wwwdev@monash.edu.au
Wed Oct 28 14:26:02 EST 1998
Auth: C Whip, University Webmaster's Office
Copyright © Monash University 1998 - All Rights Reserved - Caution
The Master of Science (MSc) program is offered by all departments in the Faculty of Science, together with the departments of the Faculty of Medicine and the Department of Geography and Environmental Science in the Faculty of Arts. The program consists of two parts: MSc part one and MSc part two.
The
admission of applicants proceeding to MSc candidature is controlled by the
faculty Committee on Graduate Matters on behalf of the Science faculty board.
Prospective applicants should direct preliminary inquiries to the postgraduate
coordinator of the relevant department to ascertain the possibility of
undertaking a research program in that prospective department or academic unit.
Applicants should note that admission to MSc candidature is dependent upon the
availability of facilities in the proposed field of research and the
availability and willingness of a member of the academic staff to supervise the
candidate; a staff member may decline to accept a candidate.The procedure for
application is as follows:
1 Application, supported by certified evidence of prior
qualifications should be made on the appropriate form and submitted to the
relevant head of department.
2 MSc applications, with a recommendation from the head of
department, will go to the Committee on Graduate Matters. The faculty will
communicate the decision of the Committee on Graduate Matters to the applicant
and to the department.
3 Any admission decision taken by the Committee on Graduate Matters
is subject to endorsement by the Science faculty board.
If the Committee on Graduate Matters does not approve the departmental
recommendation the case is normally referred back to the head of department for
reconsideration. If the matter becomes a matter of dispute between the
committee and the head of department, the Science faculty board will be
requested to resolve the issue.
On
admitting an MSc candidate, faculty board will, on the recommendation of the
head of department, appoint a member of the academic staff of the university as
supervisor. It may also appoint an associate supervisor who need not be an
academic staff member but someone of recognised standing in the field. Both
supervisors are responsible to the faculty board.
Research Fellows may be appointed as supervisors if their terms of appointment
exceed the periods of candidature and they have previous experience in
supervising higher degree candidates. Otherwise they may be appointed as
associate supervisors.
The faculty board may review the academic progress of a candidate. After taking into account any recommendations from the head of department and the supervisor, and after giving the candidate an opportunity to be heard, faculty board may terminate the candidature on grounds of unsatisfactory performance.
Guidelines for the presentation and preparation of masters theses can be found at the graduate studies web site: http://www.sci.monash.edu.au/graduate/policies.htm.
A
candidate shall state in the thesis, generally in a preface and specifically in
notes, the sources of all information and shall indicate the extent to which
the thesis represents work done in collaboration with other persons. A
candidate may not submit work previously accepted for a degree in this or
another university, nor may the candidate without the permission of the faculty
board, submit work which has previously been submitted for any such degree.
When a candidate has submitted a thesis, the supervisor shall submit a
statement, endorsed by the head of the department, certifying to the best of
his or her knowledge, the extent to which the work was carried out by the
candidate and whether, in his or her opinion, the thesis is properly presented
and is prima facie worthy of examination. Where the supervisor does not certify
that the thesis is properly presented and is prima facie worthy of examination,
the faculty board shall determine whether or not the thesis is to be
examined.
The faculty requires four copies of the thesis to be submitted for examination
in either soft or hardcover binding. The essential feature is that the thesis
be bound securely along the spine.
After a successful examination process the faculty will recommend that the
degree be awarded. A candidate who has not submitted four copies of the thesis
in hardcover binding shall then be required to have bound in hardcover form, at
least two copies of the thesis, one for retention by the library* and the other
for transmission to the head of department. Of the two remaining copies one
shall be retained by the candidate's supervisor, and the remaining copy
returned to the candidate.
*WHEN THE THESIS HAS BEEN ACCEPTED IT MAY BE MADE AVAILABLE BY THE LIBRARIAN TO
ANY PERSON FOR CONSULTATION AND PHOTOCOPYING PROVIDED THAT FOR A PERIOD OF
THREE YEARS AFTER THE THESIS IS LODGED IT SHALL NOT BE MADE AVAILABLE IN THIS
WAY WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE AUTHOR.
Candidates are advised that spiral softcover binding may not be desirable for
copies which have to be rebound in hardcover binding since a substantial amount
of trimming is required.
A candidate who is leaving Australia immediately after the thesis is submitted
for examination may prefer to submit at least two copies in hardcover binding
which, in the event of no alteration to the thesis being required as a result
of the examination, may then be lodged in the library. A candidate who will be
departing from Melbourne after the submission of the thesis and who wishes to
submit all four copies in softcover binding should consult the faculty
registrar concerning arrangements for the binding of the library copies.
When
a thesis is submitted, faculty board will appoint two examiners on the
recommendation of the head of department, of whom at least one shall be
external.
It is expected that the head of department will consult with the candidate's
supervisor, with regard to the names of possible examiners. Candidates should
be invited to name individuals whom they do not wish appointed as examiners.
Choice of examiners is made with regard to their knowledge and standing in the
field of study involved, but qualities such as reputation and experience in
thesis examining should not be overlooked. A person who has had involvement in
the student's research should not be nominated. Experience here and elsewhere
suggests that speediness in completing the examination and submission of
report, clarity of the examiner's report, and a reasonable expectation about
the standard required of a masters thesis, are important qualities to seek in
potential examiners, in addition to their scholarly standing.
It is advisable for both examiners to be asked informally before the thesis is
submitted whether they are willing to examine the thesis. It is also
appropriate at this stage to ask whether an examiner would be able to complete
the examination within eight weeks from the estimated date of receipt of the
thesis.
For
a major thesis, each examiner shall evaluate the thesis and shall recommend to
the faculty board whether or not the work of the candidate merits the award of
the degree.
For a minor thesis, the head shall determine, for advice to the examiners, the
weight to be attached to the thesis in assessing the candidate's overall
performance. Each examiner shall evaluate the thesis and report the evaluation
to faculty board. The committee shall receive a report from the head on the
performance of the candidate in the courses completed and will recommend to the
faculty board through the head of department whether or not the work of the
candidate merits the award of the degree.
Where there is, in the opinion of the faculty board, a difference of substance
between the recommendations of any two examiners, the faculty board may appoint
an external adjudicator whose advice shall be taken into account by the board
in determining whether the candidate has satisfied the requirements for the
degree.
The reports of the examiners and the results of any oral examination shall be
transmitted to the faculty board which shall decide whether (i) the
candidate has satisfied the requirements for the degree, or (ii) the
candidate has failed to satisfy the requirements for the degree, or
(iii) the candidate be given leave to submit an amended thesis or to
complete further coursework, as the case may require, within such further
period and on such conditions as it may prescribe.
Students shall comply with the university statute and regulations which require all students to assign intellectual property rights to the university.
The
MSc part one program is a preliminary course of study undertaken as preparation
for admission to the MSc part two degree. It is intended primarily for
graduates who do not meet the standard eligibility requirements for entry into
MSc part two. Candidates must complete such courses and pass such examinations
as prescribed by their department with results equivalent to H2A or better for
admission into MSc part two.
The MSc part one is not an awardable degree and candidates are not eligible for
HECS exemption scholarships.
For
a new graduate with only a pass degree in a relevant field and who has not
attempted honours in that field, admission to an MSc part one will be judged on
criteria similar to those for admission to an honours year, ie normally at
least a credit grade average in a relevant third-year subject is required.
For graduates with honours in a different field (not regarded as a suitable
preparation for direct admission to their proposed graduate studies), or for
applicants applying several years after graduation and whose subsequent
training and experience is deemed inadequate for direct admission to the
proposed graduate studies, or non-university graduates with a diploma or other
qualifications, admission to an MSc part one may be approved if they are judged
to have sufficient aptitude for research in the proposed field and a suitable
attitude towards relevant studies. A suitably qualified applicant proceeding
from third-year BSc studies would normally have preference over an honours
graduate.
The MSc part one will usually include a combination of coursework and research, and it is anticipated that the research component undertaken in this course will form the basis of the research thesis required under MSc part two.
Full-time candidates are expected to complete the MSc part one within twelve months, however faculty regulations provide for a maximum of eighteen months full-time candidature. Part-time candidates are expected to complete this course within twenty-four months (maximum thirty-six months part-time candidature).
The MSc part two is a research masters degree for which candidates are required to submit a major thesis for examination. The thesis should embody the results of an investigation carried out by the candidate, under supervision, which shows independence of thought and which demonstrates their ability to carry out research in their discipline.
For
a new graduate, normally a class I or class IIA honours degree in a
relevant field is expected.
An applicant who has completed a relevant MSc part one examination at the
equivalent of a class I or class IIA honours grade will be considered
on a similar basis to a class I or class IIA honours applicant for
MSc part two candidature.
A head of department may, however, recommend for admission an applicant holding
a class IIB or class III honours degree or who has completed the
masters part one examination at the equivalent of one of these levels, if the
head believes that the applicant has the qualities necessary to complete
satisfactorily an MSc degree. Such a recommendation should comment specifically
on any circumstances which may have affected the applicant's result in the
honours or MSc part one course, as well as on the applicant's research ability,
aptitude and attitude towards the proposed program inasmuch as they can be
determined by the head at the time. In making such a recommendation a head
should be satisfied that the applicant will not require an undue amount of
supervision.
For an applicant applying several years after graduation, or a non-university
graduate with a diploma or other qualifications, a period of research,
industrial, teaching, or other relevant experience may qualify that applicant
for admission to candidature. In recommending acceptance of such a candidate
the head of department should be satisfied that the candidate will not require
an undue amount of supervision or be likely to make demands beyond the capacity
of the department's resources.
Applicants
may be admitted to part-time candidature if they can provide written evidence
that they can devote:
1 at least two full working days per week or its equivalent to
their studies if in a laboratory discipline; or
2 at least one full working day per week or its equivalent if in a
non-laboratory discipline.
Applicants in full-time employment shall provide written evidence from the
employer to the effect that sufficient time as defined above will be made
available for them to undertake studies.
A research assistant in full-time employment in the university may, on the
recommendation of a head, be permitted to enrol as a part-time MSc candidate
and shall be required to provide a statement from the supervisor, countersigned
by the head of department, certifying that sufficient freedom to pursue
original research, which may or may not be related to the work as a research
assistant, will be permitted, and that there will be no limitation on
publication of results of the research work.
In special circumstances, the Committee on Graduate Matters may recommend
exceptions to these provisions in support of approval of a particular
application.
Except where faculty board determines, a thesis may not be submitted in less than twelve months of candidature and not more than thirty-six months of full-time or sxty months of part-time candidature. Where candidates have qualified for admission to candidature by satisfactorily completing MSc part one the thesis must be submitted in not more than twenty-four months of full-time or forty-eight months of part-time candidature.
A candidate for MSc part two who has been a candidate for at least the minimum time specified in the regulations may be permitted by faculty board to write the thesis away from the university provided that the supervisor has sighted the first draft of the thesis. The thesis must be submitted by the maximum period specified for the candidate in the regulations or any shorter period specified by the board. Writing-up away is usually limited to a maximum of six months.
Subject to the following conditions, graduates of Monash University holding the degree of Bachelor of Science (pass or honours) or another appropriate Monash pass or honours degree will be given the opportunity to submit a thesis for examination in fulfilment of the requirements of the MSc part two regulations.
Candidates will not be required to have any close association with the university and their MSc part two work will not be supervised by the university. External candidates will not be eligible to submit a thesis until three years after qualifying for their Monash degree.
A candidate will be able to submit for examination either published or unpublished work embodying the results of an investigation carried out by the candidate without formal supervision or attendance at the university, provided that, if the thesis contains published work, the candidate will be required to include in the presentation a coordinating summary, embracing at least the nature, sequence, and relevance of the candidate's work.
Prior to submission of a thesis, the candidate will be required to have the field of study approved by the appropriate head of department. The candidate will also be required to enrol although no student union fees are levied. The thesis shall be submitted not less than six months and not more than twelve months after the approval of the head of the department has been granted. When submitting a thesis, the candidate will be required to discuss the work with the head and present the thesis for his or her approval.
The requirements for submission and certifications of theses and examiners are the same as for internal candidates.
A candidate shall state in the thesis, generally in a preface and specifically in notes, the sources of the information and shall indicate the extent to which the thesis represents work done in collaboration with other persons. The candidate will be required to provide a statement on where, and under what circumstances, the work was carried out. The faculty may consult with the candidate's collaborators regarding the extent of their participation in the various papers presented.
All external candidates submitting a thesis for examination will be required to undergo an oral examination.
wwwdev@monash.edu.au
Wed Oct 28 14:26:02 EST 1998