Undergraduate - UnitATS4289 - Medieval dialogues: Reason, mysticism and society

This unit entry is for students who completed this unit in 2012 only. For students planning to study the unit, please refer to the unit indexes in the the current edition of the Handbook. If you have any queries contact the managing faculty for your course or area of study.

print version

12 points, SCA Band 1, 0.250 EFTSL

Refer to the specific census and withdrawal dates for the semester(s) in which this unit is offered, or view unit timetables.

Level	Undergraduate
Faculty	Faculty of Arts
Offered	Clayton Second semester 2012 (Day)
Coordinator(s)	Professor Constant Mews

Notes

Previously coded HSY4260

Synopsis

This unit examines the intellectual interaction between Judaism, Christianity and Islam in the medieval period. Focusing mainly on the late twelfth and thirteenth century, the unit revolves around a central religious fault line of the era- reason and rationalism on the one hand, and the mystical quest on the other - and pursues a comparative analysis of the major figures from each of the traditions. Beginning with the rationalists, the course explores the thought of Ibn Rushd, Maimonides and Thomas Aquinas, before moving to a comparative examination of various mystics, such as - Bernard of Clairvaux, Bonaventure, the Zohar, Meister Eckhart, Ibn al-Arabi and Rumi.

Outcomes

On completion of this unit students will be expected to:

have an understanding of the major intellectual currents within Judaism, Christianity and Islam in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries;
have an understanding of the relationship between and mutual influences informing the various traditions;
understand the role of classical thinkers and writers on the varied traditions;
demonstrate familiarity with the major texts of the key religious figures of the period;
appreciate the exegetical horizons facing interpreters of scripture;
be able to engage in comparative analysis of philosophers and mystics from the different traditions;
have applied the reading and interpretative skills they have learned to unseen texts; and
identify continuities and ruptures among the thinkers and writers examined