester one 2014 (Day)
Clayton Trimester 2 2014 (Day)
Clayton Trimester 3 2014 (Day)

Quota applies

The number of places available in this unit is 20

Synopsis

Students may enrol in 1 of the following clinics:

  1. Sexual Assault Clinic - in conjunction with the South Eastern Centre Against Sexual Assault (SECASA) at Springvale Monash Legal Service (4 places, all clinical periods) - legal services to victims of sexual assault.

  1. Human Rights Clinic - in conjunction with the Castan Centre for Human Rights at Holding Redlich, Solicitors (2 places, Clinical Period 2 and 3) - litigation involving human rights in the broadest sense - everything from compensation for workplace injuries and discrimination to assisting asylum seekers and elderly victims of fraud and predatory lending. Immediate casework supervision is provided by the law firm and academic coordination by a member of Castan Centre staff.

  1. Commercial Law Clinic - in conjunction with Moores Legal, solicitors, 9 Prospect Street, Box Hill (1 place - Clinical Periods 2 and 3) - commercial legal work for "not-for-profit" organizations

  1. Family Violence Clinic - assisting victims of Family Violence (2 places, all clinical periods) - assisting victims of family violence by attending the court on family violence list days and assisting the duty lawyer to help clients make victims of crime applications to the Victims of Crime Tribunal.

  1. Migration Clinic - in conjunction with staff working with the South Eastern Migration Service (SEMAS) (2 places, clinical periods 2 and 3). Students who have an interest in migration law and working with refugees can assist clients make application for visas, respond to requests from DIAC or be involved in preparing reviews of decisions to the department or the Refugee Review Tribunal.

  1. JobWatch clinic- Students are based at Jobwatch, in the city (2 places, clinical periods 2 and 3). Students receive extensive training and support to give advice on the telephone advice line in relation to various employment law issues, and assist with legal education materials.

  1. Monash/Ashurst Corporate Governance and Responsibility Clinic - (4 places, semesters 1 and 2) This clinic is open to students who have completed Corporations Law (LAW4171). Students participating in this clinic will work with faculty members, practitioners and corporations to provide advice on corporate governance and social responsibility issues to not-for-profits and/or ASX listed companies.

  1. Victoria Legal Aid Strategic Advocacy Clinic (2 places, semesters 1 and 2) - Students participating in this clinic will be partnered with a Public Defender or Advocate from Victoria Legal Aid Chambers to work on a strategic advocacy project that aims to facilitate change to benefit the community, by remedying a legal problem, policy or process. Students, working in pairs and under the supervision of a Chambers practitioner, will research and analyse a strategic advocacy topic and consider possible remedies to address the problem.

Outcomes

Upon completion of this subject students should:

  1. have further developed the personal and communication skills acquired in LAW5216 (Professional practice) to a higher level of sophistication
  2. have a good understanding of the principles of law in their chosen area
  3. have an understanding of the practical application of the law in their chosen area
  4. be able to assess the effectiveness of the law and applicable legal remedies in their chosen area
  5. have further developed their ability to work jointly with a professional in another discipline
  6. graduate with highly developed skills and recognised expertise in their chosen field.

Assessment

Casework at Clinic according to criteria available from coordinator: 80%
Written report: 20%

Chief examiner(s)

Dr Renata Alexander (Summer Semester)
Mr Ross Hyams (First Semester)
Ms Helen Yandell (Second Semester)

Workload requirements

One 3-hour clinic session per week plus follow up research and casework. In addition to the weekly intake session, students will be required to spend up to 6 hours per week in research, case preparation and consultation with their supervisor.

Prerequisites

All of LAW1101 and LAW1104; LAW2101 and LAW2102; LAW2201 and LAW2202; LAW3301 andLAW3302

In addition, students intending to undertake any of the following clinics:

Sexual Assault Clinic
Commercial Law Clinic
Family Violence Clinic
Migration Clinic
JobWatch Clinic

must have completed LAW5216 or LAW5218. In other clinics preference for a placement will be given to students who have completed these units.

Please see http://www.law.monash.edu.au/cle.html for an application form and more information.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

The nature and operation of superannuation funds in Australia and how they are affected by the superannuation legislation, by the taxation regime, and by general principles of contract and equity. The trustee's duties.

Outcomes

Upon completion of this unit, a student should understand:

  1. the structure of different types of superannuation funds in Australia and the reasons for these differences
  2. the operation of superannuation funds including:
    1. the role and duties of trustees and those to whom they delegate, especially in relation to investment
    2. the rights of members individually and collectively
    3. the role and duties of third parties such as auditors
  3. the role of the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal and the Insurance and Superannuation Commissioner and other administrative bodies.

Assessment

Assignment (2000 words): 20%
Examination (3 hours): 80% OR Assignment (5000 words): 50%
Examination: 50%

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 OR LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW4169; LAW4170


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton First semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

Examination of private international law texts in the light of different legal systems. Convention on the International Sale of Goods (Vienna Convention). Oral Advocacy in an arbitration setting. International Mooting Competition - some students selected for Vienna.

Outcomes

Upon completion of this unit, students should:

  1. have an exposure to aspects of international sale of goods, private international law, and comparative law
  2. develop a familiarity with and practice in arbitration
  3. develop oral skills of presentation of legal material before a panel of experts from different legal systems
  4. gain an appreciation of their own legal system, its limitations, and an appreciation of other legal systems and their limitations
  5. experience the concept of thorough preparation of a particular case and the opportunity to match their preparation with that of other equally prepared students.

Assessment

Writing two memoranda (Team) 20%
Mooting: 80%

Chief examiner(s)

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW2100 or LAW2101 and LAW2102


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton First semester 2014 (Day)
Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

The unit covers the concepts of income taxation and the taxation of capital gains, in their underlying historical, social and constitutional contexts. It includes the policy and constitutional matrices of taxation, the legal definition of income, taxation of income from personal services and business, taxation of fringe benefits, indirect taxation on goods and services, taxation of capital gains, allowable deductions from gross income in personal and business contexts and the general effect of anti-avoidance legislation.

Outcomes

On completion of this unit students should have:

  1. a basic, up-to-date knowledge of income tax law
  2. an appreciation of taxation law in its historical and constitutional context
  3. a critical knowledge of the central concepts involved in the operation of the income tax system
  4. an awareness of the current tax mix in Australia
  5. an understanding of the dynamic nature of taxation law and the reasons for this dynamism
  6. a clear understanding of the policy issues underlying taxation
  7. developed the ability to evaluate critically new tax proposals
  8. developed skills of statutory interpretation in the context of technical and complex legislation.

Assessment

Research assignment (2000 words): 40% and examination (2.5 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60% OR examination (2.5 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

3 hours per week over 12 weeks

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton Second semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

This unit will examine a range of advanced income tax, capital gains tax and goods and services tax issues relating to common business, property and commercial transactions. It will consider the structure of different kinds of business entities (eg partnerships, trusts and companies) and will examine how the tax law deals with business restructures, demergers, and takeovers. It will also examine a range of superannuation, fringe benefits, employee share scheme and other tax planning issues.

Outcomes

Upon completion of this unit students should have:

  1. an advanced knowledge of income tax law
  2. a reflective conception of fundamental taxation law concepts
  3. critical knowledge of the central concepts involved in the operation of the income tax system; (4) a critical awareness of the current tax mix in Australia
  4. an appreciation of the business contexts of taxation law
  5. the ability to enter and contribute to current debate about the policy issues in taxation
  6. an ability to evaluate new tax proposals critically
  7. developed skills of statutory interpretation in the context of technical and complex legislation.

Assessment

Examination (3 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100% OR Assignment (2500 words): 50% Examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 50%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 OR LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104

Co-requisites


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton First semester 2014 (Day)
Clayton Second semester 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

This unit involves a critical examination of

  • the general principles and the rules of evidence and the use of evidence law as a method of ensuring fair trials:
  • theoretical perspectives - reliability, libertarian, disciplinary principles, evidentiary law reform;
  • rules and principles governing the proof of facts in civil and criminal trials;
  • relevance and admissibility;
  • kinds of evidence;
  • competence and compellability;
  • privilege;
  • examination of witnesses
  • disposition and character
  • similar fact evidence;
  • options of the accused;
  • hearsay and exceptions to the rule;
  • res gestae;
  • confessions and admissions;
  • illegally obtained evidence;
  • corroboration;
  • identification;
  • opinion evidence.

Outcomes

Upon completion of the unit, students will have an understanding of general evidentiary principles. In particular, they will have developed:

  1. the ability to isolate principles that are fundamental to the criminal and civil process and the conduct of fair trials in the accusatorial system
  2. competence in the skills of problem solving, analysis and written communication
  3. the analytical and interpretive skills required to give advice in relation to evidence problems and the admissibility of particular items of evidence
  4. the practical skills of presenting legal arguments, advocacy and multi-issued problem resolution in a trial context.

Assessment

Assignment (2000 words): 40% and examination (2 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60% OR examination (3 hours writing time plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100%

Chief examiner(s)

Professor Jonathan Clough (First Semester)
Dr Gideon Boas (Second Semester)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week and one hour tutorial per fortnight

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW3300 or LAW3301 and LAW3302


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

This unit examines the way corporations are governed, and the roles of directors and shareholders. Primary focus will be on Australian law, however, comparisons will be drawn from other countries, eg the UK, Canada and the US. Topics include:

  1. Corporate Governance
    1. division of power between the board and the general meeting
    2. the role of the board
    3. the way boards are regulated
  2. Shareholders' Remedies
    1. self help remedies; individual shareholder activism; and customising the corporate constitution
    2. litigious remedies, including: oppression, winding up, common law limitations on majority voting power; and the statutory derivative action

Outcomes

On completion of this unit, students should be able to: recognise and understand the common problems experienced by members of various types of company; advise a hypothetical client regarding strategies for preventing or remedying those problems without recourse to litigation; advise a hypothetical client regarding litigious remedies to combat those problems; understand likely trends for future development in the law relating to shareholders' rights and remedies; develop and demonstrate oral communication skills and skills of presentation of legal concepts, rules and argument in an interactive seminar context; and, develop and demonstrate legal research and writing and legal argument skills.

Assessment

Presentation: 10%; Research Paper: 90%.

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 OR LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW4171


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

The unit involves an examination of selected contemporary problems in evidence. It is designed to give students the opportunity of studying in detail particular themes relating to proof of facts in the forensic context which themes are not covered, or are dealt with only in outline, in Evidence LAW5159. A particular focus of the course will be the Commonwealth Government's Codification of the Law of Evidence for use in Federal Courts. This codification is embodied in the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth). The background of this Act is contained mainly in the recommendations of the Australian Law Reform Commission contained in its 1987 report, Evidence (ALRC 38).

Outcomes

Upon completion of this unit students will have an in-depth understanding of the rules and principles governing the proof of facts in issue in a trial. In particular, they will have developed:

  1. an understanding of the rules of evidence which apply in Federal Courts
  2. an understanding of the legal and policy issues involved in reforming and codifying the law of evidence
  3. an understanding of the general principles of freedom of proof, relevance, admissibility and discretion as a context for the study of the obstructive and exclusionary rules of evidence which impede the ascertainment of truth in civil and criminal trials
  4. capacity to undertake research in areas of policy and reform
  5. improved capacity in the skills of problem solving, analysis and written communication.

Assessment

Examination: 100% OR Research assignment (3000 words): 40%
Examination: 60%

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 OR LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW5159


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

This unit will provide an introduction to the new legal and social issues which have arisen due to the now extensive use of the internet for commerce, education and entertainment. The unit will cover issues such as jurisdiction, electronic contracting, electronic security, content regulation, intellectual property, privacy and will provide sufficient flexibility to examine any new issues as they arise.

Outcomes

Students successfully completing this unit should have satisfied the following:

  1. To equip the students with a solid understanding of the architecture of the internet and the manner in which it functions. This knowledge will be used as the basis to understanding the difficulties of internet governance and regulation. Students will be introduced to the key bodies that make rules with respect to the structure and use of the internet. Students will also consider the nature of the evolving 'information society' including a consideration of issues related to equity and access
  2. Students will acquire an understanding of the issues related to jurisdiction which affect the resolution of disputes arising out of internet transactions
  3. Students will consider the problems that arise with respect to, and apply the laws relating to, electronic contracting, including consumer protection issues
  4. Students will consider issues arising in respect of electronic security, such as hacking and spam. Legal responses to these problems will be discussed and analysed
  5. Students will acquire knowledge of the basic intellectual property issues that arise in the internet context, including copyright issues and domain names
  6. Students will consider and apply the variety of national and international laws that have been enacted and proposed to deal with issues of online privacy
  7. Students will consider the ethical background to the formation of laws in this area
  8. Students will improve their skills of legal research and analysis through completion of the research assignment
  9. Students will improve their skills of legal analysis and argument through the completion of the examination
  10. Students will improve their legal analysis, application and argument skills through completion of the weekly reading and participation in class discussion
  11. Students will acquire an understanding of the international context of these issues and will acquire skills in identifying and analysing relevant international legal materials.

Assessment

Written research assignment (2000 words): 40% and final written examination (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60% OR final written examination (3 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 100%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Three hours of lectures per week

Prerequisites

LAW1100 OR LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW2100 or LAW2101 and LAW2102; LAW2200 or LAW2201 and LAW2202; LAW3400 or LAW3401 and LAW3402

Prohibitions


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

This unit will provide an introduction to the new legal and social issues which have arisen due to the now extensive use of the internet for commerce, education and entertainment. The unit will cover issues such as jurisdiction, electronic contracting, electronic security, content regulation, intellectual property, privacy and will provide sufficient flexibility to examine any new issues as they arise.

Outcomes

Students successfully completing this unit should have satisfied the following:

  1. To equip the students with a solid understanding of the architecture of the internet and the manner in which it functions. This knowledge will be used as the basis to understanding the difficulties of internet governance and regulation. Students will be introduced to the key bodies that make rules with respect to the structure and use of the internet. Students will also consider the nature of the evolving 'information society' including a consideration of issues related to equity and access
  2. Students will acquire an understanding of the issues related to jurisdiction which affect the resolution of disputes arising out of internet transactions
  3. Students will consider the problems that arise with respect to, and apply the laws relating to, electronic contracting, including consumer protection issues
  4. Students will consider issues arising in respect of electronic security, such as hacking and spam. Legal responses to these problems will be discussed and analysed
  5. Students will acquire knowledge of the basic intellectual property issues that arise in the internet context, including copyright issues and domain names
  6. Students will consider and apply the variety of national and international laws that have been enacted and proposed to deal with issues of online privacy
  7. Students will consider the ethical background to the formation of laws in this area
  8. Students will improve their skills of legal research and analysis through completion of the research assignment
  9. Students will improve their skills of legal analysis and argument through the completion of the examination
  10. Students will improve their legal analysis, application and argument skills through completion of the weekly reading and participation in class discussion
  11. Students will acquire an understanding of the international context of these issues and will acquire skills in identifying and analysing relevant international legal materials.

Assessment

Class presentation: 10% AND optional research assignment (1500 words): 30%
AND final written examination (closed book) (2 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 60%
OR
Class presentation: 10% AND final written examination (closed book) (3 hours plus 30 minutes reading and noting time): 90%

Chief examiner(s)

Prerequisites

LAW1100 OR LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104; LAW2100 or LAW2101 and LAW2102; LAW2200 or LAW2201 and LAW2202.

Prohibitions


12 points, SCA Band 3, 0.250 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton Full year 2014 (Day)

Synopsis

This unit provides high achieving students with an opportunity to research, write and present a significant piece of original work. Students will write a thesis under the supervision of an academic member of staff, on a topic chosen by the student and approved by the Chief Examiner. Students will also publically present the main findings of their research and participate in a seminar program.

Outcomes

The unit aims to:

  • provide an opportunity for students to undertake a considered and in-depth analysis of legal issues in a particular area and to formulate and articulate legal and policy issues
  • develop skills of critical analysis and original thought
  • encourage the interchange of knowledge and ideas between students and teachers in order to achieve a high quality of legal scholarship
  • develop students' competency in legal research skills
  • enhance students' organisational, presentational and writing skills.

Students who successfully complete LAW5207 should, in general:

  • have acquired a detailed knowledge and expertise in the area of the topic which is the subject of the thesis
  • have their capacity for critical analysis and original thought enhanced
  • have an enhanced competency in legal research skills
  • have the ability to research, organise and present legal and policy issues in a succinct and scholarly manner
  • have planned, executed and reported on a piece of research or scholarship with some independence.

Assessment

Thesis (8,000-10,000 words) 80%

Presentation of thesis findings (at Honours Conference at end of Semester 2) 10%

Attendance and participation in the supporting Honours Research Seminar Program (2 x 1 day events being the Honours Orientation Day and Honours Conference and 2 x half day Honours Seminars including completion of set exercises ahead of these seminars) 10%

Chief examiner(s)

Prerequisites

LAW1100 OR LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104

There is an academic entry requirement, see details on the Faculty webpage on Honours.

No more than 72 credit points remaining to complete the law requirements for the degree at the time of commencing the unit.


12 points, SCA Band 3, 0.250 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton Summer semester A to Semester one 2014 (Day)
Clayton Trimester 2 2014 (Day)
Clayton Trimester 3 2014 (Day)
Coordinator(s)Ross Hyams; Adrian Evans; Fay Gertner; Helen Yandell

Quota applies

The number of places available in this unit is 40

Synopsis

Attendance at a legal service which endeavours to meet the needs of its community. Students learn a range of lawyers' skills and develop professional commitment and ethical standards. The subject adds a social dimension to academic training by creating an opportunity for students to assess the adequacy of law and legal processes in context.

Outcomes

Students completing this unit should have acquired:

  1. the ability to analyse critically legal principles and the legal system in the context of contemporary society
  2. an understanding of the extent to which the law and the legal system meet the needs of the community
  3. skills involving judgment, such as the investigation of facts, the recognition of issues, the analysis of problems and situations, the use of tactics and decision-making
  4. skills in oral and written communication required of lawyers, including interviewing, counselling, negotiating, advocacy and drafting
  5. an understanding of professional legal issues of ethics and morality.

Assessment

Legal service work: 80%
Community Engagement 20%
Ungraded requirement: Completion of a reflective journal entry every two weeks throughout the clinical period.
An ungraded SFR (Satisfied Faculty Requirements) for the reflective journal is required to obtain a pass in this Unit.

Chief examiner(s)

Dr Renata Alexander (Summer Semester)
Assoc. Professor Adrian Evans (First Semester)
Mr Ross Hyams (Second Semester)

Workload requirements

One half-day Legal Service session per week for 17 weeks (including non-teaching period) plus one and a half days per week client follow-up and one 2-hour seminar for 10 weeks

Prerequisites

LAW1100 or LAW1101 and LAW1102 OR LAW1104; LAW2100 or LAW2101 and LAW2102; LAW2200 or LAW2201 and LAW2202; LAW3300 or LAW3301 and LAW3302. Please see http://www.law.monash.edu.au/cle.html for an application form and more information.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedNot offered in 2014

Synopsis

Through Springvale Monash Legal Service, students will work with identified groups in the community who are experiencing injustice because of their common identity, particular legal problem or their poverty. Students will acquire a theoretical framework and first-hand perspective of the impact of the law and the legal system and focus on appropriate law reform campaigns and community development strategies. They will be divided into small teams and supervised on a day-to-day basis by a specialist member of the legal centre staff and assessed by a Monash Law academic located at the centre.

Outcomes

Students who successfully complete this unit will:

  • understand the impact of the law and the legal system on members of the community as individuals and as groups (particularly those who are disadvantaged) within a social, economic and political context
  • understand and have developed the skills necessary to advocate for social justice in a socio-legal context
  • understand the legal needs of relevant communities and be aware of the processes for responding to these needs through collaboration with NGO and government service providers
  • be able to integrate their knowledge of particular areas of law with perceived community and client group disadvantage.
  • understand the links between inadequate law and administration of the legal system with actual injustice
  • be able to utilize affective advocacy directed at law reform.

Assessment

1 research activity of 5000 words, for example:
a submission to government on a specific aspects of law reform;
a set of community explanatory statements concerning projected changes to local laws and regulations;
a brief to media on the regional effects of government policy and regulation
OR
1 x joint research activity, involving two or more students - total of 5000 words. Can include electronic material, fact sheets etc. 65%
5 x journal entries outlining progress of project 10%
plus 1 public presentation of progress of project 25%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Students will attend a seminar program for 8 weeks involving 2 hours contact per week plus regular tutorials of 2 hours per week. Students will also be required to allocate 8 hours per week over 12 weeks for client-group consultations, private research, preparation of materials and community presentations, with assessment being finalised over the remaining 5 weeks of a 17 week period.

Prerequisites

Application form and more information available at http://www.law.monash.edu.au/cle.html


12 points, SCA Band 3, 0.250 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedClayton Summer semester A to Semester one 2014 (Day)
Clayton Trimester 2 2014 (Day)
Clayton Trimester 3 2014 (Day)

Quota applies

The number of places available in this unit is 12

Synopsis

This unit is open to those who have completed a family law unit and placement and wish to broaden their knowledge and develop their practical skills in family law.
The unit will run in a 17 week format and requires students to run their own family law files, and take a mentoring role to less experienced students. Under the supervision of a family law practitioner, students will draft documents, advise clients, brief counsel, attend court to instruct counsel and do general correspondence. Students are rostered for FLAP client contact sessions, work on ongoing files, take on new matters as initiated and attend on roster the duty lawyer service at the Family Court at Dandenong each Monday.

Outcomes

Students who successfully complete this unit will:

  • understand and be able to apply the more complex areas of family law and related legislation such as child support to real life problems of clients;
  • have developed the ability to create, maintain and attend to all substantive and procedural aspects associated with the running of family law files;
  • have gained advocacy experience in the Family Court and / or Federal Magistrates Court relating to Family law matters;
  • have developed skills in assessing the needs of clients and communicating to clients the nature of their legal options and the implications of each option; and
  • understand the importance of, and be able to achieve, client-acceptable outcomes from family-law representation.

Assessment

Casework performance including attendance and punctuality, taking instructions and relationship with clients, discussion with supervisor, follow-up work, drafting documents, family law advocacy skill, compliance with office and regulatory procedures, understanding of appropriate file initiatives 70% AND 1 individual research activity or assignment 30%. The assignment is to be 1,500 words. In place of the assignment, students can develop and present a research activity after firstly discussing a topic with the supervisor.

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Students will attend a seminar program for 6-8 weeks involving 2 hours contact per week plus regular tutorials.
Students will also be required to allocate 14 hours per week for client-group consultations, private research, preparation of materials and client presentations.

Prerequisites

Participation in a prior placement at FLAP as a part of a Monash family law unit, a minimum of 12 weeks volunteering on a one day a week basis at FLAP or completion of Professional Practice LAW5216. Please see http://www.law.monash.edu.au/cle.html for an application form and more information.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
Monash Passport categoryInternship (Act Program)
OfferedClayton First semester 2014 (Day)

Quota applies

The number of places available for this unit is limited by the number of agencies and placements offered in each year. The number of places in 2014 is 22.

Synopsis

Students are placed as interns with a partner organisation operating in the legal sector and complete a unique research project jointly defined by the partner organisation and the unit convenor. The partner organisations are leading regulatory, law reform, service provision or policy-setting organisations in the legal sector. Students communicate the research findings in the format specified by the partner organisation, such as a consultation paper, report, commentary, manual, submission or speech. The partner organisation provides field supervision, and the faculty provides academic supervision. Students negotiate a project plan with their supervisors, keep a progress journal, and make an oral report on the project and learning outcomes.

Outcomes

A candidate who successfully complete the unit should:

  1. apply broad discipline knowledge to find solutions to complex problems
  2. exercise critical thinking and professional judgement in developing new understanding
  3. show technical skill in designing, conducting and reporting on a research project
  4. plan and execute a professional project with a degree of independence and accountability
  5. communicate a clear and coherent exposition of legal and policy issues in ways that are effective for the purpose and the intended audience
  6. collaborate with others on a project in a workplace setting

Assessment

Negotiated research project 70%
Negotiated project plan and journal reporting on progress (2000 words) 20%
Oral presentation on project and learning outcomes 10%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

A total of 132 hours of internship at an agency
Six hours of seminar
one hour of meeting per month with academic supervisor

Prerequisites

LAW1100 OR LAW1101 and LAW1102 or LAW1104


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedOverseas 1-60 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas First semester 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas 2-60 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas Second semester 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas Summer semester A 2014 (Off-campus Day)

Synopsis

This unit is used by the faculty to enrol students undertaking outbound exchange studies at a host institution. Students will not be able to enrol in this unit via WES. The faculty will manage the enrolment of students undertaking an outbound exchange program to ensure fees and credit are processed accurately.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedOverseas 1-60 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas First semester 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas 2-60 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas Second semester 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas Summer semester A 2014 (Off-campus Day)

Synopsis

This unit is used by the faculty to enrol students undertaking outbound exchange studies at a host institution. Students will not be able to enrol in this unit via WES. The faculty will manage the enrolment of students undertaking an outbound exchange program to ensure fees and credit are processed accurately.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedOverseas 1-60 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas First semester 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas 2-60 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas Second semester 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas Summer semester A 2014 (Off-campus Day)

Synopsis

This unit is used by the faculty to enrol students undertaking outbound exchange studies at a host institution. Students will not be able to enrol in this unit via WES. The faculty will manage the enrolment of students undertaking an outbound exchange program to ensure fees and credit are processed accurately.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedOverseas 1-60 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas First semester 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas 2-60 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas Second semester 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas Summer semester A 2014 (Off-campus Day)

Synopsis

This unit is used by the faculty to enrol students undertaking outbound exchange studies at a host institution. Students will not be able to enrol in this unit via WES. The faculty will manage the enrolment of students undertaking an outbound exchange program to ensure fees and credit are processed accurately.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedOverseas 1-60 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas First semester 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas 2-60 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas Second semester 2014 (Off-campus Day)

Synopsis

This unit is used by the faculty to enrol students undertaking outbound exchange studies at a host institution. Students will not be able to enrol in this unit via WES. The faculty will manage the enrolment of students undertaking an outbound exchange program to ensure fees and credit are processed accurately.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedOverseas 1-60 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas First semester 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas 2-60 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas Second semester 2014 (Off-campus Day)

Synopsis

This unit is used by the faculty to enrol students undertaking outbound exchange studies at a host institution. Students will not be able to enrol in this unit via WES. The faculty will manage the enrolment of students undertaking an outbound exchange program to ensure fees and credit are processed accurately.


18 points, SCA Band 3, 0.375 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedOverseas 1-60 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas First semester 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas 2-60 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas Second semester 2014 (Off-campus Day)

Synopsis

This unit is used by the faculty to enrol students undertaking outbound exchange studies at a host institution. Students will not be able to enrol in this unit via WES. The faculty will manage the enrolment of students undertaking an outbound exchange program to ensure fees and credit are processed accurately.


24 points, SCA Band 3, 0.500 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedOverseas 1-60 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas First semester 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas 2-60 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas Second semester 2014 (Off-campus Day)

Synopsis

This unit is used by the faculty to enrol students undertaking outbound exchange studies at a host institution. Students will not be able to enrol in this unit via WES. The faculty will manage the enrolment of students undertaking an outbound exchange program to ensure fees and credit are processed accurately.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedOverseas 1-60 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas First semester 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas 2-60 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas Second semester 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas Summer semester A 2014 (Off-campus Day)

Synopsis

This unit is used by the faculty to enrol students undertaking outbound exchange studies at a host institution. Students will not be able to enrol in this unit via WES. The faculty will manage the enrolment of students undertaking an outbound exchange program to ensure fees and credit are processed accurately.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedOverseas 1-60 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas First semester 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas 2-60 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas Second semester 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas Summer semester A 2014 (Off-campus Day)

Synopsis

This unit is used by the faculty to enrol students undertaking outbound exchange studies at a host institution. Students will not be able to enrol in this unit via WES. The faculty will manage the enrolment of students undertaking an outbound exchange program to ensure fees and credit are processed accurately.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedOverseas 1-60 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas First semester 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas 2-60 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas Second semester 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas Summer semester A 2014 (Off-campus Day)

Synopsis

This unit is used by the faculty to enrol students undertaking outbound exchange studies at a host institution. Students will not be able to enrol in this unit via WES. The faculty will manage the enrolment of students undertaking an outbound exchange program to ensure fees and credit are processed accurately.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedOverseas 1-60 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas First semester 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas 2-60 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas Second semester 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas Summer semester A 2014 (Off-campus Day)

Synopsis

This unit is used by the faculty to enrol students undertaking outbound exchange studies at a host institution. Students will not be able to enrol in this unit via WES. The faculty will manage the enrolment of students undertaking an outbound exchange program to ensure fees and credit are processed accurately.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedOverseas 1-60 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas First semester 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas 2-60 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas Second semester 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas Summer semester A 2014 (Off-campus Day)

Synopsis

This unit is used by the faculty to enrol students undertaking outbound exchange studies at a host institution. Students will not be able to enrol in this unit via WES. The faculty will manage the enrolment of students undertaking an outbound exchange program to ensure fees and credit are processed accurately.


18 points, SCA Band 3, 0.375 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedOverseas 1-60 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas First semester 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas 2-60 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas Second semester 2014 (Off-campus Day)

Synopsis

This unit is used by the faculty to enrol students undertaking outbound exchange studies at a host institution. Students will not be able to enrol in this unit via WES. The faculty will manage the enrolment of students undertaking an outbound exchange program to ensure fees and credit are processed accurately.


24 points, SCA Band 3, 0.500 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
OfferedOverseas 1-60 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas First semester 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas 2-60 2014 (Off-campus Day)
Overseas Second semester 2014 (Off-campus Day)

Synopsis

This unit is used by the faculty to enrol students undertaking outbound exchange studies at a host institution. Students will not be able to enrol in this unit via WES. The faculty will manage the enrolment of students undertaking an outbound exchange program to ensure fees and credit are processed accurately.


6 points, SCA Band 3, 0.125 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

LevelUndergraduate
FacultyFaculty of Law
Monash Passport categoryDepth (Enhance Program)
OfferedClayton Second semester 2014 (Day)
Coordinator(s)Mr Lloyd England

Synopsis

This Unit provides an overview of fundamental legal concepts, principles and institutions which affect professionals across disciplines. Working individually and in groups, students will research and communicate information about current legal issues as applied to their selected profession or discipline.

Outcomes

On completion of this unit, a student should be able to:

  1. Locate and apply regulatory requirements relevant to the student's intended profession
  2. Research, articulate and apply the legal principles relevant to issues arising in professional practice
  3. Communicate effectively about legal principles to a professional audience in a suitable format
  4. Integrate and synthesise inter-disciplinary perspectives to resolve legal problems arising in professional practice
  5. Collaborate effectively with students within and across disciplinary backgrounds in producing a group work output.

Assessment

Research essay (3000 words): 60%
Group work product (1500 words each) and presentation: 30%
Class participation and attendance: 10%

Chief examiner(s)

Workload requirements

Students will be required to attend 36 hours of seminars and undertake approximately an additional 108 hours of private study, including reading, class preparation, and research assignment preparation over the duration of the course.

Prerequisites

48 credit points completed in a bachelor degree course. This unit has a quota and selection process. Please note that there is an application form for this unit, available at: http://www.law.monash.edu.au/current-students/resources/forms/index.html

Prohibitions

LAW1101 - Introduction to legal reasoning
LAW1104 - Research and writing
HSC3001 - Health law and ethics
BTH2012 - Biotechnology regulation law and ethics
NUR1202 - Legal issues and concepts