PHL2150

Ethics (6 points)

(ARTS)

Leader: Jeanette Kennett

Offered:
Caulfield First semester 2003 (Day)
Clayton First semester 2003 (Day)
Clayton First semester 2003 (OCL)
Clayton Second semester 2003 (OCL)
Clayton Summer 2003 (OCL)
Clayton First semester 2004 (Day)
Clayton First semester 2004 (OCL)
Clayton Second semester 2004 (OCL)

Synopsis: Unit deals with some central debates in normative theory and their underpinning in the meta-ethical theories of Hume and Kant. A major focus of discussion is the opposition between consequentialist theories, such as utilitarianism, which judge rightness and wrongness solely in terms of consequences, and Kantian theory which judges rightness and wrongness according to whether the act is in accordance with rational will. How do these theories account for the agent-centred reasons which arise from relations of love and friendship and which seem to have the potential to conflict with impartial moral requirements? Is there a limit to our obligation to minimise suffering and maximise happiness.

Assessment: One exercise (750 words): 20% + Essay (1800 words): 40% + Examination (2 hour): 40%

Contact Hours: 2 hours (1 lecture and 1 tutorial) per week

Prerequisites: 6 points of first-year except with permission.